The South Africanization of America: Chaos is Coming, or Already Here
While Rhodesia is a great story of how Western willingness to betray friends led to anti-civilization victory abroad, the closer example to where America is headed is South Africa, in this 🧵 I'll show why👇
First, as a reminder, South Africa embraced apartheid after WWII, and continued with white-minority government until the early 1990s
At that point, it opted for "liberal democracy," and the black majority elected Mandela, a communist convicted for helping blow up a church
His wife, Winnie Mandela, was even worse
She was another active communist in the ANC who was known for "necklacing" her political enemies, a horrific act that consisted of sticking the person in a gasoline-soaked tire and setting it ablaze, causing a long, torturous death
As in Mugabe's Zimbabwe, some held out hope that the former terrorist would be something of a moderate and not repay the indignities of apartheid with more terrorism
To some extent, those hopes proved more fulfilled in South Africa than Zimbabwe, and Mandela didn't resort to open thuggery and brutality-enforced expropriation like Mugabe
But, things still took a turn for the worse in the Rainbow Nation, particularly after Mandela's ANC successors took the helm
In the decades of ANC rule that have followed, crime has risen dramatically, the country's electrical grid has been raided by copper thieves, DEI-type policies have inflicted unbearable burdens on its formerly successful companies, and its formerly top-tier military is now struggling in a proxy war against Rwanda
The particular issue with South Africa is anarcho-tyranny: to a large extent criminals like zama zama gangs, farm attackers, and basic thugs can get away with brutal murder, with the state sometimes even assisting, while those who defend themselves face lawfare
SA is less bad on that front than Europe: self-defense is still allowed, fortunately. But, the government is clearly on the side of the criminals, particularly in farm attacks
In fact, as @k9_reaper and @twatterbaas have pointed out the farm attackers are using military-grade equipment, including highly expensive signal jammers, to assist in their attacks on farms
And, even if the government isn't directly assisting in these attacks (which it may very well be), it's at least letting them continue to occur, which is much the same thing to isolated, rural farmers
These farm attacks, as a reminder, are absolutely horrific. Here's just one of the stories @k9_reaper has shared:
And, just as the government isn't interested in preventing them, it's entirely uninterested in solving them. 95% of the murders go unsolved!
And while the farm attacks are horrible, they're not all that the South African population suffers. There are also riots that involve burning buildings, murders, theft, and the like. Here's footage of a riot that @k9_reaper shared in August of 2023
These riots often escalate, and in 2021, for example, vast columns of rioters burnt the country to a crisp, causing billions of dollars of damage in the relatively poor country
They were only stopped by groups of armed men, mainly Boers and Indians, who were armed to the teeth and fought back, protecting their neighborhoods. Thousands, if not more, died.
Here's a video of the chaos, also from @k9_reaper :
Naturally, the crime has caused a need for safety, so those South Africans who can afford it live in modern day castles. Here, for example, is video from @k9_reaper of a home protected by concrete walls, iron beams, barbed wire, light beams, and alarms:
Meanwhile, the companies that remain in the degrading country suffer under DEI laws that makes America's look tame
For example, the amended "Employment Equity Act" effectively requires racial quotas, and the DEI policies regarding hiring make it near-impossible for well-qualified whites to find employment, get into college or graduate programs, or otherwise thrive economically
It's blatant discrimination that has served no one
The DEI situation has created an immense competence crisis, and now even basic heavy industry like steel-making can't survive
So, it's a dire situation. Unfortunately, America is headed in much the same direction
For one, DEI is an obvious millstone in America, as shown by the resistance that even liberal to moderate business leaders and investors like @elonmusk and @BillAckman are putting up to it
Further, it's an obvious fact of life, and has decidedly hurt white Americans.
For example, a Bloomberg study found that only 6% of new jobs at S&P 100 companies went to whites in the years after the BLM protests. “The overall job growth included 20,524 White workers. The other 302,570 jobs — or 94% of the headcount increase — went to people of color,” Bloomberg wrote.
It was later shown that that was only new jobs. When turnover for old jobs was included, the real percentage was closer to ~25% going to whites.
But, still, at ~61% of the population, that shows obvious discrimination
The same is true of college admissions, with whites and Asians heavily discriminated against even in the very upper slice of academic scores:
American companies are, admittedly, much more successful than their South African counterparts. But, still, trouble is on the horizon, with a competence crisis nearing as merit is put last and various racial and political considerations are put first
Take, for example, the constant chaos at airports. Flights are routinely late, scheduled incorrectly, canceled, or otherwise problematic
That wasn't the case even a decade or two ago, but now it's hard to take a single flight without facing an issue of some sort
Yes, the planes aren't falling out of the sk yet...well, except for Boeing planes, but they are rarely arriving on time
And then there's crime
Yes, America isn't at the rate of crime it was in the 70s, when Black Panthers were assaulting people in the streets, leftist terror groups were carrying out regular bombings, and muggings and other sorts of petty, violent crime were through the roof
But crime is on the rise. Gangs are using signal jammers to break into homes.
Squatting, a recurrent problem in South Africa, is out of control, with the government siding with the squatters over the owners.
NYC subways aren't safe and most America cities have "No Go Zones" where violent crime is out of control
Meanwhile, those who try to stand up to it face lawfare from a government that sides with violent criminals over law-abiding citizens
And there's the rioting problem...for which those who Burned, Looted, and Murdered their way across America never faced any consequences, and indeed were often given settlement dollars by municipalities
So, America is heading the direction of South Africa.
Though we aren't in the same abysmal state as of yet, we are in a very dangerous situation where we can see the cliff ahead - South Africa-style chaos - but run toward it at full speed regardless
A competent, self-confident society would change course before it's too late. But, like South Africa, we might just commit civilizational suicide instead
England used to be the land of ordered liberty, surpassed in individual freedom only by America...now it's less free than Russia
Here are five recent examples of bureaucratic anarcho-tyranny in formerly free, now-perfidious Albion 🧵👇
These are by no means the worst examples of anarcho-tyranny in the land
That dubious award would probably go to the "Grooming Gangs" situation, in which woke police let Pakis r*pe young English girls for "cultural sensitivity" reasons. But they are some of the recent ones that have stunned me, and show the problem remains one for formerly merry England
First up: in Wales, the police let an al-Qaeda connected, Rwandan immigrant stab three little girls, and they were more concerned about anti-immigrant backlash than protecting children from terrorists
Now, cops are enforcing bans on teens buying eggs and flour because of egging incidents. Focusing on what's important!
England's Labour regime is taxing away the land of farmers: "My family's been on this land for 375 years. I want to pass this down to my boys...you're taking that"
Who's to blame? Winston Churchill, who the Duke of Beaufort thought should be fed to the foxhounds for it
🧵👇
First, the policy
Because farming is essentially non-remunerative in this free trade world (at least for ag. products), something @JeremyClarkson has shown on Clarkson's farm, and farmland has skyrocketed in price due to inflation, family farmland wasn't taxed upon death in England
That was important because, with few exceptions otherwise, it would be near-impossible for families to pass land from one generation to the next and keep farming it. It would have to be sold to pay the tax, given how little is made from farming now and how valuable farmland is (£30k an acre in some areas)
But Labour wants more money with which it can pay for wind farms and migrant benefits...and regime cronies want to be able to buy up land to put solar farms on and get the subsidies handed out for those. So, now Labour will tax farmland over £1 million in value at a 20% rate, which will destroy family farming and be the death knell of English agriculture
The thing is, we're now acclimated to death taxes because they've been used to destroy family fortunes for generations, but they're quite new, on the grand scheme of things
In fact, after being around briefly, and at a low rate, during the Napoleonic Wars, England brought them back around the turn of the century to fund the expansion of the Royal Navy
But it wasn't until around the second decade of the 20th century that they were ratcheted up to the point that they became painful. That came with the People's Budget, which raised death taxes to the painful 15% rate and taxed land
Questions I frequently get when I write about Rhodesia are 1) if I'm from there and 2) why I find it interesting
I'm not from there
But I find it interesting because of the promise it held and because it was the one proud, vital civilization, not decaying, Western country 🧵👇
The promise part I have written about before, such as in the thread below
Generally, I see it as a place that showed how both liberal, mass democracy and communism could be rejected in the name of Old World-style prosperity and stability
But that's just part of it. The other thing, something I spoke about recently with @RowdyHODL, is that it's a glimpse at a still vital and thriving country, even in wartime, when the rest of the West was battered down by malaise
As we put it, they were happy warriors in the fight for civilization, not a depressed and downtrodden land full of those who just wanted the unpleasantness to end
The problem with monarchy is the "what about a bad king?" question, a major problem with "democracy," the proponents of which mean mass, liberal democracy, is that it allows a mob of ignoramuses to rule
The solution isn't technocracy, it's Rhodesian-style propertied voting🧵👇
The general problem is that one-man rule has pitfalls related to the judgment of that individual, though it does at least ensure that there's responsibility and at least a reason to care about stewardship of the country
Mass democracy, on the other hand, means reliance on the mob's (almost always poor) judgment. Even if the mob eventually wakes up, as has happened across the West as of late, the problems created by mass democracy are often quite far along because there wasn't much of an impulse for sober judgment until things got quite bad
An example of that is the case in England, for example, where the Reform and Parliament Bill-enabled mob voted for prosperity-destroying Labourites, namely Attlee and Wilson, for years, and then only recently realized how poorly things are going. Now it might be too late for the country
The problem with technocracy, meanwhile, can be seen in American tariff policy. Industry-protecting tariffs were long tossed aside in favor of the "free trade"-style policies the technocrats wanted. Those, in a result that the technocrats cared not a bit about, resulted in a hollowing out of the American industrial base and the men who made it work. Now America can't produce naval vessels, is outproduced in simple military equipment like artillery shells by the Russians, and is seeing itself outdone by the Chinese in terms of not only ships, but also everything from drones to steel. Tariffs would have avoided a lot of that, but "the experts" were focused on short-term spreadsheet profit maximization rather than the long term
So, the problem becomes, how do you encourage screen for stewardship and weed out the incompetents who compose the mob while also keeping power out of the hands of either one man egg-head experts who don't know or care about results on the ground, for the people of the country?
Propertied voting of one sort or another seems like the best way to handle this. Power is in the hands of neither the mob nor "the experts" nor a singular king, but rather the competent people of the country
One of the saddest aspects of Rhodesia's intentional destruction by the West and commies is the immense lost opportunity that its destruction represents
This is true both materially and spiritually: its destruction benefitted only civilization-haters
I'll explain in the 🧵👇
The material case is quite obvious:
As Ian Smith noted in The Great Betrayal, Rhodesia was like the Congo, also intentionally destroyed, in that it was full of natural resources the West could have had access to had it done anything other than subvert the bastion against communism
Particularly, Rhodesia had access to the world's second-largest platinum deposit and immense chromium reserves. Chrome is critical for military uses, particularly for armor plating and protection against erosion. Platinum is only found in southern Africa and Australia and is needed for modern automobiles
So, had Rhodesia been supported, those two critical minerals that are found almost nowhere else could have been fully exploited in a stable environment with rule of law. Instead, companies have to trust the Zimbabwean, Congolese, and South African governments not to expropriate them through outright means or taxation, or just let the minerals go unexploited
Related is that Rhodesia was hugely agriculturally successful. Originally that was the cash crop of tobacco, but because of wartime conditions it became grain, the most critical crop for the continent
So, it was the bread basket of Africa and could have fed the continent into the present day. Instead of all the famines (including in Zimbabwe) caused by poor harvest, instead of having to rely on low-quality (low-protein) grain from Ukraine and Russia, instead of counting on handouts from the West, the continent could have been fed by high-quality Rhodesian grain
The starvation and deaths by famine could have been avoided, the food insecurity from the Russo-Ukraine War could have been avoided, and Rhodesia would have remained a prosperous agricultural exporter that, with the nature of its economy, provided a great deal of relatively well-paying jobs to native agricultural laborers
"We" have financialized every aspect of life in an effort to squeeze financial return from everything
Private equity is particularly notorious for this, buying everything from Little League sports teams to medical practices
The medical aspect is particularly worrisome🧵👇
Take the above example, a report conducted by CBS. Dentistry IQ, summarizing the Private Equity problem and what the report found, noted:
"Private equity firms are also buying large dental chains, many of which are owned by individual dentists and specialists who offer implant procedures. According to PitchBook, Aspen Dental bought ClearChoice for an estimated $1.1 billion in 2020, Affordable Care (whose largest clinic brand is Affordable Dentures & Implants) was purchased for an estimated $2.7 billion in 2021, and the private equity wing of the Abu Dhabi government bought Dental Care Alliance for an estimated $1.1 billion in 2022.
"The American Dental Association (ADA) reported that private equity deals with dental practices increased ninefold from 2011 to 2021. There is also an additional interest in oral surgery, possibly due to how expensive implants can be.
...
"Lawsuits have been filed nationwide alleging that dentists at implant clinics have extracted patients' teeth unnecessarily, leaving patients with misaligned implants, or even unable to chew. Dentists who are heavily pushing for implants may be striving for lucrative income instead of the health of their patients.2
"Edwin Zinman, a San Francisco dental malpractice attorney and former periodontist, said: "They've sold a lot of [implants], and some of it unnecessarily, and too often done negligently, without having the dentists who are doing it have the necessary training and experience," Zinman said. "It's for five simple letters: M-O-N-E-Y."
It gets worse. The same general issue has come to medicine generally, with PE firms buying up hospitals just to raise costs and perform unnecessary procedures.
Such is what the American Journal of Medicine noted in a report titled “Private Equity and Medicine: A Marriage Made in Hell.” It provided:
Nearly every study reported in a recent meta-analysis found that PE acquisition led to higher prices. This has been documented in detail in anesthesia practices and in a combination of dermatology, gastroenterology, and ophthalmology practices. These latter studies documented “upcoding” such as seeing a higher percentage of visits claiming more than 30 minutes spent with the patient after PE takeovers. In addition, more new patients are seen and more fee-generating procedures are performed immediately after such takeovers. PE-backed management companies generated a major share of the out-of-network “surprise bills” that received considerable notoriety, as they have acquired major shares in such fields as emergency medicine, pathology, and anesthesiology, where patients do not have the ability to choose “in-network” physicians. Another way PE firms increase their ability to raise fees is by acquiring a dominant share of select specialties in a geographic area. PE firms are particularly attracted to procedure-oriented specialties such as dermatology, gastroenterology, and cardiology, where a few more procedures a week can make a big difference to “the bottom line.”
...
Why would PE firms invest in medical and dental practices, hospitals, nursing homes, hospices, and other health care entities? These firms typically seek to sell their acquired businesses in 3-5 years, aiming for at least a 50% profit. To do this, they must show sufficient revenue and profit growth to justify a higher sales price or increase the profitability of an entity they own to justify maintaining ownership. To do this, they must increase revenues and decrease operating costs. To achieve higher revenues, they will raise prices, increase the “productivity” of practitioners (ie, ask the physicians and others to see more patients), or seek a more lucrative mix of procedures. To lower costs they will seek lower-cost supplies; in a best case through forcing lower prices on currently used products, in a worst case by substituting inferior products. More often, because the major “cost” in a medical setting is the salaries of personnel, they will seek to substitute lower-paid staff: LPNs for RNs, minimally trained “medical assistants” for nurses.