Magdi Jacobs Profile picture
Jul 10, 2024 20 tweets 8 min read Read on X
I will put this plainly, w/o hyperbole: If the U.S. leaves NATO, we will be looking down the barrell at a level of European warfare we haven't seen since WWII. Putin will invade more countries. Europe, for the 1st time in 80 years, will go it alone, w/o the U.S.
Look at a map. Consider a captured Ukraine, which is very possible if Trump wins. Romania, Moldova, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, & Poland have all said they are prepared for greater warfare. France, Germany, & Britain are preparing to defend them. Image
From this year:
-"Russia preparing for military confrontation with West, says Estonia"
-"Latvia prepares for Russian aggression amid concern war will spread beyond Ukraine"
-"We need to be ready for war with Putin, Romania’s top general says"

Image
Image
Image
Then, this, today from Poland, after Trump made his comments about abandoning NATO:
"Poland must prepare army for full-scale conflict, army chief says."
reuters.com/world/europe/p…
What happens when the threat of the US military is removed? European war. The Baltic States & Eastern EU are most threatened. Meanwhile, France, Germany, & the UK will be tasked to defend them. Italy's Meloni is cold on Putin. Why? It's an 11-hour drive from Ukraine to Venice. Image
Meanwhile, Western EU is preparing to defend the East, as the East prepares to defend itself
-New joint defense agreements btwn France/Germany/ Poland
-UK puts its defense industry on "wartime footing"
-UK starts the most intense military exercises in Poland since the 1980s

Image
Image
Image
I was raised by a military historian & part of my early ed was to avoid hyperbole. To do so, I said we're looking at "European Warfare." I didn't say WWIII. WWII was truly a *world* war. So let's take a moment to look at a broader map of EU, w/in the world. What do you see? Image
I see Iran, allied w/ Russia. I see Turkey, an opportunistic ally to both NATO & RU. An ally who might turn-coat if the threat of US force is eliminated. I see Syria, allied w/ Russia. I see Iraq, always in flux. I also see North Africa. I remember: Putin is fighting for influence in Africa.Image
So I look at the map. I ask myself, are these North African countries areas where Putin is specifically seeking influence? I find:
"Russia, Algeria 'tighten' strategic ties"
"Russia’s foreign minister tours North Africa as anger toward the West swells across the region"
Image
Image
I find, also, that North African states that have been traditionally "Western" allies, like Tunisia, are turning more towards Russia. I also find this: -Increased Russian military activity in Tunisia & Libya -Strengthened bilateral relations between Morocco & the Kremlin.

Image
Image
Image
Russia may even be intending to build a naval base in Libya. Please look at a map & consider what a "naval base" in Libya means in the context of European warfare. Image
If we take into account China & Taiwan, plus the Middle East, where Putin has power in Iran & Syria, plus North Africa, where Putin is forming alliances & also increasing a military presence, what do we have? World War III. This is not hyperbole. It's what Europe is preparing for
Without the US, can the UK, France, Germany, & Poland defend all of EU against Russia? Maybe. But can they also defend against attacks from North Africa? Can they defend Taiwan while doing so? What about the ME? Russia has been building alliances, incl. w/ Hamas, throughout
Meanwhile, Russia is also sowing domestic discord, weakening all of Europe, just like it does w/ the U.S., from within. Russia's targets are always domestic discord. They pick at Western fissures like picking at a scab. Image
This is what could happen if Trump is elected & decides to leave NATO. The International Post-WWII Era will be over. No more deterrence from the US entails aggression everywhere. From a man--Putin--who is planning to aggress. Meanwhile, the press treats this as a "nothing story."
From today, in @politico "NATO plans, Trump laughs." NATO vs Trump. It makes Trump look so strong. When really, what we're talking about, is a US abdication of its anti-war responsibilities, while the rest of the world *scrambles* to adjust to this possible New World Order. Image
The defense strategy--NATO--that prevents broader warfare is in danger if Trump is reelected. The American press alternately ignores this issue, obfuscates, or presents it as a power-move from Trump. Replace "Nato" with "All of Europe" in this headline. Image
-Given Putin's war in Ukraine
-Given Putin's influence campaigns across continents
-Given Putin's military presence in the ME & NA.
-Given Trump's stance on NATO & other alliances (Taiwan)
-We, as a world, will be closer to WWIII than we have ever been since the end of WWII.
That's a story worth taking very seriously.
I didn't even mention that Trump loves dictators & tried to use "defense" to extort the Ukrainian President, who is now reliant on US defense to defend his country. Best case scenario under Trump is that the U.S. takes the side of no one. Worst case is. . . .

