Speaking as a Midwesterner, let me give you my opinion of Tim Walz.
Walz needs to be seen in the context of the rapid fall of Minnesota, and particularly what happened to the Twin Cities.
The Twin Cities of Minneapolis & St. Paul used to be one of the nicest, safest cities
1/
in the United States. The Mary Tyler Moore show was set there for good reason, it was friendly, safe place.
Minnesota used to be purple and quite centrist.
The local Democratic party is called the DFL - the Democratic-Farmer-Labor party.
2/
That was how Minnesota politics worked - the cities in the metro area allied with the unions (primarily in the mining Northeast) who allied with the farmers. They went against the Twin Cities suburbs and businessmen, it was always polite, and the state was even.
3/
The big shift happened with the mass influx of Somalis, along with the Dems trying to bring in blacks from other metro areas. The "nice" Repubs being controlled opposition, they of course did nothing to stop this process.
4/
The demographics changed sharply, crime rates soared, and the political situation rearranged itself.
Along with much of the rest of the country, enough of the suburbs switched to the Dems, that along with the newly black metro areas, the Dems began to get a decisive margin.
5/
Polite and nice stopped right there, the new DFL played strictly hardball politics
They also turned on their traditional constituencies of the farmers and the Iron Range union workers. As soon as they didn't need the votes, it was slap across the face, and knife in the back,
6/
they had no need for those traditional white Americans, or there traditional values.
Minnesota rapidly became the most radical of the Midwestern states, even more so than Chicago-dominated Illinois.
7/
Walz is a snake & a chameleon. Yes, he hunts, does the fishing opener & sometimes wears flannel shirts - all of which are used by the entirely Democratic Minnesota media to portray him as something he is not, a folksy politician with a common touch.
8/
Walz is despised in the outstate regions where the hunting & fishing are primarily done. Those areas have flipped from Blue to solid Red, as they try to protect themselves from the radical in the Twin Cities - to no avail.
9/
The real Walz? He's the face of the Great Replacement, that is followed by the Marxists crushing the opposition.
That's exactly why they want him as VP. He brings no election advantages. They're not worried about the election, but what comes after.
10/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Who cares what our life stories looked like: in one generation the future has been wiped out?"👇
By any historical standards, the modern Left is frothing at the mouth insane. They're trying to tear it all down, every bit of Western civilization, in a single generation. 1/
They are forcing a fantastic rate of change: families, children, sexuality, the racial makeup of America. It's all one vast experiment, with no thinking about long-term consequences.
They think as one, a thoughtless mob moving together, policing each other as the required
2/
beliefs change to an even more historically unprecedented point each year. They try to control the thoughts and beliefs of the rest of the nation - and the rest of the world - banishing all dissent as misinformation.
3/
This is a fundamental division that Trump helps to illuminate.
Europe has a wide group of people. Generally, however, Europe is to the authoritarian Left of the the US Dems - which means it is highly opposed to the peoples of the Heartland & our values.
2/
Ironically enough, US history since WWII is coastal "elites" using the manufacturing power and military men of the Heartland to dominate the world, even while sharing a disdain for the people of flyover country with the Euro "elites".
The power dynamics are quite different from any other new administration. They tried to financially destroy Trump, imprison him and kill him. They would have destroyed Musk if Trump hadn't won.
Dems will still do both in 2028, if they can. That means for self-protection,
1/
Trump & Musk will need to take decisive actions to cut the head off of the snake, and this will likely be concentrated in the first 100 days of the new administration.
The snake is aware of this, and also that it has much more power to prevent it before Trump gets the
2/
powers of the Presidency.
While I hope that it will not occur, there is still a real chance of a @TheWorthyHouse scenario, with a coup attempt by the Dems / Deep State before the inauguration. I assume that at least some people on Trump's team are aware of this.
3/
The smart way for Trump to end the Ukraine war is to freeze at the current front lines (other than Kursk), recognize the occupied territories as Russian, and give them their money back.
This would *greatly benefit the US*, because it is the US that is being harmed the most
1/
by the attempts to harm Russia, and treat it as a pariah state.
Seizing the Russian reserves puts the reserve status of the dollar in question. Treating Russia as a pariah state is leading to competing geopolitical blocs, even as alternative trade and currency systems
2/
are put into place. Driving Russia, China, Iran & North Korea all closer together is insane, any remotely competent State Department would be doing everything possible to split them apart.
End the war. Stop the killing. Incentivize Russia to return to the table in working
3/
promotions. Most white men came together, roared, and provided 74% of the net positive votes.
This matters. Victory has a thousand fathers, and everyone is trying to put together the usual repub controlled opposition coalition where the minorities & women get the plums,
2/
and the white men get discriminated againt.
Enough. The white men have spoken decisively and all discriminations against them need to be illegal. This will take some big changes, but now is the time to make them.
Acknowledge the centrality of who is angry, who delivered
3/
The 2024 elections were overwhelming the victory of WHITE MEN. A 20% gap with 34% of the vote provided a +6.8% gain. WHITE women were a +1.85% gain (5% X 37%). Latino MEN were a +0.6% gain (10% X 6%).
White men provided 74% of the net 1/
gain in votes needed to elect Trump, while white women provided 20% and latino men provided 6%.
Every other group, on average, voted to elect Harris.
Yes, there were gains relative to 2020 among other groups, such as black MEN.
2/
But, to say this was a multiracial & two gender coalition that Trump over the top would be misleading.
Three quarters of what happened was white men making their minds up - and this needs to be viewed in terms of the source of the power. It was great that white women helped
3/