Beefeater Profile picture
Aug 7 7 tweets 11 min read Read on X
The United States has threatened Turkey with "consequences" for exporting technology to Russia.

This thread explores Turkey’s trade with Russia - and questions whether equal threats should now be made to EU countries complicit in building Turkey as a hub for their products being re-exported into the russian parallel market.

07 August 2024, The Financial Times reports on possible sanctions against Ankara for cooperation with Moscow.

“Washington has warned Turkey that there will be “consequences” if the country does not curtail its exports to Russia of US military-linked hardware that is vital to Moscow’s war machine.”

As part of efforts to curb illegal trade, U.S. Assistant Secretary of Commerce Matthew Axelrod met with Turkish officials. According to the representative of Ankara, the American official demanded that they work harder to limit trade in American-made chips and other spare parts that may be in demand in Russia.

Washington’s warning is the latest sign of how Turkey’s decision to retain strong trade ties with Russia has tarnished relations between the two Nato allies. The US, EU and other western partners have imposed sweeping sanctions on Russia since it launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, but Turkey has eschewed the curbs and increased trade with the country since the war broke out.

Of particular concern to the United States is the fact that Turkey has become a key hub through which Western-made electronics, including processors, memory cards and amplifiers, enter Russia.

At the end of 2023, the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury for Counterterrorism and Financial Intelligence, Brian Nelson, already shared his disappointment about Ankara's trade in military goods. The US Department of Commerce has already imposed sanctions against Turkish companies for allegedly supplying products to the military-industrial complex (MIC) of Russia.

Earlier, Turkish analyst Mehmet Perincek said that Turkey is being forced to impose anti-Russian sanctions in order to weaken its economy and make it not resist the plans of the United States. In his opinion, the conflict in Ukraine is also being used to worsen relations between Moscow and Ankara. This is done to leave Turkey without partners, the analyst believes.

Turkish economic commentator Mustafa Recep Ercin added that because of the sanctions, trade with Russia has turned into a nightmare. In May, he complained that the United States and the EU were intimidating Turkish financial institutions in the event of their cooperation with Russia.

Because of this, the volume of banking transactions fell, and importers faced difficulties in making transactions for purchased products. According to the Turkish Institute of Statistics, shipments to Russia decreased by 32 percent year-on-year in the first quarter.

Washington’s warning is the latest sign of how Turkey’s decision to retain strong trade ties with Russia has tarnished relations between the two Nato allies.

The US, EU and other western partners have imposed sweeping sanctions on Russia since it launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, but Turkey has eschewed the curbs and increased trade with the country since the war broke out.

The US is particularly worried that Turkey has become a key hub through which western-made electronics, including processors, memory cards and amplifiers, are making their way to Russian missiles and drones in contravention of export controls. Machine tools are another significant area of concern.

I argue that if the US is prepared to warn turkey and threaten sanctions for trading with Russia - a wider view and equal threat of sanctions should be applied to European countries. If you think that is controversial, here is why:

1/
Next 👉 European countries are complicit tooImage
European countries are complicit in the growth of Turkey being a russian trading hub - and they know it!

Not every country in the Caucuses has followed the sanctions circumvention supply chain scam - one exception as an example is Azerbaijan. Their main export markets are Russia, and another group of countries is Central Asia, Caucuses, Belarus, and the UAE. Azerbaijans exports have not spiked or boomed since the invasion and remain comparatively low and moderate, at circa $70 million.

This only represents a handful of dozens of countries that have all seen exponential exports. And this is only one of potentially hundreds of satellite hubs for Russian trade.

One of the largest trading hubs is of course Turkey. The amount of goods and services passing through Turkey is simply staggering. European and G7 nations are masking their sales to Russia through trading hubs such as Turkey.

For example - one of the smallest export EU countries, The Netherlands. Let’s compare what they were trading 2 years ago with a look at their current export destinations:

👉 Dutch exports to Russia were at circa $300 million Euros and after Russia’s latest war on Ukraine this has levelled out to $100 million.

👉 Simultaneously they increased their exports to Turkey from a low of €250 million to a current level in excess of $450 million.

Turkey is a middle man in the supply chain. Yes it enjoys a substantial revenue stream for being the trading hub - but I argue, the players simplicity in the trade begin at manufacturer level. They need to be regulated to ensure they are also not benefiting for knowingly selling to known parallel market exporters and importers.

They are all driven by greed and a need to maintain or increase their global sales, and in doing so they are feeding their products directly to the parallel market and providing russia with both sanctioned and un-sanctioned products, many of which are dual use with commercial and military applications.

Many products are not sanctioned, but lets be clear - any products or services that find their way into russia, support the federal budget in tax revenues to fund the war - and the availability of Western goods and Services, normalises russian consumer expectations and consumer activity - in spite of their genocidal and illegal war being waged in Ukraine.

2/
Next 👉 The effects of US sanctions threatsImage
The effects of US sanctions threats:

Biden’s decree last year authorized the U.S. to impose sanctions on any bank that helped Russia evade sanctions on the import of items essential for the defense sector. Up to now, no such sanction has been introduced, but just the possibility has been enough to seriously worry many financial institutions.

The U.S. is making strenuous efforts to ensure it is taken seriously: U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen has spent months touring the world – from China to Germany – to issue warnings about financing Russian imports.

As a result, Russian companies have faced serious problems making payments to foreign banks. Turkish banks have demanded additional checks, in and in Hong Kong there are stricter rules for working with Russian clients.

In China, things are especially tricky. In some cases, it is taking six months to process payments through Chinese banks, sources told Reuters last month, and the more closely the goods in question look like potential military components, the more extensive the checks and delays.

The threat of sanctions have also complicated payments in Chinese yuan – which the Kremlin had been relying on as a way of mitigating the effects of sanctions, and reducing risks.

The first four months of 2024 saw total Russian imports fall 10.3% year-on-year to $20.9 billion, according to Central Bank data.

As well as payment difficulties, other reasons for this trend, according to the bank, could be high interest rates, accumulated inventories and the weakness of the ruble.

Which industries are affected?

Deliveries of electronics, equipment and components to Russia are in decline. In particular, there’s less Turkish machinery and Chinese equipment reaching Russia.

In the first three months of 2024 there was a 57% year-on-year fall in imports of “machinery, equipment, vehicles, instruments and apparatus” from Kazakhstan. There were similar falls from Hong Kong (32%) and Serbia (almost 50%), according to The Bell’s calculations.

Why the world should care

Some observers believe there is a risk of blowback from secondary sanctions that could affect markets that have nothing to do with Russia. But it is clear these sanctions are pushing Russia further into isolation, and will cause productivity issues over the long term.

“Recent events show that sanctions can be an effective instrument if they are properly applied and observed,” said Heli Simola, senior economist at the Bank of Finland’s Institute of Developing Economies. “However, it’s obvious that compliance must be constantly monitored and improved as Russia keeps trying to find new workarounds.”

