The 1918 flu is called the "Spanish flu" because in most places, the media censored it. Except Spain, where they reported honestly. This isn't a conspiracy theory - it's a historical fact. And I think it is occurring right now again with COVID:
This article in The New Republic - "How America’s Newspapers Covered Up a Pandemic" - provides an overview of what happened in 1918. In short, the media either avoided talking about the flu altogether, or they blamed something else for the damage the flu was causing.
"the big-city newspapers...sugarcoated the truth, practicing an alarming level of self-censorship. Any article or headline suggesting more than casual concern about the disease would be open to attack"
"Only by putting together the tiny headlines on page 11 of the Boston Post could a dutiful newspaper reader get a sense of the full extent of the epidemic"
Is this happening again right now with COVID? I think for the first few years of the pandemic, most of the press covered it honestly (indeed, some articles at the time noted the contrast between the media's early coverage of COVID and the censorship of 1918)
But as time has passed, there's been a shift towards censorship. Articles that should obviously mention COVID now rarely do. In some cases, this is debatable, like a story on student absences. But for coverage of health trends, this is inexcusable. A few recent examples:
This article from Today reports on an alarming trend: the growing number of young, seemingly healthy people, having unexplained heart attacks. The writer suggests the cause could be obesity, or marijuana use, but does not mention COVID.
This is a glaring omission, as COVID infections increase your risk of having a heart attack, and studies have found that this risk is most pronounced among young adults.
This article tackles a similar topic, although this time it's strokes rather than heart attacks. Once again, coverage on the growing number of young people having a stroke. And once again obesity is blamed, along with stress and pollution, while COVID is never mentioned.
Again, a glaring omission: getting infected with COVID significantly increases your risk of having a stroke. One study found that the odds of having a stroke increased by 52% in the year following a COVID infection.
This article is a bit different. It isn't really about a trend, but more of a sort of thinkpiece on the relationship between chronic illnesses and stress: how stress can drive them, and how doctors can ignore them.
The article doesn't mention COVID. Chronic illnesses are obviously not new, and the space is much bigger than COVID, but it's odd to write a piece about chronic illness and not mention COVID given that it has been an enormous driver of chronic illness in recent years. According to the CDC, about 6% of all American adults are currently living with long COVID.
Recently, a sort of genre of article has emerged: stories about people having odd, unexplained health issues. Many of these health issues are immediately recognizable to anyone who has experienced long COVID, and yet, the articles themselves don't mention it, even as a possibility
This one tackles the number of people developing an odd persistent cough that lasts for weeks or months. The article mentions COVID only to assure the reader that COVID is certainly not the cause, then suggests the culprit might be social distancing, masks, or anxiety
But not only do COVID infections themselves frequently result in a cough during the acute stage, but a chronic cough is also one of the more common long COVID symptoms, lasting for at least a year after infection.
In this one, the writers visit a rural Texas town where many of the people living there have developed odd, seemingly unexplainable, health issues: blood clots, hearing loss, headaches, hair loss, and autoimmune disease, among other issues. The story clearly tries to place the blame on a BTC mine.
And while that may be the case, every symptom mentioned in the article is also a common long COVID symptom. What makes this more compelling is that long COVID disproportionately affects rural populations
As you read articles about declining health in the population - unexplained illnesses, the growing number of sick people - look to see if COVID is mentioned as a driver. If it isn't, take whatever symptoms the article is talking about, and look to see if there is research linking those symptoms to COVID or long COVID. More often than not, you'll probably find out that's the case.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People have called me a conspiracy theorist for this, but I believe that COVID (and maybe even the COVID vaccine) damages the Achilles tendon and increases the odds of suffering an Achilles tendon rupture (ATR). There's no proof, but evidence continues to pile up:
This is fresh in the news since an ATR may have just determined the outcome of the NBA finals. Early in the game, the Pacers' star player Haliburton suffered an ATR. Because of that, he had to leave the game early, and without him his team lost the finals.
But Haliburton's injury wasn't the only ATR in the NBA playoffs this year. Several other players sustained them as well, making it the worst year for ATRs in the NBA's history.
We actually don't know if our civilization can survive infinite COVID reinfections. We're just sort of hoping that's the case and pretending the evidence to the contrary doesn't exist. It makes me wonder what the American Indians thought and said to each other back in the 1500s
I'm not such a doomer that I think anything that catastrophic will actually happen. But it's a novel virus. No one understands what Long COVID even is. The political and leadership class across the world is mostly in outright denial. We just don't know
It's interesting to remember that arguments like this were being made by major figures in China prior to their reopening. Then omicron came along and they sort of...forgot about it. But nothing has fundamentally changed. We don't have any new data to make us more optimistic
I've tried ~50 different interventions for Long COVID, and have talked to hundreds of other patients and read accounts online for years. If you haven't tried much, these are the things I'd look into. I'm going to rank these by the easiest to get up to the most challenging:
Easiest (OTC or supplements): creatine, NAC, glutathione, H1 and H2 blockers, nicotine patches, probiotics, nattokinase, CoQ 10, quercetin
Requires a doctor, but many PCPs will prescribe if you emphasize your specific symptoms and/or give them some case reports and research: SSRIs (yes, long COVID is not psychosomatic, but these do help some people), Ativan, metformin, modafinil, beta blockers
I haven't written about this really, because I didn't want to give the impression in any way that Long COVID is a good thing, but I do think it might have actually "fixed" a different long term health problem I had since I was a kid:
When I was a teenager, I was diagnosed by a neurologist with delayed sleep phase disorder. That basically means I am (or was) an extreme night owl. They told me I might grow out of it, but I never did. So, for most of my life, I found it impossible to go to bed before 1 or 2am
It didn't matter how hard I tried to go to bed early. I tried all the tricks: melatonin, a strict bed time, working out in the morning, restricting caffeine etc. Nothing really worked.
In the last two months, I've felt about 95% recovered from Long COVID, up from maybe 80% a year ago. I credit most of this improvement to luck, and to having some money. But along the way, I've intentionally tried to avoid some thought patterns I see others fall into:
Refusing to try any treatments that aren't "approved". I met a guy who was on the verge of losing a job that paid nearly $1M/year because he was too sick to get out of bed. I asked him what he tried, and he told me nothing because there was no evidence that anything worked
It may take years before there are any approved treatments, if there are any at all. Obviously, people need to decide for themselves, but I've never hesitated to try things as long as they weren't too risky
I'm a finance guy, not a doctor. I don't understand much about medicine, but I do understand risk. I think a lot of problems with medicine come from the fact that it doesn't price risk correctly.
In most systems, individual participants bear some risk. "Let the buyer beware," and so on. But this isn't really the case in medicine.
Most of the risk in the medical system is transferred up the chain to a sort of amorphous bureaucracy. Drugs are given a stamp of approval at the highest level by people who will never actually treat the patients consuming them.