🧵on my take on what is happening in financial markets.
tl:dr:
Not all sharp moves in financial markets are driven by rapid changes in the economic outlook. Unexpected changes in the financial structure of the markets can also force repricing.
The most recent move in the markets has been driven by the Bank of Japan’s larger-than-expected hike last week, which led to a subsequent unwinding of the yen carry trade.
In other words, everyone is right to be mad at the central bank. The problem is that most blame the wrong central bank; they should focus on the Bank of Japan.
This is the Fed's dilemma. The catalyst for the yen carry trade unwind is the narrowing of the interest rate spread between Japan and the US, which has been caused by the Bank of Japan's hike. But if the Fed succumbs to market demands and cuts rates, it will narrow this spread further and worsen it.
(see post 12/12 for its implications for the U.S. economy)
2/12
Last Wednesday, July 31, the Bank of Japan hiked rates to 0.25%, Its highest rate since 2008. This marked the second hike this year.
3/12
The surge in Japan’s inflation drove this decision. While inflation has decreased over the past year, the concern is it will persist near current levels.
4/n
Note only 29% of respondents to a Bloomberg poll expected a Bank of Japan hike on July 31.
5/12
Overnight Index Swaps market (OIS) discounted just five basis points of hiking.
When the Bank of Japan surprised with a 15 basis point hike (chart above), the post-meeting spike shown below indicates how much of a surprise this move was (last two labels).
6/12
The surprise Bank of Japan hike led to one of the biggest unwinds of the yen carry trade.
First, how big is this trade?
No definitive statistic shows its size, so we have to infer it from the size of the Bank of Japan’s balance sheet.
The chart below shows the Bank of Japan’s balance sheet is larger than the country’s GDP, at 127.5% of GDP. By comparison, the Fed’s balance sheet is 25% of GDP.
If you think the Fed matters to markets, the Bank of Japan has a 5x larger influence on their economy.
7/12
Here are the absolute sizes of the central bank balance sheets.
8/12
What Is the Yen Carry Trade?
Japan’s short-term funding rates (shown above) were the lowest globally. They still are.
However, short-term Japanese rates were also perceived to be predictable and would remain near zero for some time. When the time to hike rates eventually arrived, it would not look like last week: a surprise move with promises of more moves to come.
With the cost of funding rising, we see massive liquidations of positions using this cheap money.
Naturally, the biggest positions using the yen carry trade are in the Japanese markets. In the last three trading days, or since the surprise Bank of Japan hike on July 31, the Japanese stock market has crashed by 20%, even bigger than the three worst three-day moves during the October 1987 crash!
If you’re looking for an indication of this trade’s size, this is as close to a smoking gun as you will find. Remember, the Japanese stock market does not crash because U.S. payrolls missed expectations.
9/12
The yen carry trade is also behind the funding of many markets outside Japan. But the Bank of Japan’s surprise move has strained these trades.
The bottom panel of the next chart shows the dollar has lost 5% of its value against the yen over the last three trading days, again going back to the July 31 Bank of Japan meeting.
Why? Global yen carry trades are being unwound in a big way. This involves existing positions in foreign markets, like the dollar, and bringing these funds home to Japan to close these funding positions. This causes massive buying of yen.
10/12
This is causing a slump in foreign markets, such as the U.S. stock market, which is seeing one of its biggest corrections since the October 2022 bear market low.
11/12
As the next chart shows, the world is running to risk-off markets like U.S. Treasuries, as all markets worldwide are under stress.
12/12
Conclusion
We would argue that much of the recent market chaos concerns financial issues around the yen carry trade. The Bank of Japan’s surprise move to increase funding rates, coupled with the belief that more such hikes are coming, spooked markets and led to an unwinding of this global trade.
As this happens, we see plenty of stories attributing this move to the U.S. economy. The Sahm Rule has been triggered, so there is concern the U.S. economy is already in a recession.
We frequently quote the late MIT economist Rudi Dornbusch:
Economic expansions do not die of old age; they are murdered.
Such financial moves can potentially “murder” the economy into recession. The last such concern of a financial “murder” occurred in March 2023, around the failure of Silicon Valley Bank. The economy was able to avoid this murder.
We would guess the U.S. economy can withstand the current yen carry unwind. Hence, we remain in the "no-landing" camp.
But there is a real risk the economy will not succumb to market volatility. Markets will remain chaotic until this unwind is done.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
JP Morgan has identified 41 AI-related stocks, 8% of the S&P 500. These stocks now account for 47% of the Index's market capitalization, a new record.
The other 459 stocks, 92% of the S&P 500, are 53% of the Index's market capitalization.
2/5
The list of the AI-related stocks
3/5
ChatGPT was released on November 29, 2022.
Since this date, these 41 stocks have accounted for 74% of the S&P 500's total increase (blue). The other 25% came from the remaining 459 stocks (orange).
This morning Friday’s SOFR was reported at 4.18%, down 12 bps. (SOFR is reported every morning for the previous day.)
So, is the liquidity problem now over? Not exactly.
Here is a version of the last above, but it only shows the last 6 months, and the SOFR/IOR spread in the bottom panel is daily (not a moving average).
3/5
See the average in the first (repost) chart above, the SOFR/IOR averaged -8 bps back to 2022. See the chart immediately above, the SOFR/IOR averaged -5 bps.
A “normal” liquidity environment is one where the SOFR/IOR spread is around -8 to -5 bps. See the last five or six weeks, lots of “green bars” (positive SOFR/IOR spread). With some “red bars” interspersed in between. In Wall Street parlance, this spread “random walks” so look to the larger trend, not day to day movements.
