AOC thinks that pundits, pollsters & columnists are underestimating the legal challenges Republicans could mount to the presence of another candidate on the ballot in key swing states including but not limited to Ohio.
She says lawyers specialised in elections—those meeting with Congress Democrats like her—cannot game out how defending against those might look.
Michigan’s ballot deadline is just 2 days after the Dem convention, for ex: one of many reasons AOC thinks an open convention is nuts.
2. Time
Even at breakneck pace, she suggests, Democrats might not be able to get a new nominee and ensure they have the time it takes to get on all ballots, garner key endorsements, etc.
And certainly not if there’s an open convention.
Getting union endorsements takes weeks, for example, she says. And early ballots start going out in September. “This election is not in November,” she says. “It’s in September.”
“This is not 2023,” she states. We can’t let decisions be made by “groupthink, momentum, inertia.”
3. Replacement efforts, AOC argues, are primarily donor driven not voter driven—especially insofar as they’re motivating her colleagues in Congress
“What I’m hearing from my colleagues is ‘my donors this, my donors that,’ not ‘my voters this my voters that.’”
“I’m not here to dismiss everyday people who have this opinion,” she says [i.e. that Joe needs to go]. But “the mechanisms by which this decision is being made are concerning me.”
She portrays replacement efforts as the work of elites who have not gamed out a clear alternative.
4. Donors & elites driving “Joe must go” are not united behind Harris, AOC argues.
“The people in these rooms,” she says, “don’t have a plan.” Many are critical of Harris, or engaging in wishful thinking about other candidates & impracticable notions of an open convention.
5. There is “no safe [alternative] option”
AOC says polling points to no clear candidate who would necessarily beat Trump, and that no alternative process avoids those other pitfalls.
“I have not seen an alternative scenario that doesn’t set us up for enormous peril,” she says.
6. Biden has outperformed electoral expectations w/ key demographics
He’s done well historically w/ “marginalised” demographics (I think she meant Black voters).
She also says that Biden does well with older people who aren’t on social media & are hard for Democrats to win.
AOC added that Biden has “strong, broad union support” & that his union support does not automatically transfer over to another candidate.
The union endorsement processes “takes WEEKS,” she says, if you’re going at a breakneck pace.” Which gets back to the time challenge.
7. Polling is often wrong & July polls shouldn’t dictate this decision
AOC says she doesn’t put huge stock in polls. She cites two examples (her first race & most recent primary race) where polls, inc her own, had her down but she won handily.
This seemed to contradict point #5
So those were her 7 main points, as I heard them. Personally, I think Biden should hand the reins to Harris ASAP & in a manner that avoids open convention.
AOC seems to be down with Biden or Harris topping the ticket, but thinks full ticket erasure & open convention are lunacy.
Throughout the hour, AOC acknowledged that people on all sides of this debate are here because of fear about what a Trump presidency might mean.
But she said that it’s important to add more dimensions to this discussion so people go in “with their eyes wide open.”
AOC reserves her greatest anger for elected Democrat colleagues who are:
1) knocking Biden off the record in leaks to the press (she blames them not the press btw), and
2) saying that Democrats are going to lose in November (she says they should stop warming their seats)
“My community doesn’t have the luxury of saying we’re gonna lose—in July!” she says, clearly exasperated with this crowd. “They’re the first ones deported.”
She emphasises avoiding defeatism and being clear-eyed, even when the choices are hard.
AOC also reminds us of her electoral pragmatism, a trait that’s annoyed more ideological supporters inc those farther to the left.
“We need to make decisions in the conditions we have before us,” she says, “even if they’re ugly, even if they’re hard.”
“We don’t get to run away”
At no point does AOC argue Biden is not missing a step cognitively, or say he’s fully capable of conducting presidential duties at all hours.
Though she does say he performs better in front of crowds, who jazz him up, than in debates or interviews with just moderators present.
She ends by suggesting she’s fine with Biden or Harris but that an open convention is madness.
“As a person responsible for coming to a decision, I haven’t seen what I need to see to substantiate an alternative,” she says, indicating she’s most comfortable with Biden.
I summarised & shared this not bc it is my personal view—I am very concerned by Biden topping the ticket, wish he’d bowed out sooner, think he’s been blinded by ego & poor advice, and wish he’d exit stage left for Harris—but bc I think AOC raises points we must deal with.
