The South Africanization of America: Chaos is Coming, or Already Here
While Rhodesia is a great story of how Western willingness to betray friends led to anti-civilization victory abroad, the closer example to where America is headed is South Africa, in this 🧵 I'll show why👇
First, as a reminder, South Africa embraced apartheid after WWII, and continued with white-minority government until the early 1990s
At that point, it opted for "liberal democracy," and the black majority elected Mandela, a communist convicted for helping blow up a church
His wife, Winnie Mandela, was even worse
She was another active communist in the ANC who was known for "necklacing" her political enemies, a horrific act that consisted of sticking the person in a gasoline-soaked tire and setting it ablaze, causing a long, torturous death
As in Mugabe's Zimbabwe, some held out hope that the former terrorist would be something of a moderate and not repay the indignities of apartheid with more terrorism
To some extent, those hopes proved more fulfilled in South Africa than Zimbabwe, and Mandela didn't resort to open thuggery and brutality-enforced expropriation like Mugabe
But, things still took a turn for the worse in the Rainbow Nation, particularly after Mandela's ANC successors took the helm
In the decades of ANC rule that have followed, crime has risen dramatically, the country's electrical grid has been raided by copper thieves, DEI-type policies have inflicted unbearable burdens on its formerly successful companies, and its formerly top-tier military is now struggling in a proxy war against Rwanda
The particular issue with South Africa is anarcho-tyranny: to a large extent criminals like zama zama gangs, farm attackers, and basic thugs can get away with brutal murder, with the state sometimes even assisting, while those who defend themselves face lawfare
SA is less bad on that front than Europe: self-defense is still allowed, fortunately. But, the government is clearly on the side of the criminals, particularly in farm attacks
In fact, as @k9_reaper and @twatterbaas have pointed out the farm attackers are using military-grade equipment, including highly expensive signal jammers, to assist in their attacks on farms
And, even if the government isn't directly assisting in these attacks (which it may very well be), it's at least letting them continue to occur, which is much the same thing to isolated, rural farmers
These farm attacks, as a reminder, are absolutely horrific. Here's just one of the stories @k9_reaper has shared:
And, just as the government isn't interested in preventing them, it's entirely uninterested in solving them. 95% of the murders go unsolved!
And while the farm attacks are horrible, they're not all that the South African population suffers. There are also riots that involve burning buildings, murders, theft, and the like. Here's footage of a riot that @k9_reaper shared in August of 2023
These riots often escalate, and in 2021, for example, vast columns of rioters burnt the country to a crisp, causing billions of dollars of damage in the relatively poor country
They were only stopped by groups of armed men, mainly Boers and Indians, who were armed to the teeth and fought back, protecting their neighborhoods. Thousands, if not more, died.
Here's a video of the chaos, also from @k9_reaper :
Naturally, the crime has caused a need for safety, so those South Africans who can afford it live in modern day castles. Here, for example, is video from @k9_reaper of a home protected by concrete walls, iron beams, barbed wire, light beams, and alarms:
Meanwhile, the companies that remain in the degrading country suffer under DEI laws that makes America's look tame
For example, the amended "Employment Equity Act" effectively requires racial quotas, and the DEI policies regarding hiring make it near-impossible for well-qualified whites to find employment, get into college or graduate programs, or otherwise thrive economically
It's blatant discrimination that has served no one
The DEI situation has created an immense competence crisis, and now even basic heavy industry like steel-making can't survive
So, it's a dire situation. Unfortunately, America is headed in much the same direction
For one, DEI is an obvious millstone in America, as shown by the resistance that even liberal to moderate business leaders and investors like @elonmusk and @BillAckman are putting up to it
Further, it's an obvious fact of life, and has decidedly hurt white Americans.
For example, a Bloomberg study found that only 6% of new jobs at S&P 100 companies went to whites in the years after the BLM protests. “The overall job growth included 20,524 White workers. The other 302,570 jobs — or 94% of the headcount increase — went to people of color,” Bloomberg wrote.
It was later shown that that was only new jobs. When turnover for old jobs was included, the real percentage was closer to ~25% going to whites.
But, still, at ~61% of the population, that shows obvious discrimination
The same is true of college admissions, with whites and Asians heavily discriminated against even in the very upper slice of academic scores:
American companies are, admittedly, much more successful than their South African counterparts. But, still, trouble is on the horizon, with a competence crisis nearing as merit is put last and various racial and political considerations are put first
Take, for example, the constant chaos at airports. Flights are routinely late, scheduled incorrectly, canceled, or otherwise problematic
That wasn't the case even a decade or two ago, but now it's hard to take a single flight without facing an issue of some sort
Yes, the planes aren't falling out of the sk yet...well, except for Boeing planes, but they are rarely arriving on time
And then there's crime
Yes, America isn't at the rate of crime it was in the 70s, when Black Panthers were assaulting people in the streets, leftist terror groups were carrying out regular bombings, and muggings and other sorts of petty, violent crime were through the roof
But crime is on the rise. Gangs are using signal jammers to break into homes.
