THIS IS BIG. WOW. New paper in PLOS Pathogens has findings about:
- the effect of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein on cardiac cells (and mitochondrial dysfunction!),
- a treatment to be investigated, and
- how this is NOT caused by mRNA vaccines!
Buckle up, we're diving in...
1/
[This paper is an uncorrected proof; it's been peer-reviewed, but not copyedited yet.]
A bit of background: syncytia (sin-sih-sha) are giant cells with multiple nuclei that form from the fusion of multiple cells. Viral infections are a common cause of syncytia.
2/
The authors had two motivations for this study:
1. Cardiac complications are a major feature of COVID. 2. Patients with heart failure tend to experience very poor outcomes from COVID.
Really, it hasn't been entirely clear *how* COVID leads to heart failure... until now?
3/
Syncytia form when the spike protein present on the surface of one cell makes contact with another cell.
This study went a step further by looking at how *extracellular* vesicles containing the spike protein can fuse cells... *without* active infection.
4/
Why do syncytia matter?
They're a potential route for the spike protein to cause damage even AFTER an active infection has subsided.
Like some other viruses, SARS-CoV-2 can cause cell senescence—which is when the cell replication cycle stops, and the cells degrades.
5/
So before we dive into results, what is the headline?
Although cytokine storm has long been thought the cause of COVID-related cardiac issues, this study found that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein "led to profound cardiac fibrosis without affecting baseline cariac function."
6/
Moreover, they found a drug target that may be able to prevent "the downregulation of mitochondrial metabolism," and it has shown potential promise in treating heart failure overall.
It would treat the "increased risk of developing heart failure and sudden cardiac death"!
7/
Let's dive in to the results! I'm going to jump around a bit, because this paper is EXTENSIVE.
First up, when they cultured cells expressing the spike (S) protein and the ACE2 receptor in a 1:1 ratio, the cells started fusing within four hours. Basic premise confirmed!
8/
In the cultures with SARS-2-S syncytia, the cells secreted more senescence-related cytokines, including IL-6, IL-8, and IL-2, compared to the cells exposed to a mutant spike protein that can't cause senesense!
They found similar syncytia formation in other cell types.
9/
They also tested the spike from four Omicron variants (BA.1, BA.5, BA.2.75, BA.2.75.2). Previous work has found BA.1 has a 5x reduction in ability to fuse cells (compared to wild-type), but the others have a 1.2-1.7x reduction.
All formed syncytia, just a bit more slowly.
10/
Here's where it gets REALLY concerning: Extracellular vesicles—little packets, emitted by cells, containing a protein or some other type of small molecule—have been found carrying the S protein in patients' blood long after initial infection...
11/
...and they found that these extracellular vesicles, once taken up by a cell, can cause the cell to fuse to another ACE2-expressing cell.
The fused cells then showed signs of senescence (including increased transcription of TNF, IL6, IL8, and CDKN1A genes).
Not great!
12/
What about the mRNA vaccines—they produce a spike protein, so can they also cause this problem? Nope!
The spike design used in the vaccines has a couple of tweaks to make it more stable, and those changes prevent it the vaccine-based spike protein from causing cell fusion!
13/
To be really sure that the S protein can cause this type of syncytial senescence to occur in real organs, they injected mice with a virus that causes them to express human ACE2 in their livers.
When injected with the wild S protein, it induced senescence in their livers!
14/
Next up, they looked at mitochondrial regulation.
Long story story, MAVS (mitochondrial antiviral signaling) proteins, which detect foreign double-stranded RNA, cause mitochondrial senescence in response to the SARS-2-S syncytia.
15/
Jumping ahead a bit, they found that "senescent SARS-2-S syncytia exhibit [shrunken] morphology, leading to the activation of WNK1," which is a molecule involved in regulating cell senesence.
It is activated by the fused cells losing their volume.
16/
They found WNK1 activation led to significantly decreased "mitochondrial oxidative capacity of the cocultured cardiomyocyte"
But "inhibition of WNK1 via WNK463 [which prevents down-regulation of metabolic enzymes] was sufficient to rescue impaired mitochondrial respiration"
17/
Jumping ahead again, we're getting to the headline experiments.
They administered the SARS-2-S protein to some mice that express the human ACE2 receptor, and syncytia formed, as expected.
18/
They concluded that "SARS-2-S promotes fibrosis without causing baseline cardiac abnormalities," and in the mice with pre-existing heart failure, it "exacerbated heart failure progression"
"fibrosis without causing baseline cardiac abnormalities"... not great!
19/
Finally, they examined if WNK1 inhibition can "alleviate heart failure exacerbated by SARS-2-S through rescuing metabolic dysfunction." They found positive results, "further supporting the notion that senescent SARS-2-S syncytia contribute to exacerbated heart failure."
20/
What do they conclude?
The S protein can contribute to heart failure. This is important for acute infections AND long-term complications, because the "persistence of circulating SARS-2-S protein ... increase the likelihood of cell-cell fusion in uninfected cells."
21/
They also note that syncytia expressed senescence-related cytokines, including TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IFN-gamma, among others, and these seem related to the metabolic regulation.
