Let’s examine how much of a joke Merriam Webster has become. Remember when a respectable dictionary wouldn’t dream of using a circular definition?
Well let’s look at these definitions. Female. “Having a gender identity the opposite of male.” 1/
So what is male? Why it’s having a gender identity that is the opposite of female, silly.
So the word male means having a gender identity which is the opposite of female which is the opposite of male which is the opposite of female ….
But wait. There is more. 2/
A gender identity is a person’s internal sense of being male (which is the opposite of female which is the oppose of male which is the opposite of female…), female (which is the opposite of male which is the opposite of female…), or some combination or neither. 3/
Now they haven’t defined what neither male or female is defined as, and I think we can all thank our lucky stars for that. Because we are already on one never ending feedback loop and one is quite enough. 4/
A girl is defined as a person whose gender identity is female. (Which remember means a gender identity that is not male.) 5/
But they did change the definition of woman back to an adult female person so they can pretend that they aren’t pushing the gender nonsense. (Except they snuck it in with the definition of female now.)
6/
Sex and gender are different. Except when they aren’t. Because one means the other but neither means anything?
This is what gender ideology does to you. It makes you look utterly ridiculous.
But wait. There is one more. 7/
Under the definition of s*x they explain it means males and females. They further explain that there is a clear delineation between sex and gender.
Which they seem to have forgotten when they defined the terms male and female. 8/
Imagine making yourself look like THIS bad.
The thing is. I don’t think they know how to think any more. They don’t know why a circular definition is bad. They don’t know they have contradicted themselves. Nor do they know what a female or male is.
9/
This ideology warps the ability to think. They must take such ridiculous stances that they paint themselves into a corner of garbled nonsense. Because none of it makes any sense. When you look closely, these gender ideology words mean nothing. Literally. 10/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Screenshots THREAD
I spent a 1 1/2 days taking screenshots of calls for more people to be next after Charlie Kirk. I’ll leave them all here together.
Please share. Follow. But most of all, save this. This is the history of this day when the posts are removed.
I decided to rewrite the Riley Gaines hit piece from the New York Times. Here is what it should have said.
A thread.
It should have said:
when Lia Thomas stood up on the starting blocks, everyone could see he wasn’t a woman. No one was fooled. The crowd was not happy. The most unfair race was about to start. 2/
Since that day Riley has shown incredible bravery. Imagine standing up to school officials that put a man into your changing room and into your sports. She has continued to stand up for women’s sports and young girls who have hopes and dreams. She is incredible. 3/
There are some moments when everything you once believed crumbles. I was once a New York Times reader. Oh, I know it’s gotten a lot of things wrong but I still thought of it as a real newspaper. Until today.
This article about Riley Gaines is so biased. So bad.
A thread.
I thought I’d go through each point that had me in stark disbelief until I looked back and realized I had 35 screenshots. Every single word of this article is a lie. A harmful twisted mass of half truths and unfair accusations.
I was truly shocked. 2/
It starts with the childish, X troll, complaint, that Riley having come in 5th has no right to say a man shouldn’t be in her race or her changing room.
Her coming in 5th is completely irrelevant! She is a hero bc she spoke UP.