Crémieux Profile picture
Jul 14 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
A new meta-analysis of group differences in measured IQs in Britain has been published.

Here are the results: Image
Here's a condensed version that just uses major groups and has 95% CIs. Image
Whites were the baseline (mean = 100, SD = 15) and equal variances were assumed. Splitting Whites into British (-0.01 d), Irish (0.02 d) and "White Other" (0.04) wouldn't change much.
The study is open access and largely based on FOIA'd data. That means it's largely based on data that the government had to be asked to release and that they probably wouldn't have made available otherwise.

So enjoy.

Source: tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.10…
Asian-White was mislabeled. Not a big deal since most of the relevant pairings still fit the original label when it comes to self-ID. Fixed. Image
If you want to learn more about this subject, also check out this post on the GCSE controversy:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Crémieux

Crémieux Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cremieuxrecueil

Jul 16
The Economist has a new special issue on boosting the world's IQs.

In it, they suggest that nutritional intervention, vaccination, and so on are low-hanging fruit.

They didn't cite any evidence that supported their conclusions, and what they did cite seemed like a bad joke🧵 Image
If beating hunger, getting people vaccinated, and improving public health generally is such low-hanging fruit for raising global IQs, what of Sub-Saharan Africa? Image
Or better yet, what of China? Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 13
There are already mentally retarded PhDs.
Image
Education has become less selective as more people have enrolled. It's a statistical necessity, so it's no surprise this has happened: Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 12
One study estimated that being exposed to Ramadan in utero reduced the test scores of six-year-old Muslims by up to about 1 IQ point. Image
Ramadan involves intermittent dry fasting during the daylight hours for 29-30 days.

Opinions vary, but most will accept that pregnant women are not required to fast, and even more will agree that they are allowed to drink water.

Nevertheless, many Muslim women strictly adhere.
Whether this sort of fasting is harmful to pregnant women is contentious, precisely because there are some who believe women ought to do it for religious reasons.

So there are bad incentives here.
Read 15 tweets
Jul 11
The Economist has a new article out today on boosting global IQ.

It starts off in error: stating that the Flynn effect means people today are smarter than people in previous generations.

So, I'm making an article that's been in my drafts for months available to subscribers🧵 Image
The full post will come out pared down later, in a different publication. This long version is just for paid subscribers

It explains

1. Why the Flynn effect has not indicated rising intelligence
2. Why it is irrelevant for group differences
3. Why it's not easy to adjust for it
What, ultimately, explains the Flynn effect?

The most consistent thing is test bias. The next thing is nothing, because the Flynn effect is not one thing, it is many factors that principally cause the interpretations of rather than the constructs underlying tests to change.Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 10
Is hiring in engineering sexist?

Do women who get offers for engineering roles get offered lower salaries due to their sex?

Thanks to the hiring platform Hired, we might know the answer! Image
Hired was an online recruitment platform for full-time engineering jobs in the U.S. It had high average wages (low six figure) and its recruitment process looked like this: Image
The salaries candidates asked for were public. The salaries companies offered (bid salaries) were given based on said asks. About a third of those bids were the asks, and most of them were close.

Their high correlation means job candidates generally got ~what they asked for.Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 4
Why are the kids scoring poorly today?

Uh, high ceilings.

This study is making the news, but it is bad🧵 Image
To start, note that multiple outlets have reported that this study provided evidence that the higher the ceiling of the test-taking environment, the lower the exam scores.

Thus, 'Your poor performance might not be your fault. It's the fault of the ceilings!' Image
Spoiler: if you download the data, you find that the correlation is -0.0423.

You could say "Oh, the effect is small, but it could matter."

But wait a second.
Read 40 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(