Covfefe Anon Profile picture
Jul 12 8 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Hilarious thread by a guy who noticed that body cams undermined the leftist narrative about cops so he searches for a way to oppose them without saying that it's because they destroy the left's narrative

You get the vague hand-waving that uses prog coded phrases - "they said it was about *transparency* [prog good word] but it was *actually* about *reducing liability* [prog boo word because it implies cutting off the ghetto lottery]" - in reality the cops realized that *increasing transparency did decrease liability*

Of course, the cops were giving far too much credit to progs for being sane - recall that there's a video of a cop shooting a black woman *who was in the process of trying to stab another black woman* and the prog response was to say that knife fights are a part of their culture

Video evidence of actual happenings makes progessives quite angry because even though they'll continue to believe the party line they'll feel uncomfortable because the cognitive dissonance is more powerful when they know that others knows they don't care about truthImage
Image
It's an interesting 🧵 b/c you can see the full progressive verbal fog on display - he's coming out against better and more evidence - he can't just say "it makes it harder for us to control the narrative" and *he might not even know that's why it bothers him* - he just recoils
This kind of thing goes throughout the thread - no, he doesn't consider that possibility because he wants to enforce the Narrative - not to think through the consequences

Hilarious example of this was FBI belatedly providing the high definition video of the Kenosha riot to the Rittenhouse defense team

Likely that was the work of some individual who made a "mistake" because he had some residual sense of justice...

The OP is much more on the veil-production side - he's working to produce thought-terminating cliches for progs to use when they want to dismiss body cam evidence from a case

Success is if progs repeat those to dismiss a Narrative-undermining video

This is very true but there was a big cost to it - that case and that video are out there like navigation hazard for questioning progressives

Every day some number of people happen upon that footage and ask questions for the first time and pull a thread

One of their most common failure modes is "believing their own bullshit" - in this case that body cams would prove the progressive narrative about "criminal justice" because they thought it was accurate

It is actually vital that progressives *not* be seen as individuals

They operate as a team and they have very clear ways of identifying each other so they can coordinate without direct communication

It is absolutely necessary to hack this

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Covfefe Anon

Covfefe Anon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CovfefeAnon

May 29
Women having significantly less general knowledge than men is a real phenomenon and shows up in multiple areas - in this case a female PhD student in the field doesn't know basic underlying facts about the field - this is only surprising in that you can't predict where her knowledge will be lacking

Part of the reason our society is destroying itself is that it's decided upon a religious dogma of group equality across all domains which it then enforces by making it taboo to look at and think about the implications of the fact that groups are *not* all equally capable

How many people know about the general knowledge gap between men and women?

Few

How many studies are there on it?

Few - no one wants to try to publish a paper that has a "controversial" result when the result contradicts progressive religious dogma

Millions and millions of "little" things like this add up and only disagreeable, knowledgeable people can actually fit it all into a coherent frameworkImage
Image
Image
Here's the thing about basic underlying knowledge - you can't predict in advance which bit of it will be important

"Why is the ping between these two data centers triple that of the ping between these two?"
"One is on the other side of an oceanic cable"

Not thinking👇through when it is related to your field shows a *huge* lack of intellectual curiosity which raises the question of why someone with so little curiosity is in a PhD program?

leading you to consider the results of "women in STEM" promotion

Read 4 tweets
Apr 29
This is what we're up against:

women have awful risk assessment - one of the biggest mental sex differences - as an example - women will routinely play poker worse than 13 year old boys

women have an emotional bias to claim men are against them *because this has a massive payoff in making men try to prove that they're not* - classic negotiating tactic / exploit but it's baked into their world outlookImage
One thing to add:

Women's minds have been shaped by evolution such that she doesn't have to worry about bears - that's her husband and father and brother's responsibility - bears don't exist in her mental universe as an idea - only as a physical being if she sees one
Excellent point on the bear question by Aimee

Read 4 tweets
Apr 11
You are so unbelievably mind fucked by American communism you literally cannot see the problems with it

Whites were driven from their homes for a decade in a campaign of officially endorsed ethnic violence and the ones who couldn't afford to move, died alone and afraid - prisoners in their own homes

The survivors not only couldn't talk about what they went through - they were *vilified* as having caused the squalor of the people who attacked them

The Regime is so unpopular and would lose every plebiscite that it holds if it didn't import tens of millions of hostile foreigners to live here to serve as vote banks. When one of them kills an actual American - USG sends a task force to threaten people into saying that "race had nothing to do with this"

Everything this Regime does is a crime or covers up a crime because it is motivated by hostility for Americans - at root because it was captured by a state religion that has hating Americans as its core because that's what's efficient to get votes and control the bureaucracy in a "democracy"

No road back to that? Good
Read this thread - the Regime that did this not only is still in power *it attacks the people it did this to*

It cannot get a thousand times worse because the Regime constantly calculates and worries about having "gone too far" - it is maximizing long term pain

It will get worse because every step it takes is optimized for the power to make things worse

Read 4 tweets
Mar 15
To Tucker's point that buildings didn't always look this way - *something* happened between 1930 and 1950

(communists won WWII)
Image
It wasn't just a material victory - it was a spiritual one - artists sensed the zeitgeist from WWII - "the future is bureaucratic / communist"

These buildings felt like The Future

"the old powers are dead, their gods abandoned them, the god of the Organization Man is strong"
This view has merit to it but just pushes the same question up another level

What is wealth *for*? There's only so much wealth you can use in a personal sense - beyond that wealth is about the ability to build - organizations, physical buildings

Read 5 tweets
Feb 14
🧵 by BAP

Here's the problem with "degeneracy" as a political platform or even as a part of politics

The degeneracy and social destruction you see is downstream of one problem - the sexual liberation of women - and it's impossible to reverse that in current electoral politics
Note that BAP is discussing the *effectiveness* of the approach of just pointing and sputtering at degeneracy

We've had that for decades and it's done nothing to even slow degeneracy!

At one point we had an FAA that took seriously Christian complaints - and yet, it got worse
"The degeneracy is so bad that this time we'll have a candidate that points at it and that will succeed"

That's not how it works - the culture looks worse to *you* but it's arguably definitional that normies accept that *everything that happens is normal*
Read 4 tweets
Jan 30
"Meritocracy" is a joke - the reality is that you need freedom of association because otherwise "merit" is *litigated* instead of tested

Want to put together a team? Use whatever criteria you want. The test of their "merit" is if your team can do the job you created it for
*Responsibility* is much more important than "merit"

A good team leader will attempt to get the best team (given constraints) and he'll use whatever tools he wants to get that team. If they fail or succeed, it's on him

"Merit" smuggles in bureaucratic oligarchy values
It smuggles in bureaucratic oligarchy values because the person who evaluates whether or not you "fairly" determined "merit" is (naturally) a commissar

It's rule by commissar

The stark choice is "rule by commissar" or not
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(