What lies behind this parallel market and russian trading hub activity?

In recent years, in light of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, global economic sanctions have targeted Russian entities and individuals, aiming to curb their activities and financial reach to pressure their government to de-escalate war efforts.

These sanctions were accompanied by decisions by private companies to suspend their activities partially or completely in Russia.

3/
Next 👉 The parallel import program authorised by PutinImage
Western companies are leaving Russia in protest of the war, and to avoid any possible backlash against profits gained in Russia, which might be used to finance the latter’s war in Ukraine.

But the withdrawal of Western brands also has massive political implications, serving as a greater reminder to ordinary Russians of their isolation than sanctions on Kremlin officials or central bank reserves.

The sanctions have already shaken the Russian economy, leading to a sharp fall in the ruble and inflationary pressures. Russian-speaking threat actors have jumped on the opportunity to cater to this growing need to evade these sanctions.

There has been a rapid growth of fraudulent activities with the goal of satisfying the Russian consumer and creating an illusion of an intact world in Russia. With this in mind, since the major brand withdrawal and the first sanctions.

In May 2022, Russia launched a parallel import program, covering goods ranging from car parts, and electronics, to clothing, as imports plummeted. In May 2022, Russia published a list of Western goods that can be imported under the parallel import system.

The list includes essentials such as warships, railway spares, and auto parts, as well as consumer goods such as electronics and household appliances, clothing, footwear, and cosmetics – goods that Russia says its Western manufacturers “refuse to supply directly”.

Russia even went so far, as to list specific brands that are eligible for this import scheme. The Russian scheme protects importers from civil lawsuits for bypassing official distribution channels.

Products now arriving in Russia are usually initially exported to countries that are part of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) led by Moscow, with which Moscow shares a customs union: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan. These products are then shipped to Russia and sold on the market.

Companies are feigning exits and knowledge of their products being sold to re-exporters to Russia, whilst enjoying the financial benefits on continuing supply volumes of their products. They are without a doubt - a special class of war supporter. They operate with impunity, and with no regard to impacts their product sales have in sustaining an illegal and murderous war of genocide.

For a deeper dive into the parallel market in Russia, and an explanation as to why businesses are using the market to feign “no knowledge or participation” in their products being exported to Russia - read my thread here 👉

4/4
———————————————————————————-

Folks, I self-fund my equipment, research and subscription costs. I would appreciate your coffee support ! If you enjoy my threads, please help me keep the threads free, it takes just a few minutes to support my work on Patreon or BuymeACoffee - in any currency.

👇 Informative, evidence lead research for the price of a few coffees!Image
Thank You! to those who have supported me on Patreon or buymeacoffee, you are simply awesome.



buymeacoffee.com/beefeaterfella
patreon.com/Beefeater_Fella
Image
@Trinityaudiobot audio

For my visually impaired followers and for easy listening on your daily commute, my threads are narrated too! - see the reply to this tweet for an audio narration of the thread: Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Beefeater

Beefeater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Beefeater_Fella

Aug 5
A Potted History of Russian Poisoning

On May 23, 1938, a Soviet intelligence agent named Pavel Sudoplatov assassinated the Ukrainian nationalist leader Yevhen Konovalets in Rotterdam.

The order for the murder had come personally from Josef Stalin. The method was none too subtle: Sudoplatov had given his victim a box of chocolates, containing a bomb.

Subtler forms of liquidation had been in the works for some time in Soviet Russia. In 1921—the year Sudoplatov was recruited at age 14 into the Cheka, the Soviet security organization formed by Vladimir Lenin—the Soviets established their first laboratory for the study and testing of poisons.

They made rapid progress. From 1928–35 secret laboratories were overseen by the accomplished Soviet biochemist Grigory Mairanovsky. The author of a 1940 classified doctoral thesis on the interaction of mustard gas with human skin, Mairanovsky was tasked to develop tasteless, colorless, odorless, and lethal poisons that could be placed in the food and drink of enemies of the state. Mairanovsky and his colleagues tested their concoctions on political prisoners of various sizes and ages.

He was so successful that by the 1940s he had become a key member of Pavel Sudoplatov’s team for political assassinations. In summer 1947, again on the order of Stalin, Mairanovsky killed the American spy for the Soviets Isaiah Oggins by injecting him in one of his laboratories with a lethal dose of the poison curare.

Poisoning has a long history. Socrates was forced to take hemlock as his death sentence. For a period of time in ancient Persia, different poisons were the weapons of choice for rivals bent on doing away with this or that Persian king. British science writer John Emsley provides a helpful history of poison in his riveting book .

In 19th-century France, arsenic came to be known as poudre de succession—”inheritance powder,” a method by which wily women would rid themselves of cumbersome husbands. Thallium, according to Emsley, was Saddam Hussein’s poison of choice for political opponents.

Russians have always seemed to have a special fondness for poisoning. In 1453, Dmitry Shemyaka, the Grand Duke of Moscow, was poisoned with arsenic in a chicken dinner, his cook having been bribed by Muscovite agents of a rival.

In 1610, Russian general Mikhail Skopin-Shuisky was poisoned on orders of the Tsar; in this instance, his wife enlisted to poison his food. In 1936, Abkhaz Communist leader Nestor Lakoba was poisoned by orders of Lavrentiy Beria, head of the NKVD, the Soviet security organization responsible for extrajudicial killings and the gulag system. Lakoba was poisoned during a dinner in Tbilisi with Beria, his death announced as a heart attack.

During the Cold War, the tradition continued. Most spectacular and famous is the case of Georgi Markov, an anti-communist Bulgarian writer who in exile had worked for Radio Free Europe and the BBC. On the morning of September 7, 1978—the birthday of Bulgarian dictator Todor Zhivkov—Markov made his way across Waterloo Bridge in London to wait for a bus.

An assassin, working for the Bulgarian secret police and aided by the KGB, poked Markov with the tip of his umbrella. By evening, Markov was checked into a hospital, feeling unwell with a high fever. Four days later he was dead.

Forensic pathologists discovered a pellet filled with traces of ricin in the back thigh of Markov’s right leg. According to former Russian intelligence officer Boris Volodarsky in his book, , Markov had likely been surveilled before the assassination by another Bulgarian BBC broadcaster named Vladimir Simeonov.

Twenty days after Markov’s murder—and two days after being questioned by Scotland Yard—the 30-year-old Simeonov was himself found dead under mysterious circumstances. In the kitchen of his flat, reports Volodarsky, “two glasses were found in the sink without any fingerprints. Traces of a bottle were identified on the table.”

1/4
Next 👉Image
A decade earlier, Alexander Dubcek, the reform communist leader of the ill-fated Prague Spring, was thought in Czech anti-Communist circles to have been poisoned by the KGB, in this instance by radioactive isotopes sneaked into his soup during a brief captivity in Moscow. Dubcek fell ill later in Bratislava, had to cancel a speech, and was hospitalized due to “a cold.” He recovered.

As in the case of Pavel Sudoplatov’s detonating chocolates in Rotterdam, surreptitious poisoning gets trumped at times in Russian political assassinations by a somewhat heavier hand. In 1940, at his compound outside Mexico City, Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky was fatally wounded by an ice-axe-wielding assassin (whose murder was ordered by Stalin and carried out under the direction of Sudoplatov).

And there was no poison involved in the murder this winter of Kremlin critic and former Deputy Prime Minister Boris Nemtsov. Shortly before midnight on February 27, walking after dinner with his Ukrainian girlfriend, Anna Durytska, across the Bolshoy Moskvoretsky Bridge close to Red Square, Nemtsov had four shots pumped into his back at close range from an assassin’s handgun.

Which brings us to the case at hand. At this writing, Nemtsov’s associate, journalist and civil society activist Vladimir Kara-Murza, lies ill in a Moscow hospital, according to reports stricken by kidney failure, double pneumonia, and pancreatitis. The 33-year-old Kara-Murza fell suddenly ill and collapsed in his Moscow office on May 26.

The day before, the organization for which Kara-Murza currently works (Open Russia, which was created in September 2014 by former political prisoner and Russian businessman Mikhail Khodorkovsky) had released a documentary about Ramzan Kadyrov, the ruthless ruler of Chechnya and a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

No one can say for sure at this point whether Kara-Murza has been poisoned. What we do know is that Russia has a ghastly tradition of poisoning political dissidents. We also know that very recent history has been alarming.

Although he survived—his face disfigured—pro-Western Ukrainian Presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko was poisoned with dioxin at a dinner in Kiev during an election campaign in September 2004.

Former FSB man and Putin opponent Alexander Litvinenko died of polonium ingested in a London hotel bar in 2006. Russian businessman Alexander Perepilichny, a key witness in a Moscow money laundering case, expired outside his Surrey home in London in 2012, apparently having been killed by poison from the highly toxic Gelsemium plant (grown remote areas of China).

Then there’s the case of journalist and Putin critic Anna Politkovskaya. She was shot to death by assassins in the elevator to her apartment on October 7, 2006. But in September 2004, Politkovskaya had become violently ill and lost consciousness after drinking tea on a Russian flight.

With the history of poisonings in Russia, one is curious about one of the preferred methods used by the russians. Here’s an intro into just one such commonly found poison…

2/4
Next 👉 болиголов - AKA - Dropwort, Hemlock WaterImage
болиголов - AKA - Dropwort, Hemlock Water

The plant species Conium maculatum (hemlock, poisonous hemlock) is one of the most toxic members of the plant kingdom. There are numerous reports of deaths for a wide range of animal species including humans.

Conium maculatum has a worldwide distribution; it is a very common plant species, a member of the family Apiaceae (formerly Umbelliferae), the carrot family.

Poison hemlock is native to northern Europe, western Asia, and North Africa and it was introduced to North America as an ornamental back in the 1800s. Over time, this weed has spread throughout America, Mexico, and Canada.

Poison Hemlock, is a member of the plant family Apiaceae, which contains a few important crops such as carrots, celery, and parsnips. This weed is a tall, invasive, and highly poisonous weed that is sometimes mistaken for one of its crop relatives. It is also commonly mistaken for Queen Anne's Lace (Daucus carota).

Poison hemlock is toxic to humans and to livestock if ingested by affecting the respiratory, central nervous, and reproductive systems.

Some humans and animals can experience dermatitis on the skin just by coming into direct contact with this weed due to the potency of the eight alkaloids that contribute to its toxicity. All parts of this plant are poisonous and can be fatal to livestock and humans if ingested.

Among all the wild plants and weeds flourishing in this year’s wet weather, hemlock is making a disconcerting appearance. This is the highly poisonous plant that was used in the death sentence of the Greek philosopher Socrates in 399BC after he was found guilty of corrupting young minds through his teaching.

And Agatha Christie used the plant to good effect in her novel Five Little Pigs, when coniine, the toxic component extracted from hemlock, is disguised in a glass of beer to kill the painter Amyas Crale.

👉 Identification

Poison hemlock is an erect biennial (flowering plant that takes two years to complete its life cycle) weed that can grow six to ten feet tall. During the first year, growth is limited to a rosette of dark green leaves. More growth is observed in the second year, where the plant develops branching and alternately arranged leaves on erect stems.

This erect plant has smooth, hollow stems that are covered with purple spots. During the reproductive stages, the flowers are white umbrella-like clusters that during June and July, turning to fruit that is small, flat, and grayish-green in color from August to September.

The root system is a fleshy white, with a long and sometimes branched taproot.

👉 Distribution

Found widely in the UK, it is also native to a large part of Europe and..

Russia.

👉 Habitat:

Very common in damp areas including marshes, lake, river and stream sides or along ditches. Can be found several metres inland from water sources.

It is reported that the wet spring of 2024 has resulted in fantastic growth of Hemlock in native areas of Russia. Fancy that!

3/
Next 👉 Hemlock - and the Sardonic GrinImage
Image
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Aug 4
A timeline of the major political events as seen through a British lens, in the conflict in Ukraine during 2024. This chronology is an abridged version of a comprehensive chronology from the beginning of the latest invasion in February 2022.

This research document is recorded in the Commons Library Research Briefing, 16 July 2024, and the author is Nigel Walker. Please see the references tab for links to two such research papers covering the period before and after February 2022.

This is a British lens of major political and key events, it is not a record of key events as may be seen though other countries lens’s. It is a useful reminder of some key events - there are arguably other events which have not been included.

The chronology does not cover military events and the genocidal actions of Russia during this period.

Chronology:

1 January 2024 In his New Year address, President Zelenskyy vows to unleash “wrath” against Russian forces in 2024, saying Ukraine has become stronger as the war moves toward its second year.

5 January 2024 In a briefing, John Kirby, the US’s national security council spokesperson, says North Korea is providing Russia with ballistic missile launchers and ballistic missiles. The US intelligence assessment is that Iranian missiles have not yet arrived in Russia, but that the deal will eventually be done. Posting on X (formerly Twitter), the UK Defence Secretary, Grant Shapps, says “we’ll make sure North Korea pays a high price for supporting Russia.”

11 January 2024 Ukraine’s parliament refuses to debate a bill aimed at drafting more soldiers, amid fierce criticism from lawmakers and the public. Ukrainian MPs criticised certain measures included in the bill as unconstitutional. Some clauses caused particular outrage, such as limiting draft dodgers from their right to own property and to freely use their personal money.

