The most difficult area on the front for the Ukrainian Armed Forces in recent weeks has been the section northwest of Avdiivka, a suburb of Donetsk captured by the Russians in February. The Russian army is currently advancing on Pokrovsk and storming Toretsk. However,
1/19
in reality, the Russians are simply advancing on all sections of the front and advancing where they can push through the Ukrainian Armed Forces' defenses, military experts explain. After taking Avdiivka, the Russian army continued to slowly advance west and northwest,
2/19
capturing several villages. An important event was the capture of the village of Ocheretyne, where Ukrainian positions were left unprotected when units were replaced. The front did not collapse, but in three months the Russians have expanded their bridgehead, occupying
3/19
several villages around it. Further south, the Russians' successes are not as noticeable, but there is also progress. The Ukrainian General Staff notes that the Russians have concentrated significant forces in the Pokrovsk direction. According to a fighter of the Aidar
4/19
In addition, in June, Russian troops began an assault on Toretsk, located to the east of Ocheretyne, and advanced several kilometers. Here, the relative success of the Russians is due to the fact that the Ukrainian units were primarily afraid of attacks from the flanks -
5/19
from the north and south of the city, writes Ukrainian military analyst Konstantin Mashovets. However, the Russians did not achieve success on the flanks and began to storm Toretsk head-on - from the east, which came as a surprise to the Ukrainian commanders. Judging by
6/19
the reports of the General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Russian troops are attacking near Toretsk no less intensively than in the Pokrovsk direction. Further advance in the area of the Ocheretyne breakthrough, as has already been said, will allow cutting off
7/19
the supply line of the Ukrainian troops. And the capture of Toretsk will complicate the situation of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Konstantinovka and Chasiv Yar. Russia is exerting pressure in several directions, probably to introduce strategic reserves where the transition
8/19
of tactical successes into operational ones is expected. However, the Russian army used large reserves for the Kharkiv front, and they are exhausted, apparently. The lack of large reserves is also indicated by the fact that most new contract soldiers are at the front
9/19
in record time. The successes of the Russian army in the last few months have become possible for three main reasons: the Russians have more artillery shells, they use powerful glide aerial bombs with the range extension kit UMPK in large quantities, commanders are ready
10/19
to send fighters to assault, regardless of large losses. However, the Russians' superiority in the amount of ammunition and manpower is gradually fading. According to Michael Kofman, in the Kharkiv region, the opponents are conducting artillery fire with the same intensity,
11/19
in other parts of the front the advantage of the Russians in shells does not exceed the ratio of 5:1 and is decreasing. Retired US Navy Colonel Mark Kansian already sees signs of stabilization of the front. John Kennedy from RAND believes that the main task of the Ukrainian
12/19
Armed Forces is to prevent significant breakthroughs by the enemy until the fall. By that time, the Ukrainian units will be replenished with trained recruits, and the weather conditions will make it difficult for the Russian army to attack. The bombing of Ukrainian
13/19
positions with aerial bombs remains an unresolved problem. Ukraine lacks modern air defense systems to counter Russian aircraft. However, the main thing is that Ukraine really surpasses Russia in terms of using drones and related technologies. Russia also has mass
14/19
production and produces a huge number of drones, but Ukraine has relied on these technologies and this helps the Ukrainian soldiers level the situation at the front, having many times fewer resources. However, it must be understood that in a war of attrition, which this
15/19
conflict has taken, taking one or two new settlements, especially after they are completely destroyed by FABs, does not affect the outcome of the conflict. The resources spent on this do. And Ukraine understands well the goal of many Russian attacks - to capture a city so
16/19
that there is something to report to the authorities. Ukraine is trying to destroy Russia's logistics and resources. Often allowing the Russians to enter the city, but then cutting them off from drone supplies. Another big news story of the past week was the abandonment
17/19
of Krynki. Experts argue about the feasibility of the entire operation and losses, but the Russians lost a huge amount of equipment and soldiers near Krynky. They were also forced to send more resources to the Kherson direction, unable to transfer them to the north.
