1) The handwringing McClellans are out, esp. after the FR/BR elections.
2) Systems matter, and POLICIES matter.
3) France was a victim of the first. They have a goofball multi-election system combined with a proportional representation structure . . .
3) contd . . . (the same that led to Hitler in Weimar Germany). Under this structure, no one is pushed to the middle to a definitive yes/no on any candidate or party. Instead, they have enclave parties that must make coalitions to "govern."
4) Le Pen never had more than 35%.
5) But the other two parties---Macaroni's party and the socialists---never had close to 50% either.
6) So Macaroni's delegates abruptly resigned, allowing the socialists to fill their seats, defeating Le Pen about 2:1.
7) A similar thing happened in Weimar Germany, where the Nazis at their peak only had 44% and were already seeing a downward trend at the ballot box. They go the National Party (8%) to ally with them on a vote making Hitler Chancellor.
8) We do not have that.
9) Did they cheat? Technically, no. They took advantage of a crappy system. A majority clearly do not want Le Pen, unfortunately. But a majority did not want the socialists until Macaroni's little maneuver. France has been socialist before.
10) This surprised me but shouldn't have. The French "center" (Macaroni) is like our RINOs: they pretend not to be commies, but really are.
11) The situation in England is ENTIRELY different. You can blame France on a "dirty trick"--Eng you have only the Tory Party to blame.
12) The Tories backed the Uke war, supported the idiotic climate change policies, and made no serious effort at all (except a couple of minor deportations) to get rid of the invaders.
13) The people did not LIKE Labour, but had no choice. The Tories were a party of McTurds.
14) The same McClellans here crying "steal" completely ignore the policies of the Tories, and then completely ignore the MASSIVE wave of populism across the rest of Europe:
*Portugal
*Slovakia
*Hungary
*Italy
*Holland
*Belgium
*Estonia
15) Even Germany is under huge populist pressure: the Greens have seen their % in that stupid proportional representation system go down every year.
16) I actually have more hope for FR than BR because people will get sick of socialism quickly, but BR has no real opposition.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
3) They didn't like LBJ but left him alone, except for some anti-war leakers.
4) But they absolutely hated Nixon. He hated them. They succeeded in the first ever "journalists' coup" in American history to get him out (with help from the CIA).
5) They really didn't like Reagan, but could find nothing on him until after 1986 and Iran-Contra. Even then, there was no smoking gun in the docs, and they couldn't concoct one.
6) After acting patriotic for a couple of years, they deeply damaged W's presidency with Abu Grahib
Things go file away: 1) It is nearly impossible for Rutabaga to resign as the NOMINEE but remain PRESIDENT. If he is too senile for one---in the public mind---he is too senile for the other. 2) If VP Harris became Acting President upon a Rutabaga resignation, she does NOT . . .
2) contd . . . Constitutionally have to name a veep for the remainder of the term. John Tyler didn't in 1841 and left the vice presidency empty for three years. Mike Johnson would be next in the line of succession.
3) This would be the best fire insurance ever for Harris.
4) Even if all that happens, and she actually appoints someone, both the senate and the house must approve. Doubtful the house will approve Witless Protection or Newsome or ANYONE who would benefit a D presidential ticket.
1) Zero (Obama) just RE-endorsed Rutabaga. Oops. Doesn't sound like he's goin' anywhere.
2) Why? Of all the DemoKKKrat fecalmonkeys, Zero seems grounded in electoral reality. He knows that replacing Rutabaga with Harris would result in a 400 EV loss for the DemoKKKrats.
3) The down-ticket collapse under Kampuchea Harris would be a thing to behold. She loses, according to Baris's polls, every single Rust Belt state and it won't be close. This would make PA, OH, and WI senate races close.
4) Sometimes you need to understand, like the Soviets did, that your enemy is at a Stalingrad and that they ain't so sharp, and the NOTHING they can do will save them. Surrender the whole army, or die.
1) Good points. @TrentTelenko mentioned Thomas Eagleton's veep resignation in 1972.
2) First, he left in September, BEFORE the absentee ballots went out.
3) Second, neither party relied on the early votes like they do today, but even if they had E left in time.
@TrentTelenko 4) However, McGovern/DemoKKKrats didn't have the looming issue of Ohio's ballot on Aug. 7 to contend with.
5) TT suggests there would be challenges to state laws.
@TrentTelenko 6) Time is on our side either way. The less time they have, even if successful, in getting some of these laws challenged the less time to cheat on the early ballots. They have shot themselves in the foot.
AP: "Biden appeared to lose his train of thought" (That train done left the station years ago)
2) PsychoDrudge: "Cruel Jill Clings to Power."
Yahoo: The Senior Sk . K must step up
3) Yet they continue to lie:
"for all the good he’s done in office, is struggling to make his case to the American people and does indeed come across as a struggling elderly man"
HE HASN'T DONE ANY GOOD. HE HAS DESTROYED A BEAUTIFUL COUNTRY.
4) This is the "Carville Fallacy," that Rutabaga just doesn't have the right messagING when he actually doesn't have the right MESSAGE or policies. Good. Let them continue to blunder.
5) DRUDGE also continues to lie or at least miss the fact that there are NOT "130 days to go."
1) If I'm coaching Pres. Trump for the debate, the strat is threefold, simple, and deadly effective.
2) Since they are counting on "triggering him" with "convicted felon," he must not debate or challenge that.
3) Rather turn it: "THIS 'convicted felon' (air quotes) will immediately close the border, begin deporting illegal invaders, stop the crushing inflation that is destroying the lifestyle of middle class Americans, rebuild the economy Biden crushed, & negotiate peace in Ukraine."
4) Every time they use the phrase, merely repeat it as an entrance into the POLICIES President Trump will enact. Believe me, people will remember those and not care about the former.
5) Point #2: at a strategic point, maybe half way through, introduce your Veep.