12 January 2024 Prime Minister Sunak visits Kyiv to sign a new security agreement and announce an increase in military funding for Ukraine.

24 January 2024 Writing in an article for Politico, Grant Shapps says the UK’s allies must increase their Ukraine military aid: “Kyiv needs more support — and not just from the United Kingdom. Our fellow allies must step up too.”

1 February 2024 European Union leaders unanimously approve a €50 billion plan to support Ukraine for the next four years. The deal, known as the “Ukraine Facility“, consists of €17 billion in grants and €33 billion in loans, designed to help Ukraine rebuild and recover from the war.

8 February 2024 In a two-hour interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, President Putin says the US “needs to stop supplying weapons” to Ukraine. The interview is Putin’s first with a western media outlet since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.

16 February 2024 President Zelenskyy visits Germany and France, signing security pacts with both countries, committing further support to Ukraine from each.

24 February 2024 Four western leaders, including the prime ministers of Italy, Canada, and Belgium, visit Kyiv to show solidarity with Ukraine on the second anniversary of Russia’s invasion. Italy’s Giorgia Meloni, Canada’s Justin Trudeau, Belgium’s Alexander De Croo and the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, travelled to the Ukrainian capital together on an overnight train from neighbouring Poland.

26 February 2024 Hungary’s parliament approves a bill to allow Sweden to join NATO, clearing the way for the Nordic country to join the alliance after months of delay.

27 February 2024 Several European countries say they are not considering sending ground troops to Ukraine after France’s president, Emmanuel Macron, said he refused to rule out sending soldiers to the country. The UK, Germany, Sweden, the Czech Republic, Poland, Italy and Hungary all rule out the move, as does the NATO Secretary-General.

1/
Next 👉 March 2024 onwardsImage
7 March 2024 Sweden becomes NATO’s 32nd member state, upon depositing its instrument of accession to the North Atlantic Treaty with the US government in Washington DC.

8 March 2024 Andriy Yermak, the head of Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s office, meets with a delegation headed by Li Hui, the Chinese government’s special representative for Eurasian affairs. They discuss China-Ukrainenrelations and the war in Ukraine.

11 March 2024 The chairs of foreign affairs committees in 23 parliaments issue a joint statement rejecting the legitimacy of elections conducted by Russia in the Ukrainian territories it has annexed.

15 March 2024 Three days of voting begins in Russia and in the annexed regions of Ukraine. There is no serious challenge to President Putin securing another term in office.

17 March 2024 In the Russian presidential election, Putin wins 87% of the vote, securing a fifth term in office. The resultbmeans Putin will overtake Joseph Stalin to become Russia’s longest-serving leader in more than 200 years.

18 March 2024 At an open-air concert in Moscow’s Red Square, to mark the 10th anniversary of Russia’s annexation of Crimea from Ukraine, Putin says Crimea had “returned to its home harbour” and would move forwards with Russia “hand in hand”.

20 March 2024 A report issued by the UN Human Rights Office accuses Russia of torturing and arbitrarily detaining people in occupied Ukraine, creating a “climate of fear”. In a press release accompanying the report, the UN says Russia has imposed its “language, citizenship, laws, court system, and education curricula on the occupied areas”.

21 March 2024 Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, addresses the European Council summit via videoconference and calls for more help with air defences and ammunition, as well for progress on Ukraine’s path towards European integration.

2 April 2024 The Register of Damages for Ukraine opens in The Hague, as part of a Ministerial Conference on “Restoring Justice for Ukraine”. The conference brings together the Council of Europe, heads of international organisations, and ministers and senior officials from more than 60 states.

9 April 2024 UK foreign secretary David Cameron visits former US president Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago residence, to discuss a new aid package for Ukraine that is being held up in Congress.

15 April 2024 President Macron of France calls for a truce in international conflicts during the Paris Olympics.Referencing the Israel-Hamas conflict, the war in Ukraine and the ongoing conflict in Sudan, Macron says: “We will work on an Olympic truce. It is something on which I will actually try to engage many of our partners.”

16 April 2024 Russia reacts coolly to the suggestion of an Olympics truce, with Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov
saying both President Putin and the Russian military had “noticed that, as a rule, the Kyiv regime uses such ideas, such initiatives to try to regroup, to try to rearm, and so on and so forth”.

24 April 2024 At a press conference in Berlin, UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz agree to closer defence cooperation between the two allies, with both leaders saying Europe must unite to support Ukraine against Russia “for as long as it takes”.

25 April 2024 The UK’s Chancellor of the Exchequer, Jeremy Hunt, meets President Zelenskyy in Kyiv and discuss sanctions against Russia.

2/
Next 👉 May 2024 onwardsImage
7 May 2024 Addressing dignitaries after being sworn in for a new six-year term, President Putin says he has not rejected dialogue with the West, saying: The choice is theirs: do they intend to continue trying to restrain the development of Russia, continue the policy of aggression, incessant pressure on our country for years, or look for a path to cooperation and peace?

8 May 2024 In a statement to the House of Commons, Home Secretary James Cleverley announces an “undeclared” Russian military intelligence officer will be expelled from the UK. The Home Secretary also announces the closure of several Russian diplomatic premises and new restrictions on diplomatic visas. The Russian Embassy in London says the restrictions have been imposed under a “groundless and ridiculous pretext”.

16 May 2024 President Putin arrives in Beijing for a two-day state visit to China. Following talks with Xi Jinping, the two leaders pledge a “new era” of partnership. Putin and Xi agree to deepen their “strategic partnership” and issue a joint statement on “the deepening of the comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation entering a new era.”

6 June 2024 President Zelenskyy joins other world leaders at the commemorations marking the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy, France. During his speech, US President Joe Biden says the US will “not walk away” from the Ukraine conflict, and that “if we do Ukraine will be subjugated, and it will not end there. Ukraine’s neighbours will be threatened, all of Europe will be threatened.”

11-12 June 2024 President Zelenskyy visits Germany to take part in the two-day Ukraine Recovery Conference and meets with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Addressing the conference, Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, says accession talks with Ukraine to join the EU will start by the end of the month, with Ukraine having fulfilled all the requirements to join the bloc. Zelenskyy later addresses the German Bundestag in person for the first time (he spoke to the parliament in March 2022, but was connected via video link only.)

13 June 2024 The US signs a bilateral security agreement with Ukraine.

15-16 June 2024 Around 100 countries participate in a two-day Ukraine Peace Summit in Bürgenstock, Switzerland. Russia is not invited to the conference and China doesn’t send a representative. 83 countries and organisations support the joint communiqué issued at the end of the summit. India, Indonesia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Thailand and the United Arab Emirates take part in the summit, but do not sign the final communiqué. Brazil attends with “observer status” and also does not endorse the communiqué.

