Husnain Bin Sajjad Profile picture
Jul 23 23 tweets 11 min read Read on X
Western Scientific Enlightenment - a direct birth child of Colonialism | a super-thread🧵

This thread explains the impossibility of imagining the western scientific revolution without its contingency upon colonial ventures. Image
Even tho the west would like to believe that modern science is simply a product of the intrinsic genius of the west, this idea couldn't be far from the truth when its scrutinised through historical narratives.
Image
Image
To begin, the WSR began with the natural sciences - which were developed solely due to the Spanish discovery and colonisation of "The New World" i.e. American continents. Where exploration of new plants and animal species and their behaviours/natural makeup necessitated
developing a new understanding of the natural world. This new understanding then, was constructed on the knowledge of the indigenous people of the colonised lands. Studies in the New World were then funded by the Spanish government for economical gains.
Image
Image
Even though the european understanding of the natural world was being aided by the knowledge of the indigenous inca & aztec communities, the Spanish still thought of the indigenous as barbaric and uncivilised, who needed to be civilised (therefore justifying colonisation) Image
Such racist rhetoric against the people of the New World sparked the curiosities of the "civilised western people" about these newly discovered "anomalous things" - which were then brought by force to europe, in order to study them as lab subjects.

Image
Image
Image
which shows that the origination of modern "Human Sciences" in the WSR was not a result of intellectual or religious change in europe, but their racist attitudes coupled with colonialism.
To learn the medical usage of american plants, and use them for economical/trading purposes and to map the new geographic territories, the primary institutionalisation of modern science in europe was done not in any academic institution, by the state to conquer the new world.
Image
Image
With this type of colonial institutionalisation of modern science in Europe as a starting point, almost every "scientific venture"
that followed was based on an understanding of science that was fused with the establishment of the empire.

Image
Image
Image
The European states even imposed sanctions and legal restrictions on the development of science of the indigenous people (through whom they themselves learned) .
Image
Image
Moving to the example of the greatest scientist, one of the fathers of WSR, Issac Newton, who himself was aware of his debt to colonial voyages - all his major theories were based on the observations made by astronomers of the slave-trade and territory conquering voyages
Image
Image
Most of the data Newton worked on was collected by EIC officers on expansion missions. Moreover his connections to the Royal (state) academic institutions allowed him access to information that was amassed due to imperial purposes.
Image
Image
In fact, the most important of newton's theories i.e. gravity was not a result of apple falling on his head but a fully intended theory built on the data and observations of a French Astronomer Jean Richer, who travelled the globe for the purpose of imperial territory markings...

Image
Image
Image
by the french military as well as slave trade voyages, not to miss the collection of most of this data was impossible without the assistance of indigenous people who were being colonised and exploited for their knowledge and skills. Image
Once Newton laid the foundations of Modern Astronomy theoretically, testing out his theories with practical measurements and observations and building on them, was another task, which was once again carried out in the culture of colonial expansion and exploitation.
The European states used Newton's astronomical data to advance their geographical understanding for territory expansion (naval navigation). Data which was developed and proved through experiments that were conducted through exploitation of "slavish/lowly" indigenous people.


Image
Image
Image
Image
A major western scientific advancement regarding the size of the solar system (done for navigation purposes) was done through a forceful military mission in the region of Tahiti (which was the best place to conduct the observations) by Captain James Cook.

Image
Image
Image
Not only that but the local indigenous skill and knowledge of sea navigation was used by Captain Cook, to map new regions for empire expansion. Knowledge of Indigenous people of colonised territories were being used to colonise new areas. Image
Biological sciences and particularly the samples and specimens used for the development of the theory of evolution was unsurprisingly also a direct result of racist social darwinism fused with colonial attitudes.
One of the most significant fossil hunter of the 19th cent. was only able to collect fossils (of indigenous) for the development of evolutionary theory, because the indigenous population was massacred by the military colonisers (with whom he entered the region). Who were...

