First, what makes something feel cool? There are three factors: fiber, weight, and weave. Most shirt fabrics fall within a narrow range in terms of weight, so we can eliminate that dimension. This leaves us to discuss fiber and weave.
Linen is a great material for summer shirts because it wicks moisture from your skin, transferring it to the other side and allowing it to quickly dissipate. You can test this by washing two shirts—one linen, one cotton—and letting them air dry. See which dries faster.
This is good because it means you will be less sweaty and sticky on a hot day. However, linen holds wrinkles, which may or may not be to your taste. You can get cotton-linen blends to tamp this down, but the more cotton in the blend, the less you get of linen's properties.
If you move over to cotton, then you'll want to pay attention to weave. The more open the weave, the more breathable the shirt. The downside, of course, is that very open weaves can be very sheer. This is a nice comparison photo from the blog Bond Suits.
In the world of shirt fabrics, voile is among the most open and lightweight of weaves. You can see this below: the cap from my camera is slightly visible beneath the fabric.
When worn, this can be very noticeable, particularly if the shirt is white (white is always going to be a little more sheer than non-white fabrics, all things equal). However, it's considerably less sheer even in colors like light blue. Compare the shirt bodies below:
I don't have a photo, but I recently saw James, the bespoke tailor behind the newly launched shirt company Hume, wearing a light blue voile shirt and it wasn't as indecent as I would have expected. Looked similar to below—totally wearable without an undershirt
IG humeldn
Alternatively, you can try a panama weave. At the British shirt fabric company Acorn, they have some made from a three-ply, 70s yarn (fabric is called Cambridge). The yarn is a little coarser and heavier, which makes them less sheer. Can't see much of my camera cap behind fabric
There are a ton of other fabrics like this. Plain weaves tend to be more open than twills, so you can look for fabrics like batiste (see below). However, ready-to-wear shirts are rarely labeled like this, so you have to hold the fabric up to see how much light pours through.
For example, here's a Leno weave. When worn, this is not sheer at all because of the thickness of the yarn and the structure of the weave. But when I hold it up to the light, I can almost see the the outline of the tree in the background. This is what you want on a hot day.
Again, no shirt is going to feel cool on a hot day—normal clothes don't have built-in air conditioners. However, the idea is that you want something a little more comfortable than a dense oxford cloth or twill. So think about elements like fiber (linen vs cotton) and weave.
There's a ton of places to get nice shirts. On the high-end, check Ascot Chang at The Armoury and G. Inglese at No Man Walks Alone. Proper Cloth is a great online made-to-measure shirtmaker. They can send swatches and make anything you want, including casual styles.
If you're interested in bespoke, CEGO, Divij Bespoke, Ascot Chang, Hume, Budd, and Dege & Skinner travel through the US for trunk shows. On the more affordable end, check J. Crew, Brooks Brothers, Kamakura, J. Press, O'Connell's, Ledbury, and Spier & Mackay.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Any time I talk about a wealthy person's outfit, someone in the comments is quick to reply: "They're rich, you think they care?" No one has to care about my opinions or clothes, regardless of net worth.
But let's talk about the connection between wealth and aesthetics 🧵
About a year ago, Tucker Carlson told Chris Cuomo that "postmodern architecture" is intentionally designed to deaden the spirit. The clip was widely circulated online by people such as Benny Johnson, who seemingly agreed.
Postmodern architecture was actually a very brief movement that emerged in the 1960s as a counter-reaction to modernism's austerity and uniformity. Examples of postmodernism include Michael Graves's Portland Building and Guild House. Also Phillip Johnson's PPG Place.
Trump released a $250 fragrance (one for women, one for men).
Sometimes a fragrance can be expensive because it contains certain ingredients or involve artisanal, small-batch production. But with no note breakdown or even a description of the scent, what justifies this price?
I'm reminded of this 2016 blog post by Luca Turin, one of the best writers on fragrances. Even for niche perfumery he warns: "Niche perfumery stands a good chance of disappearing up its own rear end if it merely becomes yet another golden opportunity to rip off the customer."
If you're into fragrances, as I am, I encourage you to not support celebrity bullshit like this. Go to real perfumers. Some of my favorites include:
— AbdesSalaam Attar: He's a self-taught Sicilian Sufi perfumer who only uses natural ingredients. Many of his perfumes feel like you're walking through a Middle Eastern bazaar or spice market. Milano Caffe, Cuoio dei Dolci, and Tabac are worth a sniff. He can also do bespoke perfumes using your favorite notes.
— DS & Durga: David Moltz describes himself as doing "scent travel." He has an uncanny ability to transport you to far off places. I like Cowboy Grass, Debaser, Amber Kiso, and Burning Barbershop. If you can get a sample of his Pale Grey Mountain, Small Black Lake Sample (made part of his Hylands collection), it's really good with tailored tweeds.
— Anything by Jean Claude Ellena: One of the most famous perfumers in the world. His scents have been likened to watercolor paintings and chamber music because they're light, airy, and have a transparent quality. This makes them particularly good for spring/ summer. Check his scents from Hermes, such as Terre d'Hermes and Un Jardin sur le Nil, which are easy to find on discount. L'Eau d'Hiver for Frederic Malle is also great, but a bit more expensive.
— Tauer Perfumes: Andy Tauer is a chemist and self-taught perfumer who specializes in dry, spicy, woody scents. L'Air du Desert Marocain makes you feel like you're in the middle of the desert at night. Lonestar Memories is like being next to a crackling campfire while picking up on the scent of tobacco and leather. IMO, a must try if you're exploring niche perfumery.
Always try to get samples before buying a bottle. Check shops such as Luckyscent, Surrender to Chance, and The Perfumed Court. Also pick up a copy of Perfumes by Luca Turin and Tania Sanchez.
People think I'm biased against Jeff Bezos, but here's F. Caraceni Sartoria, widely considered one of the best bespoke tailoring houses in the world, commenting on Bezos's wedding suit.
"The most terrible, frightening, horrible tuxedo ever seen in my life. I'm really suffering"
Nothing to do with politics, only quality tailoring. F. Caraceni made suits for Silvio Berlusconi, who was hardly beloved by progressives. Many people don't know much about tailoring, which is fine, but this doesn't mean that rich or expensive = good.
Caraceni's work:
Here is a dinner suit F. Caraceni made for Yves Saint Laurent.
Let me make the case for why the NHL should abolish its dress code, which currently requires players to wear a suit and tie while heading to and from games. 🧵
The arguments I've seen for the dress code fall into one of two categories: players look better in a coat-and-tie (some use descriptions such as "classy"). Others say that requiring players to dress in this way shows respect for the game. I will address each argument in turn.
It's true that tailoring once played a larger role in sports. Basketball coaches, for instance, used to wear tailored jackets pretty regularly, even at games. Some even looked quite good in these outfits.
It's true that progressives valorize "ugliness." But I think this person doesn't interrogate this position enough and thus lands at the wrong conclusion.
Let me give you a new perspective on ugliness. 🧵
In popular discourse, the world was once good, people were virtuous, and all things were beautiful. Then modernity came along and destroyed everything. In this view, beauty is an objective standard that has been corrupted by liberalism.
I contend that beauty in personal appearance is subjective, not objective. In fact, its standards rest on the shifting tectonic plates of politics, economics, and technology. Let me give you examples.
Today, we think of these photos as the standard for male beauty and dress: