Will Tanner Profile picture
Jul 27 32 tweets 11 min read Read on X
The South Africanization of America: Chaos is Coming, or Already Here

While Rhodesia is a great story of how Western willingness to betray friends led to anti-civilization victory abroad, the closer example to where America is headed is South Africa, in this 🧵 I'll show why👇Image
First, as a reminder, South Africa embraced apartheid after WWII, and continued with white-minority government until the early 1990s

At that point, it opted for "liberal democracy," and the black majority elected Mandela, a communist convicted for helping blow up a church Image
His wife, Winnie Mandela, was even worse

She was another active communist in the ANC who was known for "necklacing" her political enemies, a horrific act that consisted of sticking the person in a gasoline-soaked tire and setting it ablaze, causing a long, torturous death Image
As in Mugabe's Zimbabwe, some held out hope that the former terrorist would be something of a moderate and not repay the indignities of apartheid with more terrorism

To some extent, those hopes proved more fulfilled in South Africa than Zimbabwe, and Mandela didn't resort to open thuggery and brutality-enforced expropriation like MugabeImage
But, things still took a turn for the worse in the Rainbow Nation, particularly after Mandela's ANC successors took the helm

In the decades of ANC rule that have followed, crime has risen dramatically, the country's electrical grid has been raided by copper thieves, DEI-type policies have inflicted unbearable burdens on its formerly successful companies, and its formerly top-tier military is now struggling in a proxy war against RwandaImage
The particular issue with South Africa is anarcho-tyranny: to a large extent criminals like zama zama gangs, farm attackers, and basic thugs can get away with brutal murder, with the state sometimes even assisting, while those who defend themselves face lawfare

SA is less bad on that front than Europe: self-defense is still allowed, fortunately. But, the government is clearly on the side of the criminals, particularly in farm attacksImage
In fact, as @k9_reaper and @twatterbaas have pointed out the farm attackers are using military-grade equipment, including highly expensive signal jammers, to assist in their attacks on farms

And, even if the government isn't directly assisting in these attacks (which it may very well be), it's at least letting them continue to occur, which is much the same thing to isolated, rural farmersImage
These farm attacks, as a reminder, are absolutely horrific. Here's just one of the stories @k9_reaper has shared: Image
And, just as the government isn't interested in preventing them, it's entirely uninterested in solving them. 95% of the murders go unsolved! Image
And while the farm attacks are horrible, they're not all that the South African population suffers. There are also riots that involve burning buildings, murders, theft, and the like. Here's footage of a riot that @k9_reaper shared in August of 2023
These riots often escalate, and in 2021, for example, vast columns of rioters burnt the country to a crisp, causing billions of dollars of damage in the relatively poor country

They were only stopped by groups of armed men, mainly Boers and Indians, who were armed to the teeth and fought back, protecting their neighborhoods. Thousands, if not more, died.

Here's a video of the chaos, also from @k9_reaper :
Naturally, the crime has caused a need for safety, so those South Africans who can afford it live in modern day castles. Here, for example, is video from @k9_reaper of a home protected by concrete walls, iron beams, barbed wire, light beams, and alarms:
Meanwhile, the companies that remain in the degrading country suffer under DEI laws that makes America's look tame

For example, the amended "Employment Equity Act" effectively requires racial quotas, and the DEI policies regarding hiring make it near-impossible for well-qualified whites to find employment, get into college or graduate programs, or otherwise thrive economically

It's blatant discrimination that has served no oneImage
The DEI situation has created an immense competence crisis, and now even basic heavy industry like steel-making can't survive Image
So, it's a dire situation. Unfortunately, America is headed in much the same direction Image
For one, DEI is an obvious millstone in America, as shown by the resistance that even liberal to moderate business leaders and investors like @elonmusk and @BillAckman are putting up to it Image
Further, it's an obvious fact of life, and has decidedly hurt white Americans.

For example, a Bloomberg study found that only 6% of new jobs at S&P 100 companies went to whites in the years after the BLM protests. “The overall job growth included 20,524 White workers. The other 302,570 jobs — or 94% of the headcount increase — went to people of color,” Bloomberg wrote.

