Aizenberg Profile picture
Aug 6 17 tweets 7 min read Read on X
🧵CNN piece that IDF is far from victory over Hamas is fake news that simply wishes this were true. CNN offers almost no evidence and relies on cherry-picked experts who have been claiming IDF failure since 10/7. Subtext: IDF has killed Gazans for nothing. Full analysis: 1/Image
CNN starts out slowly: Hamas has rebuilt some fighting capabilities. Fine. Article even admits Hamas is now a “guerilla force.” But authors then speculate, cite other experts who push line that “victory” over Hamas is not in sight, then it becomes “power of Hamas is growing”! 2/Image
CNN’s analysis relies on Hamas “claims” — Really? Despite never admitting any combatant deaths? Hiding Deif & Issa deaths? Also open source data. CNN offers no info from IDF, citing just one unnamed “Israeli source close to military.” IDF officially rejected CNN's thesis. 3/Image
Scant detail CNN reveals is stunning. Definition of Hamas battalion that has “reconstituted,” the main reason why CNN claims Israel is not winning, is “rebuild some military capabilities at least once in the last six months.” ONE time in SIX months = reconstituted battalion! 4/Image
CNN claims only 3 of 24 Hamas battalions are “combat ineffective” but then strangely also says 13 of 24 can only “conduct sporadic largely unsuccessful guerilla-style attacks.” Huh? Sure seems these 13 are also “combat ineffective.” CNN admits IDF calls them "dismantled"! 5/ Image
CNN enlisted experts who are long standing Israel defeatists who have been pushing “IDF cannot beat Hamas, they're stronger now” since first week of war. Missing are any contra experts that I cite below, proving CNN had an agenda, not real analysis. Here is the IDF response: 6/ Image
CNN cites Peter Mansoor who has been pushing the “Israel is losing” narrative since day one, of course he’s not going to change course now even with IDF achievements. Already on Oct 2023 he falsely claimed IDF was simply conducting war of “revenge” that would likely fail. 7/ Image
In May 2024 Mansoor also claimed Israeli failure, that Israel should not have gone to war, it's only a political matter, Israel is ignoring “root causes” — but real root cause is Hamas’ aim to kill all Jews! Saying Israel only wants revenge undermines his entire view on Gaza. 8/Image
CNN also enlists Robert Pape who has pushed "Hamas is only getting stronger" line from the beginning. Kill them — stronger. Don't kill them — stronger. See how that works? Losing key military chiefs and only lifeline for arms (Egypt) somehow grows Hamas' power in Pape's eyes. 9/ Image
Pape has not changed his thinking since day one and no doubt CNN knew he'd provide the quotes needed, that "power of Hamas is growing." @spencerguard demolished his views in discussion below: 10/
Apparently Hamas “recruiting like crazy” points to Israeli defeat. Really? Handing untrained men a rifle while every day IDF is picking them off wherever they congregate is the Hamas rebuilding of forces? Somehow we're to believe that Hamas is actually growing its power? 11/ Image
CNN could have brought in other experts with alternative opinions, like from @Mr_Andrew_Fox for a real analysis. They could have let others evaluate the new "data" CNN supposedly has. But CNN and its lead author (more on her below) have an anti-Israel agenda to push. 12/ Image
Fox, of the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, wrote about his recent visit to Gaza to study IDF action. He addressed this CNN article, explaining that the “IDF is losing” is part of a months long agenda, part of a “desperation” to portray Israel as losing, when it is not. 13/ Image
Leading war expert @spencerguard has stated "Israel is, by every definition, winning in Gaza". He recently wrote in Newsweek how the demise of key Hamas leaders are “major milestones to Israel being able to achieve their immediate goals in Gaza.” 14/ Image
Another military expert, former US general David Deputa was recently in Gaza and lauded IDF action and success in Gaza, such as in destroying tunnels. CNN notably does not describe ANY IDF successes in Gaza. 15/ Image
We also find clues about the agenda driven narrative based on previous writings of lead author @tamaraqiblawi -- she loathes Israel & “Zionism” adding to the evidence that this CNN piece is mostly propaganda, a deliberate distortion of reality. 16/ honestreporting.com/not-again-cnn-…
Defeatists, apologists & haters say Israel can’t win because they don’t want Israel to win. Sure, IDF has lots more painful work to do given Hamas’ human shield & baby kidnapping strategy. Bravo Hamas. But to claim they are stronger today is inane, as shown in chart below. ENDImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aizenberg

Aizenberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Aizenberg55

Sep 16
🧵@kenroth inadvertently admits Israel is not starving Gaza, there is no siege or famine. He claims Israel is "smart" by masking a starvation strategy by allowing 100 trucks/day vs 500 prewar; but only 73/day of food entered pre-war! Roth loses track of his lies. See detail: 1/Image
