Trent Telenko Profile picture
Aug 7, 2024 23 tweets 10 min read Read on X
The Armed Forces of Ukraine have launched a up to 25K, or small NATO Corps sized, incursion into the Kursk Oblast that is moving between 7 & 10 km a day.

AFU Bde have between 4 to 9 battalions per brigade with 6 Bn as average, so ~18 Bn seem involved.
AFU's Strategic raid🧵
1/

Image
Image
Image
US made and AFU crewed Stryker & Humvees are in Russia as a part of an AFU multi-domain - that is, air and ground - offensive.

A RuAF conscript regiment -- doing animal labor logistics - was thrown at the assault and shattered. Chechens ran.

Russia's reserves are airpower.
2/ @NOELreports photo of a M1132 Stryker ESV with LWMR mine roller in Russia.
What has been particularly interesting has been the further demonstration of the floating 10 km "FPV Motor Transport Kill Bubble" that extend around AFU Drone-ground teams that has picked off a pair of RuAF tank transporter convoys behind the border.

3/
And this "FPV Motor Transport Kill Bubble" is now going for big game.

That is, Ukrainian FPVs are targeting Russian railway engines on the Kursk Oblast rail lines.

4/ Image
The last two days of NASA FIRMS heat maps shows hot spots of AFU & RuAF artillery fires that seem to confirm Ukrainian claims of major ground gains.

Ukrainian BUK SAM launchers and FPV interceptors have, so far, kept the VKS jets & choppers off the backs AFU ground units.

5/
Image
Image
This is a video of a Russian attack helicopter over Kursk Oblast being destroyed by a Ukrainian FPV interceptor.

The same could happen to a US Army AH-64 Apache in the near future.

6/
While some are claiming we are seeing the beginnings of a Ukrainian strategic envelopment.

There was a lack of Russian social media comment on this AFU force before this attack that would reflect a major strategic logistical build up.

7/
And the distances involved - 150 km - from Kursk to Vovchansk are operational-strategic in scope.

This makes me think we are looking at a Ukrainian strategic level raid aimed at placing Russia in a nested series of logistical dilemma's in order to give AFU the initiative.

8/ Image
Where that 1st logistical dilemma that is making itself felt is the Anti-Access Area Denial (A2AD), jammer & FPV based AFU air superiority over Kursk below 3,000 feet/914 meters.

We saw this at #Krynky in 2023 and we are seeing it again now in Kursk.
9/
It's the reach of the Ukrainian Baba Yaga with a more than 25 km radius of action while dropping heavy munitions, or FPV's while acting as a radio relay, that is going to be a horror show for the RuAF.

Three TM-62 mines dropped from one will cut a railway line.

And Russia can't risk scarce railway repair crews inside the Baba Yaga bubble for fear those crews will be targeted.

10/Image
Image
In WW2 the 2nd Allied Tactical Air Force would sweep areas before British Commonwealth armored columns penetrating Nazi lines.

Typhoons were armed with 8 each RP-3 rockets and P-47's with 500lb bombs.

AFU is replaying these tactics using drones.
11/
Image
Image
Wherever Ukrainian ground forces are present, you have to draw a 25 km bubble ahead of them to account for their drone interdiction of major transport infrastructure and 10 km for killing Russian motor transport.

Given Kursk's rail network...opps😈⬇️
12/
Russia's real logistical dilemma is they are on exterior versus interior lines of communications with an inferior sized ground force.

The Russians were too confident in the paralytic fear of the Biden NSC. The fools.

The NSC is now paralyzed between fear of Moscow & fear of political crucifixion on multiple fronts.

13/
(H/T @WarintheFuture)Image
The analytical loons on X buying into the "Russia Strong™️" narrative about RuAF having infantry superiority ignored the fact that RuAF counted on the Biden Administration keeping Ukraine out of Russia.

Reflexive Control infowar doctrine was used as a RuAF strategic economy of force measure to get local numerical superiority for offensives.

So RuAF didn't honor the threat of AFU's larger ground forces across from the Kursk Oblast.

14/Image
This only worked as long as Ukraine played by US rules. It looks like the Biden Admin refusal to allow ATACMS strikes on Russian airfields while VKS withdrew was the last straw.

The lack of Russian reserves means Kherson Oblast is the only source of formed military units, unless RuAF gives up the Vovchansk offensive.

GMLRS made this a problem in the summer of 2022. (Map⬇️)

ATACMS ranges on all rail lines in occupied Ukraine. It will take more than a week to get RuAF units from Kherson to Kursk by rail.

15/
(H/T @FreudGreyskull)Image
Russia has to gather a lot of scarce motor transport to move ground units out of Kherson.

Then put them, and especially their heavy equipment, on rail outside of GMLRS range and take the risk of ATACMS and partisan attacks in Southern Ukraine to get them to Kursk.

16/ Image
The complete destruction of the Russian railway ferry fleet was, in retrospect, a strategic level AFU shaping operation for the current Kursk offensive

It is certain that Ukraine is waiting for a munitions train to approach the Kerch Straits bridge.

