Jim Bianco Profile picture
Aug 5 12 tweets 6 min read Read on X
1/12

🧵on my take on what is happening in financial markets.

tl:dr:

Not all sharp moves in financial markets are driven by rapid changes in the economic outlook. Unexpected changes in the financial structure of the markets can also force repricing.

The most recent move in the markets has been driven by the Bank of Japan’s larger-than-expected hike last week, which led to a subsequent unwinding of the yen carry trade.

In other words, everyone is right to be mad at the central bank. The problem is that most blame the wrong central bank; they should focus on the Bank of Japan.

This is the Fed's dilemma. The catalyst for the yen carry trade unwind is the narrowing of the interest rate spread between Japan and the US, which has been caused by the Bank of Japan's hike. But if the Fed succumbs to market demands and cuts rates, it will narrow this spread further and worsen it.

(see post 12/12 for its implications for the U.S. economy)
2/12

Last Wednesday, July 31, the Bank of Japan hiked rates to 0.25%, Its highest rate since 2008. This marked the second hike this year. Image
3/12

The surge in Japan’s inflation drove this decision. While inflation has decreased over the past year, the concern is it will persist near current levels. Image
4/n

Note only 29% of respondents to a Bloomberg poll expected a Bank of Japan hike on July 31. Image
5/12

Overnight Index Swaps market (OIS) discounted just five basis points of hiking.

When the Bank of Japan surprised with a 15 basis point hike (chart above), the post-meeting spike shown below indicates how much of a surprise this move was (last two labels). Image
6/12

The surprise Bank of Japan hike led to one of the biggest unwinds of the yen carry trade.

First, how big is this trade?

No definitive statistic shows its size, so we have to infer it from the size of the Bank of Japan’s balance sheet.

The chart below shows the Bank of Japan’s balance sheet is larger than the country’s GDP, at 127.5% of GDP. By comparison, the Fed’s balance sheet is 25% of GDP.

If you think the Fed matters to markets, the Bank of Japan has a 5x larger influence on their economy.Image
7/12

Here are the absolute sizes of the central bank balance sheets. Image
8/12

What Is the Yen Carry Trade?

Japan’s short-term funding rates (shown above) were the lowest globally. They still are.

However, short-term Japanese rates were also perceived to be predictable and would remain near zero for some time. When the time to hike rates eventually arrived, it would not look like last week: a surprise move with promises of more moves to come.

With the cost of funding rising, we see massive liquidations of positions using this cheap money.

Naturally, the biggest positions using the yen carry trade are in the Japanese markets. In the last three trading days, or since the surprise Bank of Japan hike on July 31, the Japanese stock market has crashed by 20%, even bigger than the three worst three-day moves during the October 1987 crash!

If you’re looking for an indication of this trade’s size, this is as close to a smoking gun as you will find. Remember, the Japanese stock market does not crash because U.S. payrolls missed expectations.Image
9/12

The yen carry trade is also behind the funding of many markets outside Japan. But the Bank of Japan’s surprise move has strained these trades.

The bottom panel of the next chart shows the dollar has lost 5% of its value against the yen over the last three trading days, again going back to the July 31 Bank of Japan meeting.

Why? Global yen carry trades are being unwound in a big way. This involves existing positions in foreign markets, like the dollar, and bringing these funds home to Japan to close these funding positions. This causes massive buying of yen.Image
10/12

This is causing a slump in foreign markets, such as the U.S. stock market, which is seeing one of its biggest corrections since the October 2022 bear market low. Image
11/12

As the next chart shows, the world is running to risk-off markets like U.S. Treasuries, as all markets worldwide are under stress. Image
12/12

Conclusion

We would argue that much of the recent market chaos concerns financial issues around the yen carry trade. The Bank of Japan’s surprise move to increase funding rates, coupled with the belief that more such hikes are coming, spooked markets and led to an unwinding of this global trade.

As this happens, we see plenty of stories attributing this move to the U.S. economy. The Sahm Rule has been triggered, so there is concern the U.S. economy is already in a recession.

We frequently quote the late MIT economist Rudi Dornbusch:

Economic expansions do not die of old age; they are murdered.

