Amanda Hu Profile picture
Jul 31 8 tweets 4 min read Read on X
I think it's time to write an explainer about air quality ratings and what they actually mean!

This will detail:
1. Particulate counts
2. US Air Quality Index (AQI)
3. Canada's Air Quality Health Index (AQHI)
4. What this actually means for our health
🧵
1. Particulate counts
PM2.5 refers to tiny particles equal to or less than 2 microns (μm) in diameter. These are very tiny particles that are so small that they can get stuck deep in your lungs. Measuring the amount in a space can be shown in µg/m³ or ppm. graphic showing a particulate size comparison between PM10 (<10 μm), a human hair (50-70 μm) and PM2.5 (<2.5 μm)
2. US AQI
The US AQI takes the measurements of Ozone, particulate matter (PM) , carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) to come up with a 0-500 rating representing overall air quality. They are grouped into 6 categories to make general statements. Chart with three columns (from left to right) For this AQI... use this descriptor... and this colour...  Each row corresponding to those columns: 0-50, Good, Green 51-100, Moderate, Yellow 101-150, Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups, Orange 151-200, Unhealthy, Red 201-300, Very Unhealthy, Purple 301+, Hazardous, Maroon
3. Canada's AQHI is a calculation based on the observed relationship of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ground-level ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) with mortality from an analysis of several Canadian cities resulting in a 1-10+ rating scale. The groupings are shown here. Colour scale showing a rating from 1-10+ corresponding to a gradient of light blue to dark maroon. The scale denotes the following categories: Low Risk: 1-3 Moderate Risk: 4-6 High Risk: 7-10 Very High Risk: 10+
The AQI and AQHI are intended to indicate the exposure risk in the moment from all the air contaminants present. Limitations: these indexes are calculated using past data so lag behind current conditions. They also don't account for cumulative exposure and the scales max out
Knowing your actual exposure level is important for gauging the long-term effects of air pollution. The @WHO revised its exposure recommendations in 2021, stating, "Air pollution is one of the greatest environmental risk to health." who.int/news-room/fact…
Chart showing the WHO recommendations for pollutant exposure averaged annually and over 24 hours
Going back to the measurement in the quoted tweet, I measured 470.1 µg/m³ and the index ratings at the same ranged from:
US AQI: 339-480 (h/t @SafetyinNumbrz)
Canadian AQHI: 16-25 (out of 10 🫠) (h/t @stormwx1)
Image
Image
On the low end, 24hrs of exposure at this level is like smoking nearly 16 cigarettes. And honestly, I think that may be the most effective way to express this kind of risk, given the general public knows that cigarettes have short- and long-term harms. jasminedevv.github.io/AQI2cigarettes/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Amanda Hu

Amanda Hu Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @amandalhu

Aug 2
It’s so wild to me that the Tokyo Olympics were postponed and held without audiences because everyone was concerned about the impact of COVID-19 on athletes and visitors and then this time they just weren’t worried about it. So a bunch of athletes and visitors just got COVID-19.
In 2021, vaccines were widely available, people wore masks, but new variants continued to circulate. Now in 2024, vaccines are less available, people don’t wear masks, so many more new variants are circulating and we know more much more about the bad long-term impacts.
They keep calling it the first post-COVID Olympics and it’s got way more COVID than any other Olympics before it.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 19
Reminders:
- Kids don’t need to get sick to be healthy
- Viruses are bad. They can cause damage to our bodies+long-term issues
- The need you think kids have, to get exposed to germs to teach their immune system, is what vaccines are for
- COVID is worse than many other viruses
This was prompted by a convo I had with a friend’s family member today when she asked me about my mask and why my friend’s family wears them. We had spent chatted a bit before about music and her being a band teacher and I showed her how to cool her townhouse with multiple fans.
We had a good rapport and she seemed to take what I had said very seriously. I also emphasized that I had learned a lot from my friend, and that her expertise and knowledge was very important and relevant. I hope she sees my friend’s efforts in a new light.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 26
Something I learned by getting to know people over the past year and them getting to know me is that people who don’t pay attention to Covid or the climate crisis or any of the other existential concerns we face are extremely concerned about stuff that I never worry about 1/
People are worried their kids getting abducted inside indoor recreation facilities, homeless people being dangerous, sunscreen toxins, not being able to to find camp for their kids over the summer, whether their kitchen renovation will still be on trend 2/
I’ve read and learned about a lot of stuff so I know that most children are harmed by adults they know and things in sunscreen aren’t necessarily harmful because they sound like something else that is harmful. I know that homeless folks are just people who don’t have homes 3/
Read 8 tweets
May 21
Reminder that McKinsey also came up with “economic endemicity” aka the “move to endemic” and other such rhetorical tools for the manufactured end of COVID. That’s why there’s now always more COVID than “during COVID”
McKinsey helping governments “solve” their pandemic spending problems with justifications for the end of COVID protections was just another part of their role in marginalizing the working class for the benefit of their corporate clients
It’s worked so well that the majority of people now *refuse* to take steps to protect themselves from contracting COVID, let alone demanding their governments and healthcare providers take reasonable steps to prioritize public health and infectious disease control
Read 4 tweets
Apr 30
I feel like the escalation of H5N1 is going exactly how you’d expect after capitalism won over common sense with COVID and our public health social contracts were destroyed: Farmers hiding their animals’ sickness, no willingness to use PPE, ID experts saying, “It’s inevitable”
No clear communication on infection control as the WHO and others are tied in knots to try and avoid saying “airborne” and people know govts won’t provide a sufficient cushion if they have to take a huge loss due to culling. Because they hung people out to dry last time
I can see why people don’t feel compelled to consider the bigger picture and how we need to act together. Because they were told it’s everyone’s own responsibility to take care of themselves.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 25
This woman’s only known diagnoses are autism and ADHD. She was assessed for MAiD 4 times by 5 doctors and now has been given approval.
This is a really concerning situation. She stated her death was “reasonably foreseeable” but was approved for Track 2. From a previous story: cbc.ca/news/canada/ca…

"As it stands, AHS [Alberta Health Services] operates a MAID system with no legislation, no appeal process and no means of review," wrote Miller in her brief for the court.
Miller also pointed out that on her initial MAID application, M.V. indicated her death had become "reasonably foreseeable" yet she was approved as a "track 2" MAID patient, which means death is not reasonably foreseeable. "Therefore M.V. is not a reliable witness," wrote Miller in her brief. Feasby heard that two doctors were initially approached by M.V. One agreed to sign off on approving her for MAID, the other denied the application. A third "tie-breaker" doctor, as described by lawyers for Alberta Health Services, was then offered to the patient, ...
Here is the recent ruling: canlii.org/en/ab/abkb/doc…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(