Debate guest @spencerguard asks Roth question see below. Simply put: how is it possible to claim Israel is enacting a siege and strategy to deliberately starve Gazans when 29,000 trucks have entered Gaza? (it's 49,000 today). Roth does not have a credible answer, so he lies. 2/Image
Roth replies (below) claiming Israel is “smart” by masking siege & starvation, letting in “drips & drabs” of food, admits “people are not dying,” Israel is letting in 100 trucks/day vs 500 pre-war. He inadvertently admits no siege, no “dribs & drabs,” no famine or starvation! 3/Image
Read 8 tweets
Sep 12
🧵Many leading worldwide military experts affirm that Israel is complying with rules of war in Gaza – no war crimes, no genocide, no indiscriminate attacks. In sharp contrast all reports by NGOs UN ICJ ICC claiming war crimes never cite military experts. Review of 10 experts: 1/Image
John Spencer @SpencerGuard is the leading expert on urban warfare, at West Point the top US military academy. Spencer has written extensively how Israel’s actions to limit civilian harm are unprecedented. Like the others, he is simply pro-truth. 2/
newsweek.com/israel-has-cre…
British General Sir John McColl was Deputy Commander of NATO Forces, so his view carries weight. He wrote piece titled “I know Israel’s doing all it can to save civilians” which says it all. NGOs can’t cite NATO leaders to support their fake “reports.” 3/
thetimes.com/article/e21252…
Read 12 tweets
Sep 9
🧵Hamas wants to kill all Jews, evidenced in word and deed across its political and spiritual leadership. Claims persist that Hamas will accept two states or some form of peace. Here is a long review of Hamas' clear genocidal intent to kill all Jews spoken by its leaders: 1/Image
See below from 1988 charter. In 2017 Hamas issued “A Document of General Principles & Policies” that sanitizes Jews as “Zionists” but notably and critically, the original 1988 charter was never revoked – it still stands and killing Jews has not been repudiated! 2/Image
In July 2018 senior Hamas official Fathi Hamad said in a speech: “we must attack every Jew on the globe by way of slaughter and killing.” His words were publicized and condemned, so he walked back his comments. All ok then, didn’t mean it, right? 3/ timesofisrael.com/hamas-distance…
Read 16 tweets
Sep 4
🧵UK admits it is impossible to assess IDF conduct in Gaza because they do not have inside data such as “intended targets and anticipated civilian harm” (taken from UK export ban document). For this same reason all “reports” by NGOs alleging IDF war crimes are fake. Analysis: 1/Image
Fake NGOs @hrw @amnesty, armchair military experts and many in media do not know upfront what IDF intended to hit and expected civilian harm so they cannot assess distinction and proportionality. Here is rule per Geneva Article 51. There is no statistical measurement of this. 2/Image
Does it make assessing a legality of military strike very difficult? Yes. Geneva also provides wide latitude. But this does not relieve burden of NGOs and does not absolve their fakery. Like the UK, NGOs must admit that they don’t have the data to properly assess IDF action. 3/Image
Read 6 tweets
Aug 23
🧵@VanityFair piece by Ta-Nehisi Coates is anti-Israel libel. He literally fakes a quote from Herzog, falsely claims Gaza pre-10/7 was a prison, falsely claims spousal law applies only to Arabs, falsely claims Israel is like "Jim Crow" and omits mention of hostages. Analysis: 1/Image
Topic of article is Palestinians at DNC but it's real purpose is to bash Israel. Coates claims “intention” of Gaza war is “erasing 2% of entire population of Gaza” never mind Hamas, human shields, 50% killed are combatants. His evidence for intention is a totally fake quote. 2/ Image
Herzog never said: “There are no innocent civilians in Gaza” or any words close to this (recall that quotes must be exact). Coates thus engages in gross academic fraud. Thread below documents what Herzog actually said and how his words were twisted 3/
Read 10 tweets
Aug 20
🧵Another fake report by @HRW — now claiming Israeli attack on Hodeida possibly war crime because UN officials said there is no military activity at port. But UN report HRW cites contradicts claim; evidence shows Houthis smuggle arms and launch attacks from port. Analysis: 1/Image
HRW claims IDF attack was “indiscriminate” meaning port was not used for any military purpose & disproportionate. How does HRW know port was not used for military purposes? UN staff & Yemenis said so. That’s literally the only evidence HRW can muster! 2/Image
Is it true UN “never found evidence of a Houthi military presence" at port? FALSE. HRW themselves cite UN report (S/2023/130) contradicting claim. HRW conveniently omits. Clause 35 recounts how port was used by Houthis in 2022 to detain a UAE vessel. A clear military use. 3/Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(