Will Tanner Profile picture
Jul 23 24 tweets 9 min read Read on X
Rhodesia, after it fell to Mugabe in 1980, was forgotten for many decades, but it matters greatly because it shows why the West is no longer what it once was

A short 🧵👇 Image
First, what was Rhodesia?

It was the little land north of South Africa and south of the Belgian Congo, where decolonization meant chaos and slaughter that effectively hasn't ended since the Belgians left

Despite being landlocked and underpopulated, it was an economic powerhouse. It was the breadbasket of Africa, exporting food to the rest of the continent, and was an industrializing economy that was also successful at growing cash crops like tobaccoImage
Notably, Rhodesia also didn't have apartheid. Rather, it had a voting system like America and much of the West, such as Britain used to have: anyone could vote so long as they owned a requisite amount of property

That restriction was meant to keep it a republic and percent the problem of democracy, which is mob voting and the wolves voting to eat the lamb
But despite its economic success, resistance to communism, and its hope to chart a course in Africa where the whites wouldn't face the fate of those left behind in Congo or Kenya and where blacks wouldn't face the same fate as in South Africa, America helped the USSR destroy it Image
Yes, America helped the Russian and Chinese communists destroy a functional, Western nation known for being "more British than the British"

The result was genocide. With Mugabe, the winning communist, first butchering the Ndebele tribe and then forcing white farmers off their land, killing many in the expropriation process

Britain helped tooImage
Why? Why destroy an agricultural land that mimicked Britain at its Victorian height?

Because Cultural Marxism and liberalism generally had rotted the West from the inside. It was no longer comfortable with itself and its old values, and so wanted to destroy them Image
Particularly, it wanted to destroy the twin concepts of natural hierarchy and cultural achievement Image
As a reminder, the Old World, and much of the new (South America and the Cavalier South) were ruled by hierarchy: landed aristocrats, whether titled or gentry, handed down their wealth and prestige from generation to generation Image
As a result, wealth was largely controlled by an elite few, and those few were the ones who, largely, were the ones best suited to responsible nurture it in the manner of a garden

That brought with it noblesse oblige, or the concept that the privileged should care for their social inferiors in the name of the community.Image
But they weren't to destroy all wealth in the impossible quest to eradicate poverty; Jesus reminded us that the poor with always be with us, after all

Instead, donated was responsibly spent on bettering the circumstances of the poor, such as by building worker cottages Image
Or it was spent on cultural achievements. The great statues of the Renaissance. The beautiful Palladian country houses of England. The hunting castles of Scotland. The music of Mozart and Beethoven

All came only as a result of noble wealth; hierarchy enabled achievement
Image
Image
Then came Marxism and Leninism, the twin ideas of enforced egalitarianism and weaponized grievance

Death duties, punitive income taxation, social leveling, and hostility to beauty resulted from those impulses, destroying much of the Old World mindset Image
This era, roughly the two or three decades after WWII, saw the British nationalized coal industry destroy Wentworth Woodhouse, the greatest of country houses, out of envy. It saw America destroy the space program to focus on welfare. And, perhaps worst of all, it saw former empires turn on their colonial subjectsImage
Hatred of hierarchy meant hatred of colonialism and imperialism after all, so Britain and France effectively helped communists carry out atrocities in Algeria, Kenya, the Congo, and more as they left and helped the "national governments" accede to power Image
Rhodesia saw what happened in the Congo and told Britain to get lost, with WWII Spitfire pilot and war hero Ian Smith, the PM, leading Rhodesia as it declared independence in the hope of surviving as a functional nation Image
So, the UK, and eventually America under Civil Rights Carter and his friends like Andy Young, embargoed Rhodesia. It couldn't import fuel or weapons and so was slowly strangled by the West as communists funded and armed by the USSR and Red China murdered civilians in horrible ways as their form of "war"Image
Eventually Rhodesia fell, unable to survive without being able to import fuel or weapons and unable to export its cash crops.

