Pantéa Javidan, JD, PhD Profile picture
Jul 16 3 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Full text of my paper about human rights violations during the ongoing pandemic through lack of mitigations in schools is now available online via @ManchesterUP

False Divisions and Dubious Equivalencies:
Children’s Rights During the COVID-19 Pandemic

manchesterhive.com/display/978152…
Quick summary

My research is about the causes and consequences of the crisis in children’s rights during the ongoing Covid pandemic—specifically, how and why children’s fundamental rights to life, health, and safety are besieged in the context of education and schooling.

I scrutinize pandemic non-interventionism in comparative global perspective, with the United States exemplifying this model and faring worst among peer nations, alongside the United Kingdom and Sweden.

From a perspective of systemic inequities, I analyze school reopenings and related policy through a review of news media, surveys, statistical data, and public discourse.

I find that the master narrative regarding childhood education during the pandemic has created false divisions and dubious equivalencies between different sets of children’s rights to justify in-person schooling with inadequate mitigations.

Political officials, economic elites, contrarian “experts,” and aligned technocrats have promoted pandemic non-intervention through a combination of disinformation campaigns, moral panic, and political violence, to overpower scientific consensus, public opinion, and human rights, which disproportionately harms working-class and racial minority children.
I'm grateful to be connected to many here whose research and advocacy have fortified mine. Some are cited in this paper, while others have helped alert me to important research and developments that inform this paper. Thank you all. @jfeldman_epi @NafeezAhmed @karamballes @thrasherxy @NaomiAKlein @WalkerBragman @realLandsEnd @avierkant @gorskon @KeeangaYamahtta @LongCovidKids @m_scribe @dgurdasani1 @PeterHotez @PeoplesCDC @TheWHN @GosiaGasperoPhD @DrEricDing @EricTopol @michael_hoerger @cv_cev @DrJudyStone @luckytran @wsbgnl @Antonio_Caramia (No doubt I'm missing several, but much gratitude to everyone I follow who posts on this topic).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pantéa Javidan, JD, PhD

Pantéa Javidan, JD, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pjavidan

Aug 23, 2023
Full clip of public comments from @CDCgov HICPAC meeting today regarding proposed changes to infection control guidance in healthcare settings that risk reducing infection control protections, esp. re: aerosol transmission & multidrug-resistant organisms:

Problems re: proposed changes to healthcare infection control guidelines by HICPAC, highlighting concerns over content of revisions, integrity of the process, potential risks to healthcare safety.
Experts, industrial hygienists, academics are united in opposition, calling for transparency, inclusion, focus on scientifically supported measures.

Main problems:
Read 18 tweets
Jul 9, 2023
New California Supreme Court ruling re: employer liability for contraction of infectious diseases is problematic and concerning. Court rules that workers contracting COVID-19 from co-workers can't sue employers unless intentional or fraudulent negligence is found [1].
However, in contrast, employers were held liable for asbestos exposure to workers' families in a 2023 ruling [2]. This contradiction between asbestos and infectious diseases such as COVID-19 highlights the inconsistent nature of employer liability laws.
The Court distinguished between the two by comparing latency, severity, and foreseeability. They state that asbestos exposure symptoms may not appear until decades after, challenging affected workers and their families to seek timely compensation [3].
Read 11 tweets
Nov 13, 2022
Here is the easiest way to tell if someone—especially a contrarian expert—is spreading disinformation or bad advice about Covid.

This is the current scientific consensus just published in Nature, a leading global journal of peer-reviewed scientific research,…
on how to live through the pandemic, rather than live sicker and shorter lives due to repeat Covid infections. Any advice about Covid should be measured against expert consensus...
386 experts studying Covid in 112 countries came to a consensus on what needs to be done to end the pandemic, and restore pre-pandemic levels of life expectancy and quality of life…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(