18 June 2024 President Putin is greeted by North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-Un, upon landing in Pyongyang on his first visit to the country since 2000.

19 June 2024 On the second day of Putin’s state visit to North Korea, he signs a deal Kim Jong-Un that includes a mutual defence pledge, which Kim says amounts to an “alliance”

25 June 2024 The European Union formally launches accession talks with Ukraine and Moldova, at an Accession Conference in Luxembourg. The International Criminal Court issues arrest warrants for Sergei Shoigu, the former Russian defence minister, and Russian general Valery
Gerasimov, for alleged crimes committed during Russia's invasion of Ukraine. This brings to six the number of arrest warrants issued against senior Russians since Moscow sent troops into Ukraine in February 2022.

27 June 2024 The European Union signs a security agreement with Ukraine.

3/
Next 👉 July 2024 onwardsImage
Read 7 tweets
Jul 31
The CNC Scourge helping russia build it’s weapons of destruction - consolidating reports on what we know:

When a Russian Iskander short-range precision-guided ballistic missile struck a cafe in the village of Hroza 35 km away from the frontline, killing 52 people who gathered to commemorate a fallen soldier. Later - two volunteers, Emma Igual of Spain and Anthony Ignat of Canada, were killed, and two more were hospitalized when their car was struck by Russian shelling while assessing the needs of civilians caught in the daily crossfire.

What connects these tragedies is the fact that the weapons used were built using Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine tools, produced in the West and imported into Russia.

Shockingly, despite sanctions, Russia continues to buy high-precision machine tools and spare parts from Western firms, enabling it to commit the most atrocious war crimes.

At least 70% of all Russian CNC machine tools are imported, largely from the US, EU, and Japan. Over 80% of all CNCs end up in Russia’s military production facilities. This makes CNCs a perfect target for the West to degrade the Russian military complex by clamping down on imports.

Researchers from the Economic Security Council of Ukraine (ESCU) have recently developed a roadmap to achieve just that.

What are CNC machine tools?

👉 CNC (Computer Numerical Control) machine tools are automated robot machines using software to manufacture various metal products without direct human intervention. CNC machinery is a crucial means of production for advanced arms manufacturing such as missiles, aircraft, or radars.

👉 WСNC machines are the backbone of Russia’s military production and a window of opportunity for trying to stop the aggressor, ESCU said.

With a CNC, a computer program does all the necessary shaping and cutting. The machine tool uses a drill bit mounted on a head that moves in three dimensions to automatically carve digitally modeled shapes into metal.

What can CNC machines produce?

There is not a single Russian tank, plane, or APC that does not have parts made with foreign CNC machine tools. Even nuclear weapons are manufactured with the help of CNC machinery. With the help of CNCs, Russia produces:

👉 Aircraft components: engine components, landing gear parts, and structural elements.

👉 Weapon systems: firearm components, missile guidance systems, and other weapon parts.

👉 Armor and vehicle components: body panels, turrets, etc;

👉 Electronic and communication equipment: communication equipment, and radar systems for military use.

1/5
Next 👉Image
Manufacturers and countries that are conduits for CNC exports to russia, supporting the russian military industrial complex.

The most influential manufacturers are DMG Mori, Trumpf, Fair Friend Group, Haas, Sodick, Dr. Johannes Heidenhain GmbH, Maier Werkzeugmaschinen GmbH & Co., KG HEDELIUS, GF Machining Solutions, Yamazaki Mazak Corporation, Okuma, Index Traub, Hermle, FICEP, Nakamura-Tome, Willemin-Macodel.

Russia’s arms industry still importing vital foreign CNC machines despite sanctions. Japan and Germany are the top two CNC producers whose machines help Russia produce high-tech weapons.

Türkiye, the UAE. and China are acting as key conduits for Western technology feeding Russia’s arms production, an investigation has found. Despite sanctions, Russia imported at least 6.4 billion rubles ($68 million) worth of computer numerical control (CNC) machines and parts in 2023, according to a report by the investigative outlet Istories.

The actual figure is likely much higher due to incomplete documentation and misclassification of imports from countries such as Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan.

CNC tools are considered to be a hole in the West’s sanctions regime against Russia, as they allow Russia to build precise weapons domestically.

The machines, essential for modern weapons manufacturing, are sourced from leading global producers including Doosan and Hanwha of South Korea, Spinner and Hermle of Germany, Fanuc of Japan, and others.

Others like Spain’s Vanto Machines and Poland’s Soldream Polska claimed their products were falsely declared as Russia-bound by Turkish middlemen. Switzerland’s TL Technology insisted it halted Russian operations in early 2022.

Several major Russian importers of foreign machines are already under sanctions, the report noted. But others like the Engineering Center for Production Equipment from St. Petersburg, which supplied DMG Mori machines to UEC Saturn and other defense firms in 2023, have so far avoided them.

Even if Western imports are cut off, Russia could last quite a long time in the war by shifting to Chinese machines with components from US allies. The vulnerability it appears - is the software that modern CNC equipment depends on, which could be disabled or hacked?

On January 02, 2024 - the FT reported “Chinese shipments to Russia of an important class of advanced machine tools have increased tenfold since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, with the country’s producers now dominating trade in high-precision “computer numerical control” devices vital to Moscow’s military industries.

The soaring shipments of CNC units, which permit extremely precise metal milling, have become a big concern to Ukraine’s allies as they seek to crack down on Russia’s access to the equipment.

Russian customs returns show Chinese producers shipped $68mn worth of CNC tools in July, the latest verifiable figure available, up from just $6.5mn in February 2022 when Moscow launched the full-scale invasion.

2/5
Next 👉Image
Russian imports of CNC tools from the EU, historically its main source, have dramatically fallen as restrictions have tightened since February 2022.

Analysts said Moscow was seeking to obtain CNC tools from sources that would not be closed off by international controls. The customs returns show Chinese-origin CNC devices made up 57 per cent of Russian imports by value in July, up from just 12 per cent before the war.

They suggest Moscow also continued to import substantial amounts of CNC tools made in Taiwan and South Korea.

In November, the US imposed sweeping sanctions on all significant Russian importers of CNC tools — including some that had moved less than $200,000 of equipment since the invasion in February last year.

Chinese companies that continue to trade with the Russian importers now risk action from the US that would imperil their ability to trade in other markets.

Beijing insists it does not ship lethal weapons to Moscow and denies supporting its neighbour’s war effort, but also rejects the use of sanctions.

Chinese shipments of products including oil, machinery, consumer goods and cars are helping to sustain Russia’s sanctions-hit economy. Xi Jinping, president of China, told Russia’s Vladimir Putin in October that annual trade between the two countries had hit a “historic high” of nearly $200bn. - See link to report in References and sources tweet.

