I believe we are approaching a period of DeFi renaissance after 4+ years of extreme underperformance.
A lot of these DeFi OGs are now in the category of "high float, low FDV" coins with strong catalysts on the way.
Here's why I believe $AAVE @aave is poised to outperform
This thread will be spread into two sections: 1) Addressing the elephant in the room: the AAVE/ETH pair has been bleeding endlessly for years, what makes me think the bottom is in? 2) What's the significance of the most recent AAVEnomics update with the $AAVE fee switch?
If you prefer learning about the $AAVE thesis in video form, check out the post below.
Just because they have underperformed for 4 years does not mean that they will underperform forever.
There's strong precedence that DeFi tokens (category leaders) that introduce value accrual significantly outperform ETH.
A lot of you may remember my $MKR trade over a year ago when I was banging the drum for a "hated rally." A hated asset is synonymous with an asset that no one owns. With the right catalyst, these coins can violently reprice to the upside.
On June 23, 2023, $MKR introduced the Smart Burn Engine. This proposal gave way for the DAO to start buying back their own token with protocol profits, resulting in consistent buy pressure from interest payments from billions of tbills.
If you bought $MKR on the day of the proposal, you would have outperformed ETH by over 100%.
MKRETH WAS going to zero, but a governance proposal to introduce direct value accrual put in a bottom for $MKR. Since then, MKR is up over 300% against USD and 130% against ETH.
I believe a similar set up is present for $AAVE. On July 25, @lemiscate put forth a "Temp Check" proposal to introduce a "Buy and Distribute" model for $AAVE using excess protocol profits.
The timing for execution is uncertain, but I would expect it going live by EOY.
Admittedly, AAVE/ETH looks horrible and calling a bottom is a dangerous game to play. However, this is one of those situations where, "If AAVE/ETH does not bottom on a fee switch proposal, when will it ever?"
The risk/reward for longing $AAVE is better than ever.
The biggest risk to the trade is the "trigger milestones" for the buybacks not being met. These are:
- $GHO to hit 175M supply
- Market to be able to absorb a big $GHO sell with minimum slippage
- Sustainable profitability to the DAO
$GHO supply has surpassed 100M recently, so 175M seems attainable in a couple of months. They can also utilize its treasury of >$60M to incentivize liquidity.
I believe $GHO growth is the most important metric to look at as it's easily the highest margin product in scale.
The DAO has also taken great steps to lower costs and introduce new revenue drivers, so the outlook for future profitability looks bright.
Still room for improvement but these teams are cleaning up their act while no one is paying attention.
As the top decentralized onchain bank, they have the brand and lindy-ness that cannot be replicated by new players.
As demand for leverage grows and they expand to more chains, AAVE profits should scale linearly with DeFi TVL growth and adoption. Why use any other money market?
Reasons to bet on AAVE/ETH bottoming:
• MKRETH bottom precedent
• High float, low FDV coin with proven PMF
• A clear winner in an underowned category
Everyone agrees DeFi has PMF. Where people disagree is whether or not these tokens are investable. AAVEnomics changes this.
Actions speak louder than words; I am currently staking $AAVE acquired at ~$92. I cannot dump on you as there's a 20 day cooldown period (at least it's not 21 days lol). In fact, YOU can dump on ME!
I am betting on AAVE outperformance over a multi-month horizon into 2025.
A lot of you discovered me through my AAVE/Polygon videos in Q2 2021. I was told that my videos were the reason a lot of you started your onchain journey.
Now we're going full circle, staking $AAVE on ETH mainnet like a crazy person. Am I being exit liquidity again?!
The memecoin meta has made a lot of people jaded about crypto. For the vibes to improve, people need to believe in something. Believe in the tech.
I choose to believe in the protocol that kickstarted my journey. I choose to #BelieveInSomething.
Do YOU believe in something?
Make fun of me and call me midcurve all you want, but I believe in the tech. I believe fundamentals matter. And I am placing my bets.
And also, if there’s anyone in the world that can put the bottom in for DeFi, it has to be me… right??? Be the bottom that you want to see 🍑
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is going to be a long read, but I hope it will be an entertaining one for those that are students of the laws of crypto ponzinomics, human greed, and market bubbles.
So let's get started! 🧵
This piece will be separated into 4 sections: 1) What is Celestia? 2) What's the narrative around $TIA? 3) What similarities does $TIA have and (3,3)? 4) What I'm doing to prepare for this
Before you get mad at me, I am not claiming that Celestia is a ponzi. In fact, I think it’s one of the most important technological advancements we’ve seen in a long time.
I highly recommend following @nosleepjon and reading some of his substack articles.
I read "The Most Important Thing" by Howard Marks so you don't have to.
Here are some excerpts from the book I found interesting. I'll also share some personal takeways and how it applies to the crypto markets.
Marks' approach to value investing is centered around the concept of “second-level thinking,” which means that investors should think differently than the market and look for opportunities where others do not.
He runs Oaktree Capital Management which had an AUM of $164B in 2022.
Though Marks comes from a non-crypto background, his lessons from surviving multiple cycles is still valuable for those trying to make it in crypto.
Good times create weak men, and weak men create bad times. Bad times creates strong men, and strong men create good times.
I read "Best Loser Wins" by Tom Hougaard so you don't have to.
I'll share some interesting excerpts, personal takeaways, and thoughts on how they apply to the crypto markets.
The book focuses on the fact that in markets, 90% of traders lose money. So the author says, "Why don't we study what errors the 90% makes, and do the opposite?"
This is of course easier said than done. But let me dive deeper from quotes in the book.
Brokers are required to post the failure rates of their clients and most of them lose money.
If you're reading this, you probably think you're not the 90%. But statistically, that cannot be true.
I read "Trading in the Zone" by Mark Douglas so you don't have to.
Here are some excerpts from the book I found interesting and personal takeways I took from it.
And how it applies to the crypto markets.
The book focuses on the most common mental blocks that a lot of traders get into. I like books that focus on
investor psychology since there are a lot that can be applied to other markets, like crypto.
The best traders are detached from the markets - they view each trade as independent to others.
People fall into traps when they buy/sell something because "XYZ will happen." However, the best traders think in probabilities and don't try to project their opinions on the markets.
After sleeping on it, I'm actually extremely bullish @Blast_L2
It's the culmination of the DeFi/RWA-driven thesis I've been discussing here for the past 6 months.
Thoughts laid out below.
Don't worry, I didn't invest in $BLAST
As the founder of @HFAresearch, I have a personal mandate to not participate in seed/angel deals (private markets).
If I'm posting research about the liquid markets, there is a conflict of interest if I'm getting rich on private deals.
Blast markets itself as the L2 with "native yield."
What this means is that all ETH & stablecoins bridged to the L2 will be staked to earn yield. Likely ETH will be staked with @LidoFinance and stablecoins staked with @MakerDAO