Squatting, a recurrent problem in South Africa, is out of control, with the government siding with the squatters over the owners.
NYC subways aren't safe and most America cities have "No Go Zones" where violent crime is out of control
Meanwhile, those who try to stand up to it face lawfare from a government that sides with violent criminals over law-abiding citizens
And there's the rioting problem...for which those who Burned, Looted, and Murdered their way across America never faced any consequences, and indeed were often given settlement dollars by municipalities
So, America is heading the direction of South Africa.
Though we aren't in the same abysmal state as of yet, we are in a very dangerous situation where we can see the cliff ahead - South Africa-style chaos - but run toward it at full speed regardless
A competent, self-confident society would change course before it's too late. But, like South Africa, we might just commit civilizational suicide instead
Why's he so angry? Because this is a Trump-sparked, quiet reversal of the civilization-obliterating DEI mindset that has been pushing America toward South Africanization
We'll now see if this is a bump on a dark path to bloody South African egalitarianism or a real reversal🧵👇
The degree to which DEI, the polite name for race communism, leads to perdition can't be overstated
And though South Africa's descent is highly relevant, really it's Zimbabwe that best emphasizes the ends of that mindset
It was best reflected when Mugabe said, "The only white man you can trust is a dead white man... our party must continue to strike fear in the heart of the white man, our real enemy... the white man is not indigenous to Africa."
He proceeded to expropriate the white-owned farms and chase the white farmers out of the country. The result of that race communist tyranny was not just horror and murder for the whites, but starvation and hyperinflation for the blacks he claimed to be aiding
But while Mugabe is the best example, the same mindset is present elsewhere
Take the below clip of EFF leaders Julius Malema, a race communist radical even for South Africa, saying, "The revolution will require us to kill" while calling for Mugabe-style land expropriation
He's the same one known for chanting the genocidal "Kill the Boer" song
Buffett is portrayed as being virtuous for this "I never wanted to found a dynasty" attitude but it's actually quite anti-civilizational, and is the opposite of how the men who built the West thought
The thing is, it's only dynastic thinking that leads to lont-term thinking🧵👇
This is, frankly, the difference between a Lord and a modern CEO:
One cares about what will be happening 6 quarters from now, if he thinks even that far ahead. The other thinks six generations from now, as it is his duty to do so
While Buffett is undoubtedly a longer-term thinker than most of his peer group, he still faces the modern problem of assuming that what is most moral is for things to be (mostly) reset at each generation. He (and many others like him) see inheritance of a vast fortune as wrong because it is "unearned"
So, instead of keeping the fortune intact so that it can be used for great ends, it's wasted away on vague "philanthropy" that does little, in the end, to actually help anyone, at least compared to what could be done with a vast estate
At least Buffett isn't a "die with zero," type who wants to spend everything
But, still, his flaw in thinking about wealth is that it prevents anything substantial from being built over time
So, whereas in the past projects could be multi-generational, whether it was the building and maintenance of a grand estate or the turning of a bank like JP Morgan into an immensely powerful, influential behemoth, now they can't be. Instead, whatever was intended to be accomplished has to be accomplished in essentially the prime of life, or it will fail for lack of time, as the next generation can't be get involved
While this is bad enough in the case of Buffett, who at least managed to build an interesting business that might survive him, it's even worse in the case of people who did little that will survive, instead only accumulating money. The trend of celebrities announcing their kids won't inherit anything of note is such an example. That means nothing real will ever be accomplished. Whatever charity gets the money will either waste it or never spend it, limiting its usefulness, and what could have been the start of a multi-generational ascent to greatness is instead over before it ever began
This was somewhat accurate around the early 20th century and is becoming true again, at least for some swathes of people in some jobs
But it was fixed then and could be fixed with similar policies now
Fortunately, it was McKinely who fixed it and Trump wants to emulate him🧵👇
McKinley's main problem, as a governer and then as president, was that labor and capital were at each other's throats, seeing each other as the enemy
Both had fair points
On one hand, labor was underpaid compared to its basic life expenses, though things were better for our industrial laborers than in England
But, on the other, capital noted that stiff competition from abroad via imports meant that higher wages weren't economically feasible. It's profits were generally thin, thanks to imports, so higher wages would sink companies and lead to higher unemployment
And, both sides had valid complaints of violence directed at them; tempers were reaching a boiling point
Related to that was the issue of money
Debtors, particularly farmers, largely wanted an inflationary money supply because it made their debts easier to pay off
Creditors wanted a rigorous gold standard, as a lack of inflation, or better yet deflation, made their loans worth more and made business easier to plan for
This was a huge issue, with William Jennings Bryan winning immense popularity on the back of his anti-gold standard, pro-silver speeches
Like the wage issue, this was reaching a boiling point
I get that this is supposed to be a positive image showing American continuity, but really it shows how devastating to the national psyche the Depression and FDR were
A quick 🧵👇
This is observable in attire: three men on the right all have some degree of continuity to them
The colonial era, early republican era, and latter 19th century all were somewhat different, as attire shows, but there was no great breakdown
So breeches turned to trousers, tricorns to top hats, cravats to ties, and so on, but the progression was understandable in response to the changing environment and nature of life; life as a gentleman in Mrs. Astor's New York is different than that of a planter in 1720, so clothing changed
But, importantly, it was still dignified. A top hat and a tricorn were different forms of headwear, as breeches and trousers or a frock jacket and morning coat are different, but weren't particularly casual or slovenly, at least in the image presented
The three men look dignified, their sons would have looked the same, and "democracy" hadn't turned America into a thoroughly casual, anti-tradition society
A great challenge for America is that it's become a twisted version of England in the early 20th century
This is best seen in land and elite social life, but is present everywhere; in all cases, we must overcome the change or we'll face the fate of our English cousins🧵👇
First, what was going on with England?
