Let’s examine how much of a joke Merriam Webster has become. Remember when a respectable dictionary wouldn’t dream of using a circular definition?
Well let’s look at these definitions. Female. “Having a gender identity the opposite of male.” 1/
So what is male? Why it’s having a gender identity that is the opposite of female, silly.
So the word male means having a gender identity which is the opposite of female which is the opposite of male which is the opposite of female ….
But wait. There is more. 2/
A gender identity is a person’s internal sense of being male (which is the opposite of female which is the oppose of male which is the opposite of female…), female (which is the opposite of male which is the opposite of female…), or some combination or neither. 3/
Now they haven’t defined what neither male or female is defined as, and I think we can all thank our lucky stars for that. Because we are already on one never ending feedback loop and one is quite enough. 4/
A girl is defined as a person whose gender identity is female. (Which remember means a gender identity that is not male.) 5/
But they did change the definition of woman back to an adult female person so they can pretend that they aren’t pushing the gender nonsense. (Except they snuck it in with the definition of female now.)
6/
Sex and gender are different. Except when they aren’t. Because one means the other but neither means anything?
This is what gender ideology does to you. It makes you look utterly ridiculous.
But wait. There is one more. 7/
Under the definition of s*x they explain it means males and females. They further explain that there is a clear delineation between sex and gender.
Which they seem to have forgotten when they defined the terms male and female. 8/
Imagine making yourself look like THIS bad.
The thing is. I don’t think they know how to think any more. They don’t know why a circular definition is bad. They don’t know they have contradicted themselves. Nor do they know what a female or male is.
9/
This ideology warps the ability to think. They must take such ridiculous stances that they paint themselves into a corner of garbled nonsense. Because none of it makes any sense. When you look closely, these gender ideology words mean nothing. Literally. 10/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You’ve heard how people say terrible things about JK Rowling and what an awful person she is? It stems from the fact that she calls a man a man. That’s it. That is the crime of the century.
Seriously. They demand she pretend men are women and she won’t. 1/
I can’t stress enough. That’s what all the hullabaloo is over. They say that she is denying a man’s humanity by calling him a man. That’s IT.
This is upside down and inside out.
She couldn’t be humanizing him more by recognizing his actual humanity. 2/
Don’t be fooled by any of this. Of course there is nothing wrong with recognizing an adult male human being as an adult male human being. Of course it’s not denying his humanity. It’s silly to say otherwise. So why do they do it? Why say such a ridiculous thing? 3/
The man on the right and two others are suing England Hockey bc they dared to say women’s hockey is for females. They created an open category for him. But that isn’t his cup of tea.
He also says 1/
Yes, he does use the changing room with all the women. Since no one has said anything to him he assumes that means that all the women are fine with it. 2/
He will punish England Hockey
for daring to have a female only category. The punishment is the legal process. He is trying to raise £100,000 for the legal costs. How can clubs survive vexatious lawsuits like these? 3/
I’m speechless here. Not only did John Oliver belittle Payton McNabb for getting hurt by a male volleyball player but here he calls her vile names for calling out a man in the ladies room!
What???????
1/
He has the audacity to say the man crossing women’s boundaries isn’t doing anything?!!!!
When did it become to perfectly ok to violate women’s privacy?
It’s like we are in anti Me Too world. 2/
He focuses the whole world on this young lady and calls her nasty. That’s low.
What is going on??????
Of all people to go after!! He goes after the girl who was seriously injured bc they let a boy play against her!!!
She is still dealing with the effects of that hit.
You know Payton McNabb. She is the young lady who was bashed so hard with a volleyball hit by a male player that she got seriously hurt.
Here is John Oliver going after her. She’s a young girl and John Oliver is attacking her! 1/
Seriously, can we all stop and appreciate the situation here. John Oliver is minimizing what happened to her. He can’t address the issue that having men in women’s sports is dangerous, so he belittles a young girl, a teenager at the time, who was seriously injured by a boy. 2/
She did nothing but GET HURT and has to shame her on his show.
This is so low, folks. So down and dirty. He is putting her in danger to push an ideology that is indefensible on its own terms. 3/
For some reason the left’s hill seems to be getting men into women’s sports. And denying it’s happening.
I have no idea why they want to do the former, but they want to do the latter bc it’s so unpopular. Or shall I say enraging?
Enter John Oliver. 1/
The UN has put out a statement saying there are hundreds of men in women’s sports. If you’ve been paying the slightest bit of attention, you know. You see it every week. Another guy somewhere has taken a place from women in sports. Just this week we saw three. 2/
So what is a political group to do that is pushing something that NO ONE wants? They have to deny it. And hard!
They try to say it’s not happening by forcing sports groups into NOT keeping records. If no one keeps track, it isn’t happening, right? 3/
A very activist Montana judge has temporarily blocked a bill (HB 121) that was signed into law protecting women’s privacy in bathrooms.
The reasoning is spectacular. Just wait for this:
1/
The judge found there is no evidence that it protects women’s privacy to keep men out of women’s bathrooms!
Um….excuse me. What does this judge think women want privacy from? 2/
This is a bit technical legally but the court finds that TG status is a suspect class which gets special protection. Why? Bc equal treatment on the basis of s*x is a fundamental right.
But genderism isn’t ON the basis of s*x at all!!!!! Talk about mixing up concepts. 3/