How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
Let’s start with the alleged content. The letter reads like a surrealist dialogue between two Bond villains. It’s abstract, poetic, and weirdly restrained — not remotely how Trump talks or writes.https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1859243572853170552The US Census Bureau finds 2.6% of the population identifies as trans or nonbinary, about 8.7 million people. Compared to The Human Rights Campaign's count of 36 homicides, that is a rate of 0.41 per 100,000, a mere fraction of the national rate of 7.1.
https://twitter.com/memeticsisyphus/status/1760305008044581166This has been going on for awhile. I don’t have as clear a recollection of any particular exercise, but I’ve been familiar with this type of ruse since grade school, also.
https://twitter.com/gitabushi/status/1461401604112928773
Because IPG is at minimum twice removed from any consumer advertising, it’s a little tough to know which agencies, let alone which brands, they are behind. I know from memory that IPG is behind GM, L'Oreal, and Mondelēz—maybe behind them all.
https://twitter.com/AndToddsaid/status/1567505025898889217Really consider the way ideas are stated and, rather than jump to the most likely meaning—which is the best practice in a one-on-one or small group conversation—instead try to think of the least likely thing the same phrase could mean.
https://twitter.com/cbs_herridge/status/1567489453052116994Moreover, the type of “nuclear capabilities” is unstated. The audience is supposed to think weapons, but in an era where energy sources are hotly debated, it could likely be about some nation’s power grid. There’s so much innuendo here, I wonder how a fact could hope to slip in?
To elaborate, both sides of the argument over what occurred in the 2020 presidential election, culminating with the events of January 6, 2021, base their claims in democracy.https://twitter.com/RealPhillyP/status/1512038367285981191@StevenWillcox2 raises a good question.
https://twitter.com/StevenWillcox2/status/1512089325323763716?s=20&t=vq3RV9lEmJA9Fdd-T5ROiw
https://twitter.com/robbysoave/status/1511359304238051329In response to Robby's singular objection, it's a principle of statutory interpretation that when a term is not otherwise defined therein, it's to be read by the ordinary meaning. Naturally, ordinary meanings can be vague, but it's here that Robby needs to offer an example.
https://twitter.com/DavidAFrench/status/1511091758347792385David puts the charitable reader in the awkward position of having to decide whether he is disingenuous or just dumb. Of course a Parental Rights in Education addresses more than young children! This thing has been on the radar for months! /2
https://twitter.com/DavidAFrench/status/1511091760403038209?s=20&t=yjTe38UqUqG8MaaP0b5X6Q
Because I'm a mischievous jerk, I like to often leave it at that. But I do have a solid idea what whiteness and blackness in woke parlance actually have to do with. I promise, I'll get back to the nifty meme. Away we go.
Quickly, I'd point out that "misleading" is not wrong, per se. So Twitter implies that preferring "gene therapy" to "vaccine" insinuates the thing identified does not do what it is meant to. This connotation is not removed, and is only deepened, by insisting on the disputed term.