Here is the @Olympics fraudulent DMCA takedown notice to me as well as information on the posts being taken down despite it being the most iron-clad case of Fair Use imaginable.
@Olympics As you can see, this content utilizes short, representative clips found originally on X that are explicitly used for the purposes of public reporting and criticism. Iron-clad.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
That's an eternity for the Secret Service to surveil and neutralize a threat to a former president's life.
The Trump assassination attempt came days prior to Joe Biden suddenly dropping out of the 2024 race.
The American people need answers. Now.
Personally, I would expect Secret Service agents to become aware of a threat and seek to neutralize it within 1-2 minutes, even if coordinating with local law enforcement.
This is beyond unacceptable. It is outright suspicious.
*I am intrigued by Dan Bongino's point that Crooks may have been allowed to penetrate so far due to the Secret Service's misapprehension that Crooks was potentially a member of the Counter-Sniper team. But 90 minutes is more than enough time to vet and neutralize a threat.
CONFIRMED: Google is already suppressing searches on the "assassination attempt on TRUMP."
This is clearly an attempt to prevent political support for Donald Trump.
Big Tech is once again r*gging the presidential election.
It gets worse. Google pretends not to know who the Trump shooter is or how to direct people to searches on him.
Here we are OVER TWO WEEKS after an assassination attempt on a former president.
We still don't have mainstream reporting on the pro-Biden shooter's obvious motives, nor any analysis on how the mainstream media fueled a shooting that nearly killed a presidential candidate.
JUST IN: Peter Doocy confronts KJP on the now-infamous "talking points" card that tells reporters to deny Kamala Harris was ever appointed "Border Czar."
Drop what you're doing *right now* and watch this *entire* video from start to finish. It will *shock* you.
Ed. note: I will refrain from further commentary except to note that it contains "rock solid" audio analysis that fits my initial reaction to the Trump shooting video.
It is corroborated by video analysis and mainstream media reporting. It is *not* fringe analysis. It is conducted by Dr. Chris Martensen @chrismartenson. There is nothing hyperbolic or flimsy about it.
We should not rush to conclusions. But I will add that I am highly disturbed by the prospective inference about where a "second gunman" appears to have shot Trump. (In my view, it seems to be the "first gunman.")
Here are select slides from the analysis. Make of it what you will.