Full text of my paper about human rights violations during the ongoing pandemic through lack of mitigations in schools is now available online via @ManchesterUP
False Divisions and Dubious Equivalencies:
Children’s Rights During the COVID-19 Pandemic
My research is about the causes and consequences of the crisis in children’s rights during the ongoing Covid pandemic—specifically, how and why children’s fundamental rights to life, health, and safety are besieged in the context of education and schooling.
I scrutinize pandemic non-interventionism in comparative global perspective, with the United States exemplifying this model and faring worst among peer nations, alongside the United Kingdom and Sweden.
From a perspective of systemic inequities, I analyze school reopenings and related policy through a review of news media, surveys, statistical data, and public discourse.
I find that the master narrative regarding childhood education during the pandemic has created false divisions and dubious equivalencies between different sets of children’s rights to justify in-person schooling with inadequate mitigations.
Political officials, economic elites, contrarian “experts,” and aligned technocrats have promoted pandemic non-intervention through a combination of disinformation campaigns, moral panic, and political violence, to overpower scientific consensus, public opinion, and human rights, which disproportionately harms working-class and racial minority children.
I'm grateful to be connected to many here whose research and advocacy have fortified mine. Some are cited in this paper, while others have helped alert me to important research and developments that inform this paper. Thank you all. @jfeldman_epi @NafeezAhmed @karamballes @thrasherxy @NaomiAKlein @WalkerBragman @realLandsEnd @avierkant @gorskon @KeeangaYamahtta @LongCovidKids @m_scribe @dgurdasani1 @PeterHotez @PeoplesCDC @TheWHN @GosiaGasperoPhD @DrEricDing @EricTopol @michael_hoerger @cv_cev @DrJudyStone @luckytran @wsbgnl @Antonio_Caramia (No doubt I'm missing several, but much gratitude to everyone I follow who posts on this topic).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Full clip of public comments from @CDCgov HICPAC meeting today regarding proposed changes to infection control guidance in healthcare settings that risk reducing infection control protections, esp. re: aerosol transmission & multidrug-resistant organisms:
Problems re: proposed changes to healthcare infection control guidelines by HICPAC, highlighting concerns over content of revisions, integrity of the process, potential risks to healthcare safety.
Experts, industrial hygienists, academics are united in opposition, calling for transparency, inclusion, focus on scientifically supported measures.
New California Supreme Court ruling re: employer liability for contraction of infectious diseases is problematic and concerning. Court rules that workers contracting COVID-19 from co-workers can't sue employers unless intentional or fraudulent negligence is found [1].
However, in contrast, employers were held liable for asbestos exposure to workers' families in a 2023 ruling [2]. This contradiction between asbestos and infectious diseases such as COVID-19 highlights the inconsistent nature of employer liability laws.
The Court distinguished between the two by comparing latency, severity, and foreseeability. They state that asbestos exposure symptoms may not appear until decades after, challenging affected workers and their families to seek timely compensation [3].
on how to live through the pandemic, rather than live sicker and shorter lives due to repeat Covid infections. Any advice about Covid should be measured against expert consensus...
386 experts studying Covid in 112 countries came to a consensus on what needs to be done to end the pandemic, and restore pre-pandemic levels of life expectancy and quality of life…