18/19
Bloomberg reported, citing sources, that Greece and Malta have become the main obstacles to an EU proposal to replace the price cap on Russian oil with a ban on services necessary for transporting fuel. According to the agency’s interlocutors, the two southern European
🧵
countries raised concerns about this step at a meeting of EU ambassadors on Monday, where the latest sanctions package against Russia was presented. They warned that such a shift could affect Europe’s shipping industry and energy prices. Both countries also requested
clarifications regarding proposals to impose sanctions on foreign ports handling Russian oil and to strengthen oversight of ship sellers in order to reduce the number of vessels entering Moscow’s fleet. A representative of the Greek government declined to comment.
The most unpleasant forecasts regarding the Russian economy are beginning to materialize. What analysts cautiously spoke about a year ago is now being discussed openly even by the most pro-government Russian economists: the safety margin is rapidly shrinking. While Putin talks
🧵
about “stability” and “growth,” the reality looks far more prosaic: a country that unleashed a war of aggression against Ukraine is methodically burning through its own financial system. According to estimates by Germany’s BND intelligence service, Russia’s real military spending
reaches around 10% of GDP and nearly half of the federal budget. In fact, actual expenditures are 66% higher than officially declared, due to hidden budget lines, Defense Ministry construction projects, military IT infrastructure, and social payments to servicemen. In simple
According to BND estimates, last year Russia’s military spending may have amounted to almost half of the state budget and around 10% of the country’s GDP. According to the German intelligence service, Russia is spending significantly more on the war and its armed forces
🧵
than it has declared in recent years. Since the start of the war against Ukraine in February 2022, Russia’s defense budget has increased sharply every year. In addition, Russia’s interpretation of “defense spending” differs significantly from the NATO definition, German
intelligence officials note. A comprehensive analysis of budget data conducted by BND shows that Russia’s defense budget in recent years was 66% higher than officially reported. Unaccounted expenditures include, for example, construction projects of the Ministry of Defense,
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky explained why he sharply criticized Europe at the World Economic Forum in Davos. He made these remarks during a meeting with journalists in Kyiv, according to a correspondent from European Pravda. Zelensky said he had grounds for critical
🧵
statements toward Europe after a lack of funding led to a shortage of air defense missiles, allowing Russia to strike Kyiv’s energy infrastructure. Zelensky did not deny that his speech may have sounded overly harsh from European capitals and explained this by saying that
Ukraine and the rest of Europe live in different information spaces. He also acknowledged that the differences are not only informational but also emotional in how events are perceived. The president explained that his Davos speech was preceded by heavy strikes on energy
Putin is losing the game he himself started. His bet was placed on a return to the world of the 19th and early 20th centuries - a world of empires and spheres of influence, where Europe, America, Africa, and Asia are divided among several “superpowers.” In Putin’s vision of
1/19
the world, there were supposed to be three such powers: the United States, Russia, and China. However, the real transformation of the global order is unfolding in a completely different way. The key failure is Ukraine. At the end of the fourth year of war, Russia has still
2/19
been unable to subjugate it. The army is visibly degrading, human and technological resources are being exhausted, the economy is held together by military spending and gray schemes, and the state increasingly resembles an overextended empire losing its ability to govern
3/19
Within NATO, the possibility of conducting a special joint mission in Greenland is being considered in order to accommodate the interests of US President Donald Trump. This week, the US president once again stated that he wants Greenland. Military intervention is not being 1/8
ruled out. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen previously said that this would mean the end of the Alliance if the United States were to begin military action against her country. On Thursday morning, the 32 ambassadors of the Alliance gathered for their weekly meeting. 2/8
It took place in a "calm atmosphere." Denmark raised the Greenland issue in a "positive and forward-looking manner," NOS insiders reported. The US ambassador to NATO, Whitaker, also reportedly spoke in a conciliatory tone. As became clear during the meeting, almost all 3/8