Jim Bianco Profile picture
Aug 5, 2024 12 tweets 6 min read Read on X
1/12

🧵on my take on what is happening in financial markets.

tl:dr:

Not all sharp moves in financial markets are driven by rapid changes in the economic outlook. Unexpected changes in the financial structure of the markets can also force repricing.

The most recent move in the markets has been driven by the Bank of Japan’s larger-than-expected hike last week, which led to a subsequent unwinding of the yen carry trade.

In other words, everyone is right to be mad at the central bank. The problem is that most blame the wrong central bank; they should focus on the Bank of Japan.

This is the Fed's dilemma. The catalyst for the yen carry trade unwind is the narrowing of the interest rate spread between Japan and the US, which has been caused by the Bank of Japan's hike. But if the Fed succumbs to market demands and cuts rates, it will narrow this spread further and worsen it.

(see post 12/12 for its implications for the U.S. economy)
2/12

Last Wednesday, July 31, the Bank of Japan hiked rates to 0.25%, Its highest rate since 2008. This marked the second hike this year. Image
3/12

The surge in Japan’s inflation drove this decision. While inflation has decreased over the past year, the concern is it will persist near current levels. Image
4/n

Note only 29% of respondents to a Bloomberg poll expected a Bank of Japan hike on July 31. Image
5/12

Overnight Index Swaps market (OIS) discounted just five basis points of hiking.

When the Bank of Japan surprised with a 15 basis point hike (chart above), the post-meeting spike shown below indicates how much of a surprise this move was (last two labels). Image
6/12

The surprise Bank of Japan hike led to one of the biggest unwinds of the yen carry trade.

First, how big is this trade?

No definitive statistic shows its size, so we have to infer it from the size of the Bank of Japan’s balance sheet.

The chart below shows the Bank of Japan’s balance sheet is larger than the country’s GDP, at 127.5% of GDP. By comparison, the Fed’s balance sheet is 25% of GDP.

If you think the Fed matters to markets, the Bank of Japan has a 5x larger influence on their economy.Image
7/12

Here are the absolute sizes of the central bank balance sheets. Image
8/12

What Is the Yen Carry Trade?

Japan’s short-term funding rates (shown above) were the lowest globally. They still are.

However, short-term Japanese rates were also perceived to be predictable and would remain near zero for some time. When the time to hike rates eventually arrived, it would not look like last week: a surprise move with promises of more moves to come.

With the cost of funding rising, we see massive liquidations of positions using this cheap money.

Naturally, the biggest positions using the yen carry trade are in the Japanese markets. In the last three trading days, or since the surprise Bank of Japan hike on July 31, the Japanese stock market has crashed by 20%, even bigger than the three worst three-day moves during the October 1987 crash!

If you’re looking for an indication of this trade’s size, this is as close to a smoking gun as you will find. Remember, the Japanese stock market does not crash because U.S. payrolls missed expectations.Image
9/12

The yen carry trade is also behind the funding of many markets outside Japan. But the Bank of Japan’s surprise move has strained these trades.

The bottom panel of the next chart shows the dollar has lost 5% of its value against the yen over the last three trading days, again going back to the July 31 Bank of Japan meeting.

Why? Global yen carry trades are being unwound in a big way. This involves existing positions in foreign markets, like the dollar, and bringing these funds home to Japan to close these funding positions. This causes massive buying of yen.Image
10/12

This is causing a slump in foreign markets, such as the U.S. stock market, which is seeing one of its biggest corrections since the October 2022 bear market low. Image
11/12

As the next chart shows, the world is running to risk-off markets like U.S. Treasuries, as all markets worldwide are under stress. Image
12/12

Conclusion

We would argue that much of the recent market chaos concerns financial issues around the yen carry trade. The Bank of Japan’s surprise move to increase funding rates, coupled with the belief that more such hikes are coming, spooked markets and led to an unwinding of this global trade.

As this happens, we see plenty of stories attributing this move to the U.S. economy. The Sahm Rule has been triggered, so there is concern the U.S. economy is already in a recession.

We frequently quote the late MIT economist Rudi Dornbusch:

Economic expansions do not die of old age; they are murdered.

Such financial moves can potentially “murder” the economy into recession. The last such concern of a financial “murder” occurred in March 2023, around the failure of Silicon Valley Bank. The economy was able to avoid this murder.

We would guess the U.S. economy can withstand the current yen carry unwind. Hence, we remain in the "no-landing" camp.

But there is a real risk the economy will not succumb to market volatility. Markets will remain chaotic until this unwind is done.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jim Bianco

Jim Bianco Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @biancoresearch

Mar 22
1/4

Yesterday I posted the thread below arguing that the market is repricing an inflation shock, not a recession scare.

10-year yields are rising, bond volatility is exploding, inflation expectations are jumping, and Fed pricing has swung from cuts toward hikes.

