In 2021, @VP Harris agreed to lead the Administration’s signature effort to expand Internet infrastructure. Congress then provided $42 billion for the work.
It’s now been 9️⃣8️⃣7️⃣ days since the plan was enacted &
0️⃣ Americans have been connected
0️⃣ Shovels worth of dirt turned
It gets worse.
In 2020, Starlink won an FCC award to quickly & efficiently offer Internet to 642,000 homes & businesses.
But the FCC revoked that award in 2023.
The revocation hit states like Pennsylvania particularly hard b/c it had 59,200 locations covered by the award.
The 2023 Commission decision to revoke the Starlink award only came after the Administration gave agencies the green light to go over Musk.
The government’s approach to broadband infrastructure should be guided by smart policies not partisan score settling.
Pennsylvania alone is supposed to be getting $1.16 billion of the $42B based on needing to extend Internet to 278,536 unserved homes and business.
But not one of those locations have been connected with these dollars.
There’s still time to correct course & start connecting communities.
Begin by eliminating the DEI mandates, dropping the climate change agenda, reversing the unlawful technology bias, and cutting out the layers of needless red tape added on by the Biden-Harris Administration.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2021, the Biden Administration got $42.45 billion from Congress to deploy high-speed Internet to millions of Americans.
Years later, it has not connected even 1 person with those funds. In fact, it now says that no construction projects will even start until 2025 at earliest.
Meanwhile, the Biden Admin has been layering a partisan political agenda on top of this $42.45B program - a liberal wish list that has nothing to do with connecting Americans.
Climate change mandates, tech biases, DEI requirements, favoring government-run networks + more.
It gets worse
While the Biden Admin's $42.45B plan from 2021 has not resulted in even a single shovel's worth of dirt being turned, the government in 2022 revoked an award to Starlink that would have delivered high-speed Internet to 642K rural locations
After being caught allowing personnel in Beijing access to U.S. data, TikTok promised to reform its ways & wall that data off.
But of course, TikTok did not change its ways. As the WSJ found, it kept on sharing sensitive U.S. data with China. Personnel inside China have simply ignored the “Project Texas” promises that TikTok has made to U.S. lawmakers.
Or take TikTok’s decision to enable Beijing-based personnel to spy on Americans.
Initially, TikTok denied the story and claimed that the reporters lacked journalist integrity. But eventually,
TikTok was forced to confess that, yes, it had illicitly surveilled the locations of specific Americans despite its representations to lawmakers.
For years, TikTok represented that none of the sensitive data that it collects on U.S. users is available to personnel inside China.
Then leaked internal materials revealed this to be nothing more than gaslighting.
A deeply reported story broke in 2022 that pulled back the curtain on TikTok’s data flows back into China.
Based on leaked audio from 80 internal TikTok meetings, the report revealed that “Everything is seen in China,” as one TikTok official put it.
And that “everything” is more than just your average cat video.
TikTok collects reams of highly sensitive data on U.S. users, including location data, search and browsing histories, keystroke patterns, and biometric identifiers, including faceprints and voiceprints
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that the government keep this type of data confidential when it is collected by the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission.
But the FCC goes another way—one that violates the Constitution, as courts already found in two prior FCC cases.
This is no benign disclosure regime either.
The evidentiary record makes clear that the FCC has chosen to publish these scorecards for one and only one reason—to ensure that businesses are targeted and pressured into making decisions based on a person’s race and gender.
Last year, after Elon Musk acquired Twitter, President Biden gave federal agencies the green light to go after him.
And they have.
Today, the FCC adds itself to the growing list of federal agencies engaging in the regulatory harassment of Elon Musk.
I dissent.
President Biden stood at a White House podium & stated that Elon Musk “is worth being looked at.”
When asked "How?", President Biden responded “There’s a lot of ways.”
There certainly are. The DOJ, FAA, FTC, NLRB, SDNY, & FWS have all taken action.
The FCC now joins them.
The FCC's recent decision - like many of the other actions being taken by federal agencies against Musk - fits the Biden Administration’s pattern of regulatory harassment.
It is a decision that cannot be explained by an objective application of law, facts, or policy.
New analysis here shows that the average #TikTok user is more likely to be exposed to content favorable to the CCP than a user of other major social media
TikTok search results for “PLA” overwhelmingly pro CCP
“Wuhan lab” lacks relevant results on TikTok, suggesting moderation
Leaked documents obtained by a reporter in 2019 showed that "TikTok... instruct[ed] its moderators to censor videos that mention Tiananmen Square, Tibetan independence, or the banned religious group Falun Gong." Those guidelines are no longer in use.
That same year, a search for #hongkong on Twitter returned images of pro-democracy marchers.
Searches on TikTok revealed a different and for the CCP "more politically convenient" version of reality: playful selfies, food photos & barely a hint of unrest.