On both sides the battle ends up looking like a political objective made military neccesity.
For Ukraine, the initial river crossing didn't create the kind of a unified bridgehead that was needed for follow on operations.
2/
Ukraine attempted to gain a foothold near Pischanivka, Pidstepne, Kozachi Laheri and Krynky. Had they succeeded in all places, the bridgehead may have been wide enough to create an actual threat to Russia.
However, all other crossings were defeated except the one in Krynky.
3/
For chances of any larger success Ukraine should've timed the assault to coincide with the fighting in Robotyne. They didn't.
Ukrainian officials gave out of context comments about 3-8 kilometer deep buffer zone on the Dnipro, and having made it 70% of the way to Crimea.
4/
In reality, the Ukrainian marines were stuck scraping defensive positions in marshy ground around the village of Krynky. The bridgehead was, at best, a few kilometers wide and 500 meters deep.
Resupplying the area was extremely hard.
5/
With the possibility of success exhausted, and the failure of the summer offensive, maintaining the bridgehead became a political goal.
Unable to admit failure, and needing propaganda victories, Ukraine, once again, turned to spending lives rather than giving up land.
6/
The outspoken goal was now to tie up and destroy Russian forces.
The Russians gleefully obliged, as always. Destroying the bridgehead rather than containing it, became, in turn, a political objective for the Russians.
Krynky turned into a grueling battle of attrition.
7/
Russians threw men and material at the bridgehead with no consideration for their survival. In just over 4 months of fighting the Russians lost over 200 pieces of heavy equipment.
There is no solid data on the total Russian lives lost, but it must've been immense.
8/
Despite the ceaseless attacks and hundreds of bombs dropped on the village the Russians are unable to make headway. Ukrainian artillery and FPV fire is murderous.
It takes the Russians 9 months to push the Ukrainians out of the bridgehead.
9/
Ukrainian soldiers call Krynky "hell" and "purgatory". Crossing the river under constant Russian surveillance and artillery fire is openly called "suicidal" from the first months of the operation onwards.
The soldiers themselves question the rationale of the battle.
10/
The Ukrainians lose over a 1000 men dead and missing, most of the missing presumably left behind in Krynky or drowned in the Dnipro during the precarious crossings.
It's likely that the ratio of KIA to WIA is significantly worse in Krynky than anywhere else on the frontline
10/
In the end neither side achieves much in Krynky.
For the Ukrainians, the reports coming from Krynky, and the disbelief of analysts, quickly overshadow any propaganda purpose the battle might've had.
It doesn't stop Russia from launching an offensive in Avdiivka either.
11/
For Russia, the immense lossess of manpower and equipment for no gain are humiliating. Despite being able to conduct offensives in Avdiivka, the troops used to attack Krynky are away from more important directions.
12/
Now the battle is over.
DeepState says the last Ukrainian positions were overrun on the 17th of June.
Ukraine has lost what it gained in the fall of 2023. The Marines have moved to Kharkiv.
Russia has reduced the bridgehead on the Dnipro and can move troops elsewhere.
13/
The officials of both sides seem to be content on letting the end of the battle fly under the radar.
The Ukrainians stayed silent about the loss of Krynky for almost a month, while the Russians likely don't want to announce the "liberation" of Krynky for a third time.
14/
To me the decision to fight Krynky will go on to the list with Severodonetsk and Bakhmut.
It was a operation with no hope of success from the get go that Ukraine did not need to fight, especially when it was suffering from a manpower and ammunition deficit.
15/
Both Ukraine and Russia expend immense resources they can ill-afford to lose to achieve diminutive goals.
In the end all that remains in Krynky are the cratered ruins of a tiny fishing village. Once the smoke clears, neither side can truly claim victory.
16/16
17/16
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Writing about the frontline situation and changes in Ukraine is hard, because I feel there has been very little new to say for a long while.
The same patterns repeat.
The Russians creep forwards at varying rates, the Ukrainians suffer from manpower issues.
Sometimes a flank gets weakened enough that the Russians form a pocket or threathen a city.
Ukrainians use up resources to withdraw from an area they should've left a while ago.
The Russians won't create larger operational success.
Ukrainian counterattacks remain tactical.
The situation looks largely stable from Western capitals, but in actuality it slowly worsens for Ukraine. It's just at such a rate that it doesn't raise red flags.
The Russian rate of advance slowly rises, more gaps appear in Ukrainian lines...
Over the past 10 days, a Russian offensive pushed Ukrainian forces out of the Kursk salient, ending a 7-month operation.
What happened? Why did Ukraine withdraw? What’s next? 🧵
You can read a longer version on our Substack
1/
In August a Ukrainian offensive captured over 1200 km² of Russia's Kursk oblast.
The claimed goals were to draw Russian forces from Pokrovsk, capture leverage for negotiations and spoil a Russian operation from Sumy. It was likely also meant to shift the discourse.
2/
However, the Ukrainians failed to expand & secure their flanks and over the next 6 months the Ukrainian perimeter in Kursk diminished steadily. By the beginning of March the Ukrainians only held a bit over 300 km² of terrain in a narrow salient around the town of Sudzha.
I think there is some flawed logic here. In general the article fail to compare and contrast the Ukrainians and the Russians on similar grounds.
To an outside observer it feels like picking and choosing talking points instead of a completely honest assessment of the situation.
For example, the authors engage with assessments of Russian casualty numbers, yet fail to mention how Ukrainian officials have multiple times now published UA casualty numbers that indicate, at best, a 1:2 overall casualty ratio.
Current ratios may, naturally, differ from that.
It also ignores the enduring Ukrainian manpower issue that Ukraine has seemingly been unable to solve, while Russian recruitment is, according to Ukrainian intelligence, able to replace the casualties it's taking in Ukraine.
One needs to consider that when talking of attrition.
After breaching Selydove and Hirnyk early in the week, the Russians started offensive operations in the Vuhledar direction on Friday..
Due to these developments the situation on the South Donetsk frontline has turned very difficult.
Dark red = 20. OCT
1/
Vuhledar front:
On Friday the Russians began large scale attacks towards Shakhtarske and Bohoiavienka.
They gained ground quickly, advancing almost 7km towards Shakhtarske.
These attacks were supported by large scale artillery and air bombardments.
2/
In Bohoiavienka the Russians had managed to advance within 3km of the town before Friday.
Although the initial attacks may have been repelled, video footage from Bohovienka and reports from Shakhtarske indicate that Russians have a strong foothold in both villages.
After a few weeks of (relatively) lower intensity actions, the Russians have resumed offensive operations in the Selydove-Hirnyk area, south of Pokrovsk.
In the past few days, we've seen the Russians make tactical gains throughout the AO.
Selydove direction, a thread.
1/
As said, after an operational pause and transfer of reinforcements, the Russians have restarted offensive operations.
They are taking advantage of Ukrainian lack of manpower and using infiltration tactics, sending small infantry units through gaps in the Ukrainian line.
2/
The Russian advance here has been relatively rapid, over the past three days. Pictured is the confirmed change since monday.
According to unconfirmed reports, the Russians may control much of the grey area.
Confirmed advance is up to 2,6 kilometers, but likely further.