Such financial moves can potentially “murder” the economy into recession. The last such concern of a financial “murder” occurred in March 2023, around the failure of Silicon Valley Bank. The economy was able to avoid this murder.

We would guess the U.S. economy can withstand the current yen carry unwind. Hence, we remain in the "no-landing" camp.

But there is a real risk the economy will not succumb to market volatility. Markets will remain chaotic until this unwind is done.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jim Bianco

Jim Bianco Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @biancoresearch

Aug 3
1/5

🧵on an issue with the jobs report, I have not seen much discussion about.

TL: Dr. The BLS says Hurricane Beryl did not impact yesterday's (July) jobs report, but some data suggests there might have been an impact.
----
The BLS had this footnote in yesterday's report. (note that this landfall left about 2.7 million people without power).

Hurricane Beryl made landfall on the central coast of Texas on July 8, 2024, during the reference periods for both the household and establishment surveys. Hurricane Beryl had no discernible effect on the national employment and unemployment data for July, and the response rates for the two surveys were within normal ranges.

bls.gov/news.release/e…
2/5

Here are the initial claims for unemployment insurance from Texas.

If a business is without power, and you cannot go to work and get paid, you can and will file for unemployment insurance, even if it is just one or two weeks.

In a typical week in Texas, about 15k people file for unemployment insurance. 25k filed for the week of July 12, and 31k filed for the week of July 19.

Or, about 26k "excess Texas claims" were filed for unemployment insurance in the week after Beryl.

Remember that not everyone who cannot work for a week and get paid files for unemployment insurance. But tens of thousands did.Image
3/5

The BLS has a series that estimates the number of people who cannot work because of bad weather. This series is highly seasonal, so the best metric to look at each month separately.

Here is the national average for July.

Note that not everyone who could not work did not get paid. Many did, like salaried employees.

The BLS does not break those who got paid and those who did not in this statistic.Image
Read 5 tweets
Jul 29
1/5

Former Fed Vice-Chairman and current Princeton Economics Professor Alan Blinder wrote an op-ed in the WSJ today.

🧵on why I disagree with him.

Bottom line, the Fed will cut rates in September, but they should not.

And Blinder's "degen" argument that the Fed needs to boost markets because a 20% gain in six months apparently is not enough is a dangerous reason to advocate for cuts.
-----
Blinder ...



It’s now a foregone conclusion that the Federal Open Market Committee’s next interest-rate move will be down. The little inflation scare in February and March proved to be a blip, likely caused by faulty seasonal adjustment. But when will rate cutting begin?wsj.com/articles/the-f…
2/5

Blinder argues that "faulty" seasonal adjustments caused the big February and March inflation readings.

If this is the case, and we are open to this idea, there must be an offset.

Seasonal adjustments are zero-sum. For every month that overstates inflation, another month has to understate it.

The chart below shows month-over-month CPI. We highlighted the summer months in red.

All of these (red) months were the low points of the year. So, could these be faulty seasonal adjustments as well? Could the 0.1% and -.01% in May and June be the year’s low point, like the previous three summers?

This would prove to be problematic for rate cutting.Image
3/5

Blinder also said ...

Money is tight right now. With inflation in the 2.5% to 3% range, depending on how you measure it, the current federal-funds rate of 5.25% to 5.5% leaves the real interest rate—the interest rate adjusted for inflation—around 2.5% to 3%. The Fed is squeezing the economy, though certainly not suffocating it. Eventually, rates must come down. But when?
---
Here is a chart of what Blinder is describingImage
Read 5 tweets
Jul 24
1/10

Former NY Fed President Bill Dudley is out with an opinion piece arguing.

I’ve long been in the “higher for longer” camp, insisting that the US Federal Reserve must hold short-term interest rates at the current level or higher to get inflation under control.

The facts have changed, so I’ve changed my mind. The Fed should cut, preferably at next week’s policy-making meeting.

More from Dudley:

Most troubling, the three-month average unemployment rate is up 0.43 percentage point from its low point in the prior 12 months — very close to the 0.5 threshold that, as identified by the Sahm Rule, has invariably signaled a U.S. recession.
---
🧵on the issues this piece brings up.

tl:dr

Dudley's main "facts change" data point is the Sahm Rule is close to flashing a recession warning.

