I will put this plainly, w/o hyperbole: If the U.S. leaves NATO, we will be looking down the barrell at a level of European warfare we haven't seen since WWII. Putin will invade more countries. Europe, for the 1st time in 80 years, will go it alone, w/o the U.S.
Look at a map. Consider a captured Ukraine, which is very possible if Trump wins. Romania, Moldova, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, & Poland have all said they are prepared for greater warfare. France, Germany, & Britain are preparing to defend them.
From this year:
-"Russia preparing for military confrontation with West, says Estonia"
-"Latvia prepares for Russian aggression amid concern war will spread beyond Ukraine"
-"We need to be ready for war with Putin, Romania’s top general says"
Then, this, today from Poland, after Trump made his comments about abandoning NATO:
"Poland must prepare army for full-scale conflict, army chief says." reuters.com/world/europe/p…
What happens when the threat of the US military is removed? European war. The Baltic States & Eastern EU are most threatened. Meanwhile, France, Germany, & the UK will be tasked to defend them. Italy's Meloni is cold on Putin. Why? It's an 11-hour drive from Ukraine to Venice.
Meanwhile, Western EU is preparing to defend the East, as the East prepares to defend itself
-New joint defense agreements btwn France/Germany/ Poland
-UK puts its defense industry on "wartime footing"
-UK starts the most intense military exercises in Poland since the 1980s
I was raised by a military historian & part of my early ed was to avoid hyperbole. To do so, I said we're looking at "European Warfare." I didn't say WWIII. WWII was truly a *world* war. So let's take a moment to look at a broader map of EU, w/in the world. What do you see?
I see Iran, allied w/ Russia. I see Turkey, an opportunistic ally to both NATO & RU. An ally who might turn-coat if the threat of US force is eliminated. I see Syria, allied w/ Russia. I see Iraq, always in flux. I also see North Africa. I remember: Putin is fighting for influence in Africa.
So I look at the map. I ask myself, are these North African countries areas where Putin is specifically seeking influence? I find:
"Russia, Algeria 'tighten' strategic ties"
"Russia’s foreign minister tours North Africa as anger toward the West swells across the region"
I find, also, that North African states that have been traditionally "Western" allies, like Tunisia, are turning more towards Russia. I also find this: -Increased Russian military activity in Tunisia & Libya -Strengthened bilateral relations between Morocco & the Kremlin.
Russia may even be intending to build a naval base in Libya. Please look at a map & consider what a "naval base" in Libya means in the context of European warfare.
If we take into account China & Taiwan, plus the Middle East, where Putin has power in Iran & Syria, plus North Africa, where Putin is forming alliances & also increasing a military presence, what do we have? World War III. This is not hyperbole. It's what Europe is preparing for
Without the US, can the UK, France, Germany, & Poland defend all of EU against Russia? Maybe. But can they also defend against attacks from North Africa? Can they defend Taiwan while doing so? What about the ME? Russia has been building alliances, incl. w/ Hamas, throughout
Meanwhile, Russia is also sowing domestic discord, weakening all of Europe, just like it does w/ the U.S., from within. Russia's targets are always domestic discord. They pick at Western fissures like picking at a scab.
This is what could happen if Trump is elected & decides to leave NATO. The International Post-WWII Era will be over. No more deterrence from the US entails aggression everywhere. From a man--Putin--who is planning to aggress. Meanwhile, the press treats this as a "nothing story."
From today, in @politico "NATO plans, Trump laughs." NATO vs Trump. It makes Trump look so strong. When really, what we're talking about, is a US abdication of its anti-war responsibilities, while the rest of the world *scrambles* to adjust to this possible New World Order.
The defense strategy--NATO--that prevents broader warfare is in danger if Trump is reelected. The American press alternately ignores this issue, obfuscates, or presents it as a power-move from Trump. Replace "Nato" with "All of Europe" in this headline.
-Given Putin's war in Ukraine
-Given Putin's influence campaigns across continents
-Given Putin's military presence in the ME & NA.
-Given Trump's stance on NATO & other alliances (Taiwan)
-We, as a world, will be closer to WWIII than we have ever been since the end of WWII.
