Given the unusually high number of swimmers catching Covid in the Olympics, many have hypothesized as to why. I’ve seen a few people point to some work we published on how environmental factors affect SARS-CoV-2’s aerostability.
When respiratory aerosol is exhaled, the dissolved CO2 in the fluid (in the form of HCO3) leaves the aerosol over the course of a couple of minutes. When the CO2 leaves, the pH of the aerosol reaches >10.3.
The high pH drives viral decay.
We have reported that anything that can limit this increase in aerosol pH, such as nitric acid or CO2, slows the airborne viral decay rate. This, in turn, will increase the risk of transmission.
The net effect is more impactful over longer time periods. Elevating the CO2 from 500 to 3000 ppm leads to a 10-fold increase in the airborne viral load over 40 minutes. Likewise, increasing nitric acid from 0 to ~50 ppb leads to 2-fold increase.
The decay rate of the virus in the aerosol slows over time (left). The reason for this is that the trace acidic vapor in the air (normal air pollution) will slowly neutralize the aerosol. As this happens, the aerosol becomes more and more hospitable for the virus (right).
Okay, so what does this have to do with a swimming pool? Well, the swimming pools are disinfected with chlorine. Chlorine vapourwill react with the water in the respiratory aerosol to form acid. This will reduce the aerosol pH.
This suggests that the chlorine in the air around the pool will lead to the virus remaining infectious in the air longer, leading to higher transmission risk.
Theory 1: The chlorine above the pool neutralizes the aerosol, leading to the virus remaining infectious in the air longer.
Theory 2: The concentration of chlorine above the pool is so high that the pH in the aerosol actually becomesacidic, and the acidity inactivates the virus.
Which theory is correct? 1 or 2?
Unfortunately, currently, we simply don’t know. The measurements have yet to be made. I could speculate, but that wouldn’t be all that helpful (if not harmful).
A link to the study where we first explore the interplay between air acidity and aerostabilityis here:
It’s also important to note that there are numerous factors that ALL play a role in airborne viral transmission. What is happening in the Olympic pool could be due a factor other than aerostability, or even a combination of multiple factors. We need to make measurements to know.
Since there were people discussing this, I thought it would be helpful for people to have a better understanding of the underlying processes that are in play.
If you have any questions, I would be happy to try to answer them.
I suppose? Humidity is known to affect mucosal immunity, perhaps this is something similar(?).
Maybe someone more familiar with this end of things can add some insights… 🙏
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This question came up on BlueSky. While somewhat coy, the question isn’t actually that simple to answer.
Given that I’m an “aerosol scientist”, I figured I take a crack at answering it.
An aerosol scientist is simply a scientist that studies aerosol.
Aerosol are any liquid or solid particle that is suspended in the air. Typically, these objects aresmaller than 100 microns. In short, we study various small airborne things.
These “things” can be literally anything. From biological (viruses, bacteria), to environmental (particulate matter), to industrial (spray drying), and beyond.
Thus, when someone studies aerosol, there are countless systems they could be interested in.
Shoutout to @CDare10 for flagging up this idiot’s post.
@CDare10 Hey @ClareCraigPath , how do scientists study airborne viruses if they are “uncontrollable “? For example, how is airborne decay measured if it’s impossible to control an aerosol?
Over the past decade, various randomized control trials (RCT) have been published that attempt to measure the effectiveness of physical mitigation strategies of airborne disease transmission.
And for the most part, most of them are terrible.
Let me explain why.
A🧵
Airborne disease transmission is extraordinarily complicated, with many steps involved. Consequently, there are many different solutions that have been proposed to limit transmission. They largely involve the removal of exhaled aerosol from the air prior to inhalation.
The most common physical interventions being air filtration, ventilation and masking.
If You Want Clean Indoor Air, Not One Thing Will Work!!
How Sadiq Khan is taking a page out of the Team GB Cycling Team’s playbook to clean up London’s air
A 🧵
People spend the majority of their time indoors. As a result, indoor air quality is incredibly important for public health. So then, how do we improve the quality of indoor air?
Well, there are countless ways. That said, they can be grouped into 3 broad areas.
1) Source Control
Air is naturally clean. It is largely human activity that pollutes it. So, by limiting the amount of air pollution produced, we can limit our exposure. This includes both indoor and outdoor sources.
Context: Air filtration has been argued as an effective means to limit airborne disease transmission. Like any physical intervention of transmission, the effectiveness will depend on how it is used
In this study, they put air filters in classrooms and measured transmission rates