Then the aforementioned horrors of Mugabe occurred, with the West covering for Mugabe and even congratulating him as he butchered his own people Image
That conduct matters, and it's largely the reason the West is no longer functional and, indeed, often abetting its own destruction by importing hordes of foreigners

It's no longer self-confident, and as such, no longer willing to stand for the traits that made it great
Image
Image
Egalitarianism did not make the West great. Social welfare did not make the West great. Hatred of white people did not make the West great. Degenerate culture and rotten entertainment did not make the West great

Social hierarchy and its wonderful fruits did

But, as shown by its rejection of Rhodesia, the West turned its back on those values. Rotted internally by Cultural Marxism and the Leninist grievance impulse, it destroyed themImage
Now, instead of moon landings, concertos, and palaces, "we" have brutalist architecture, rap music, and food stamps

Was that a good tradeoff? Was it worth it?

Or should we have sided with Rhodesia as it remained the last outpost of the Old World, beset by grievance politics of the sort now destroying us?Image
Image
Read more about the West's war on Rhodesia here:
theamericantribune.news/p/how-the-unit…
Oh, and I should have added this earlier, but also check out @k9_reaper to understand the similar events happening in South Africa, and check out this interview we did with him on the subject, in which we mention the Bush War: theamericantribune.news/p/surviving-so…
And credit to the intro pic from @thewardoll, from whose account I found it awhile ago
Make sure to read these superb books about the Bush War and Rhodesia:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will Tanner

Will Tanner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Will_Tanner_1

Sep 7
What does DEI lead to? What is affirmative action policies' desired end effect?

South Africa shows. Impoverishment at the bottom, a hammering of the wealth of Europeans, and corrupt enrichment the hierarchy ladder's top

🧵👇 on the destruction of South Africa through DEI Image
South Africa used to be a thriving land. Much like Rhodesia to its north, it had a modern, industrial economy that took great advantage of its natural resource wealth, from the wealth of its fertile soil to the immense resources deep underground

Then things started to change as the world went woke

First, inflation ripped through the economy as sanctions and embargoes meant it couldn't import needed resources it was without, such as oil. While that might not have immiserated the populace in the way Zimbabwean inflation did, it was a problem and the economy wasn't as strong as it could have beenImage
So, the South Africans eventually gave into world opinion and implemented mass democracy, which meant Mandela

Mandela had been trained by the Soviets, like many African communists, and so was fluent with the violent race communism Mugabe implemented at the point of a thug-carried hatchetImage
Read 13 tweets
Sep 6
One of the other cool things about Rhodesia is that looking at it, and what people were like in it, is that it was still a land of adventure in a world growing ever more bureaucratic and HR-dominated

Not only is that like the Old World in a good way, but it's what we need

🧵👇 Image
Pictures and stories from Rhodesia hint at that aspect of it

A few Selous Scouts out on patrol, them against a near-infinite number of enemies. Stories about drunken excursions, practical jokes in the jungle, and run-ins with megafauna

Everywhere is regulated to some degree, but fun was still possible, even despite a bloody and long-running warImage
That's quite like things used to be

Lewis and Clark had random run-ins with bears on their adventure across the continent

What would the Wild West have been without being...wild?

Young men used to have a variety of adventures jobs, from time on railways to sailing the seas on a merchant ship, before settling down and doing something more serious

Or, like Churchill, they'd spend a few years in a unit abroad, seeing the world and conquering it with pistol, repeater, and saber then return from the field of battle to the polo field and ballroomImage
Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 5
One thing I haven't yet managed to articulate in my 🧵s is why Rhodesia is relevant to America, other than that America was involved in its destruction

So, time for a new 🧵: The Mugabification of the World and Why Rhodesia Matters

🧵👇Image
First, as a brief review of what happened (though there's a longer 🧵 on this linked at the bottom):

When Mugabe came to power in 1980, he was the head of a country that had long been the breadbasket of Africa and was quickly industrializing, at least until the Bush War kicked into high gear