Customs records show CFT, a large now-sanctioned Russian importer of CNC devices, imported very few Chinese-origin products up to July. A leaked internal document from CFT shows it is a supplier to Russian defence manufacturers including Aeroscan, which produces the Lancet kamikaze drone that has inflicted serious losses on Ukrainian forces.”

3/5
Next 👉Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 30
This thread is intended to introduce you to the murky world of sanctions circumvention through parallel imports. Some ideas are suggested, but this is unchartered territory for most countries - who have not had to deal with the complexities and risks associated with a full blown war in their trading markets during the past 60 years.

A long thread (you won’t gain wisdom in 280 characters), perhaps consider skipping to the last tweet and the first reply will be a link to an audio narration of the thread. Great for multitasking and produced for my visually impaired followers.

Introduction:

Nearly 1,400 companies, including many of the most internationally recognisable brands, have since February 2022 announced that they would cease or dial back their operations in Russia in protest of Moscow’s military aggression against Ukraine.

But two years after the invasion, many of these companies’ products are still widely sold in Russia, in many cases in violation of Western-led sanctions.

Russia’s economy is resilient because it is, for the most part, still a market economy. Russia has been allowed to find their ways around sanctions and “keep things working” – thus proving to be one the key factors behind Russia’s relative “resilience” to Western sanctions.

Aided by the Russian government’s legalisation of parallel imports, Russian businesses have established a network of alternative supply chains (parallel imports), to import restricted goods through third countries.

The companies that make the products have been either unwilling or unable to clamp down on these unofficial distribution networks.

The Russian government claimed in December 2023, over $70 billion worth of goods were confirmed to have been imported into the country through so-called “parallel” or “grey” imports – helping the total 2023 imports to slightly exceed pre-sanction levels to reach $300 billion, according to Moscow.

👉 What are parallel imports?

Summary

👀 Parallel imports are items designed to be sold in one part of the world, which are they bought by a third party and imported against the brand’s intentions.

👀 The legality of parallel imports is often murky, and can depend on minor details.

👀 Parallel imports can be a headache for brands, and are extremely time-consuming to track.

👀 A parallel import is an item that’s imported and sold outside of the brand’s authorized distribution channels. It is no longer on the white market, but on the gray market. This can happen with electronics, books, magazines, software, accessories, cars and much more. Most of the time, it’s not illegal, unless local courts decide otherwise.

Parallel imports are commonly understood to mean imports into the country without the consent of the rightholder of goods to which a trademark is lawfully affixed and which have been lawfully introduced into civil turnover in the territory of any other state outside the Russian Federation.

Such consent is usually required in countries where the national principle of exhaustion of the exclusive right to a trademark is applied.

Parallel imported goods in russia are imported directly to russia and through countries “friendly” to the Russian Federation or countries of the Eurasian Economic Union – Armenia, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Turkey, UAE, etc.

The list of goods allowed for parallel import includes ferrous metals, inorganic compounds, medical and other equipment, ships, spare parts for railways and auto components, consumer goods such as electronics and household appliances, clothing, footwear, and cosmetics.

In particular, among the brands approved for parallel imports are Apple, Samsung, Hewlett Packard, ASUS, Cisco, Dell, Microsoft, Mercedes-Benz, General Motors, and others.

1/8
Next 👉 Russia legitimises parallel imports!Image
👉 Russia has legitimised parallel imports in law:

After some foreign companies started to stop direct deliveries of their products to the Russian market through their subsidiaries and official distributors, there was a threat of shortages of a number of goods. This was due to the fact that the goods were no longer supplied by official importers but third parties were still not allowed to import them without the consent of the rightholder.

In this regard, Federal Law No. 46-FZ was enacted on 8 March 2022, which tasked the Government or another body to which such right has been delegated with approving a list of goods in respect of which parallel imports are permitted. In exercising this authority, the Ministry of Industry and Trade approved such a list (“List”). The List is currently approved by Order No. 2701 dated 21 July 2023, which replaced Order No. 1532 dated 19 April 2022.

The List has been amended many times. As a rule, it includes trademarks belonging to companies that have left the Russian market, but there are also exceptions.

At the St Petersburg International Economic Forum in 2024, it was announced that the existing approach to differentiated regulation of parallel imports would be extended to 2025. At the same time, a decision was made to extend such approach to the use of inventions, utility models, industrial designs without the consent of the patentee with notification of the patentee as soon as possible and with the payment of commensurate compensation.

In practice, courts assume that persons reselling goods after purchasing them from importers are to be held civilly liable only if they sell counterfeit goods (but not goods imported through parallel import).

This arguably, should / could have been a starting point for companies to proactively prevent their products from being bought by an intermediary country. An indicator of products at risk of seeing a surge in sales to an existing or new country, at volumes previously not realised in the trading relationship. Or an indicator for new buyers entering the market from known russian trading hubs.

👉 Parallel imports - the cloak of innocence or the legitimate get-out clause for products sold in Russia?

The parallel imports scheme is aimed at helping Russia bypass supply restrictions put in place by Western countries and companies in response to the invasion of Ukraine.

The parallel imports list includes critical imports like warships, spare parts needed for railways and auto components as well as consumer goods like electronics (including mobile phones), household appliances, clothing, footwear, and cosmetics.

Potential red flags may include companies registered recently; companies based in Armenia, Belarus, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan or other countries helping Russia circumvent sanctions; companies making large orders of products within a short space of time; companies with obscure beneficial ownership structures, etc.

Parallel import supply chains is the cloak that western businesses at best, use for indirect trade to distance themselves from Russia - or at worst knowingly disguise their ongoing trade with Russia. The question arises, who deserves more contempt?

⚠️ The businesses like Unilever who have anchored their position to stay in Russia, actively trading and profiting from the market and paying tens of $ millions in taxes - which are disbursed into the federal budget to support the illegal war in Ukraine.

⚠️ The businesses who feign their exit from Russia, using opaque and unregulated supply chains to conduct business as usual using intermediary countries like Turkey, the UAE, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia and others?

These companies have often spent extraordinary efforts and money creating PR whitewashing campaigns - protesting their ignorance to the grey market imports to Russia of their products?

2/8
Next 👉 Who is the bigger culprit, morally?Image
Do you find both equal culprits of funding the war in Ukraine, or do you have a tempered response to companies who have shifted their supply chains to grey markets to evade scrutiny and liability?

I would argue the companies feigning exits, whilst enjoying the financial benefits on continuing supply volumes of their products - to be a special class of war supporter. They operate with impunity, and with no regard to impacts their product sales have in sustaining an illegal and murderous war of genocide.

Challenging businesses who’s products are still freely traded in russia:

challenged 79 large companies with two key questions back in 2022, as sanctions were maturing and the illegal invasion of Ukraine has been established as a long term venture of Putin.

1. Has your company put in place appropriate internal mechanisms and tools to carry out enhanced due diligence of your supply chains, intermediaries, customers and end-users to understand the risk of your products’ diversion to Russia? If yes, please provide details.

