Al Haddrell Profile picture
Aug 3, 2024 14 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Given the unusually high number of swimmers catching Covid in the Olympics, many have hypothesized as to why. I’ve seen a few people point to some work we published on how environmental factors affect SARS-CoV-2’s aerostability.

Some thoughts🧵:

Context:

When respiratory aerosol is exhaled, the dissolved CO2 in the fluid (in the form of HCO3) leaves the aerosol over the course of a couple of minutes. When the CO2 leaves, the pH of the aerosol reaches >10.3.

The high pH drives viral decay. Image
We have reported that anything that can limit this increase in aerosol pH, such as nitric acid or CO2, slows the airborne viral decay rate. This, in turn, will increase the risk of transmission. Image
The net effect is more impactful over longer time periods. Elevating the CO2 from 500 to 3000 ppm leads to a 10-fold increase in the airborne viral load over 40 minutes. Likewise, increasing nitric acid from 0 to ~50 ppb leads to 2-fold increase. Image
The decay rate of the virus in the aerosol slows over time (left). The reason for this is that the trace acidic vapor in the air (normal air pollution) will slowly neutralize the aerosol. As this happens, the aerosol becomes more and more hospitable for the virus (right). Image
Okay, so what does this have to do with a swimming pool? Well, the swimming pools are disinfected with chlorine. Chlorine vapourwill react with the water in the respiratory aerosol to form acid. This will reduce the aerosol pH. Image
This suggests that the chlorine in the air around the pool will lead to the virus remaining infectious in the air longer, leading to higher transmission risk.
Theory 1: The chlorine above the pool neutralizes the aerosol, leading to the virus remaining infectious in the air longer. Image
Theory 2: The concentration of chlorine above the pool is so high that the pH in the aerosol actually becomesacidic, and the acidity inactivates the virus. Image
Which theory is correct? 1 or 2?

Unfortunately, currently, we simply don’t know. The measurements have yet to be made. I could speculate, but that wouldn’t be all that helpful (if not harmful). Image
A link to the study where we first explore the interplay between air acidity and aerostabilityis here:

royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…
It’s also important to note that there are numerous factors that ALL play a role in airborne viral transmission. What is happening in the Olympic pool could be due a factor other than aerostability, or even a combination of multiple factors. We need to make measurements to know. Image
Since there were people discussing this, I thought it would be helpful for people to have a better understanding of the underlying processes that are in play.

If you have any questions, I would be happy to try to answer them.
I suppose? Humidity is known to affect mucosal immunity, perhaps this is something similar(?).

Maybe someone more familiar with this end of things can add some insights… 🙏

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Al Haddrell

Al Haddrell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ukhadds

Apr 23
Climate change is a massive problem.

Geoengineering, even if possible, is not going to be a good solution for a variety of ethical (and technical) reasons.

Some thoughts. 🧵
First off, here's a link to The Guardian article that got me thinking about this:
theguardian.com/environment/20…
Essentially, geoengineering involves injecting large quantities of sulfur dioxide (SO2) into the upper atmosphere where it forms clouds that can then reflect sunlight back into space, andthus cooling the planet. Image
Read 15 tweets
Mar 22
I received this question over on B-Sky, and thought maybe other might have it as well. I thought the easiest way to answer would be to put together a short thread. Image
When it comes to short distance transmission, the proximity one has to the exhalation plume is important. But what dictates the size of the plume (ie how far does the exhaled aerosol initially travel)? And what factors matter? Image
In the initial inhalation plume, there will be a range of particle sizes. The larger particle’s momentum will carry them beyond the plume where they will eventually drop. How far they travel, and how long it takes for them to reach the floor will depend on the size and humidity Image
Read 16 tweets
Mar 18
A new study came out showing that smoking cannabis leads to “myocardial infarction and cardiovascular risks”. If you understand what happens when inhale a tremendous amount of particulate matter, these findings are not at all surprising.

Some thoughts.

Exposure to elevated levels of particulate air pollution begins a cascade of biological responses.
First, the site where the aerosol deposits will respond. The degree of the response will depend on the cumulative oxidative potential of the aerosol.

If the oxidative stress is high enough, the cells that are dosed will initiate an inflammatory response. Image
Read 8 tweets
Mar 6
A study has come out the discusses how “new inactivation data significantly influences infection risk predictions”.

Since that “new inactivation data” was from our team’s research, I have some thoughts. Image
Here’s a link to the study:

link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Context:

Prior to 2022, airborne viral decay was described in terms of half-lives, and on the order of hours. Famously, it was reported that SARS-CoV-2 had a half life of 1.1 hrs and could remain infectious in the air for 16 hrs.
Read 20 tweets
Mar 1
I was asked this question, and thought since it will take a bit of an explanation, I figured I’d make a thread.
Essentially, the question is about the degree to which exhaled water vapour from evaporating aerosol would affect the humidity in a room.
The subtext, is that people exhale CO2, and we use the CO2 concentration in a room to estimate the amount of exhaled air.

Does something similar with water vapour occur? Image
Read 17 tweets
Feb 26
A paper was published that presented a new model to predict airborne disease transmission. There were many features included in this model that make it interesting.
I have some thoughts.
The first author of article was written by @ScientistAndre. If you have any questions about it, I’m sure he would be more than happy to discuss.

Moreover, if I get anything wrong, I hope he jumps in to correct me!
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(