No… medical professionals aren’t “struggling to prevent transmission”.
Where airborne disease guidelines are followed, outcomes are outstanding. (E.g. infectious disease hospital in Italy 2020.)
Medical professionals and health managers are choosing not to follow the protocols.
Where airborne disease guidelines are followed, outcomes are outstanding. (E.g. infectious disease hospital in Italy 2020.)
Medical professionals and health managers are choosing not to follow the protocols.
That’s mainly because of government acceptance of “a certain amount of loss” aided by chaos agents and misguided people in media… including SoMe.
I wouldn’t normally engage… but I think that this was an important point to be made.
The airborne disease control protocols are excellent, have been around for decades, and they work.
The airborne disease control protocols are excellent, have been around for decades, and they work.
The only thing preventing their use is the *cost*.
They have allowed numbers of SARS2 cases to exceed capacity for containment using current infrastructure.
There are two solutions.
They have allowed numbers of SARS2 cases to exceed capacity for containment using current infrastructure.
There are two solutions.
Solution 1.
Reduce case numbers to manageable quantities. Pretty much double digit for something as fast as COVID-19.
Reduce case numbers to manageable quantities. Pretty much double digit for something as fast as COVID-19.
Solution 2
Build the infrastructure to reduce the spread of ubiquitous airborne disease.
One would hope an engineer with investment interests would be keen on this one…
Build the infrastructure to reduce the spread of ubiquitous airborne disease.
One would hope an engineer with investment interests would be keen on this one…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
