Neil O'Brien Profile picture
Aug 7 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I have a new piece up, based on information I've obtained from Freedom of Information requests to HMRC.

1) New data on migrants earnings suggests the median earnings of non-EU migrants under the new system is much lower than previous migrants. The 2 biggest groups are below: Image
2) The new system made the system more restrictive for EU nationals but much less selective for non-EU nationals. The result has been record immigraiton overall. The number of employments of EU nationals has declined & the number for non-EU nationals has increased: Image
3) Earnings for EU nationals increased relatively, but less selectivity means earnings for non-EU nationals have decreased relative to the UK average. Given most previous migrants are still here in the data, this suggests the earnings of *new* non-EU migrants are *much* lower Image
The new system starts less selective towards non-EU migrants. The post-study work visa and social care visa then further reduced selectivity, & less selective routes for adult dependents of people on work & study main visas have also been much more heavily used in recent years.
The numbers of employments are also interesting. From Dec 19 to Dec 23 there were:

1.481 million more employments

1.465 million more accounted for by people from outside the EU

257,000 more employments for UK nationals…

…offset by 242,000 fewer employments for EU nationals
Within that non-EU total, the biggest growth in employments in absolute terms were nationals of India (+488,000), Nigeria (+279,000), Pakistan (+101,000), and Ghana (+55,000). Given there's no net migration data by country yet, this provides clues as to what it will look like.
*Private sector* employments for UK nationals were slightly down (29,000) over the period Dec 19 - Dec 23, so *all* the growth in private sector employments came from a 1.2 million increase in employments for non-EU nationals. (Self employed peope are not in this data.)
Given the unavoidable costs in terms of capital dilution, public services, housing and infrastructure pressures, we need to select for migrants who are significantly higher-earning than existing residents in order to improve the net impact on the existing population.
Rebooting the system to be more selective and shift the balance towards higher skilled / higher earning migrants and groups with higher employment rates could provide a boost to the public finances and the economy more generally.
There's lots more in the piece - please do take a look!

neilobrien.co.uk/p/the-new-migr…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Neil O'Brien

Neil O'Brien Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NeilDotObrien

Jan 23
I have a new (data-heavy!) article on migration & ethnicity which includes:
- The "missing million" difference in migration figures
- Interactive maps for parliamentary constituencies
- An in-depth examination of changes in schools from a WPQ on DFE data

neilobrien.co.uk/p/migration-an…
The theme of the piece is that the effect of migration and ethnic change varies massively between different places and people. For some people, immigration hasn’t really changed their world. For others, it has absolutely transformed it.
I've used census data to make interactive maps of the impact of migration at the local level. While many shire and coastal constituencies have seen less than 5% of the population arriving since 2001, many London constituencies had more than 30%.

datawrapper.de/_/KYowd
Read 15 tweets
Dec 12, 2023
My new article looks at how changes put in place by Boris Johnson both massively increased overall immigration, and also took us further away from being the 'grammar school of the west' (1/10)

almondtree.substack.com/p/legal-migrat…
The UK has shifted from mainly EU migration to mainly non-EU migration (2/10) Image
Within non-EU migration, the mix has shifted towards poorer countries and away from richer. (3/10) Image
Read 10 tweets
Oct 24, 2022
There is a lot on this super-timely @ukonward mega polling report - things I thought were interesting included: (1/7)

ukonward.com/wp-content/upl…
Why voters left - scandals, being too liberal on migration and (for some) the economy (2/7)
How much store voters put on honesty from PM (3/7)
Read 7 tweets
Aug 30, 2022
Energy Thread:
1 reason energy package will need an element of direct help is massive variation in energy cost WITHIN different income groups.

Chart below (which is old) shows huge variations, and all these costs will now go up a lot, making absolute variation even bigger (1/7)
In the old example above, the median household in the bottom spending decile was spending 14% of post housing income on energy, but the top quartile of same group were spending 23% and top tenth safely over a third. (2/7)
Different way to visualise (also old, this time income decile)

If you do enough for the average lower / middle income family, there are still a bunch of people with higher energy costs who are still stuffed (top left - I've coloured them red) (3/7)
Read 7 tweets
Aug 15, 2022
The latest in my series of pieces on challenges for the new PM looks at migration. Quick thread:

Since '97 there’s been unprecedented net migration to the UK. England and Wales’ population rose just 1.2 million from 1971 to 1991, but 7.6 million over the last twenty years (1/13)
Many Leave voters assumed Brexit would reduce immigration. But since the referendum gross migration has increased not reduced. (2/13)
The proportion of UK residents born overseas increased from 7.5% to 14.5% since 2000.

In Manchester and Birmingham it’s over 1/4 . 37% Londoners were born overseas.

Though we think of the USA as a “melting pot”, we now have a slightly higher proportion born overseas. (3/13)
Read 13 tweets
Jan 23, 2021
*Networks of disinformation: a thread.*

The covid-sceptic campaign group @pcrclaims have deleted all their tweets from before the last couple of days.

They are trying to cover their tracks & look more 'respectable' by deleting stuff like the below (from 16 December). 👇
But they still claim Covid is a "pseudo epidemic".

Their website features Clare Craig saying:

"it is all based around false positive test results, when there is no real disease behind it, and I think that's what we are seeing here." (2/3)

pcrclaims.co.uk/video/Clare-Cr…
Concerningly, it seems to be part of a network of slick disinfo sites:

pcrclaims.co.uk
ycampaign.org
hartgroup.org
chinafiles.org / @china_files

The sites share people. EG Mike Yeadon has his own site & *was* a spokesman for PCRclaims.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(