Angus Calder@mastodon.scot Profile picture
Jul 10 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
For comparison the active travel budget for the *entire country* is £220m/a.

It's long past time for @transcotland
to redirect funding for climate emergency era obsolete road schemes like the M8, A9 & Sherriffhall to sustainable modes.
A short history of M8 Wooodside project costs:

*Year* *Cost* *Completion*
Sep 21 £35m Late 23
May 23 £100m Late 24
July 24 £152m Early 26

That’s a >400% rise in costs over a three year period.
Of note:

Based on v scant info publicly available, these costs/timelines appear to be for initial 'temporary propping' work only 😱

Ie they do not include the cost of permanent repair work, which 'seem certain to run into the hundreds of millions'

No consultation.
How on earth can we possibly justify continuing to provide apparently endless funding for eye-wateringly expensive roads projects like the M8 in a time of 'difficult choices' for everything else (ie ongoing & deepening cuts to frontline services, canecellation of the BPF etc)?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angus Calder@mastodon.scot

Angus Calder@mastodon.scot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AngusEd

Jan 30
So, Edinburgh's Circulation Plan is finally out!
🧵

The CP set out to significantly rebalance our streets city-wide to meet our now - *extremely pressing* - 2030 Net Zero & 30% car km reduction commitments.
1/
After almost two years of serious graft, the CP has evolved into a huge, sprawling, ambitious, highly complex piece of work that has involved CEC officers, consultants & stakeholders alike often grappling with approaches that are still genuinely novel in the UK context.
2/
The CP (& tram study) has now produced a wall of dense, highly technical reporting for consideration at TEC that includes many innovative policy proposals, reams of dense technical data & argumentation & *critically important* but challenging to interpret mapping..
3/
Read 25 tweets
Jan 30
Agree: Its definitely not either or!

The CPs finalised networks have been much more heavily discussed & properly integrated with other workstreams & modes than the tram work & as such
are likely to be much more definitive (than an offhand paragraph in the tram report)
🧵
Happily, the CP cycle network plan shows the whole Roseburn NEPN corridor being retained as part of the 'secondary cycle network'.
2/
The Roseburn NEPN has been correctly designated as secondary cycle network *precisely because* there is parallel on road segregation proposed AND the NEPN has (well established) problems with poor social safety etc.
3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(