๐งต The #UKCovidInquiry's first report on ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ has been published.
While it addresses many critical areas, it missed significant issues faced by Clinically Vulnerable (CV) families. Hereโs what you need to know...
1/ #CVAwareness
The reportโs focus on general preparedness overlooked the specific needs and challenges of CV people.
Our community faced unique risks and often felt abandoned in the early stages of the pandemic. Our exclusion from *this module* (M1) of the inquiry was a glaring oversight. 2/
Key areas missed include:
๐ The lack of tailored guidance for CV families
๐ท Insufficient availability of appropriate PPE for home use
๐ซ Inadequate mental health support
CV households had to navigate the crisis alone, compounding their stress and isolation.
3/ #CVAwareness
The report also failed to address the systemic issues in healthcare access for CV people.
๐ฅ Delayed treatments / limited availability of in-person consultations put these vulnerable people at greater risk.
We are in the upcoming Healthcare module (M3).
4/ #CVAwareness
๐ฉโ๐ซ Education was another key area. CV children and those in CV households faced challenges without remote learning / safe schools. The lack of appropriate protective policies disrupted their education significantly.
We hope to have the opportunity to assist the Inquiry in M8. 5/
๐ท Economic support mechanisms often did not account for the additional costs borne by CV families, such as home delivery charges and increased utility bills due to shielding or informal shielding.
Financial assistance was vital but insufficiently targeted.
6/ #CVAwareness
For future preparedness, itโs vital that the voices of CV people are heard. Our experiences offer valuable insights into creating a more inclusive and effective response framework.
7/ #CVAwareness
The inquiry must broaden its scope to consider the impact on CV communities in upcoming modules. Ignoring their plight risks repeating the same mistakes in future health crises.
We are still *not* identified in their Equalities and Human Rights statement:
8/ #CVAwareness
We have raised concerns to the that we are missing from this statement for a considerable length of time now. Perhaps almost 18 months?
Equity can only be achieved if we recognise that people have different needs and circumstances. #CVAwareness !
๐ Calling all UK COโ monitor owners
AND any helpful UK voters
PLEASE REPOST โป๏ธ โค๏ธ and tag others!
๐ Can you *please* help us at the local elections next Thursday?
- Even if you don't own one, we still need your help!
1/๐งต
<Read our new article - next post>
Last year, your evidence helped us change the Electoral Commission guidance for assisting Clinically Vulnerable voters - which has improved safety for everyone.
This year, we NEED YOUR HELP - to audit whether the guidance has worked. ๐
The UK has not shared data from 2025. But for CV people it is much worse:
2024 JCVI data showed that vaccines reduced hospitalisations for Clinically Vulnerable people by 45%.
They published it!
...then removed millions with health conditions from eligibility!
2/
45% may sound lower.
But if your baseline is 2-12x more likely to be hospitalised from Covid, a 45% reduction in risk prevents 2-12x more hospitalisations per dose.
The JCVI removed high-risk groups on cost-effectiveness grounds.
But the cost-effectiveness case is stronger!
3/
The government just published its Pandemic Preparedness Strategy.
TLDR: Some welcome commitments inc. on ventilation. But Clinically Vulnerable people are still not clearly defined or automatically protected, and the prioritisation framework won't arrive until 2027.
1/๐งต
What's new?
Published 25 March 2026, this is the UK's first major pandemic strategy since Covid.
It covers all 4 nations, sets out 12 principles and detailed action plans to 2030, backed by around ยฃ1 billion of investment.
But what about the detail...?
2/
They know another pandemic is coming... and epidemics are also a risk.
The question is:
Will Clinically Vulnerable families be protected when it does?
- This document raises the question more than it answers it.
โ ๏ธEast Kent Trust failed to report their first case for 2 daysโ ๏ธ
Here's what you need to know.
TLDR: Peaked 13th March. No new cases since - with reporting delays, but that's even better news than it sounds.
1/๐งต ๐ @laurabundock @SkyNews
THE OUTBREAK IS DECLINING but understates how well that's going. ๐
The earliest case became unwell on 9th March, with the latest on 16th March, and the peak was 13th March.
2/
Cases take time to be confirmed and reported.
The fact that nothing new has surfaced in the data as of 23rd March - despite the reporting lag - means the real-world situation is almost certainly better than the numbers show.
Meningitis
* Important thread for those who prefer balanced and factual information *
In order to understand risk we need to break down a few things....
๐ฆ Risk from the bacteria
๐๐๐ Individual risk
๐ Environmental risks 1/
The Kent outbreak is predominantly MenB (Group B). This is a serious infection - and potentially an adapted strain - investigations are ongoing...
Bacterial meningitis is rare but more severe than viral, and up to 1 in 10 cases of bacterial meningitis in the UK is fatal.
2/
MenB isn't new. There are around 300 cases of MenB per year in the UK, even with vaccination programmes.
What's unusual is the cluster - multiple cases linked to a single location in a short window. It has now spread to a student at a second university in Canterbury, Kent. 3/
UK COVID INQUIRY - CVF๐๐๐
@AdamWagner1 Closing Submissions
The Covid Inquiry has good ventilation protocols (as advised by CVF at the start of the Inquiry) including HEPA filters.
Under 1000ppm is therefore the safe threshold ( but without it would be under 800ppm).
1/
We need to understand airborne transmission in order to make all indoor environments safer for everyone, and especially for Clinically Vulnerable people.
2/
The need for Clinically Vulnerable people to have: