Will Tanner Profile picture
Jul 27, 2024 32 tweets 11 min read Read on X
The South Africanization of America: Chaos is Coming, or Already Here

While Rhodesia is a great story of how Western willingness to betray friends led to anti-civilization victory abroad, the closer example to where America is headed is South Africa, in this 🧵 I'll show why👇Image
First, as a reminder, South Africa embraced apartheid after WWII, and continued with white-minority government until the early 1990s

At that point, it opted for "liberal democracy," and the black majority elected Mandela, a communist convicted for helping blow up a church Image
His wife, Winnie Mandela, was even worse

She was another active communist in the ANC who was known for "necklacing" her political enemies, a horrific act that consisted of sticking the person in a gasoline-soaked tire and setting it ablaze, causing a long, torturous death Image
As in Mugabe's Zimbabwe, some held out hope that the former terrorist would be something of a moderate and not repay the indignities of apartheid with more terrorism

To some extent, those hopes proved more fulfilled in South Africa than Zimbabwe, and Mandela didn't resort to open thuggery and brutality-enforced expropriation like MugabeImage
But, things still took a turn for the worse in the Rainbow Nation, particularly after Mandela's ANC successors took the helm

In the decades of ANC rule that have followed, crime has risen dramatically, the country's electrical grid has been raided by copper thieves, DEI-type policies have inflicted unbearable burdens on its formerly successful companies, and its formerly top-tier military is now struggling in a proxy war against RwandaImage
The particular issue with South Africa is anarcho-tyranny: to a large extent criminals like zama zama gangs, farm attackers, and basic thugs can get away with brutal murder, with the state sometimes even assisting, while those who defend themselves face lawfare

SA is less bad on that front than Europe: self-defense is still allowed, fortunately. But, the government is clearly on the side of the criminals, particularly in farm attacksImage
In fact, as @k9_reaper and @twatterbaas have pointed out the farm attackers are using military-grade equipment, including highly expensive signal jammers, to assist in their attacks on farms

And, even if the government isn't directly assisting in these attacks (which it may very well be), it's at least letting them continue to occur, which is much the same thing to isolated, rural farmersImage
These farm attacks, as a reminder, are absolutely horrific. Here's just one of the stories @k9_reaper has shared: Image
And, just as the government isn't interested in preventing them, it's entirely uninterested in solving them. 95% of the murders go unsolved! Image
And while the farm attacks are horrible, they're not all that the South African population suffers. There are also riots that involve burning buildings, murders, theft, and the like. Here's footage of a riot that @k9_reaper shared in August of 2023
These riots often escalate, and in 2021, for example, vast columns of rioters burnt the country to a crisp, causing billions of dollars of damage in the relatively poor country

They were only stopped by groups of armed men, mainly Boers and Indians, who were armed to the teeth and fought back, protecting their neighborhoods. Thousands, if not more, died.

Here's a video of the chaos, also from @k9_reaper :
Naturally, the crime has caused a need for safety, so those South Africans who can afford it live in modern day castles. Here, for example, is video from @k9_reaper of a home protected by concrete walls, iron beams, barbed wire, light beams, and alarms:
Meanwhile, the companies that remain in the degrading country suffer under DEI laws that makes America's look tame

For example, the amended "Employment Equity Act" effectively requires racial quotas, and the DEI policies regarding hiring make it near-impossible for well-qualified whites to find employment, get into college or graduate programs, or otherwise thrive economically

It's blatant discrimination that has served no oneImage
The DEI situation has created an immense competence crisis, and now even basic heavy industry like steel-making can't survive Image
So, it's a dire situation. Unfortunately, America is headed in much the same direction Image
For one, DEI is an obvious millstone in America, as shown by the resistance that even liberal to moderate business leaders and investors like @elonmusk and @BillAckman are putting up to it Image
Further, it's an obvious fact of life, and has decidedly hurt white Americans.

For example, a Bloomberg study found that only 6% of new jobs at S&P 100 companies went to whites in the years after the BLM protests. “The overall job growth included 20,524 White workers. The other 302,570 jobs — or 94% of the headcount increase — went to people of color,” Bloomberg wrote.

It was later shown that that was only new jobs. When turnover for old jobs was included, the real percentage was closer to ~25% going to whites.

But, still, at ~61% of the population, that shows obvious discriminationImage
The same is true of college admissions, with whites and Asians heavily discriminated against even in the very upper slice of academic scores: Image
American companies are, admittedly, much more successful than their South African counterparts. But, still, trouble is on the horizon, with a competence crisis nearing as merit is put last and various racial and political considerations are put first Image
Take, for example, the constant chaos at airports. Flights are routinely late, scheduled incorrectly, canceled, or otherwise problematic

That wasn't the case even a decade or two ago, but now it's hard to take a single flight without facing an issue of some sort Image
Yes, the planes aren't falling out of the sk yet...well, except for Boeing planes, but they are rarely arriving on time Image
And then there's crime

Yes, America isn't at the rate of crime it was in the 70s, when Black Panthers were assaulting people in the streets, leftist terror groups were carrying out regular bombings, and muggings and other sorts of petty, violent crime were through the roof Image
But crime is on the rise. Gangs are using signal jammers to break into homes.

Squatting, a recurrent problem in South Africa, is out of control, with the government siding with the squatters over the owners.

NYC subways aren't safe and most America cities have "No Go Zones" where violent crime is out of controlImage
Meanwhile, those who try to stand up to it face lawfare from a government that sides with violent criminals over law-abiding citizens
Image
Image
And there's the rioting problem...for which those who Burned, Looted, and Murdered their way across America never faced any consequences, and indeed were often given settlement dollars by municipalities Image
So, America is heading the direction of South Africa.

Though we aren't in the same abysmal state as of yet, we are in a very dangerous situation where we can see the cliff ahead - South Africa-style chaos - but run toward it at full speed regardless

A competent, self-confident society would change course before it's too late. But, like South Africa, we might just commit civilizational suicide instead
Remember, we needn't have neded up here
Read here about the DEI similarities: theamericantribune.news/p/south-africa…
And read here our interviews with @k9_reaper about the state of things in South Africa:
theamericantribune.news/p/surviving-so…
And read here about the West's betrayal of Rhodesia:
And learn here how you can stand up to this discriminatory regime in a legal, reasonable way that helps bring merit back to the workplace:
Read here about Rhodesia's similar situation:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will Tanner

Will Tanner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Will_Tanner_1

Jan 17
The thing is, this meme is accurate: were it not for Reagan's abominable surrender on immigration policy, namely amnesty for 3 million illegals, this wouldn't be happening

If Trump wants to fix California, he'll have to do much the opposite. Fortunately, that's possible🧵👇 Image
First, the policy. I've written about this before, so I'll keep it brief (more details in a linked thread at the end of this one)

Under the 1986 Immigration Bill, Reagan gave amnesty to nearly 3 million illegal immigrants (first 2.6 million, then 300k minors) who entered the country illegally before 1982

The bill was supposed to have limited future illegal immigration by enacting provisions like harsher punishments for business owners who hired illegals. But those were mostly stripped at the last moment in a bit of perfidy from the Democrats, and Reagan signed it anyway.

He was probably close to being senile at that point, so this was more an HW Bush decision than Reagan's alone. Still, he's the one who signed itImage
That created a few problems

The first is that there were three million new Americans, and thus future voters, in the country, from a demographic that votes overwhelmingly blue

The second, and more long-term problematic issue, is that this encouraged millions upon millions of illegals to cross into America in the ensuing decades: if their predecessors got amnesty, why wouldn't they?Image
Read 19 tweets
Jan 16
"You Best Start Believing in the South Africanization of America...You're In It!"

See the signal jammer?

This is the big change coming to American crime

We've long suffered the predations of criminals and their enablers, but signal jammer use shows how it'll get worse

🧵👇Image
First, here's how @k9_reaper described signal jammer use to me in a November of 2023 interview:

Signal jammers are being used for everything from everything from hijackings, cash-in transfer heists, home invasions, and farm attacks as well. So the signal jammer, depending on the model, works at blocking all incoming and outgoing signals from everything from cell phones to radios to even some security cameras in a range of 25 to 100 meters. The sole goal of a signal jammer is to ensure that your target can’t call for help. The reason they use them for farm attacks is that a lot of farmers are out of the community safety initiative and they rely on radios to be able to call for help to one another, to come and assist.

You’re probably thinking of that famous picture of that guy with the signal jammer backpack during a farm attack. It was like a black-and-white photo, and he had that proper military signal jammer. That wasn’t just anything you could get from Alibaba, or even from Mozambique and just driving it over the border or something. That was a proper military use jammer pack in use with the SADF. You’ll see a lot of military and ex-active duty military personnel in these farm attacks, and they often just take what they need from the military before they go out on the attacks.

In essence, the farm attacks are the most brutal thing anyone can imagine. They make those attacks going on in Israel and Gaza look like a walk in the park. And the use of the signal jammer packs is real. It is happening on a daily basis. Both to the citizens of the Republic of South Africa and to people they want to assassinate.Image
So, how's that relevant for Americans?

Well, first off, even if you are armed not being able to call for help can be a problem if there are multiple assailants

But, more than that, most people aren't armed. At least not with firearms. They still, delusionally, believe the police are there to help them, even after the Floyd riots showed that to largely be a lie. So, if unarmed and unable to call for help because of signal jammers, you're at the not-so-tender mercies of the criminal underclass, and face situations like that called out by K9 in the post belowImage
Read 13 tweets
Jan 16
This is such nonsense

Ever since the Greeks built a culture around wine, the West has functioned quite well with alcohol as a social bedrock

And while min-maxing every tidbit of life is ridiculous anyway, there's not really evidence that reasonable drinking is bad for you🧵👇 Image
First, the cultural aspect:

There is something unique about the West that was typified by its Mannerbund beginning but has held true through the ages; the ties of hierarchy, feelings of individualist, and pairings of brotherhood and merit created something truly astounding to behold

Such men could, with their ties that bind intact and providing strength and individual quest for honor and glory providing impulse, conquer the world

In fact, they quite literally did so; only a few minor realms remained outside Great Power control by 1913, and much of that had been conquered by adventurers of the Courtney Selous, James Brooke, and Julius Caesar mold. Men who created intense ties of brotherhood within their group and dominated the world as small bands

Meanwhile, back at home, the societies they lived in and which their compatriots built were, on the whole, more gorgeous than any competitors: where were the county houses of Imperial China, the parks and coverts of Mesoamerica, or the opera houses of Dahomey? None existedImage
What, then, beyond heritage, was unique?

Why did the Franks and Normans conquer the world while the Arabs once so far ahead of them fell first somewhat behind, then greatly behind, and were eventually under the thumb of the descendants of the Crusaders they once bested? Image
Image
Read 13 tweets
Jan 15
Why did the West work with the communists to destroy Rhodesia?

Or, why would the "free" side of the Cold War ally with the communists to destroy a thriving, resource republic in a critical area

It makes no sense at first. But it makes much sense with a closer look 🧵👇 Image
Critical to understand here is what the two main sides of the Cold War were

On one side was the communist block. It wanted, whatever its internal divisions, to spread communism abroad, mainly by launching revolutions within the old Empires of the Great Powers

The other side was America. It, by hook or crook, aimed to contain and then roll back communism, mainly by subsuming the same former Great Power colonies the communists were aiming for, and replacing colonial government with nationalist-minded locals that would engage in free trade with America and at least pay lip service to liberal democracyImage
Notably, then, both sides shared two common traits

The first was a desire to strip the old powers of their empires. So, whenever imperialism fought the locals, America and the Soviets were on the same side, as happened first in the Suez Crisis

Egalitarianism, or the belief that there are no differences in capability between humans and that if any differences show themselves to exist, the state must destroy them, was the other common trait. The Soviets (and Red Chinese) were a bit more brutal about it, but the impulse was the same. "Liberal democracy" meant the destruction of natural hierarchy based forms of government, namely aristocracy, and its replacement with mass democracy or leveling dictatorship. Communism just jumped straight to the dictatorship bit, with a leveled country and a dictator + his cronies at the very topImage
Read 11 tweets
Jan 14
One thing I've seen missed in the housing price debate on here the past few days is that, while the price of houses has increased tremendously in fiat cost over recent years, valued in real money it has held steady for a century

A short thread with some helpful charts🧵👇 Image
This is one helpful chart given its length, and though it only goes to 2020, it does show the general trend:

Priced in real money, housing has actually gotten less expensive, even despite increasing in square footage, quality, and complexity; think of all the extra plumbing and electrical wiring now compared to 1900!

Meanwhile the fiat value has rocketed upward tremendously, as anything exponential eventually does

The only time housing increased priced in gold is when gold was artificially suppressed as inflation raged from the mid-1930s to gold being legal to purchase again in the 70sImage
Here's a chart going up to today and back to 1889: the house price hasn't changed much, priced in gold, and really the only spike was when gold's price was artificially suppressed Image
Read 11 tweets
Jan 14
This lack of generational continuity is a big problem, as it leads to denying responsibility to the past and future which, in turn, creates a leftist political bent

Americans must learn to be Grosvenors rather than Vanderbilts; America's post-Depression history shows why🧵👇 Image
The lack of "Old Money" in America is often celebrated, as it seems to signal total meritocracy, democracy as applied to the social scene, etc.

But that's not really true. America in, say, 1890 was a meritocratic time: Rockefeller, Carnegie, the Vanderbilts, etc. built and maintained vast fortunes and were able to do so because the general freedom of action allowed by the time created opportunity. They were free to unleash their genius, in other words, and so created vast fortunes

But it was also an era in which "Old Money" not just existed but dominated the social scene. A great example is Mrs. Astor's New York Four Hundred. Composed almost entirely of families of "gentlemen" in that the family money had been had for at least three generations, it ruled New York society and determined what was posh, fashionable, accessible and so on.Image
Image
Those with talent, in short, were free to make their fortunes and often rose not just to business, but political prominence

Meanwhile, there was still a tradition-minded cohort that ensured old traditions, manners, customs, and so on were respected

They watched for excess - for example it was they, as represented by the Morgan dynasty, that kept banking in America long the province of gentlemen with strict moral standards (@NormanDodd_knew has done a fantastic job highlighting this)- and, as necessary and salutary integrated the "new men" into the social framework

What that accomplished was keeping society, both with a capital S and without, on the right track. Men and women dressed respectably, acted respectably in public, were inculcated in the view of service to the state (namely in the military) as a good thing, understood their duty to the different classes, and so on

Notably, it was the new men who never joined that group, men like Henry Clay Frick, who had the worst Gilded Age reputations for treating workers poorly

Nothing is perfect, of course, but America remained a stable and prosperous place, avoiding socialism and/or revolution as happened in much of Europe, and the sons of the wealthy volunteered in units like the Rough Riders and first air force (composed mainly of the Yale flying club) when war broke outImage
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(