It was later shown that that was only new jobs. When turnover for old jobs was included, the real percentage was closer to ~25% going to whites.

But, still, at ~61% of the population, that shows obvious discriminationImage
The same is true of college admissions, with whites and Asians heavily discriminated against even in the very upper slice of academic scores: Image
American companies are, admittedly, much more successful than their South African counterparts. But, still, trouble is on the horizon, with a competence crisis nearing as merit is put last and various racial and political considerations are put first Image
Take, for example, the constant chaos at airports. Flights are routinely late, scheduled incorrectly, canceled, or otherwise problematic

That wasn't the case even a decade or two ago, but now it's hard to take a single flight without facing an issue of some sort Image
Yes, the planes aren't falling out of the sk yet...well, except for Boeing planes, but they are rarely arriving on time Image
And then there's crime

Yes, America isn't at the rate of crime it was in the 70s, when Black Panthers were assaulting people in the streets, leftist terror groups were carrying out regular bombings, and muggings and other sorts of petty, violent crime were through the roof Image
But crime is on the rise. Gangs are using signal jammers to break into homes.

Squatting, a recurrent problem in South Africa, is out of control, with the government siding with the squatters over the owners.

NYC subways aren't safe and most America cities have "No Go Zones" where violent crime is out of controlImage
Meanwhile, those who try to stand up to it face lawfare from a government that sides with violent criminals over law-abiding citizens
Image
Image
And there's the rioting problem...for which those who Burned, Looted, and Murdered their way across America never faced any consequences, and indeed were often given settlement dollars by municipalities Image
So, America is heading the direction of South Africa.

Though we aren't in the same abysmal state as of yet, we are in a very dangerous situation where we can see the cliff ahead - South Africa-style chaos - but run toward it at full speed regardless

A competent, self-confident society would change course before it's too late. But, like South Africa, we might just commit civilizational suicide instead
Remember, we needn't have neded up here
Read here about the DEI similarities: theamericantribune.news/p/south-africa…
And read here our interviews with @k9_reaper about the state of things in South Africa:
theamericantribune.news/p/surviving-so…
And read here about the West's betrayal of Rhodesia:
And learn here how you can stand up to this discriminatory regime in a legal, reasonable way that helps bring merit back to the workplace:
Read here about Rhodesia's similar situation:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will Tanner

Will Tanner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Will_Tanner_1

Dec 17
Buffett is portrayed as being virtuous for this "I never wanted to found a dynasty" attitude but it's actually quite anti-civilizational, and is the opposite of how the men who built the West thought

The thing is, it's only dynastic thinking that leads to lont-term thinking🧵👇 Image
This is, frankly, the difference between a Lord and a modern CEO:

One cares about what will be happening 6 quarters from now, if he thinks even that far ahead. The other thinks six generations from now, as it is his duty to do so

While Buffett is undoubtedly a longer-term thinker than most of his peer group, he still faces the modern problem of assuming that what is most moral is for things to be (mostly) reset at each generation. He (and many others like him) see inheritance of a vast fortune as wrong because it is "unearned"

So, instead of keeping the fortune intact so that it can be used for great ends, it's wasted away on vague "philanthropy" that does little, in the end, to actually help anyone, at least compared to what could be done with a vast estateImage
At least Buffett isn't a "die with zero," type who wants to spend everything

But, still, his flaw in thinking about wealth is that it prevents anything substantial from being built over time

So, whereas in the past projects could be multi-generational, whether it was the building and maintenance of a grand estate or the turning of a bank like JP Morgan into an immensely powerful, influential behemoth, now they can't be. Instead, whatever was intended to be accomplished has to be accomplished in essentially the prime of life, or it will fail for lack of time, as the next generation can't be get involved

While this is bad enough in the case of Buffett, who at least managed to build an interesting business that might survive him, it's even worse in the case of people who did little that will survive, instead only accumulating money. The trend of celebrities announcing their kids won't inherit anything of note is such an example. That means nothing real will ever be accomplished. Whatever charity gets the money will either waste it or never spend it, limiting its usefulness, and what could have been the start of a multi-generational ascent to greatness is instead over before it ever beganImage
Read 14 tweets
Dec 17
This was somewhat accurate around the early 20th century and is becoming true again, at least for some swathes of people in some jobs

But it was fixed then and could be fixed with similar policies now

Fortunately, it was McKinely who fixed it and Trump wants to emulate him🧵👇 Image
McKinley's main problem, as a governer and then as president, was that labor and capital were at each other's throats, seeing each other as the enemy

Both had fair points

On one hand, labor was underpaid compared to its basic life expenses, though things were better for our industrial laborers than in England

But, on the other, capital noted that stiff competition from abroad via imports meant that higher wages weren't economically feasible. It's profits were generally thin, thanks to imports, so higher wages would sink companies and lead to higher unemployment

And, both sides had valid complaints of violence directed at them; tempers were reaching a boiling pointImage
Related to that was the issue of money

Debtors, particularly farmers, largely wanted an inflationary money supply because it made their debts easier to pay off

Creditors wanted a rigorous gold standard, as a lack of inflation, or better yet deflation, made their loans worth more and made business easier to plan for

This was a huge issue, with William Jennings Bryan winning immense popularity on the back of his anti-gold standard, pro-silver speeches

Like the wage issue, this was reaching a boiling pointImage
Read 10 tweets
Dec 16
I get that this is supposed to be a positive image showing American continuity, but really it shows how devastating to the national psyche the Depression and FDR were

A quick 🧵👇 Image
This is observable in attire: three men on the right all have some degree of continuity to them

The colonial era, early republican era, and latter 19th century all were somewhat different, as attire shows, but there was no great breakdown

So breeches turned to trousers, tricorns to top hats, cravats to ties, and so on, but the progression was understandable in response to the changing environment and nature of life; life as a gentleman in Mrs. Astor's New York is different than that of a planter in 1720, so clothing changedImage
Image
But, importantly, it was still dignified. A top hat and a tricorn were different forms of headwear, as breeches and trousers or a frock jacket and morning coat are different, but weren't particularly casual or slovenly, at least in the image presented

The three men look dignified, their sons would have looked the same, and "democracy" hadn't turned America into a thoroughly casual, anti-tradition societyImage
Image
Read 9 tweets
Dec 16
A great challenge for America is that it's become a twisted version of England in the early 20th century

This is best seen in land and elite social life, but is present everywhere; in all cases, we must overcome the change or we'll face the fate of our English cousins🧵👇 Image
Image
First, what was going on with England?

The years that followed the beginning of the Agricultural Depression and preceded WW1 saw immense change of a bad sort

For one, free trade was eating away the country. Its now uneconomic farms were lying fallow, its factories facing unbeatable competition from the much larger markets abroad with industrial innovation and prosperity slowing as a result, and its trade deficit widening dramatically

Similarly problematic was how social changes were going. King Edward famously surrounding himself with various sorts of disreputable characters, from banksters to actresses, rather than the old-blooded Lords. That presaged similar changes, with Churchill taxing away the wealth of those Lords with his People's Budget and Lloyd George destroying their power with his Parliament Bill. Alongside their loss of the prestige and political position of the old families came a change in social mores: gone were the old, Christian values and in was the free-living "fast set" with its rampant infidelity and eyebrow-raising lifestyle.