The years that followed the beginning of the Agricultural Depression and preceded WW1 saw immense change of a bad sort
For one, free trade was eating away the country. Its now uneconomic farms were lying fallow, its factories facing unbeatable competition from the much larger markets abroad with industrial innovation and prosperity slowing as a result, and its trade deficit widening dramatically
Similarly problematic was how social changes were going. King Edward famously surrounding himself with various sorts of disreputable characters, from banksters to actresses, rather than the old-blooded Lords. That presaged similar changes, with Churchill taxing away the wealth of those Lords with his People's Budget and Lloyd George destroying their power with his Parliament Bill. Alongside their loss of the prestige and political position of the old families came a change in social mores: gone were the old, Christian values and in was the free-living "fast set" with its rampant infidelity and eyebrow-raising lifestyle.
And, of course, those changes brought with them immense upheaval in the basic life of the land. A great example is foxhunting: whereas in the past the activity was a country sport enjoyed by locals of all stripes, from the sons of small farmers to the local magnate, railroads turned it into something the new elite felt compelled to engage in for reasons of status. So the farmers were screened out, the magnates saw their fields full of new men, and what had been a jovial activity that created bonds between the rural classes became something decidedly otherwise; the new elites lacked concern or care for their inferiors, being ruled by money rather than tradition and noblesse oblige
In short, wealth and policy favoritism flowed from an at least somewhat virtuous and tradition-minded old elite to a rapacious, plutocratic one with decidedly less virtuous morals
Meanwhile, life got worse for the average person. Poor wage work in factories left workers unable to eat healthily, with health standards declining from the 1850s to WW1 rather than rising with the "GDP." Meanwhile, land remained somewhat expensive (20 pounds an acre around 1900 translates to around $3800 today), pricing out most farmers and meaning land remained in concentrated hands...though it was increasingly sold to new men rather than remaining in the somewhat more paternalistic hands of the old elite. Eventually, by the 1920s(ish) and post-WW2 period, small farmers did end up buying farms; however, doing so drained them of capital and further limited English agricultural innovation, a major change from the pre-Ag Depression period
So life was getting worse for most people, the morals of the country were getting decidedly worse, and the top of the pyramid was changing much for the worse
This is the most imbecilic tax proposal, given what it means for society and tradition
“A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit," as the proverb goes
This forces them to cut trees down, and England's decline shows where that goes🧵👇
First off, the obvious problem with this, regardless of tradition, is that it makes it essentially illegal to build anything that matters
All great projects, whether a farm or kingdom, JP Morgan-style bank or SpaceX-style goal to settle Mars, are multi-generational. It takes time to build, decades of investment and work, and so on
All the jobs, all the advancements, all the achievements that come from those multi-generation projects are great things for society but they don't occur in a vacuum. They require that willingness to invest in the future that only really comes when one knows that the future will be their through heirs
Often, those heirs are children, but sometimes, as in the case of the Antonines or later Morgans, they are chosen successors. Regardless, what matters is that it can be passed on so that the future can be thought of and invested in, that once the boy earns his spurs he can be trusted with the kingdom
If taxes obliterate that, if they prohibit the handing off to the next generation because the state will confiscate everything that exists, of what use is anything than society-rotting hedonism
We see that now. The worst politicians are those without children; they do not care for the future because, to them, the future is dead. So they're perfectly ok with bringing in a billion Third Worlders to push the price of cat grooming down
Similarly, the worst CEOs are those who are there for a term of years. They only have to care about what quarterly earnings will be for a few years, so they can get their stock package and golden parachute