Biden’s disastrous debate performance brought to a screeching halt a multi-year campaign from the media to present the president as mentally fit.
Do you really remember how hard the press pushed you not to trust your lyin’ eyes on Biden’s decline?
Start here ⤵️
I suspect most of you remember the allegations from the White House that videos showing Biden behaving erratically were “cheap fakes.”
The media rushed to repeat this claim. Look at the extent @nytimes went to say you didn’t see anything and that Biden was fine.
Perhaps the wildest was @washingtonpost, who gave “Four Pinocchio’s” to videos showing Biden displaying cognitive problems, dismissing them as fakes, “pernicious” efforts “to reinforce an existing stereotype.”
Part of their defense was that Biden “doesn’t dance.”
Really.
Just look at this headline from @AP.
And it only gets worse from there.
Again, your lyin eyes are the problem. Not Biden. Allegedly.
@AP took specific issue with one supposed “fake”: a video where Biden freezes and needs to be led off a stage.
The video looks brutal.
But why would you believe what you can see, rather than Biden’s and Jimmy Kimmel’s comms teams?
@TheWrap blamed Biden’s stutter.
Really. Line highlighted.
@NBCNews lamented how hard all these deceptive “cheap fakes” were for our noble fact checkers.
But this headline was everywhere.
An obviously dubious statement from a White House official was repeated as gospel truth.
Here’s @ABC, @NBCNews, @thedailybeast and @CNN.
Really. I’m not exaggerating. There are even more at my full write up (link is in bio) but here’s another four boxer courtesy of @washingtonpost, @CBSNews, @Salon and @RollingStone
But what you may have forgotten are the ways that this was just the latest attempt from the press to hide the fact that the president might lack the mental wherewithal to execute the duties of his office.
Remember the special counsel report on Biden’s documents?
Back in February, special counsel Robert Hur determined that Biden lacked the mental fortitude to face a jury without seeming like a feeble, affable old man.
The press were incensed. @nytimes threw up the roadblocks, saying we needed more evidence to make a real diagnosis.
@washingtonpost claimed that what had been disclosed about Biden was just like anyone mixing up the names of their children.
Nothing to see here!
It was a popular refrain. Here’s @AP doing the same. Just like mixing up your kids’ names!
How silly! Even the leader of the free world does it!
@CNN assured us that it was nothing to worry about, Biden was fine, especially at his age.
They quoted a comms professor as their authoritative source.
These built off longstanding claims that criticism of Biden’s mental capacity were “ageist.”
Here’s @TIME pushing that claim repeatedly.
And some more from @Forbes, @NPR, @TheView and @Will_Bunch
Perhaps the richest of them all came last year from @nytimes.
Biden was so spry and vigorous that his young staff couldn’t keep up! Everyone was saying so!
It reads like North Korean propaganda.
The debate dashed this narrative that the press had worked so hard to build. Biden has lost even the editorial boards of @nytimes, @BostonGlobe and more.
It’s time, the press laments, to move on. And maybe we should’ve seen this coming.
I don’t think it’s a mystery why this topic wasn’t covered well, @CNN
That isn’t to say that some outlets haven’t maintained the fiction.
Biden had a cold at the debate. That was the problem, they claimed. I won’t let @CBSNews, @axios, and @NBCNews forget.
Or @AP…whatever this is.
It should go without saying, but the media actively working to hide from the American people that the commander and chief is exhibiting signs of serious cognitive decline is an enormous problem.
As I conclude in my newsletter (again, link in bio):
And that the press, I don’t think it’s a stretch to say, pushed this fiction to give one side a leg up in the election?
I think the media’s word for that is “election interference”
I know it’s hard to believe, but there are many more examples of the media covering for Biden’s mental state than what I could fit in this thread.
Biden’s pardoning of his son Hunter says an enormous amount about the president’s views of justice.
But it also says a lot about the willingness of the mainstream media—the nation’s noble fact checking corps—to repeat bogus claims that suit Democrats.
Remember? ⤵️
For starters, let’s revisit the coverage of how Biden wouldn’t do what he just did.
Biden said he wouldn’t pardon his son, no way. He would trust our legal system.
The media repeated it at every turn, without a shred of incredulity.
Here’s @washingtonpost
Seemingly every outlet did the same. @CNN had a couple of my favorites.
Look at the lede in on this first one.
The media’s job isn’t to simply repeat what politicians tell them. Whatever happened to “defenders of our democracy” and all that?
The news that MSNBC may soon have a new owner (and that it might be a certain X power user) compelled me to finally open my “MSNBC conspiracy theories” screenshot folder and, woo boy, there are a lot.
If you’d like to revisit them, buckle up, and follow along. ⤵️
There’s nowhere better to start than with Russiagate.
Do you remember the promotion from @chrislhayes, @MalcolmNance, @maddow and others at @MSNBC that perhaps Donald Trump was a Russian agent?
I, for one, will not be forgetting.
But there was plenty of other insanity from the gang at MSNBC about Russiagate.
Here are just a couple.
The first seems apropos with Trump again picking a cabinet.
Whatever happened to Harris and Biden’s “strongest economy ever” that the media spent so much time hyping up in the lead up to the election?
I revisit the claims, and explain why they were off the mark about the economy all along, in my latest @AmerCompass.
Quick🧵thread🧵⤵️
It can be easy, in the wake of an election, to forget just how dominant a media narrative was.
One that’s already fading from view was how “great” the economy was, and why it would benefit Harris on Election Day. americancompass.org/its-still-the-…
As a refresher, check out this headline from @axios about the data.
@YahooFinance upgraded Biden’s economic grade to an A. That captures the press sentiment at the time quite well.
In recent days, the mainstream media has taken nakedly ridiculous claims about the tattoos of @PeteHegseth, Trump’s SecDef nominee, to spin up a story alleging he’s an extremist.
It’s an egregious example of politically driven “journalism.” I unpack why. ⤵️
The story really started with @AP, who ran an article claiming that two tattoos that @PeteHegseth has have ties to extremism, citing an extremely thin (and downright suspect) report.
They used that to label him a potential “insider threat” in their headline.
It wasn’t until 3 paragraphs in that a reader was told what that claim rested on: a tattoo of a Latin phrase. They’d go on to mention “concerns” about a cross tattoo as well.
Would be great if Trump’s unconventional picks for his cabinet inspire the media to consider a nominee’s credentials.
They might want to look at the current HHS Secretary, Xavier Becerra, who brings to the table the medical experience of being in Congress for 12 terms.
Or perhaps Obama’s former HHS Secretary, Sylvia Matthews Burwell, who had just finished her stint lobbying for Walmart.
Or Donna Shalala, Clinton’s former head of HHS, whose credentials were as a university administrator and feminist.