Biden’s disastrous debate performance brought to a screeching halt a multi-year campaign from the media to present the president as mentally fit.
Do you really remember how hard the press pushed you not to trust your lyin’ eyes on Biden’s decline?
Start here ⤵️
I suspect most of you remember the allegations from the White House that videos showing Biden behaving erratically were “cheap fakes.”
The media rushed to repeat this claim. Look at the extent @nytimes went to say you didn’t see anything and that Biden was fine.
Perhaps the wildest was @washingtonpost, who gave “Four Pinocchio’s” to videos showing Biden displaying cognitive problems, dismissing them as fakes, “pernicious” efforts “to reinforce an existing stereotype.”
Part of their defense was that Biden “doesn’t dance.”
Really.
Just look at this headline from @AP.
And it only gets worse from there.
Again, your lyin eyes are the problem. Not Biden. Allegedly.
@AP took specific issue with one supposed “fake”: a video where Biden freezes and needs to be led off a stage.
The video looks brutal.
But why would you believe what you can see, rather than Biden’s and Jimmy Kimmel’s comms teams?
@TheWrap blamed Biden’s stutter.
Really. Line highlighted.
@NBCNews lamented how hard all these deceptive “cheap fakes” were for our noble fact checkers.
But this headline was everywhere.
An obviously dubious statement from a White House official was repeated as gospel truth.
Here’s @ABC, @NBCNews, @thedailybeast and @CNN.
Really. I’m not exaggerating. There are even more at my full write up (link is in bio) but here’s another four boxer courtesy of @washingtonpost, @CBSNews, @Salon and @RollingStone
But what you may have forgotten are the ways that this was just the latest attempt from the press to hide the fact that the president might lack the mental wherewithal to execute the duties of his office.
Remember the special counsel report on Biden’s documents?
Back in February, special counsel Robert Hur determined that Biden lacked the mental fortitude to face a jury without seeming like a feeble, affable old man.
The press were incensed. @nytimes threw up the roadblocks, saying we needed more evidence to make a real diagnosis.
@washingtonpost claimed that what had been disclosed about Biden was just like anyone mixing up the names of their children.
Nothing to see here!
It was a popular refrain. Here’s @AP doing the same. Just like mixing up your kids’ names!
How silly! Even the leader of the free world does it!
@CNN assured us that it was nothing to worry about, Biden was fine, especially at his age.
They quoted a comms professor as their authoritative source.
These built off longstanding claims that criticism of Biden’s mental capacity were “ageist.”
Here’s @TIME pushing that claim repeatedly.
And some more from @Forbes, @NPR, @TheView and @Will_Bunch
Perhaps the richest of them all came last year from @nytimes.
Biden was so spry and vigorous that his young staff couldn’t keep up! Everyone was saying so!
It reads like North Korean propaganda.
The debate dashed this narrative that the press had worked so hard to build. Biden has lost even the editorial boards of @nytimes, @BostonGlobe and more.
It’s time, the press laments, to move on. And maybe we should’ve seen this coming.
I don’t think it’s a mystery why this topic wasn’t covered well, @CNN
That isn’t to say that some outlets haven’t maintained the fiction.
Biden had a cold at the debate. That was the problem, they claimed. I won’t let @CBSNews, @axios, and @NBCNews forget.
Or @AP…whatever this is.
It should go without saying, but the media actively working to hide from the American people that the commander and chief is exhibiting signs of serious cognitive decline is an enormous problem.
As I conclude in my newsletter (again, link in bio):
And that the press, I don’t think it’s a stretch to say, pushed this fiction to give one side a leg up in the election?
I think the media’s word for that is “election interference”
I know it’s hard to believe, but there are many more examples of the media covering for Biden’s mental state than what I could fit in this thread.
Having worked on the Hill I get the ubiquity of Politico Pro and its cost.
But I think it takes an enormous suspension of disbelief to call it a conspiracy theory to look askance at the millions of dollars the Biden admin paid the paper that ran this hatchet job on his opponent.
Which, to be clear, is exactly what outlets like @CNN are doing.
@CNN This from @axios seems particularly unreasonable.
It isn’t a “fake theory” to say that Politico is “funded by the government.” It is, to the tune of $8 million. That isn’t in dispute.
Quick 🧵 revisiting corporate media claims on the Covid lab leak theory then (a “conspiracy theory,” “misinformation,” etc.) vs. now (“okay the CIA even admits it”).
Trump’s return to the Oval Office has me reflecting on some of the worst “journalism” during his first term.
Of that long list, one in particular jumps out: the corporate press hype around the Steele dossier.
Do you *really* remember how bad it was? Follow along. ⤵️
Before I dive in, would really encourage you to read my full piece at @Holden_Court, because there’s too much to fit in a thread.
That said, surely you remember the dossier, a bunch of dramatic claims about Trump that even @nytimes now calls “discredited” open.substack.com/pub/drewholden…
But before that, there was the hype: the hero worship of Christopher Steele, the spy who was going to save American from Trump, the Russian puppet.
I mean, @washingtonpost put “hero” right in the title.
The rest of the piece is worse. WaPo repeats the claims — that the Russians had kompromat on him for engaging with prostitutes! Maybe Trump was compromised — verbatim without mentioning in the first instance that there’s no evidence these claims are true! Look at the highlights.
An unthinkable breach of journalistic ethics. There was plenty more.
Do you remember the media meltdown over Trump’s pardons? As Biden hands out decades-long passes to his family and friends, that concern is nowhere to be seen.
Biden no doubt wants you to forget this outrage in the glow of the inaugural.
Don’t. Screenshots help. ⤵️
When Trump announced pardons late in his first term, @nytimes said it “showed his willingness to use his power aggressively on behalf of loyalists” to “override courts, juries and prosecutors to apply his own standard of justice for his allies.”
When Biden did the same thing, @nytimes said he was using his “power to protect people targeted by…Trump” to “head off politically driven prosecutions.”