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Magdi Jacobs

Magdi Jacobs Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

Jun 25
I do not like sweeping people's concerns, fears, or pain under the rug. I do not like gaslighting people. If a significant number of people from a minority or otherwise vulnerable population express concerns, fears, or pain, I believe it is wrong to pretend they are not speaking
Perhaps, after hearing people from a group express their concerns, fears, or pain, you will enter all of this differently into your political calculus than I do. That is a more honorable step than not listening at all. If you are intellectually honest about it.
And not listening at all is still less gross than pretending people are not speaking. I do not like this mass act of gaslighting. It disgusts me on a very deep level. I am speaking, here, of American Jews who are expressing concerns, fears, or pain.
Read 9 tweets
Jun 10
The comparisons between any modern protest movement we've seen & the Civil Rights Movement are simply inaccurate. The inaccuracy is beyond frustrating b/c it contributes to an erasure of history. An erasure of the nature of the movement itself. Here are notes from CORE, 1963 Image
Image
Image
Image
The purpose of the movement was to show the world the apartheid state. Nonviolence was a "philosophy" re: right/wrong, but it was also, perhaps more importantly, a tactic w/in a broader strategy. "You will be peaceful. And you will be beaten. And then the world will see." Image
Image
Image
Image
Members would gather together & study the violence others had experienced. They would then carry out that violence against each other. In order to train themselves, they would hit each other, spit on each other, call each other the n-word. They practiced singing through it. Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Jun 4
Here's what I think.
-We have never paid as much attention to any war as we have the Israel/Gaza war. Even our "own" wars.
-Israel has consistently been framed as the primary agent in this defensive war, with malicious (genocidal) intent against Palestinians
-Why?
-Just the fact that we pay more attention to this war should be illuminating.

Why.

Does it require more attention than the Syrian Civil War, Sudan, Ukraine, etc?

Why.
I'm going to tell you what the end of my thought process is, re: the "why"

It's because of Jews. Or, rather, not because of Jews but because of fucking gentile bullshit re: Jews.

The Russians

The idiotic American Left.
Read 8 tweets
May 28
I did know that, in fact. And now I know something else: You are wildly unqualified to make any comments on this topic. The depth of the ignorance that you proudly display as "knowledge" is so freaking profound that I don't think you even know what antisemitism is. Image
If you don't know that
-"Jewish" refers to an ethnicity, as well as a religion
-Western antisemitism has, for over a century (at least, maybe longer) been primarily an anti-ethnic phenomenon
&
-Being Christian hasn't saved ethnic Jews before
Please get out of the conversation.
I would laugh if this weren't so serious. These are profound errors. Is this where they're going now? "He was Christian so it wasn't antisemitic?" I cannot stress how profoundly ignorant that point is about what "Jewish" means & what "antisemitism" means.
Read 8 tweets
May 25
Yes. I would count myself as having been sane about Israel pre-10/7, vis à vis other people, as well as careful about my conscious bias. After 10/7, I realized I--& other Westerners--were subject to greater bias than we knew & this bias can be linked to decades of propaganda.
This doesn't mean I approve of Netanyahu's conduct in war or his war-planning. It just means I did not view Israel w/ clarity of thought, nor did I understand its history vis à vis Palestine at all. And I would consider myself well-educated in history.
I'll firmly argue that this type of bias is not only unjust towards Israelis, but unjust towards Palestinians. Many have been indoctrinated by the very same propaganda that has intentionally held Palestinian people as a permanent refugee population to be exploited symbolically.
Read 24 tweets
May 24
This is important. It also jogged my memory. I didn't always know this history. I only learned about it last year. I learned about it precisely bc I suspected, from my experience on this website, that Russia was exploiting & amplifying antisemitism, as well as divisions over I/P
Let me correct myself, before continuing. I said I "suspected" RU was exploiting & amplifying antisemitism. That is incorrect. I actually *knew* this was happening. It was documented. What I "suspected" was that it was *also* happening on this site. Image
So the chain of evidence & inference is important in the service of "theory-building" or "truth-seeking" or whatever we call it. I knew what Russian strategies were. I had experienced Russian interference online before (2016, etc). I felt I was experiencing the same re: I/P. Image
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(