I have a new piece up, based on information I've obtained from Freedom of Information requests to HMRC.
1) New data on migrants earnings suggests the median earnings of non-EU migrants under the new system is much lower than previous migrants. The 2 biggest groups are below:
2) The new system made the system more restrictive for EU nationals but much less selective for non-EU nationals. The result has been record immigraiton overall. The number of employments of EU nationals has declined & the number for non-EU nationals has increased:
3) Earnings for EU nationals increased relatively, but less selectivity means earnings for non-EU nationals have decreased relative to the UK average. Given most previous migrants are still here in the data, this suggests the earnings of *new* non-EU migrants are *much* lower
The new system starts less selective towards non-EU migrants. The post-study work visa and social care visa then further reduced selectivity, & less selective routes for adult dependents of people on work & study main visas have also been much more heavily used in recent years.
The numbers of employments are also interesting. From Dec 19 to Dec 23 there were:
1.481 million more employments
1.465 million more accounted for by people from outside the EU
257,000 more employments for UK nationals…
…offset by 242,000 fewer employments for EU nationals
Within that non-EU total, the biggest growth in employments in absolute terms were nationals of India (+488,000), Nigeria (+279,000), Pakistan (+101,000), and Ghana (+55,000). Given there's no net migration data by country yet, this provides clues as to what it will look like.
*Private sector* employments for UK nationals were slightly down (29,000) over the period Dec 19 - Dec 23, so *all* the growth in private sector employments came from a 1.2 million increase in employments for non-EU nationals. (Self employed peope are not in this data.)
Given the unavoidable costs in terms of capital dilution, public services, housing and infrastructure pressures, we need to select for migrants who are significantly higher-earning than existing residents in order to improve the net impact on the existing population.
Rebooting the system to be more selective and shift the balance towards higher skilled / higher earning migrants and groups with higher employment rates could provide a boost to the public finances and the economy more generally.
There's lots more in the piece - please do take a look!
I have a new (data-heavy!) article on migration & ethnicity which includes:
- The "missing million" difference in migration figures
- Interactive maps for parliamentary constituencies
- An in-depth examination of changes in schools from a WPQ on DFE data
The theme of the piece is that the effect of migration and ethnic change varies massively between different places and people. For some people, immigration hasn’t really changed their world. For others, it has absolutely transformed it.
I've used census data to make interactive maps of the impact of migration at the local level. While many shire and coastal constituencies have seen less than 5% of the population arriving since 2001, many London constituencies had more than 30%.
My new article looks at how changes put in place by Boris Johnson both massively increased overall immigration, and also took us further away from being the 'grammar school of the west' (1/10)
Energy Thread:
1 reason energy package will need an element of direct help is massive variation in energy cost WITHIN different income groups.
Chart below (which is old) shows huge variations, and all these costs will now go up a lot, making absolute variation even bigger (1/7)
In the old example above, the median household in the bottom spending decile was spending 14% of post housing income on energy, but the top quartile of same group were spending 23% and top tenth safely over a third. (2/7)
Different way to visualise (also old, this time income decile)
If you do enough for the average lower / middle income family, there are still a bunch of people with higher energy costs who are still stuffed (top left - I've coloured them red) (3/7)
The latest in my series of pieces on challenges for the new PM looks at migration. Quick thread:
Since '97 there’s been unprecedented net migration to the UK. England and Wales’ population rose just 1.2 million from 1971 to 1991, but 7.6 million over the last twenty years (1/13)
Many Leave voters assumed Brexit would reduce immigration. But since the referendum gross migration has increased not reduced. (2/13)
The proportion of UK residents born overseas increased from 7.5% to 14.5% since 2000.
In Manchester and Birmingham it’s over 1/4 . 37% Londoners were born overseas.
Though we think of the USA as a “melting pot”, we now have a slightly higher proportion born overseas. (3/13)