The last two years of questioning Pres Biden's age has been about hoping to knock Madam Vice President off.
This thread is going to be a love letter to her and the strongest argument for Pres Biden to stay.
It's not accurate to say she isn't strong electorally, especially considering her 2020 profile.
When MVP Harris announced her candidacy in 2020, she had the highest in-person turnout for her launch, the highest-rated town hall, and was one of the largest fundraising draws.
What she did NOT have is an access relationship with legacy media.
Nor did she have a good campaign operation. The second you can fix. That will not prevent her in the future.
The first - lets discuss.
Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren had those relationships (even w/ black pundits) worked systematically on knocking Madam Vice President down a peg to remove her from their way.
Some media kept on doing so once she became Vice President, othering her reminiscent to that of HRC
This is how the Khive was born the playbook had been used effectively against HRC.
People were watching in real time the blatant disrespect, use of racial tropes, the constant questioning of her qualifications ...and it was a collective not on my watch.
Madam Vice President is building her reputation back.
The longer she is out there being her awesome self it quiets the doubters (not all)
But she needs a runway. We have people who work on vibes calling her "unserious" when she has a long resume.
@jrpsaki said Madam Vice President's biggest pitch for her to be president is you cannot sidestep her.
No, her biggest pitch to be President is she is qualified and in her serving in the role of Vice President the most qualified.
@jrpsaki The issue of "side-stepping" the Vice President is in doing so it will rend the party in ways we cannot calculate.
Its about a party health thing.
To even bring it up- is to start the game of verbal chicken - "Black people have nowhere else to go- they are not going to skip voting?
Dare you to say that out loud. Feeling of disrespect aren't always logical and should 1% act on those feelings- Trump wins.
The largely white media and donor community has little to no connection to the active voting base responsible for Democratic wins.
They hear the perspective of their Uncle Steve at dinner making fun of her for laughing too much.
Let me explain what that means. President Obama handily won re-election in 2012 when the entire media/polling saw him losing.
Why because 2012 demographics had shifted. If they were 1996s- we would have had a Pres Romney.
The demographic shifts are causing havoc in polling, and modeling.
Its like nailing Jello. There are more Latinos, 15% Blacks, Asians, and other than is shifting our electorate. BUT
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Fetterman has sharp political instincts, contrast that to the lack of brains in prominent Dem- Im shocked. Both our political donors and the media fail to grasp the electorate or the political machinery. Worst many made irreversible statements that tarnish their reputations.
He understood what @MarkWarner @RepRaskin, @EricHolder didn’t clearly get you never want to go on record speaking ill of a voting process for a back room process even if the rules say you can- which no one is sure you can
@MarkWarner @RepRaskin @EricHolder Everyone sees the trap.
If you don’t see it is because you are either too corrupt, too stupid, or both
Realized something that hadn't clicked before: many campaigns strategist lack knowledge about the process. They drive the car but don't maintain it. Aspects such as delegate selection, finance and coordinating with states for ballot access they know nothing about
This conversation could have concluded last year if the punditry grasped the processes and the extensive runways required for setup.
Process like setting up finance committees
Ballot access
Party and State Coordination
1. Union membership worldwide has decreased. The nature of work is changing, moving away from traditionally unionized sectors.
There is a push to unionize new sectors, the pace is slower compared to the previous unionization trade and manufacturing
.forbes.com/sites/niallmcc…
Part 2 of this - is there are less jobs in these sectors due to automation.
Gary - before joining us- worked at a steel mill since he was 19- until his first retirement in his 50s. He said when he started it was a loud factory floor, when he left you can hear a pin drop.
I've been involved in policy advocacy since the age of 17. So hearing the 'Twitter mafias', portray ideal progressive policies as just one popular presidential decision away.
I am screaming, my war wounds are screaming, I am PTSDing that is not reality.
I talk openly about losing the fight for faster implementation of renewable energy in states--because a version of AARP moonwalked over my ass.
Good ppl but the idea of investment cost clashed w/ their fixed incomes, and their voting power convinced Dem/Rep law makers alike.
So when people who have never done any of this stuff and have an advocacy resume you could fit on a quarter of a napkin
" Just implement it faster"
" Let's withhold our vote until politicians get it done"
I want to point out that reality paints a different picture
Some people, without any sense of irony, claim that Hillary Clinton wasn’t a good enough candidate to attract them but then praise Jill Stein and Marianne Williamson.
This isn't a discussion about quality; it's about their desire for highly customized candidates.
🧵
Expecting a candidate to be your perfect match may work in dating apps, but it doesn't work in democracy, where winning requires a majority vote.
In any group of even 10 people, choices involve compromise and give-and-take.
Candidates should work to earn your vote. This effort is often misconstrued as needing to chase you down like a dating hunt. Many people communicate this expectation to me on this app, but that's not how it works.