He destroyed all that. He solidified power by genociding the Ndebele tribe (loyal to his rival, Nkomo) in the Gurukhundi and confiscated all privately owned weapons. Then, he seized the farms of white farmers and handed them to his followers

That was a big issue, as none of them really knew how to farm. So, the formerly thriving farms laid fallow for want of effort and knowledge. Not only did the country starve from famine, but now it had no exports with which it could earn foreign exchange and so it couldn't pay its debts or import food. Thus came the hyperinflation for which Zimbabwe is famous, and the continent no longer had its breadbasketImage
That's just a brief and simplified summary, but generally shows the issues at hand

Mugabe weaponized racial grievance and used it to push bloodthirsty communism and implement disastrously bad policies rooted in acting on hatred and envy rather than finding solutions that worked for the country and made it broadly prosperous and pleasantImage
Read 16 tweets
Sep 5
This might be my most unpopular take, but whatever

The West works FAR BETTER when guys are drinking more

Time for a very short 🧵

🧵👇
Image
Pretty much all of the Agricultural Revolution and the beginnings of the Industrial Revolution, and the military improvements that made the West and undefeatable behemoth for a century came during the Georgian Era and Regency

During the Regency the gentlemen were sneered at if they couldn’t make it through 4 to 6 bottles of port and claret (red wine) during dinner. “Just” two was seen as shameful

Meanwhile workers were drinking cider and beer all dayImage
Similarly, America’s conquest of a continent and rise to being a world power came alongside men drinking gallons of whisky a year

During Prohibition, the country was a wreck

Then our last real time of glory was the 50s, an era defined by three martini lunches and punch-dominated dinnersImage
Read 7 tweets
Sep 5
This is one of those things that people say, but by what metric is it true?

Churchill’s writing was excellent, but he failed at nearly everything he attempted to do

Its time for a 🧵 on Churchill’s leadership and accomplishments, for better and worse

🧵👇 Image
First, in this I will try to focus not on moralizing, but on describing what Churchill did and how it impacted Britain’s national interests and fate, not if it did the moral thing or helped others who weren’t British

So, to begin Churchill’s writing generally was quite good. His Marlborough biography is superb, as is the River War. The History of the English Speaking People is quite good as well

Then there are his histories of WWI and II, both of which are reasonably good and widely read. Since he wrote them and portrayed himself favorably in them, he’s seen on a better light in part thanks to his own writingImage
And so he’s seen as a terrific war leader, a Cassandra who predicted war when no one would listen, and the guy who’d inspire the nation to hold onto the bitter end

That worked quite well for his WWII, but less well for WWI, for which he is mostly remembered for the Gallipoli debacle and how poorly it want. His interwar record is probably the worst of all.Image
Read 12 tweets
Sep 4
"A man"

There's so much going on in this post that it's gonna need a 🧵 to examine, namely how everywhere in America is turning into South Africa and Americans are too worried about "optics" nad "political correctness" to properly keep themselves and their families safe

🧵👇Image
First there's the mere description of the guy as "a man" despite the fact that the "man" was apparently screeching about white hatred

That vague description was probably required by the reddit rules, instead of saying a "homeless black guy" or "crackhead'

A sane society would be comfortable describing criminals, black, white, or otherwise, so that 1) future potential passers by could avoid such a murderous lunatic, 2) to help with identification or bringing out other victims, and 3) because it's the truth and so it shouldn't matter if people are offendedImage
But now we don't live in a sane society. Quite the opposite, in fact

So, it's effectively banned on some social media platforms to describe your attacker if you were attacked

That's insane, for all the reasons mentioned above, but perhaps most of all because it's an admittedly anti-Truth sentiment. The moderators don't care about the truth any more than they care about the victim. Instead, they're totally ideologically captured and want to pretend the attempted murderer could be an astronaut if only he'd had a better calculus teacher, or whatever

The pic is of Lee Rigby's killer, but seemed appropriate given the postImage
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(