17/
Being a WW2 Pacific historian specializing in electronic warfare, signals & logistics.

It makes you acutely aware that troops in transit are utterly useless for doing anything until they arrive, shake out and move from the port to battle.

Russia is doing that with trains.
18/ Image
It isn't just moving the 100K troops RuAF needs to stabilized, & then start reducing the Kursk salient.

The ATACMS threat dispursed VKS jets needs munitions & fuel moved to support operations simultaneously, w/o forklifts & pallets.

Bombs on a train aren't on a flight line.
19/Image
The Russian Railway monopoly is suffering a perfect storm of Western railway cassette bearing wear out, maintenance work force burnout, and administrative chaos between oligarchs owning rolling stock.

Now it is being over stressed by priority...

20/
t.me/vchkogpu/49636
Image
...military trains heading in every direction in Western Russia and occupied Ukraine at the same time.

It's almost like Ukraine is making a Russian economy suffering from rail transportation double pneumonia to do a 400 meter sprint in winter.😈

21/
I think the real objective of the AFU strategic raid into Kursk Oblast is to cause a systemic collapse of Russian railway system as a set up for a series of AFU offensives.

Like the one I predicted for September 2024.

22/22 End
@threadreaderapp unroll please

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trent Telenko

Trent Telenko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrentTelenko

May 13
Finally!

Accounts watching the Russo-Ukrainian War have been utterly confused as to why Ukraine and Russia simply refused to use barbed wire.

1/
This one of my long threads on the lack of barbed wire from 2023.

4/
Read 7 tweets
May 13
This Ukrainian video shared by @bayraktar_1love makes clear it wasn't US Patriots on German mobile launchers that nailed a Backfire bomber and a pair of A-50 AEW radar planes.

It was a Ukrainian 1960's era S-200 (Nato SA-5) SAM.

A Victory Lap🧵
1/
What that video showed was the remote control feature for the S-200's 5P72 launchers.

This Soviet PVO scheme allowed S-200 batteries to put the 5P72 launcher near the front lines and keep the 5N62 Square Pair illuminating target radar 100 km behind it,

2/ Image
Image
...out of range of NATO tactical ballistic missiles.

A lot of "expert" X accounts in Feb 2024 were saying that this video showed a Patriot engagement or Russian friendly fire engagement.

The A-50 countermeasures pattern was inconsistent with both.

3/
Read 15 tweets
May 11
Actually, I disagree with @wretchardthecat below.

The question to be asking is "which military power is it more cost effective to have a cease fire?"

Strangely enough, a 30 day ceasefire favors Ukraine far more than Russia, because drones.

1/
The most important grand strategy scale decision of this conflict has been Ukraine's move to mass produce multi-copter drones, Propeller assault (OWA) drones, jet drone-missiles and increasing numbers of military spare parts via masses of 3D/AM printers.

2/
Ukraine is making 4 million drones a year including over 30,000 long range OWA drones and 3,000 "Drone-missiles" of three models a year.

That's over
33K small drones
2,500 OWA drones, and
250 Drone-missiles per month.

3/
Read 6 tweets
May 11
I have a copy of Solly Zuckerman's book mentioned in the thread below and I can confirm it's applicability to the Russo-Ukrainian War for the Ukrainian cause.

1/
To date, no strategic bombing campaign has been analyzed by serious historians as to how the targeting decisions for the various strategic bombing campaigns against Germany, Japan, North Korea, and North Vietnam/Laos/Cambodia were done.

2/
To quote the late Pierre Sprey:

"...strategic bombing targeting in every one of those campaigns was done by highly centralized, highly bureaucratized committees--and every one of those committees

3/
Read 17 tweets
May 6
This is Grok analysis of one of my X threads is a good example of why farming out your thinking/analysis to AI is a really bad idea.

Grok accurately reflects a highly flawed US National Security consensus about small drones.😱

A Grok vs Drone Reality🧵

x.com/i/grok/share/B…
Grok focused on Ukrainian drone capabilities to the exclusion of actual fielded Chinese drone capability and literally eight decades old aviation technology like conformal fuel tanks which have also been applied to cruise missiles in the Chinese technological base for 20 years
2/ Image
The Chinese Sunflower-200 is it's clone of the Iranian Shahed-136. It appeared at Russia's Armiya-2023 show and in 2025 combat in Sudan.

The China Defense website says it has a 3.2-meter length, 2.5-meter wingspan, a flight speed of 160-220 km per hour with a maximum take-off weight of 175 kilograms, a combat payload of 40 kilograms and can fly up to 2000 kilometers.
x.com/clashreport/st…
3/Image
Image
Read 18 tweets
May 4
I cannot begin to tell you how heartened I am by this development in Ukrainian combat barrier doctrine.

1/
Compare the picture above to my complaints about Ukrainian fighting doctrine in the Summer of 2024.

2/
Or my B*tching about its lack in the Summer of 2023 for the Russian Army

3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(