Let's start by quickly reviewing how shoes are made.
All shoes are made on a last, which is a wooden or plastic form over which the uppers are pulled. This determines the shape of the shoe (and how well they fit your particular feet).
These lasts stay at the factory. So when you buy a pair of shoes, you just get the shoes themselves. If you wear them for a while, you may notice that the soles will start to curl and the uppers will get very wrinkly. This doesn't look very good.
So, the point of shoe trees is to help the shoes retain their original shape. A Reddit user once conducted an experiment: he wore the same pair of boots every day, but only inserted a tree into one boot at the end of each day.
After a few months, you can see how one is more curled. The more curling, the more wrinkles in the uppers. So the point of shoe trees is to both minimize curling and wrinkling.
The best shoe trees are lasted, which means they come in the same shape as the original last on which your shoes were made. This is common in bespoke and a small number of high-end shoe brands (you would buy the trees from the shoe company or maker)
In bespoke shoemaking, some companies rely on Hervé Brunelle, a French firm that turns bespoke lasts into customized shoe trees. Here's a 5 min French program on the company, if you're so inclined to watch the process (and can understand French)
Lasted shoe trees are nice because they won't distort the uppers. Here are two shoes, each stored unworn for ten years. The brown shoe had a lasted tree; the black one didn't. You can see the distortion.
Unfortunately, most ready-to-wear companies nowadays don't offer lasted shoe trees. The few that do only offer lasted trees for a small number of lasts in their range. So most of us have to rely on generic shoe trees from companies like Woodlore. They look like this:
These trees typically come in a range of sizes (small, medium, and large) to fit various shoe sizes (7-8, 9-10, 11-12, etc). But since they are not made for any particular pair of shoes, they are typically spring loaded to fill up any empty space.
This is how you can sometimes get this sort of distortion. No real way around this since lasted trees are uncommon, particularly in ready-to-wear shoes. Good news is that most shoes are not museum objects and this will not affect the shoe's performance.
But this is to say that, if lasted trees are available and money is not a concern for you, sometimes it can be wise to buy lasted trees, which are made with a hinge. These will fill up the empty space in your shoes and not exert any unnecessary pressure.
There's a theory online that cedar shoe trees are good for sucking up moisture in your shoes. Personally, I don't believe this is true. But cedar shoe trees do look nicer to me than plastic ones.
As a general matter, you can get more wear out of your shoes if you rotate between them (sweat from the previous day can prematurely break down the material). And insert a pair of shoe trees into your shoes when they're not in use. This helps them look better.
Finally, a quick look at some novelty shoe trees. Some makers, such as Saint Crispin's, provide hollowed out shoe trees, like the ones you see below. These are considerably lighter in weight, making them good for travel.
There are also three piece shoe trees, which are more common for bespoke boots. Here, you insert the front, then the back, and then slide the center piece so everything is secure.
Sometimes you'll see these in riding boots. Tall boots often need specialized trees because regular shoe trees won't fill up the empty space in the vamp (the area of the shoe that covers the top of your ankle)
Lastly, this sort of thing is only really necessary for leather shoes. You don't really need them for sneakers because rubber soles and canvas don't behave in the same way as leather.
And that's about all your need to know regarding shoe trees. 👞
Addendum: Sorry, I should be more explicit. By "rotate between your shoes," I mean give your leather shoes a day of rest before wearing them again. This will allow them to dry properly. Sweat from your feet can otherwise prematurely break down the material (think of what happens when you flex wet cardboard back and forth). Don't try to speed up the drying process by putting your shoes next to a heat source, like a furnace. This will dry out the oils in the leather and potentially crack your uppers, which is not something you can fix.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you're just dipping your toes into tailored clothing, start with a navy sport coat. This is something you can wear with a button-up shirt and pair of trousers, or something as casual as a t-shirt and some jeans. It's easily the most versatile jacket.
Key is to get something with texture so it doesn't look like an orphaned suit jacket. Spier & Mackay has great semi-affordable tailoring. Their navy hopsack Moro is made from pure wool and a half-canvas to give it shape. Classic proportions and soft natural shoulder
There's a pervasive belief that we no longer produce clothes in the United States. This is not true. In this thread, I will tell you about some great made-in-USA brands — some that run their own factories, while others are US brands contracting with US factories. 🧵
I should first note this thread focuses on well-made, stylish clothes produced in ethical conditions. For me, producing in the US is not enough. It means nothing if the clothes are ugly, crappy, or produced in sweatshop conditions. My article for The Nation below.
JEANS
Gustin produces MiUSA jeans using raw Japanese denim. "Raw" means the fabric hasn't been pre-distressed, allowing it to naturally fade with use, reflecting your actual body and lifestyle. I like their fuller 1968 Vintage Straight fit. They also do lots of other stuff.
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.
Watch these two videos. Then answer these two questions:
— Which of the two men is better dressed?
— How does each come off?
I think Carney is better dressed, partly because his clothes fit better. Notice that his jacket collar always hugs his neck, while Pierre Poilievre's jacket collar never touches him.
The level of craftsmanship that goes into a lot of Japanese menswear simply doesn't exist in the United States. You can do this for many categories — suits, jeans, hats, etc.
In this thread, I will show you just one category: men's shoes 🧵
For this comparison, I will focus on Japanese bespoke shoemaking vs. US ready-to-wear. The level of bespoke craftsmanship shown here simply doesn't exist in the US, so a Japanese bespoke vs. US bespoke comparison would be unfair. US bespoke is mostly about orthopedic work.
So instead, I will focus on the best that the US has to offer: ready-to-wear Alden.
On a basic level, top-end Japanese shoes are better because they are handwelted, whereas Alden shoes are Goodyear welted. The first involves more handwork and can be resoled more often.
In 1999, a group of Haitians were tired of political disorder and dreamed of a better life in the United States. So they built a small, 23-foot boat by hand using pine trees, scrap wood, and used nails. They called the boat "Believe in God." 🧵
In a boat powered by nothing but a sail, they somehow made it from Tortuga Island to the Bahamas (about a 90 mile distance). Then from the Bahamas, they set sail again. But a few days and some hundred miles later, their makeshift boat began to sink.
The men on the boat were so dehydrated this point, one slipped in and out of consciousness, unable to stand. They were all resigned to their death.
Luckily, they were rescued at the last minute by the US Coast Guard.