Thread by @CrayonMurders

Andrew Tate's old Twitter account is a masterclass in what NOT to write on the internet.

A thread. 🧵 1/

2/

3/

4/

5/

6/

7/

8/

9/

10/

11/

12/

13/

14/

15/

16/

17/

18/

19/

20/

For those of you who are unsure if @OfWudan was Tate’s old account, or are in denial, let Tate tell you:

@OfWudan 21/

@OfWudan 22/

@OfWudan 23/

@OfWudan 24/

@OfWudan 25/

@OfWudan 26/

@OfWudan 27/

@OfWudan 28/

@OfWudan 29/

@OfWudan 30/

@OfWudan 31/

@OfWudan 32/

@OfWudan Thanks for blowing up this thread. 🙏🏼

I’ll make a part two; there’s loads more to share.

In the meantime, if you’re interested in learning about why he was actually criminally charged, this thread is a good place to start:

https://twitter.com/crayonmurders/status/1708418331949375684

@OfWudan If you’re wondering if Andrew Tate exploits women, let him tell you:

@OfWudan Does Andrew Tate exploit women?

Let him tell you in his own words:

@OfWudan 🚩 The above post is not being shown to some people. It appears it’s being shadow banned or blocked in regions.

The thread breaks down their case files, which consist of around 75,000 pages. Most of the files are evidence.

The case files:

@OfWudan 33/

@bodhxsattva This is what 1 hour of ‘not listening’ looks like.

4.4m > 6.8m

@itsalwaysrains @TheLastAnRkist @RyLiberty

https://twitter.com/crayonmurders/status/1796536952717787170