This is a huge decision and it’s happening in an extremely non-ideal way. Whatever goes down this coming month, I believe Biden & his inner circle did a huge disservice by waiting this long.
It’s a Catch-22 w/ serious risks all around. AOC is right that it’s not 2023, sadly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Helpful explainer on DSA’s decision to yank endorsement of its star politician, @AOC. The move contradicted most members’ wishes & political common sense.
It had “less to do with Ocasio-Cortez’s actions than with the byzantine factional politics of DSA’s national leadership.”
For AOC to win back DSA’s endorsement, she’d have to fulfil the following conditions.
This decision will, I predict, have a self-marginalising effect on DSA, since few politicians could meet these maximalist conditions & have a prayer of getting elected anywhere in the US.
As Peter’s piece explains, national @DemSocialists’s board is split between explicitly Marxist hard left members, who prevailed here, and a softer left (DSA’s right, but to the left of the Democratic Party), who were overridden.
It says there are reasonable grounds to believe that Hamas leaders bear criminal responsibility for extermination, rape, sexual violence, torture & other war crimes & crimes against humanity.
Here are the ICC's arrest warrant charges against Netanyahu & Gallant.
Contentious charges like genocide are not on this list. Instead, the ICC opted for rock-solid charges w/ clear evidence, eg: Netanyahu & Gallant have used starvation of civilians as a method of war:
Many on both "sides" will spin this.
But ICC's charges should discomfort partisans & hearten supporters of internatnl law.
Both Hamas & Israel's leaders are being called to the carpet for crimes inc hostage taking, sexual violence, willful starvation of civilians & more.
Unbelievable, but true. Tunisian social media networks are abuzz today w/ the absurd idea that Zuckerberg not only gives a fig about Tunisia, but is part of some Western plot to destabilise it.
The truth is different, ofc, but just as grim & deserves book-length studies: 🧵
The weakness of Tunisian Arabic content moderation on platforms like Facebook—a phenomenon more tied to neglectful resource allocation in small language markets (w/ parallels in Myanmar, for ex)—plus Saied’s xenophobic conspiracies, metastasised into a storm of hateful content.
Since Saied’s presidential coup ended Tunisia’s decade-long democratic experiment in 2021, organic & possibly inorganic pro-Saied social media minions—Facebook brownshirts, I call them—have doxxed Saied’s critics, stimes inciting physical violence against them or their property.
Tunisia has, like many societies, long struggled w/ anti-Black racism as the scholar @HudaMzioudet documents.
But following President Saied’s Feb. 2023 “great replacement” speech, Tunisia rapidly morphed into the most violently anti-Black environment I’ve ever experienced 🧵
Within weeks of Saied’s speech, pogroms against Black migrants & refugees—sometimes implicating the security forces themselves—resulted in stabbings, rapes, evictions & chasing people from their homes at knife-point and more abuses. Even Black Tunisian citizens were targeted.
Taxis often refused to take Black people.
The state began rounding up Black migrants & refugees, busing them to Saharan desert borders w Algeria & Libya, then dumping them there—inc babies—w/o food or water.
Tunisians who tried to help, even by offering water, were criminalised
Sickened by Europe’s descent into fascism, the Austrian Jewish author Stefan Zweig & his wife Charlotte committed suicide in 1942. They were found, having escaped to Brazil, overdosed on barbiturates, holding hands.
His memoir, The World of Yesterday, describes what was lost. 🧵
This quote reminds me of what some friends in the Arab Spring, & in Tunisia in particular, have suffered. The tumultuous ups & downs, and the gaping sense of all that was lost:
“Before [the two great] wars I saw individual freedom at its zenith, and then I saw liberty at its lowest point in hundreds of years. I have been acclaimed and despised, free and not free, rich and poor.
Democratic enfranchisement of Turkey’s Kurdish citizens, like that of Palestinians, requires the dominant powers—the Turkish & Israeli states, respectively—to reconcile themselves w/ reality that Kurds & Palestinians may vote for candidates they consider terrorist sympathisers 🧵
In the eastern Kurdish-majority city of Van, Turkey’s local elections produced a winning candidate—Abdullah Zeydan—who was imprisoned after attending the funeral of a YPG fighter. Ankara sees YPG as part of the PKK, which has used terrorism in Turkey. rudaw.net/english/middle…
@hrw criticised Ankara’s use of terrorism charges to repress the pro-Kurdish party, HDP, whose leader, Selahattin Demirtas, remains jailed.