Given the unusually high number of swimmers catching Covid in the Olympics, many have hypothesized as to why. I’ve seen a few people point to some work we published on how environmental factors affect SARS-CoV-2’s aerostability.
When respiratory aerosol is exhaled, the dissolved CO2 in the fluid (in the form of HCO3) leaves the aerosol over the course of a couple of minutes. When the CO2 leaves, the pH of the aerosol reaches >10.3.
The high pH drives viral decay.
We have reported that anything that can limit this increase in aerosol pH, such as nitric acid or CO2, slows the airborne viral decay rate. This, in turn, will increase the risk of transmission.
The net effect is more impactful over longer time periods. Elevating the CO2 from 500 to 3000 ppm leads to a 10-fold increase in the airborne viral load over 40 minutes. Likewise, increasing nitric acid from 0 to ~50 ppb leads to 2-fold increase.
The decay rate of the virus in the aerosol slows over time (left). The reason for this is that the trace acidic vapor in the air (normal air pollution) will slowly neutralize the aerosol. As this happens, the aerosol becomes more and more hospitable for the virus (right).
Okay, so what does this have to do with a swimming pool? Well, the swimming pools are disinfected with chlorine. Chlorine vapourwill react with the water in the respiratory aerosol to form acid. This will reduce the aerosol pH.
This suggests that the chlorine in the air around the pool will lead to the virus remaining infectious in the air longer, leading to higher transmission risk.
Theory 1: The chlorine above the pool neutralizes the aerosol, leading to the virus remaining infectious in the air longer.
Theory 2: The concentration of chlorine above the pool is so high that the pH in the aerosol actually becomesacidic, and the acidity inactivates the virus.
Which theory is correct? 1 or 2?
Unfortunately, currently, we simply don’t know. The measurements have yet to be made. I could speculate, but that wouldn’t be all that helpful (if not harmful).
A link to the study where we first explore the interplay between air acidity and aerostabilityis here:
It’s also important to note that there are numerous factors that ALL play a role in airborne viral transmission. What is happening in the Olympic pool could be due a factor other than aerostability, or even a combination of multiple factors. We need to make measurements to know.
Since there were people discussing this, I thought it would be helpful for people to have a better understanding of the underlying processes that are in play.
If you have any questions, I would be happy to try to answer them.
I suppose? Humidity is known to affect mucosal immunity, perhaps this is something similar(?).
Maybe someone more familiar with this end of things can add some insights… 🙏
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Given that the COVID numbers are on the rise, I thought I’d it useful to share some our research team’s work looking at the interplay between CO2, aerosol, SARS-CoV-2, and airborne transmission. 🧵
SARSCoV2 is spread primarily through the air via aerosol. Meaning, the amount of aerosol a person produces will to some degree correlate with the amount of virus exhaled. Our group has done of studies into how different activities affect aerosol production tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
The amount of aerosol a person exhales is correlated with how loud they are talking/singing. Perhaps a reason why there have been no super spreader events reported in a library (?)
Understanding the rate aerosol particles change phase is critical, from drug delivery to the lung or atmospheric processes, to disease transmission.
Our work looking into the dissolution and crystallization dynamics of aerosol has just been published: pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac…
For example, the size of a particle will influence where it is deposited in the airway. Likewise, the rate in which a solid particle dissolves will affect both where the particle is deposited as well as the structure of the particle when it lands: () pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac…
Previously, we’ve reported that when aerosol containing SARS-CoV-2 are exhaled into dry air, the aerosol changes phase (effloresces). This results in a rapid loss of ~50% of the infectious viral load.
Understanding aerosol phase dynamics is important!
@ToshiAkima Great question! The maximum pH respiratory aerosol will reach is highly dependent on CO2. The evaporation of CO2 from the droplet is relatively slow, taking 10s of seconds to minutes. One result of this is at 2 minutes, we saw no effect on aerostability between 500ppm and 0ppm:
@ToshiAkima Thus, at 2 minutes the pH of the 500 and 0 ppm droplets were still the same. The result of this is that for short distance transmission, the increase in outdoor CO2 concentration over the past hundred or so years would be expected to have no effect. HOWEVER…
@ToshiAkima After 2 minutes, the pH difference between the 2 would become different. The expected result would be at lower CO2, >99% of the infectious viral load would be gone faster. Much in the same way we show with 3000 ppm vs 500 ppm data:
I’m excited to discuss our latest research on how ambient CO2 affects how long #SARSCoV2 remains infectious in air. We report that even subtle increases in CO2 affects both how long #COVIDisAirborne and transmission risk. Here’s a🧵going over the findings nature.com/articles/s4146…
Somebroader context: this study is the third part of our SARS-CoV-2 (SARS-Wars(?)) trilogy.
In our first paper we reported that the decay dynamics of the original strain. We reported that the viral decay rate is faster than initially reported: 90% of the viral load is inactivated in 20 min. We proposed aerosol pH was playing a role in the decay
Measuring how long viruses remain infectious in the air is very difficult. A review article discussing the challenges of making these measurements, and the need for standardization, has just been published! The paper was the brainchild of @robbie_groth
@robbie_groth For any measurement, standardization is critical. Without it, it’s impossible to compare results between laboratories. For example, for something as simple as mass, people use calibration weights to ensure their scale is accurate.
@robbie_groth To study viral decay in air, the virus is aerosolised, contained in a controlled environment, sampled and measured. Every aspect of this process affects viral decay to some degree. Thus, to compare results between labs, identical techniques/benchmarks, etc must be used.
The length of time viruses and bacteria remain viable in the air is dependent on the conditions they experience in an aerosol droplet. In our latest study, we explore how the size/phase/composition of respiratory aerosol changes in a range of conditions. tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
This work was headed up by Jianghan Tian (@TianJianghan96).
In the study, individual droplets are generated, levitated and probed with an electrodynamic trap. A laser probes the droplet. From the scattered light, both the droplet size and morphology can be measured over time.
@TianJianghan96 The levitated particles can be collected, and then imaged using electron microscopy. The structure of the particles formed can help in the interpretation of bacteria/viral decay measurements.