Follow up 🧵
2/4

The immediate pushback is familiar: this “supply shock” will hurt real growth, so the Fed should cut rates.

This well-known economist has been making exactly that argument. Image
3/4

That is only half the equation. A supply shock hurts growth, but it also raises inflation, so the real question is which side dominates.

In 2022, inflation rose more than real growth fell: the blue CPI line and arrow moved sharply higher while the green real-GDP bars and arrow moved modestly lower. The bottom panel shows the Fed’s answer: hikes, not cuts, as the federal funds rate moved from near zero in early 2022 to above 4% by year-end 2022.

Why? When inflation rises faster than growth falls, nominal growth (real GDP plus inflation) rises. If today’s oil shock does the same thing as 2022, the correct takeaway is not automatic cuts. It is possible that the Fed may have to stand pat or even consider hiking.Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 11
1/6

Ten seafarers have now been killed in 13 attacks on merchant vessels since the Iran conflict erupted on February 28 — more than the 7 U.S. servicemen killed in the war.

The focal point is shifting: can the Strait of Hormuz be reopened? Is the Administration pivoting to that mission?

Every day without a visible path to reopening, the market will price in more risk.

x.com/MikeSchuler/st…

@johnkonrad @mercoglianos
2/6

The problem: the Administration APPEARS to not be taking the Strait threat seriously. The contradiction is stark:

- Trump to tanker captains: "These ships should go through the Strait of Hormuz and show some guts, there's nothing to be afraid of..."

- The U.S. Navy, citing risk of attacks as "too high," says it is unable to provide escorts — despite near-daily requests from the shipping industry.

WTF!

x.com/foxandfriends/…
x.com/FreightWaves/s…
3/6

Yesterday, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine was asked about naval escorts in the Strait. His answer:

"If tasked to escort, we'll look at the range of options to set military conditions to be able to do that..."

Did he just admit they don't have a plan — and haven't started one?

Read 6 tweets
Mar 9
1/5

A 10% increase in energy prices that persists for a year would push global inflation up by 40 basis points and slow economic growth by 0.1-0.2%, International Monetary Fund Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said.

So, what price measures "persists for a year?"

🧵
2/5

As the table below shows, crude oil futures prices for delivery into 2027 are trading in extreme backwardation. Image
3/5

Below is the calendar spread between the first contract (now April) and the 6th contract (now September).

As the bottom panel shows, this spread is -25%, a record since the mid-1990s when the contract specifications were last changed. Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 7
1/4

I fear this is spot on.

@CryptoNobler's thread unpacks $BTC's "synthetic supply" problem. ETFs, structured notes (@CryptoHayes), futures, options, swaps, lending—all flood the system with "paper" BTC.

When it swamps real demand, price crashes.

x.com/CryptoNobler/s… x.com/coinbureau/sta…
2/4

@CryptoHayes: structured notes on $IBIT flooded $BTC with synthetic supply → forced liquidations turbocharged the dump.

Next rally? TradFi piles into ETFs → Wall Street "prints" more synthetics.

Price discovery decoupled from on-chain.

Volatility on steroids
3/4

Wall Street's entry turned BTC into a pseudo-fractional reserve system.

21M cap? On-chain only—price discovery swims in synthetic street "printing."

Fractional is inherently unstable. That's why banks need heavy regs (Fed/Treasury/OCC/FDIC).

On-chain BTC only needs code.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 1
1/6

10% of the outstanding $BTC is held by $MSTR and the 11 Spot BTC ETFs.

These are the ways normies hold $BTC in regulated brokerage accounts.

Collectively, the avg purchase price is $85.36K, meaning the average is now ~$8k underwater, with an unrealized loss of ~$7B.
🧵 Image
2/6

The 11 biggest spot $BTC ETFs now hold 1.29M $BTC – worth over $115B (Friday PM).

These ETFs hold roughly 6.5% of all $BTC in circulation.

The 3 largest – iShares’ $IBIT (blue), Fidelity’s $FBTC (red), and Grayscale’s $GBTC (orange) – hold 5.65%. Image
3/6

The 11 Spot $BTC ETFs average purchase price is ~$90.2K (blue), about $13K (16%) above the current price (bottom panel).

Note these ETFs are collectively on a record 10 consecutive outflow days. $BTC is down ~8% since Friday's NYSE close. Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 19
1/11

What is Housing?

Affordable shelter or path to retirement?

It cannot be both.

We tried to make it both in the early 2000s and almost wrecked the financial system.

🧵 Image
2/11

The average home price is $417K (above), an all-time high.

This means around 43% of a median household income (~$84K) goes to housing.

For the last three years, this has been comparable to the (unsustainable) housing peak in 2006. Image
3/11

For 50 years, from the end of World War II through 1997 (red box), housing was affordable. Prices rose by the inflation rate.

In other words, it held its value but remained within reach of most renters/first-time homebuyers. Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(