Image
Image
Image
massacred due to the colonial darwinistic mindset of replacing the primitive/barbaric civilisations with the civilised Europeans.
Conclusion: The WSR is rooted in the ambition of empire expansion, exploitation of indigenous knowledge/labour and coercive military action for "scientific research" - where science only served the purpose of exploitation. Making WSR, in no way, a revolution of western genius.
[Based on: Horizons, A Global History of Science by James Poskett.] Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Husnain Bin Sajjad

Husnain Bin Sajjad Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @husnayn_

Jul 20
"I am a Muslim"
"No one is superior to another because of their religious identity"
"Islam demands you to give the same amount of respect to other religions as it does for itself".

Dude is trying hard to be a wannabe unbiased intellectual at the cost of making basic sense.
By the very fact that you consider Truth to be virtuous and better than Falsehood, & you consider your adopted ideology to be closer to Truth than others ideologies - automatically concludes that you consider your ideological position to be more virtuous & superior to others.
Not to miss, Islam considers everything that promotes Shirk and Falsehood to be of the lowliest of ideologies. A sinful follower of prophet of Allah ص will always be objectively better than a hindu 'saint' who persistently follows and commands shirk.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 13
Copernicus's "couple" diagram & al-Tusi's original couple diagram. As can be seen nicolaus even used the exact equivalent letters,

ا = A
ب = B
ج= G
ی = E

There's absolutely no denying that Copernicus simply couldn't have made sense of his heliocentric model without Tusi.
Image
Image
Not only Al-Tusi but his work was just a continuation of the discourse of muslim scientists like Ibn al-Haytham and Ali Qushji in the issue of solar system models. Image
The very kickstart of the Renaissance scientific revolution in europe cannot even be imagined as Copernicus's sole effort, it was built/premised on the legacy of Muslim scientists and cultural exchange with the muslim world. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 9
A note for (mainly) liberal "Islam is easy"-kind Muslims | 🧵

If you require every single ruling of Islam to sync with your own will, ideas and wants, you have completely turned the very essence of Islam upside down.
The fact that Islam means "the submission of one's own will" intrinsically means that Islam for the most part, definitely has to contrast your personal desires in order to carry out its very purpose. If you go on cherry-picking fringe opinions from islamic legal tradition,
to suit your own views and wants - you're in a sense contradicting the purpose of your own identity, by being yourself an obstacle for your spiritual development by not letting your proclaimed ideology (Islam) to operate properly.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 13
You can't compare Einstein to your mohallay ka (town's) moulvi. | 🧵

Great point by @fakazmi in this debate. Scientists are usually judged through the successes of their best minds while the ulema are judged through the pettiest errors of their lowest class. This, in my opinion
is precisely due to the fact that the laymen (masses) aren't aware of the failures of science/scientists whereas the shortcomings of the ulema are too visible in the society - global media plays a great biased role in this plus the ulema are too involved in the society (mostly
their lowest and weakest trained classes) therefore everyone is aware of their weaknesses. And quite the opposite is the case with scientists, science today has gotten too advanced and technical for the layman to understand its dynamics or notice its errors and damages.
Read 15 tweets
Jun 8
Seyyed H. Nasr on the significance of studying the western philosophical tradition by being a rooted Muslim first | 🧶

"We have to know the West in every way. Our philosophers have to know Western philosophy, but like a living human being knows something external on the basis of
what is within himself. There has to be a subject first. What do I mean by that? I mean the Muslims who study the West have to be Muslims first who then study the West-but not drown in it. We have scholars who study Western philosophy, but they're swallowed up by the whale.
They're not studying from the point of view of Islamic philosophy; rather they become tenth-rate Western philosophers. We have a lot of those. We don't need those.
Read 9 tweets
Apr 4
Some actual context for those crying about "Heritage".

The Taliban left this statue all alone after its discovery by them for three years. The decision to destroy it only came after an absurd reaction of the west regarding the circumstances in Afghanistan. The Taliban...
representative of that time, clearly stated that what triggered the outrage in their camp was the offering of money and resources by the western institutions for the "care and protection" of this "Art" while the children of Afghanistan were facing harsh droughts and salvation Image
- And when the Taliban requested to use that money for the health and safety of the people, they weren't allowed to do so because the money was only for the "statue".

"If they don't care about our Children, we don't care about their statues". The matter was not even about Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(