2. Does your company consider potential red flags that suggest the use of front companies that may hide the true end-users of your products and thereby evade sanctions and export controls? If yes, please provide details.

3. Has your company taken any other actions to prevent re-export of your products to Russia?

By June 2023, they had responses from just 41 companies, or 52% of those approached. Thirty-nine companies provided responses. One company committed to respond later. One company declined to respond. See the response list here 👉

An example of a positive response (there were many), is seen in Mitsubishi’s response:

Mitsubishi Electric Group response:

The Japanese export control law and regulations restrict sales to Russia as the final destination. The rules of Japanese law and regulations are in line with US and EU sanctions against Russia.

Mitsubishi Electric Group judges the propriety of transaction based on the law and regulations of Europe, United States and Japan in the event of all transaction to Russia as the final destination for all business located around the world.

In addition, considering the risk of detour export, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation is conducting export control procedure to check the destination, End-use and customer attributes for all transaction including domestic transaction in Japan.

For your information, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation is responding to the products listed on line 22 of page 22 of the list issued by the Russian government. There are hundreds of companies with MITSUBISHI in their names, but each are separate entity. We understand that products on the list with MITSUBISHI other than those above are products from separate company of the MITSUBISHI entire group.

An example of a negative response came from Apple:

Apple simply failed to respond. Why??

This is the companies strategy to limit scrutiny and criticism of their trade conduct and ethics. In November 2023, Apple also failed to respond to a request for comment on working conditions at Chinese contract manufacturers.

Apple does set out it’s trade compliance policy on it’s website, see it here 👉

Officially, Apple does not officially sell its products in Russia.

The California-based tech giant was one of the first companies to announce it would exit the country in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022. Yet in 2024, a new Apple Watch is available cheaper on Yandex Market in russia, than the equivalent in Italy.

3/8
Next 👉 Can they be controlled ?Business-humanrights.org
business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news…
apple.com/au/legal/more-…Image
Read 13 tweets
Jul 29
The relationships that Russia forges through nuclear projects surpass even the lengthy contracts for pipeline gas supplies. The coalition has focused on restricting Russia’s revenue through fossil fuel sales, and focus almost all of it’s efforts in sanctions to restrict income from oil and gas - that is used to fund Russia’s murderous and illegal war in Ukraine.

What is not spoken about or targeted - is the substantial revenue stream and global influence russia has using nuclear energy and enterprises associated with it.

🧵 This thread pieces together information around Russia’s nuclear energy reach as a political tool in the UN, as well as leading thoughts and analysis.

Please see the references tab for links to full articles this thread has combined together.

👉 In June 2024, FT ran an article titled: “How Russia is using nuclear power to win global influence despite sanctions”.

Russian companies are building more than a third of the new reactors around the world, which is gaining Moscow new friends

Nuclear plant construction takes about 10 years, with a reactor lifespan of 60 years for newer plants. Dismantling preparations, including removing radioactive parts, take another 10-20 years and require substantial funds. The Russian side treats the plants as if they are owned by Rosatom. The only role of the host country is to buy the electricity from the reactor.

Istituto Affari Internazionali suggest that Russia has found in the nuclear market a means to buttress ties with countries in the Global South by providing high-technology elements to these nations.

Through partnerships in the nuclear sector, Russia has not only strengthened its presence in the global energy landscape but has also enhanced its geopolitical influence, particularly in regions where emerging economies seek technological advancements and energy solutions.

Russia’s strategic use of nuclear partnerships with countries in the Global South does not only increase its global influence, but also poses challenges related to technology transfer and economic dependency. Indeed, these partnerships often rely heavily on Russian technology and financing, raising concerns about recipient countries’ autonomy and economic vulnerability.

1/
Next 👉 About RosatomImage
👉About Rosatom:

Russia’s nuclear industry is concentrated in Rosatom, a state-owned company that is the successor to the Soviet Union’s Ministry of Medium Machine Building and Russia’s Ministry of Atomic Energy.

Through its state company Rosatom, Russia is the world leader in nuclear power export markets. The company controls almost half of the world uranium processing and enrichment market and holds 70% of the reactor export market. Setting aside some cancellations following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Rosatom’s portfolio of foreign orders appears stable at about $200 billion.

In addition to its commercial role, Rosatom is a foreign policy instrument that may advance Russian strategic interests by establishing long-term official and commercial ties with governments and businesses in customer nations.

Rosatom offers one-stop shopping for design, construction, fuel, training, maintenance, and spent fuel processing as well as attractive financing. The company generally has strong support from Russia’s government.

While some of Rosatom’s prewar aspirations for growth may no longer be realistic, and while the company is losing some business in the West, Rosatom appears to be largely on track with its non-Western projects, which comprise the bulk of the company’s business. Reducing Rosatom’s global role will not be quick, easy, or cheap.

👉 Per Rosatom’s self description - “ROSATOM is the only company in the world that has all technologies of the nuclear fuel cycle, from uranium mining to the back end of nuclear facilities life cycles. Its scope of activities also includes production of innovative non-nuclear products, nuclear medicine, digitalization and software development, logistics and development of the Northern Sea Route.

ROSATOM incorporates over 450 enterprises employing a total of more than 350,000 people.”

2/9
Next 👉 Foreign projects and revenueImage
Rosatom, foreign projects — including the construction of nuclear power plants, the export of enriched uranium and other initiatives — account for about half of its total revenue, according to annual reports. In 2023, Rosatom earned $16.2bn from these projects, up from $11.8bn in 2022.

This revenue has more than doubled in the past decade. Operation costs and contributions to the state, however, eat up most of Rosatom’s earnings, bringing the group’s net profit to $2mn-$3mn a year.

By 2030, Rosatom’s total revenue is expected to reach over $56bn, more than double the current level, according to the company’s development strategy. This growth is to be driven primarily by foreign projects, the document states.

Sanctions have so far not hampered the nuclear energy sector, which can create long-lasting political ties and disrupt western efforts to isolate Putin’s regime. Despite sanctions on its economy, Russia continues to be an unrivalled exporter of nuclear power plants.

It is involved in more than a third of the new reactors being constructed around the world at the moment, including in China, India, Iran and Egypt. State-owned Rosatom is able to offer up to 90 per cent financing for nuclear projects, with repayments spread over decades at minimal interest rates.

But even cheap loans have to be repaid, and this could become a problem for the reactor buyers — and another lever of pressure for Russia- especially in the UN with votes being guaranteed in Russia’s favour regardless of Russia’s position or illegality.

Rosatom has won numerous bids for the sale of reactors, positioning itself as the leader in terms of the number of simultaneously implemented nuclear reactor construction projects, with 3 units in Russia and 33 abroad at various stages of implementation.