And, of course, those changes brought with them immense upheaval in the basic life of the land. A great example is foxhunting: whereas in the past the activity was a country sport enjoyed by locals of all stripes, from the sons of small farmers to the local magnate, railroads turned it into something the new elite felt compelled to engage in for reasons of status. So the farmers were screened out, the magnates saw their fields full of new men, and what had been a jovial activity that created bonds between the rural classes became something decidedly otherwise; the new elites lacked concern or care for their inferiors, being ruled by money rather than tradition and noblesse obligeImage
In short, wealth and policy favoritism flowed from an at least somewhat virtuous and tradition-minded old elite to a rapacious, plutocratic one with decidedly less virtuous morals

Meanwhile, life got worse for the average person. Poor wage work in factories left workers unable to eat healthily, with health standards declining from the 1850s to WW1 rather than rising with the "GDP." Meanwhile, land remained somewhat expensive (20 pounds an acre around 1900 translates to around $3800 today), pricing out most farmers and meaning land remained in concentrated hands...though it was increasingly sold to new men rather than remaining in the somewhat more paternalistic hands of the old elite. Eventually, by the 1920s(ish) and post-WW2 period, small farmers did end up buying farms; however, doing so drained them of capital and further limited English agricultural innovation, a major change from the pre-Ag Depression period

So life was getting worse for most people, the morals of the country were getting decidedly worse, and the top of the pyramid was changing much for the worseImage
Image
Read 18 tweets
Dec 13
This is the most imbecilic tax proposal, given what it means for society and tradition

“A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit," as the proverb goes

This forces them to cut trees down, and England's decline shows where that goes🧵👇 Image
First off, the obvious problem with this, regardless of tradition, is that it makes it essentially illegal to build anything that matters

All great projects, whether a farm or kingdom, JP Morgan-style bank or SpaceX-style goal to settle Mars, are multi-generational. It takes time to build, decades of investment and work, and so on

All the jobs, all the advancements, all the achievements that come from those multi-generation projects are great things for society but they don't occur in a vacuum. They require that willingness to invest in the future that only really comes when one knows that the future will be their through heirs

Often, those heirs are children, but sometimes, as in the case of the Antonines or later Morgans, they are chosen successors. Regardless, what matters is that it can be passed on so that the future can be thought of and invested in, that once the boy earns his spurs he can be trusted with the kingdomImage
If taxes obliterate that, if they prohibit the handing off to the next generation because the state will confiscate everything that exists, of what use is anything than society-rotting hedonism

We see that now. The worst politicians are those without children; they do not care for the future because, to them, the future is dead. So they're perfectly ok with bringing in a billion Third Worlders to push the price of cat grooming down

Similarly, the worst CEOs are those who are there for a term of years. They only have to care about what quarterly earnings will be for a few years, so they can get their stock package and golden parachuteImage
Read 18 tweets
Dec 12
Is there an antidote to egalitarianism and its ill effects that doesn't require some sort of autocracy?

This is a question I was recently asked, and it's an interesting one

The answer is yes. That antidote is pairing a landed, tradition-minded elite with propertied voting🧵👇Image
The problem is that egalitarianism, or the idea that 1) all outcomes must be equal and 2) it is the regime's duty to destroy any differences that exist, leads to immense civilizational problems that are as varied as they are caustic

A good example is "disparate impact" prohibition. This is the idea that if any test for employment, schooling, punishment of unruly students, etc. is failed by a certain group (e.g. black women) at a higher rate than others, it's illegal and must be illegal because it's discriminatory, even if no intentional discrimination was involved in the creation of the test. This is why failed candidates for police/fire departments will routinely win millions of dollars for not being able to do push-ups or basic reasoning questions (this happened twice recently), why a woman won millions of dollars from Equinox when fired for failing to show up to work on time dozens of times, and so on

Of course, that sort of thinking and its various step-children (affirmative action for schooling, DEI for hiring, and so on) make it impossible to get anything done. Semiconductors can't be created when employees behave erratically, rockets don't work when the math isn't exactly correct, water can't have just a little bit of cholera in itImage
So, to where that leads is South Africa, or as I like to call it in the context of America: South Africanization, the total destruction of every form of civilization in the name of egalitarianism

The Congo falling to pieces out of a refusal to maintain infrastructure and learn from the Belgians, the waging of war on men like Rockefeller or JP Morgan simply for being successful, the cancellation of the Apollo program to pour more money into welfare programs, etc. are all examples of this

Soon, we'll be like South Africa: firing overachievers in critical industries like electricity generation because they dared to succeed at tasks rather than fail like their peersImage
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(