Let’s examine how much of a joke Merriam Webster has become. Remember when a respectable dictionary wouldn’t dream of using a circular definition?
Well let’s look at these definitions. Female. “Having a gender identity the opposite of male.” 1/
So what is male? Why it’s having a gender identity that is the opposite of female, silly.
So the word male means having a gender identity which is the opposite of female which is the opposite of male which is the opposite of female ….
But wait. There is more. 2/
A gender identity is a person’s internal sense of being male (which is the opposite of female which is the oppose of male which is the opposite of female…), female (which is the opposite of male which is the opposite of female…), or some combination or neither. 3/
Now they haven’t defined what neither male or female is defined as, and I think we can all thank our lucky stars for that. Because we are already on one never ending feedback loop and one is quite enough. 4/
A girl is defined as a person whose gender identity is female. (Which remember means a gender identity that is not male.) 5/
But they did change the definition of woman back to an adult female person so they can pretend that they aren’t pushing the gender nonsense. (Except they snuck it in with the definition of female now.)
6/
Sex and gender are different. Except when they aren’t. Because one means the other but neither means anything?
This is what gender ideology does to you. It makes you look utterly ridiculous.
But wait. There is one more. 7/
Under the definition of s*x they explain it means males and females. They further explain that there is a clear delineation between sex and gender.
Which they seem to have forgotten when they defined the terms male and female. 8/
Imagine making yourself look like THIS bad.
The thing is. I don’t think they know how to think any more. They don’t know why a circular definition is bad. They don’t know they have contradicted themselves. Nor do they know what a female or male is.
9/
This ideology warps the ability to think. They must take such ridiculous stances that they paint themselves into a corner of garbled nonsense. Because none of it makes any sense. When you look closely, these gender ideology words mean nothing. Literally. 10/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Keith Olberman, a 65 year old man, has been sending stunning to Riley Gaines. This isn’t normal X banter. This is wrong. This is targeted. The makeup and sheer amount of these messages is shocking.
Thread. 1/
Calling her a future bad parent? Dude. Come on. 2/
Why would an elderly man who is possibly in Depends by this point, stalk this young swimmer? She isn’t into you, guy. 3/
In a story almost too shocking to be believed a report condemns a rap* crisis center for damaging victims of rap*!
The center is run by a man who claims to be a woman and who told women to “reframe their trauma” and accept men as being women.
1/
An independent review found the center failed to provide survivors with women only spaces.
The review was heavily critical of chief exec Mridul Wadhwa, who self identifies as a woman but does not have a gender recognition certificate and is legally and actually a man. 2/
The scathing report found him domineering and “did not understand the limits on [his] role’s authority” and it said Wadhwa “failed to set professional standards of behaviour” within the organisation.
3/
The 51 year old father of two, who does not need a guide to race unlike other competitors, says that it is irrelevant that he uses the ladies private spaces bc he can’t see.
1/
He says he is feels terribly sluggish and slow keeping his testosterone levels at 300-1000% higher than women’s. (He can go to 10 nmol, women are typically in the 1-3 nmol range).
2/
And by the way, women are not low testosterone men. So all of that is irrelevant.
Did you notice any 51 year old grandmothers in the race?
3/
Riley Gaines to lawmakers: “You allowed college women to be traumatizedand violat*d on your campus in this way. Why didn’t you protect us?" 1/
“We did not give our consent to be exploited and exposed to a 6-foot-4 fully nak*d man," she said. "Because you did nothing, that man walked into our women’s locker room at your university and saw me undress down to full nudity.” 2/
A reprise of a thread about language and its importance.
1. How many times does someone says “including others doesn’t hurt you”? We hear it all day long.
They are wrong. They know it. They don’t want you to know it.
Why do women need their own exclusive word?
2. When women are a subset of women they cannot lay claim to anything that was separately a woman’s. In one linguistic sleight of hand, women have lost their individuality that determines who has control of something. Be it sports or prison or their name.
3. Now the woman is just a grumpy member of the group trying to keep something away from other WOMEN.
EVERY reason why we have separate spaces women is instantly wiped out with this trick. We are stunned.
We try to explain. We are sure it’s a misunderstanding.