Al Haddrell Profile picture
Aug 3, 2024 14 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Given the unusually high number of swimmers catching Covid in the Olympics, many have hypothesized as to why. I’ve seen a few people point to some work we published on how environmental factors affect SARS-CoV-2’s aerostability.

Some thoughts🧵:

Context:

When respiratory aerosol is exhaled, the dissolved CO2 in the fluid (in the form of HCO3) leaves the aerosol over the course of a couple of minutes. When the CO2 leaves, the pH of the aerosol reaches >10.3.

The high pH drives viral decay. Image
We have reported that anything that can limit this increase in aerosol pH, such as nitric acid or CO2, slows the airborne viral decay rate. This, in turn, will increase the risk of transmission. Image
The net effect is more impactful over longer time periods. Elevating the CO2 from 500 to 3000 ppm leads to a 10-fold increase in the airborne viral load over 40 minutes. Likewise, increasing nitric acid from 0 to ~50 ppb leads to 2-fold increase. Image
The decay rate of the virus in the aerosol slows over time (left). The reason for this is that the trace acidic vapor in the air (normal air pollution) will slowly neutralize the aerosol. As this happens, the aerosol becomes more and more hospitable for the virus (right). Image
Okay, so what does this have to do with a swimming pool? Well, the swimming pools are disinfected with chlorine. Chlorine vapourwill react with the water in the respiratory aerosol to form acid. This will reduce the aerosol pH. Image
This suggests that the chlorine in the air around the pool will lead to the virus remaining infectious in the air longer, leading to higher transmission risk.
Theory 1: The chlorine above the pool neutralizes the aerosol, leading to the virus remaining infectious in the air longer. Image
Theory 2: The concentration of chlorine above the pool is so high that the pH in the aerosol actually becomesacidic, and the acidity inactivates the virus. Image
Which theory is correct? 1 or 2?

Unfortunately, currently, we simply don’t know. The measurements have yet to be made. I could speculate, but that wouldn’t be all that helpful (if not harmful). Image
A link to the study where we first explore the interplay between air acidity and aerostabilityis here:

royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…
It’s also important to note that there are numerous factors that ALL play a role in airborne viral transmission. What is happening in the Olympic pool could be due a factor other than aerostability, or even a combination of multiple factors. We need to make measurements to know. Image
Since there were people discussing this, I thought it would be helpful for people to have a better understanding of the underlying processes that are in play.

If you have any questions, I would be happy to try to answer them.
I suppose? Humidity is known to affect mucosal immunity, perhaps this is something similar(?).

Maybe someone more familiar with this end of things can add some insights… 🙏

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Al Haddrell

Al Haddrell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ukhadds

Dec 30, 2025
In 2025, I’ve put together many threads discussing various aspects of science, science communication, aerosol science, or airborne disease transmission

With it being the end of the year, and social media being largely fleeting, I thought I’d highlight a few worth revisiting Image
A few of the threads discussed the fundamental challenges around measuring the effectiveness of mitigation strategies.

In this thread I discuss some of the challenges around designing RCT studies.

In this thread, I discussed how poor experimental design leads to incorrect conclusions about the effectiveness of ventilation/filtration, etc. on disease mitigation.

Read 11 tweets
Dec 20, 2025
One of the reasons why I go so hard on science misinformation/disinformation, is that as a working scientist it is frustrating to see your research misreported to push an agenda.

For example, consider this piece of right-wing propaganda from The Telegraph that was just published Image
Here’s a link to the article (free to access on Yahoo).

Spoiler alert: it’s rubbish.

yahoo.com/news/articles/…
The article is an opinion piece masquerading as journalism. While this is typical of these sorts of trashy publications, what concerned me was that they highlighted my research specifically to push their message.

Consequently, I feel like I ought to respond. Image
Read 13 tweets
Nov 30, 2025
This question came up on BlueSky. While somewhat coy, the question isn’t actually that simple to answer.

Given that I’m an “aerosol scientist”, I figured I take a crack at answering it. Image
An aerosol scientist is simply a scientist that studies aerosol.

Aerosol are any liquid or solid particle that is suspended in the air. Typically, these objects aresmaller than 100 microns. In short, we study various small airborne things. Image
These “things” can be literally anything. From biological (viruses, bacteria), to environmental (particulate matter), to industrial (spray drying), and beyond.

Thus, when someone studies aerosol, there are countless systems they could be interested in. Image
Read 14 tweets
Nov 20, 2025
Counterpoint: you ABSOLUTELY can control an airborne virus.

Seriously, who says this kind of nonsense? We literally have numerous ways to control airborne spread.
Shoutout to @CDare10 for flagging up this idiot’s post.
@CDare10 Hey @ClareCraigPath , how do scientists study airborne viruses if they are “uncontrollable “? For example, how is airborne decay measured if it’s impossible to control an aerosol?
Read 9 tweets
Nov 17, 2025
Since 2020, we’ve learned a tremendous amount about the airborne transmission of disease. Yet, in many ways we’ve just begun to scratch the surface.

This document came out of the WIAC conference held this summer. In it, many of the fundamental questions before us are proposed. Image
You can find a link to the article here:

iris.who.int/items/9fb7d176…
I’ve also uploaded the presentation about our research that I gave at the conference to my YouTube channel.

Read 7 tweets
Oct 25, 2025
Over the past decade, various randomized control trials (RCT) have been published that attempt to measure the effectiveness of physical mitigation strategies of airborne disease transmission.

And for the most part, most of them are terrible.

Let me explain why.

A🧵 Image
Airborne disease transmission is extraordinarily complicated, with many steps involved. Consequently, there are many different solutions that have been proposed to limit transmission. They largely involve the removal of exhaled aerosol from the air prior to inhalation. Image
The most common physical interventions being air filtration, ventilation and masking. Image
Read 40 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(