22/
And, importantly, the mRNA vaccines CANNOT cause cellular senescence using this mechanism, as they have a couple of mutations which "effectively inhibit the formation of syncytia, mitigate cellular senescence, and prevent the release of" senescence-relate signals.
23/
Because patients with heart failure show elevated ACE2 expression, while those with Long COVID exhibit "persistent circulating SARS-2-S and EVs harboring SARS-2-S," this combination "may increase the likelihood of syncytium formation."
24/
This is very much a basic research paper and doesn't have anything directly *usable* in clinical practice. However, it really illuminates the pathophysiology of cardiac complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection—EVEN ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTIONS.
AFAIK, it’s totally a non-issue with the non-mRNA vaccines, because they don’t even have a full spike protein.
And I think their statements about how mRNA vaccines with a different design could have more complications was a veiled reference to one of China’s vaccines
New preprint on the PATHOGENICITY of H5N1 was published yesterday, and... it's not good news, but it's definitely not *terrible* news either!
The delayed, lackluster response to the current outbreak remains DEEPLY concerning.
Here's a summary for a general audience!
1/many
They test three H5N1 isolates. I'll refer to them as:
- Texas: Isolated from worker at Texas dairy farm (A/Texas/37/2024)
- Bovine: Isolated from dairy cow (A/bovine/Ohio/B24OSU-342/2024)
- Vietnam: Isolated from fatal 2004 human infection in Vietnam (A/Vietnam/1203/2004)
2/
This study looked at pathogenicity, which is, basically, the ability of a virus to fuck up your cells, organs, or body, as determined by some measurable indicator of damage.
It's one of those concepts that's so broad that it's useful to include a formal definition:
This isn't a major paper, but it's an interesting jumping-off point for three different topics:
- Accuracy of RATs—in practice
- Understanding what descriptive (incl. Bayesian) statistics mean
- HOW rapid tests work
Here's a thread written for a general audience!
1/
This study was conducted from January 2020 to June 2021 using admission screening swabs from 556 oncology patients at a single hospital in Jerusalem.
The patients in this study were swabbed for both PCR and RAT, allowing for comparison of the detection ability.
2/
The takeaway is simple: The Rapid Antigen Test (RAT) used here had a sensitivity of 69.6%.
Sensitivity is the *true positive* rate. This means that, out of the patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using qRT-PCR testing, only 69.6% were *also* positive on the RAT.
Turns out SARS-CoV-2 RAPIDLY infects the NERVOUS SYSTEM long BEFORE it even enters the bloodstream.
These findings have huge implications! Here's an analysis of the study, written for a general audience. (Sorry in advance!)
1/many
Overall, it's pretty extensive: They examined the productivity of neuronal infection in multiple animal models and multiple neuronal cell cultures, and found productive neuronal infection across the board.
It's also a long one, but we'll pick up the pace as we go!
2/
So, as you may already know, neurological symptoms are actually VERY common when it comes to COVID, with several different types of neurological issues being notable features of Long COVID. There's seriously so much evidence beyond these 13 citations!
Big picture, these findings are bad for EVERYBODY, but ESPECIALLY for those still clinging to the fantasy of "natural immunity."
The takeaway? It's unclear if ANYONE has strong immunity to COVID infection!
Here's a deep analysis thread, written for a general audience!
1/many
The paper is fairly complex, but the takeaways are pretty straightforward, so I'll start with the highlights!
Method is robust, data collection was EXTENSIVE: It's a longitudinal study (follows the same individuals over time) with regular nasal swabs and blood draws!
2/
Because they have blood draws from just before each wave, it's the perfect data to examine the immunity conferred by prior infections.
Because South Africa had a low vaccination rate at the beginning of Omicron, this is also great data for examining natural immunity!
This preprint seems HUGE: It has CONCRETE DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA for a specific subtype of LC!
The novel disease identified here is named "SARS-CoV-2 Persistent Intestinal* Epithelial Syndrome (SPIES)"!
Gastrointestinal LC has a new name! Thread, for a general audience...
1/20
I love this preprint because, not only does it make a specific subtype of LC into a tangible medical artifact, but it also identifies the way in which SPIES differs from similar conditions, like IBS!
2/
GI issues following a COVID infection have been known for a long time, and gastrointestinal Long COVID is one of the more prevelant issues among the total population.
Because there is the possibility of viral persistence, that's what they examined here.
FIRST: This paper DOES NOT HAVE CLINICAL VALUE. It is NOT about treatment!
With that out of the way: WOW, WOW, WOOOW.
"After six years, 44.1% of the [ME/CFS patients treated with cyclophosphamide] scored an SF-36 PF of at least 70, and 17.6% of at least 90..."
Summary ⬇️
1/13
The clinical trials (conducted last decade) were based on the hypothesis that a subset of ME/CFS patients are experiencing an autoimmune condition; this study is the six-year follow-up!
The interesting result here is the impact of cyclophosphamide (from the CycloME trial)
2/
Here's the major takeaway: "In the CycloME trial, mean SF-36 PF increased from 35.4 at baseline to 54.4 at 18 months, and 56.7 at six years."
At six years, 44% of the CycloME group had an SF-36 PF ≥ 70, and 18% had an SF-36 PF ≥ 80 "which is within normal range."