Western Scientific Enlightenment - a direct birth child of Colonialism | a super-thread🧵
This thread explains the impossibility of imagining the western scientific revolution without its contingency upon colonial ventures.
Even tho the west would like to believe that modern science is simply a product of the intrinsic genius of the west, this idea couldn't be far from the truth when its scrutinised through historical narratives.
To begin, the WSR began with the natural sciences - which were developed solely due to the Spanish discovery and colonisation of "The New World" i.e. American continents. Where exploration of new plants and animal species and their behaviours/natural makeup necessitated
developing a new understanding of the natural world. This new understanding then, was constructed on the knowledge of the indigenous people of the colonised lands. Studies in the New World were then funded by the Spanish government for economical gains.
Even though the european understanding of the natural world was being aided by the knowledge of the indigenous inca & aztec communities, the Spanish still thought of the indigenous as barbaric and uncivilised, who needed to be civilised (therefore justifying colonisation)
Such racist rhetoric against the people of the New World sparked the curiosities of the "civilised western people" about these newly discovered "anomalous things" - which were then brought by force to europe, in order to study them as lab subjects.
which shows that the origination of modern "Human Sciences" in the WSR was not a result of intellectual or religious change in europe, but their racist attitudes coupled with colonialism.
To learn the medical usage of american plants, and use them for economical/trading purposes and to map the new geographic territories, the primary institutionalisation of modern science in europe was done not in any academic institution, by the state to conquer the new world.
With this type of colonial institutionalisation of modern science in Europe as a starting point, almost every "scientific venture"
that followed was based on an understanding of science that was fused with the establishment of the empire.
The European states even imposed sanctions and legal restrictions on the development of science of the indigenous people (through whom they themselves learned) .
Moving to the example of the greatest scientist, one of the fathers of WSR, Issac Newton, who himself was aware of his debt to colonial voyages - all his major theories were based on the observations made by astronomers of the slave-trade and territory conquering voyages
Most of the data Newton worked on was collected by EIC officers on expansion missions. Moreover his connections to the Royal (state) academic institutions allowed him access to information that was amassed due to imperial purposes.
In fact, the most important of newton's theories i.e. gravity was not a result of apple falling on his head but a fully intended theory built on the data and observations of a French Astronomer Jean Richer, who travelled the globe for the purpose of imperial territory markings...
by the french military as well as slave trade voyages, not to miss the collection of most of this data was impossible without the assistance of indigenous people who were being colonised and exploited for their knowledge and skills.
Once Newton laid the foundations of Modern Astronomy theoretically, testing out his theories with practical measurements and observations and building on them, was another task, which was once again carried out in the culture of colonial expansion and exploitation.
The European states used Newton's astronomical data to advance their geographical understanding for territory expansion (naval navigation). Data which was developed and proved through experiments that were conducted through exploitation of "slavish/lowly" indigenous people.
A major western scientific advancement regarding the size of the solar system (done for navigation purposes) was done through a forceful military mission in the region of Tahiti (which was the best place to conduct the observations) by Captain James Cook.
Not only that but the local indigenous skill and knowledge of sea navigation was used by Captain Cook, to map new regions for empire expansion. Knowledge of Indigenous people of colonised territories were being used to colonise new areas.
Biological sciences and particularly the samples and specimens used for the development of the theory of evolution was unsurprisingly also a direct result of racist social darwinism fused with colonial attitudes.
One of the most significant fossil hunter of the 19th cent. was only able to collect fossils (of indigenous) for the development of evolutionary theory, because the indigenous population was massacred by the military colonisers (with whom he entered the region). Who were...
massacred due to the colonial darwinistic mindset of replacing the primitive/barbaric civilisations with the civilised Europeans.
Conclusion: The WSR is rooted in the ambition of empire expansion, exploitation of indigenous knowledge/labour and coercive military action for "scientific research" - where science only served the purpose of exploitation. Making WSR, in no way, a revolution of western genius.
[Based on: Horizons, A Global History of Science by James Poskett.]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Khilafah as an ethico-spiritual existential purpose: al-Raghib al-Isfahani's theory of human vicegerency | 🧵
Read time - 15 minutes approximately.
Introduction -
Khilafah has always been a central concept of Islamic theology particularly gaining momentum in its political imaginations in the 20th century. Its current popular understanding holds it to be restrictively synonymous with exclusive political sovereignty in dunya. The current essay however sheds light on an alternative perspective on khilafah, as an existential ethico-spiritual condition rather than an activity of political domination and subjugation - exploring the theories of the concept independent of its modern articulations within the nation-state paradigm. Al-Raghib al-Isfahani's (rh) conceptualisation of human vicegerency would be our pivot idea here alongside a few other pre-modern and contemporary thinkers of the Islamic tradition.