What the larger trend shows is this measure of liquidity is still “worrisome.” Not a crisis, but worrisome. And note that over the last few months trend is moving toward larger green bars.
tl:dr, Liquidity in the plumbing of the financial system is getting scarce. It is not a crisis now, but it has been moving in this direction for weeks, and it is now at a worrisome point.
When the financial plumbing gets stressed, it is when bad loans (aka "cockroaches") get noticed.
(long thread, tried to write it so "normies" can follow.)
---
Wall Street is famous for diagnosing symptoms, not causes. I believe they are doing this again with the banking issues of the last few days., I do not think this is a "cockroach" problem (bad credit/loans) waiting to get disclosed publicly.
It is a liquidity problem that makes the "cockroaches" matter.
Banks (all 4,000+) hand out a trillion in loans. So, they will always have "cockroaches." So, it is not an issue of whether cockroaches exist; they always do. Instead, it is the environment in which such disclosures are made. Does the market care or not?
Now it cares. Why?
---
@NickTimiraos said below:
How to define "temporary" and "modest." Repo rates in the last two days have moved up to the top of the fed-funds range and around 10 bps above IORB, but it's only been two days.
---
I would argue it has not "only" been two days; worsening liquidity in the funding market has been unfolding for weeks. It just got noticed in the last two days.
This chart shows Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR (orange), and Interest on Reserves, or IOR (blue). The bottom panel shows the spread between these two, along with some metrics (dashed line = average, shaded area = standard deviation range).
See the arrow; this spread (3-day average, so it is less noisy) has been tightening for weeks. This spread moved to positive territory in early September and has remained there for weeks. The last time it was positive for this long was in March 2020 (not shown).
2/6
A positive spread is typical around month- and quarter-end "window dressing," when financial institutions need to report their positions and want to show conservative cash positions. Now it has been weeks, and it is in the middle of the month.
This chart shows that liquidity has been worsening for weeks. It was two days ago that it finally got noticed.
But note that Jay Powell noticed it, because in his speech to the NABE Conference three days ago:
Some signs have begun to emerge that liquidity conditions are gradually tightening, including a general firming of repo rates along with more noticeable but temporary pressures on selected dates.
SOFR replaced Libor (London InterBank Offer Rate) two years ago; it is the rate charged in the funding markets (that is, financial institutions that need cash and will borrow to get iInterbank Offer Rate) two years ago; it is the rate charged in the funding markets (that is, financial institutions that need cash and will borrow to get it) for overnight loans collateralized by Treasury Bills) on overnight loans collateralized by Treasury Bill ("Secured"). So these loans carry no credit risk. They are compared to the IOR rate, which is the interest rate the Federal Reserve pays banks on their reserve balances. This means that the spread between SOFR and IOR is purely driven by supply and demand. SOFR comprises three components.
* General Collateral repo Loans
* Tri-party repo (biggest part)
* Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC) cleared bilateral repo
As the bottom panel shows, the SOFR market is now $3 trillion of overnight loans a day. It has doubled in the last two years.
The SOFR market has never been bigger (strong demand), and spreads are moving higher (insufficient supply).
3/6
In a normal SOFR market, when the balance between supply/demand is maintained, SOFR loans should trade at a slight discount to IOR rates (see the average and standard deviation range in the bottom panel of the spread chart in the first post). This is because IOR should act as a ceiling on money rates. Banks will not lend out below the IOR rate. Why should they when parking money (reserves) at the Fed offers a better rate?
In a normal market, non-bank (broker/dealers, money market funds, and Government-Sponsored Enterprises, or GSEs, etc.) with money to lend, who cannot park it at the Fed to get IOR rates, will offer it at slightly lower than the IOR rate to anyone that needs cash (to settle trades, needs to put up margin on derivatives, or money for other transactions). They will offer a better deal than IOR, so they do not have to compete with banks for interest on their cash.
Typically, eight basis points below IOR will do it (as the bottom panel shows in the first post), which is the same spread Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan noted in Timiroas' tweet above. Note that before the Dallas Fed, Logan ran the NY Fed Open Market Desk.)
In other words, a negative spread indicates that funding markets are "liquid" and functioning normally. Conversely, an uptrend in the SOFR/IOR spread, which tips to a positive spread, indicates that the supply of cash (aka liquidity) is falling behind the demand for money. So the price (rate) is rising relative to the IOR benchmark.
Restated, liquidity in the plumbing of the financial system is getting scarce. It is not a crisis now, but it has been moving in this direction for weeks, and it is now at a worrisome point.
Remember, financial institutions are highly leveraged; these seemingly little moves can have a significant impact on the P&L and capital ratios.
Why Now?
Why is this happening now? And why should we believe the uptrend in SOFR/IOR will not stop its two-month uptrend?
The answer to the first question is Quantitative Tightening (QT). This is the Fed pulling out liquidity since 2022 by reducing its balance sheet.
As this chart shows, they are now 45% of the S&P 500.
2/4
A list of the stocks
3/4
ChatGPT was released on November 29, 2022.
Since this date, these 41 stocks have accounted for 70% of the increase in the S&P 500's value (blue). The other 30% came from the remaining 359 stocks (orange)
Following every recession, the tenor of inflation shifts.
The current post-COVID recovery, as shown in blue, indicates inflation has reached a significantly higher level, with more volatility (wider standard deviation) than during the post-financial crisis period.
3/6
Something more may be at play, as larger trends in inflation seem to have shifted with the COVID pandemic.