Todd of Mischief Profile picture
Jul 17, 2024 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Cancel culture is losing a scholarship because you sang a hard-r along with your favorite rapper on TikTok.

Cancel culture is having your food-truck review-bombed because you decided to learn how to make authentic tortillas in Mexico.
Cancel culture is your employer receiving threats because you posted something from your vacation about how different the culture is in another part of the world.

Cancel culture is getting mobbed for wearing a sombrero on Cinco de Mayo.
Cancel culture is getting suspended for failing to use neo-pronouns.

Cancel culture is getting you website shut down for articles that challenge scientific consensus.

Cancel culture is getting hit in the head with a bike lock for wearing a red cap.
Cancel culture is out-of-proportion, unforeseeable consequences for newly-decided social faux pas.

Cancel culture is NOT the reaction you get when you cheer on the attempt to cancel someone in the most permanent way possible: by assassination.
The left polices social boundaries so much harder than the right. The left demands observation of all of their orthodoxies on pain of loss of property, livelihood, and even freedom.
What examples of right wing cancel culture even are there? Product boycotts? Wrongly-labeled book bans? The occasional pushback against a would-be canceller?
I researched for this thread. Conservative parents voicing objections to curriculum at school board meetings are called right-wing cancel culture.

Two of the most frequently cited examples of right-wing cancel culture are McCarthyism and Jim Crow, I kid you not!
I’m sure with a little more digging, I could find an example of right-wing cancel culture that arrives on par with the left’s enforcement of their hegemony.
But in light of what’s going on right now, calling out—and yes, even reporting them to their employers—those who praise attempted murder and lament that he wasn’t successful isn’t cancel culture. It’s a healthy social impulse trying to reassert itself.
If you made it this far, and want to keep going, every post of this thread makes a solid point. Fully endorsed:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Todd of Mischief

Todd of Mischief Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AndToddsaid

Jul 18, 2025
🧵Everyone’s talking about the alleged Trump birthday letter to Epstein. But before we accept its existence as proof of anything, let’s consider how easily such a document could be fabricated — even in 2003. 🧵

1/ Image
Let’s start with the alleged content. The letter reads like a surrealist dialogue between two Bond villains. It’s abstract, poetic, and weirdly restrained — not remotely how Trump talks or writes.

2/
Lines like “Enigmas never age” and “may every day be another wonderful secret” would make Danielle Steele vomit into her typewriter. Trump’s usual style? Blunt, brash, and allergic to metaphor.

3/ Image
Read 13 tweets
Nov 20, 2024
The amount of attention given to trans and nonbinary homicide would lead one to think that this population faces a level of violence beyond what any other group contends with. However, the very opposite is true. They are, in fact, the most protected in America. Keep reading.

1/
The US Census Bureau finds 2.6% of the population identifies as trans or nonbinary, about 8.7 million people. Compared to The Human Rights Campaign's count of 36 homicides, that is a rate of 0.41 per 100,000, a mere fraction of the national rate of 7.1.
usafacts.org/articles/what-…
If we just compare trans and nonbinary homicide rates to those of regular men and women, we find that the rate for women is almost 8 times higher at 2.7 while the rate for men is a staggering 28 times higher at 11.0!

cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr…
Read 6 tweets
Aug 19, 2024
@Gitabushi Hmm, the post-Katrina Kanye West line "George Bush doesn't care about Black people" needs this context to be properly understood. West at the time was describing a particular kind of care, direct, overt action. You may have noticed, the left talks often about direct action.
@Gitabushi What West meant, and what I suspect is often meant by such sentiments, is that Republicans do not personally attend to certain groups. This may be tinged by an assumption that they do attend to other groups.
@Gitabushi What matters is that the model of care that Republican/conservative/right-side politics promote is not perceived when focusing on the other model. The right-side model is focused on caring about people's equal standing and their ability to act freely.
Read 14 tweets
Feb 22, 2024
.@Gitabushi Here is a perfect example 🧵 of the consequences of the type of education you’ve described where, instead of teaching critical thinking, students are taught to look for the twist.
This has been going on for awhile. I don’t have as clear a recollection of any particular exercise, but I’ve been familiar with this type of ruse since grade school, also.
“Pedagogy” is the word I was looking for! Lefties are always talking about critical pedagogies, by which they mean, assume everything is false. Critical has shifted to cynical.

Cynical pedagogies.
Read 15 tweets
Aug 18, 2023
The "Trump brought this on himself" argument fails because of course anyone who aims to root out official corruption is going to bring corrupt officialdom down on themselves.
It's like the old children's riddle about the two barbers who share a shop. One has a good haircut, the other a bad one. Who do you choose to cut your hair?
Or again, it's like not trusting the doctor because all his patients are sick.
Read 9 tweets
Nov 8, 2022
Guys, heads up. See the logo in the bottom right? IPG. Ever heard of it? Probably not. That’s because 1) they don’t actually advertise to consumers, 2) they are a holding agency that owns ad agencies.
Because IPG is at minimum twice removed from any consumer advertising, it’s a little tough to know which agencies, let alone which brands, they are behind. I know from memory that IPG is behind GM, L'Oreal, and Mondelēz—maybe behind them all.
The reason I point this out is that including the IPG logo amongst the consumer brands they are paid to promote is weird. So weird, I think it’s a clue. Big companies pay agencies to tell them how to market their products.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(