I think it's time to write an explainer about air quality ratings and what they actually mean!
This will detail: 1. Particulate counts 2. US Air Quality Index (AQI) 3. Canada's Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) 4. What this actually means for our health
🧵
1. Particulate counts
PM2.5 refers to tiny particles equal to or less than 2 microns (μm) in diameter. These are very tiny particles that are so small that they can get stuck deep in your lungs. Measuring the amount in a space can be shown in µg/m³ or ppm.
2. US AQI
The US AQI takes the measurements of Ozone, particulate matter (PM) , carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) to come up with a 0-500 rating representing overall air quality. They are grouped into 6 categories to make general statements.
3. Canada's AQHI is a calculation based on the observed relationship of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ground-level ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) with mortality from an analysis of several Canadian cities resulting in a 1-10+ rating scale. The groupings are shown here.
The AQI and AQHI are intended to indicate the exposure risk in the moment from all the air contaminants present. Limitations: these indexes are calculated using past data so lag behind current conditions. They also don't account for cumulative exposure and the scales max out
Knowing your actual exposure level is important for gauging the long-term effects of air pollution. The @WHO revised its exposure recommendations in 2021, stating, "Air pollution is one of the greatest environmental risk to health." who.int/news-room/fact…
Going back to the measurement in the quoted tweet, I measured 470.1 µg/m³ and the index ratings at the same ranged from:
US AQI: 339-480 (h/t @SafetyinNumbrz)
Canadian AQHI: 16-25 (out of 10 🫠) (h/t @stormwx1)
On the low end, 24hrs of exposure at this level is like smoking nearly 16 cigarettes. And honestly, I think that may be the most effective way to express this kind of risk, given the general public knows that cigarettes have short- and long-term harms. jasminedevv.github.io/AQI2cigarettes/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Friendly reminder that anti-intellectualism is an authoritarian tactic that is used to control a population by robbing people of the tools to understand and solve problems, foster innovation and build up communities. Education gives people power to improve their conditions.
Curiosity and the drive to keep learning are essential survival skills and enrich our lives. I see it as a gift when people offer some of what they know so that I can know too. It’s how I’ve learned so much over the past 5 years: the generosity of others with their knowledge
Not knowing shouldn’t be shamed or feel embarrassing. It’s an opportunity to learn. And others knowing and sharing is not meant to harm.
Just an FYI, pretty much whenever you go out in public, you’re visiting a space with immunocompromised individuals. That’s why it would be nice to have a culture of masking where people just wear them sometimes if they are sick or don’t want to get sick.
It’s not really feasible or encouraged for many without sick leave or other societal safety nets to stay home for 24hrs, which is often why people just go everywhere sick all the time and get others sick, and then they go and get others sick. There’s where masks were nice
It’s just a nice tool to have that people just refuse to use!
We don’t have to empathize with people who make decisions that we think are wrong, but we do have to get over the shock that they would make different decisions, because they did. They’ve done it many times. Accept it and look for the reasons why and how we can change things
“I’ll never understand why people voted for <x person>. They are wrong!” That doesn’t matter. We need to accept that they did, and figure out why. What benefit did they see for themselves? What did the alternatives look like for them?
There are multiple possibilities why someone would vote for Donald Trump, like:
- they think he will make their lives better
- they think their lives being better relies on someone else being worse off and he’ll target those other people
- they believe something that isn’t true
One of the most important defenses against institutional gaslighting is to have a friend who will say to you, “No, the person in charge here is being a ridiculous clown who is likely driven by their fear of liability or personal discomfort.” Consider me this friend.
There is some heinous and bizarre behaviour coming from people in positions of authority happening every day that probably make a lot of you feel like you are losing your mind. Believe me when I say a lot of this is a “them” problem.
Teachers yelling at kids for wearing a mask? Pathologizing the reasonable want to avoid being sick all the time? That’s weird stuff.
My regular reminder to public health officials that denying the harms of COVID infections and obvious increase in post-viral sequelae leaves a wide open space that is filled with misinfo about the vaccines. You are spawning more antivaxxers every day people aren’t told the truth.
Facebook groups, parent meetups, WhatsApp chats are filled with people trying to understand why they’re experiencing nerve damage, autoimmune disease, cardiovascular issues, and DBH et al are still going on the news saying that Covid infection may even be good for you.
What are people supposed to think? Where are they supposed to find answers?