Al Raghib al-Isfahani's Cosmology -
Little is known about al-Isfahani's personal life and biographical details, his scholarly footprint however can be traced from his immense impact on al-Ghazali's thought - he openly confessed to be inspired by his writings and as both the thinkers are analysed it becomes more than apparent how influential al-Isfahani's writings were on abu-hamid.
Al-Raghib al-Isfahani can be said to belong to the same intellectual family of philosophers such as al-Tawhidi & Miskawayh - his cosmology was therefore influenced by the inherited philosophical paradigm of neo-platonism but departed from the ideas of ikhwan-as-safaa and the falasifa due to his strong adherence to quranic themes of willing creation and a transcendent yet personal God rather than necessary-emanationism. The general neo-platonic hierarchy of existence (universal intellect - tablet - material existence etc) was accepted by al-Isfahani alongside the macrocosm - microcosm interdependent dichotomy of man and the universe. Man is placed therefore in his cosmological order as (ideally) a united culmination of the values, ideals and attributes of the universe, where the universe itself is the fragmented manifestation of the attributes and qualities of God. With such a cosmological dynamic between God, universe and man, al-Isfahani's proto-akbarian theory presents man's ontological role to be necessarily linked with that of the universe since both are manifestations of the same ultimate ontology - God. Man's understanding of the universe and therefore God is henceforth dependent on his understanding of his self and vice versa - and this understanding, cognition or knowledge of his is man's prime mode of self-actualisation since the self can only be actualised when it grasps the inter-connected hierarchy of existence (as bestowed through the attributes of God) through which its essence is derived. Knowledge of the self here, leads to spiritual ascendancy, for just as one unravels their self and achieves intimacy with their soul by knowing more about it, they achieve closeness (qurb) with God since their self is a manifestation of God's attributes, and their cognition of their self thus is the closest they can get to a cognition of God i.e. pure being, absolute existence & ultimate goodness. How exactly does this process of spiritual cognition and ascendency of the self unfold is tied to his theory of human vicegerency (khilafah).
Important to note that unlike the Akbarian school, al-Isfahani doesn't hold God, universe and man to belong to a single ontological field but rather affirms a fundamental ontological distinction between the creation and the created regardless of their interconnection through the attributes and their manifestations (not being) in the creation.
The mirage of the success through imitation of the modern west | 🧵
& the muslim need for ideologically sovereign material institution building. /20
Secular modernity as a social system is a consequence of the western historical contingencies (genealogy) and is therefore particularly native to western identity and its success - the west can be true to it and thus achieve success through it.
It's (secular modernity's) imposition on the 'rest', or its imitation by the rest, regardless of their own genealogical contingencies/ continuities of selfhood and worldview wouldn't automatically bring about a sovereignly sustainable success like that of the west's.
Prof. Jackson's islamic secular is a backtracking from the ghazalian shariah-tasawwuf synthetic culture of the islamic legal philosophy.
The sacred & the profane were never distinct in Islam because of the all encompassing muslim subjectivity.
For even the "profane" acts as minimal as clearing any obstruction in the civil pathway or putting a morsel of food in one's wife's mouth were qualified as components of faith and described in the language of religiosity because they were governed by and hence judged by niyyah.
The niyyah in islamic theories of selfhood is a formation of an internal primary will (to oversimplify) that cannot be formed (ought to be formed in a muslim) except through putting the sunnah and the pleasure of Allah as integral spiritual-moral ideals.
muslim secularists would have you believe that - our souls were gathered in alam e arwah for a direct covenant with God, that the entire world was destroyed through flood during nuh's a.s times, that ibrahim a.s clashed directly with the babylonian emperor of his time,
that ibrahim a.s left his family in the barren deserts of arabia, that ibrahim a.s sacrificed laid down every single thing he loved for sacrifice, that yusuf a.s was sold in the bazaars of misr, that musa a.s confronted the most powerful earthly authority of his age head on,
that musa a.s brought the entire force of the empire upon himself, that bani israel wandered cluelessly in the deserts for forty years, that muhammad ص, the most modest and honest of all men, was ridiculed, tortured and exiled by his own family and authoritative clan,
The Muslim youth should be aware that this idea of forced financial independency doesn't go well with our identities and the sacred duties on our shoulders in this age.
Indeed there are those who have to support their families all by themselves and they should definitely work on financial independency & success.
However all those who would probably inherit a good sum from their parents (that the prophet has commanded: al-Bukhari 5354), enough to support their families and homes should really stop chasing the modern materialistic standard of success.