That's a story worth taking very seriously.
I didn't even mention that Trump loves dictators & tried to use "defense" to extort the Ukrainian President, who is now reliant on US defense to defend his country. Best case scenario under Trump is that the U.S. takes the side of no one. Worst case is. . . .
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hi. I am about to swear. I apologize for this. I don't think it's particularly becoming. I also think there is no way to convey my thoughts without swearing, perhaps to a great extent.
Democrats: Get Your Fucking Shit Together.
The truth about why we lost 2016 was not a Trumpian revolution. It's because we looked weak. We made ourselves weak. We made HRC look weak. What y'all are doing right now makes this weak-ass shit from 2016 look like fucking pudding. You Are Weakening Us.
There has been *at most* a 2-point shift in the polls since the debate. A 2-point shift. And instead of trying to counter that shift with a unified effort, you are all making us look fucking weak. You are making us look weaker than we did in 2016. This is fucking stupid.
French leftists were not instructed to vote for "a better life." They were instead instructed to join forces w/ the Center to avoid "the worst possible outcome." American leftists could take a real lesson from this, but instead they're making up an alternative reality.
Trust me. I'm inspired by the French today, just as I have been inspired by the French in '02 & '15 & many other years. But what is inspirational about the French then & the French now is their formation of coalitional strength, despite deep antipathy, in order to oppose fascism.
What's history-making about this election is that the traditional conservatives had less of a role in the fight against fascism than they used to. The far-left took on a greater roll than they did in 2017, which is to their great credit.
-First 20 mins made me panic
-I recovered, as Biden did
-After watching w/ partner, who is not a partisan Dem or news-junkie like me, felt grumpy, but ok, Thursday night
-Partner was like, "Are you kidding me? Trump sucked!"
-Next day, Democrats + the press made me feel awful
I really did think the first 20 minutes were bad. I really did think Biden recovered. I did worry about "perception." Everything that has made me feel increasingly sick since has been b/c the people around me created it. Biden has also done well since then.
I've been saying this since Friday/Saturday. This is a self-fulfilling prophecy. People have made this happen' it didn't need to happen. Everyone who wasn't exposed thought the debate went fine/shaky-but-fine. People were focussed on one candidate.
The political press was like, "LOL, KHIVE is for Biden." I have a personal response, mixed w/ an objective one. Both boil down to: you don't understand KHIVE. I'm not responding to the political press right now, but I'll make some points, here.
The political press does not understand KHIVE, which has never been more obvious than their "shock" at KHIVE standing by Biden. No one who understands KHIVE would be shocked by this. The basis of KHIVE is solidarity. If you don't "get" this, you shouldn't report on KHIVE.
KHIVE started as an effort to provide truth about a Black woman--VP Kamala Harris--against voluminous inaccurate anti-Harris attacks. I have seen many members say this is b/c they saw what happened to HRC. Many prominent KHIVERs are Black &/or gay. It's a coalition.
When he was 45-years-old, RFK Jr. blocked his family's 23-year-old baby-sitter in a room & began "groping her, putting his hands on her hips and sliding them up along her rib cage and breasts." This sexual assault was only interrupted when another man walked into the room.
One of RFK Jr's best friends--Jay Carson--bought some lambs a few years back, had his children befriend the lambs, then slit the lambs' throats in front of the children. This friend produced a campaign video for RFK Jr, in which this question was posed: “What if he’s not crazy?"
Here is a photo of RFK Jr. having what appears to be the time of his life w/ a barbecued dog, btw
I am not sure what y'all learned from the Civil Rights movement but, personally, one thing I learned is that you never stop fighting. Come back to me when we're living in Jim Crow conditions. Until then, do not disrespect what those folks did by saying you can no longer fight.
Think for just one moment about what Black people were going through & about the nation that put them through that pain, then come back to me & tell me it's time to stop fighting. Start respecting your elders. Start respecting those who made America a better country.
You disrespect Martin Luther King w/ your doomerism. You disrespect John Lewis. You disrespect every person who came before you and had less than you and still said, "I will keep on fighting." Honor them by staying in the fight.