The problem is when millions of unemployed migrants flood into the country; the unemployment rate will rise.

Is this rise telling us the country’s demographics are changing, or is the economy slowing into a potential recession?

This question needs to be answered before economists like Dudley demand monetary policy adhere to the Sahm Rule.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
2/10

The Sahm Rule is now driving all economic decisions.

Former Federal Reserve Economist @Claudia_Sahm developed it, and it has a good track record for predicting recessions.

It is close to triggering a recession warning (bottom panel).
---
Definition:

Sahm Recession Indicator signals the start of a recession when the three-month moving average of the national unemployment rate (U3) rises by 0.50 percentage points or more relative to its three-month average low during the previous 12 months.Image
3/10

The top panel of the Sahm Rule chart above shows that the unemployment rate has increased over the last year. However, as the following chart shows, company hiring has not weakened significantly over the last year—not enough to warn of a recession like the one the Sahm Rule is close to triggering.

The U.S. economy should not be at risk of recession warnings when it is creating 177,000 jobs monthly.Image
Read 11 tweets
Jul 20
1/7

The most interesting question going into next week is whether the US economy is picking up.

Did it start with the release of the June data?

Is this going to frustrate a September rate cut?
🧵

Consider ....

Here is the Bloomberg Surprise Index. It bottomed on July 5, the nonfarm payroll release date. Since then, it has been trending higher. The move higher over the last five days (one business week) has been the biggest since September 2021 (bottom panel).

Bloomberg smooths this index with a six-month "decaying" moving average. This means the below-zero index, signifying worse-than-expected economic data, is an artifact of weaker data earlier this year. The recent surge in the last week is this Index dropping that older "decayed" data for new stronger data releases over the past several days.Image
2/7

The Atlanta Fed GDPnow bottomed on July 4, the day before payrolls. It was at 1.55%. Currently (July 19) it is at 2.73%.

So, all the data released this month, for June, have surged this estimate of Q2 2024 GDP by over 1.2% in just a couple of weeks. Image
3/7

Lastly, the Dallas Fed has a "Weekly Economic Index" (WEI) that is indexed to GDP.

It uses ten daily or weekly indicators to estimate GDP each week.

Here are the inputs. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 5
1/9

Since the 10 Spot ETFs started trading on January 11, they have collectively generated $14.6 billion in net new money. They peaked near $16 billion last month.

Collectively, these ETFs are the most successful ETF launches in history.

The problem might be they are successful for ETF providers but maybe not as much for BTC holders.

A 🧵to explain.Image
2/9

As I noted last month, most of this "new" ETF money was on-chain coins moved to regulated brokerage accounts that bought the BTC ETFs.

Of the peak inflows near $16 billion into BTC ETFs, only ~$3 billion was really "new" money into the BTC ecosystem.

3/9

The lack of a rally showed that the "new" money in the entire BTC ecosystem was small (~$3 billion). Despite all the bullish talk and "here come the boomers" proclamations, BTC peaked in March at $74k.

The BTC bulls were correct that near $16 billion of "new" money into the ecosystem should have pushed BTC to >$100k. However, it was not near $16 billion as most ETF flows came from on-chain accounts and not new fiat entering for the first time.

Further supporting this are the fears surrounding Mt. Gox liquidations. A total of $7.6 billion of BTC (140k BTC) is getting transferred. If $7.6 billion is hitting the price this much, and only a small portion will be liquidated for fiat, then near $16 billion of new BTC ETF money, if this was the case, should have skyrocketed the BTC price.

It did not happen.

forbes.com/sites/siladity…
Read 9 tweets
Jun 30
1/3

Breaking news Saturday night ... just as Biden arrives at the Hamptons fundraiser.

----

President Joe Biden is expected to discuss the future of his re-election campaign with family at Camp David on Sunday, following a nationally televised debate Thursday that left many fellow Democrats worried about his ability to beat former President Donald Trump in November, according to five people familiar with the matter.

nbcnews.com/politics/2024-…
2/3

Betting market reaction to this news ....

Notice who moved ahead of Gavin Newsom into second place for the Democrat nomination. Image
3/3

The last time Harris was ahead of Newsom for the Democrat Nomination ....

July 2022!! Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(