Likewise, it controls approximately 20 per cent of the global market of conversion and enriched-related materials, something that made it an important partner of scientific groups from the US and European countries regardless of the Russia-Ukraine War – for example, participating in the ongoing construction of the Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR), an international accelerator facility to perform cutting-edge research in Germany.

Similarly, since 2023 Rosatom has been the exclusive supplier of enriched uranium-related products to Brazilian nuclear facilities. This landmark agreement is the first long-term partnership with Brasília, replacing previous imports from Canada and European consortiums.

These factors come precisely at a time when Rosatom seeks to expand its relations with BRICS countries to increase its participation in the sale of nuclear subsidies for the production of radioisotopes in these nations and to secure financing from the BRICS New Development bank.

3/9
Next 👉 International reach and influence in the United Nations votingImage
Read 12 tweets
Jul 27
An estimated €200 billion worth of Russian assets were frozen in the EU following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, with around 90% held in Belgium, home to the international fund depository Euroclear. In May, the EU-27 agreed to utilise the interest generated by these frozen Russian central bank assets.

The interest is expected to yield between €2.5 and €3 billion annually, which will be used to support Ukraine’s defence and post-war reconstruction.

Ninety percent of the interest generated by these frozen funds (which remain frozen) will be allocated to the European Peace Facility (EPF), an EU mechanism for managing interventions in conflicts, including supplying arms. The remaining 10% will go to the EU’s separate “Facility” for Ukraine, established to support the country’s reconstruction needs.

The Swiss have chosen not to disappoint - Russia. They will not release any proceeds of the profits on frozen russian assets to Ukraine. In fact they may be hiding a significant amount of russian assets from public scrutiny in an attempt to remain “neutral” by harbouring the assets of russians and genocide merchants the world over.

The Swiss timeline on russian assets:

👉 13 February, 2024 - Over a third of the assets reported in Switzerland with links to Russia are at Credit Suisse. This includes funds from sanctioned persons, but not exclusively.

Since Russia invaded Ukraine, the Swiss federal government has frozen assets of those with links to Russia and Belarus in Switzerland worth more than 7.5 billion francs ($8.1 billion). In addition, 15 properties were seized as a result of the adoption of EU sanctions.

According to Seco, around 7,500 business relationships and a total of 46.1 billion francs with a connection to Russia had been reported by mid-November. Credit Suisse has frozen Russian assets of 17.6 billion francs, according to a report in the Sonntagszeitun, corresponding to over a third of all reported Russian assets in Switzerland.

Only about 4 billion francs of Russian assets at Credit Suisse assets originate from people on the sanctions list, according to the newspaper. The remaining 13.6 billion francs are said to be partly from people such as Viktor Vekselberg, who has an account with Credit Suisse but cannot access it because of other sanctions.

At UBS (so subsequently bought Credit Suisse after it faced bankruptcy), is twice the size of Credit Suisse. The share of Russian funds affected amounts to 0.3 percent of invested assets in Global Wealth Management, according to a UBS spokeswoman. That percentage corresponds to $7.5 billion of assets.

For the fourth quarter in 2023, UBS mysteriously stopped reporting the on frozen assets.

Just one bank Credit Suisse - claims it had frozen 17.6 billion Swiss Francs ($15 billion USD) from assets held by Credit Suisse and another 6.4 billion Swiss Francs ($7.5 billion) held by the new parent company UBS. That is $22.5 billion (19.91 billion Swiss Francs) - held by this one bank alone!

Remember Switzerland is built on its corrupt, secretive and opaque banking and shell company offering. Russia had money, assets and gold distributed across all major banks in Switzerland,

1/3
Next 👉 16th Feb 2023 positionImage
👉 16 February 2023 - Switzerland has said it is legally impossible for it to confiscate the assets of sanctioned Russians held in the country, dealing a blow to European efforts to use that wealth for Ukrainian postwar reconstruction. Until then, Bern has moved in line with the EU in freezing the assets of high-profile Russians connected to the regime of president Vladimir Putin.

Switzerland holds more than SFr7.5bn ($8.1bn) in frozen Russian assets nearly one year after the invasion of Ukraine, according to the Swiss ministry of finance. (Remember, in February 2023, one bank alone admitted to freezing $22.5 billion in russian assets) - it appears quite a lot has been unfrozen and returned to the russians on the quite.

“The expropriation of private assets of lawful origin without compensation is not permissible under Swiss law. The confiscation of frozen private assets is inconsistent with the constitution,” the Swiss Government added, and “violates Switzerland’s international commitments”.

March 08, 2024 - The Swiss Foreign minister said that “over $8 billion” of Russian central bank reserves and assets are currently held in Switzerland. That at today’s exchange rate is 7.07 billion Swiss Francs.

Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis stated, "Russia has seriously violated international law. It must therefore repair the damage caused." Cassis added that Switzerland's commitment to international discussions around compensation mechanisms was consistent with its history of involvement in such matters.

The only russian frozen assets in the world, to “lose in value”

👉 April 23, 2024 - Switzerland has frozen Russian assets worth 5.8 billion Swiss francs ($6.36 billion), the Swiss government said, a big drop that could intensify international pressure on the neutral country to do more to sanction Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine. The figure, which applies to assets frozen at the end of 2023, was down from the 7.5 billion francs in assets frozen at the end of 2022.

The main reason was a decrease in the market value of the shares and other financial assets that have been blocked, said the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs, which oversees sanctions. Switzerland seem to be the only country in the EU alliance that has not generated interest profits form the assets they claim to have frozen. There is something fishy going on here.

Falling stock values had wiped 2.3 billion francs off the worth of previously blocked assets, SECO said, while an extra 580 million francs in assets held via complex financial structures had been discovered and frozen last year. This included luxury cars and artworks.

Switzerland was now in a "completely different place" to last year when the G7 countries criticised, opens new tab Swiss loopholes on sanctions, and was implementing them well, said Simon Pluess, head of export controls and sanctions at SECO.

2/3
Next 👉 23 April, 2023 onwardsImage
April 23, 2024 per Bloomberg:

According to the State Secretariat of Economic Affairs (SECO), Switzerland has frozen 13 billion francs ($14.3 billion) in Russian assets, including over 7 billion francs in reserves and assets of Russia’s central bank. Additionally, in 2023, Swiss authorities froze an additional 580 million francs in financial assets and two properties, bringing the total number of frozen properties to 17.

The move to adopt EU sanctions following Russia's invasion of Ukraine represents a significant departure from Switzerland's traditional neutrality.
However, this decision has faced criticism domestically, with activists gathering signatures to hold a popular vote on Switzerland’s neutrality. They aim to enshrine neutrality in the constitution and prevent participation in non-military coercive measures, including sanctions.

The total value of private assets frozen stood at 5.8 billion francs by the end of 2023, reflecting valuation losses, while central bank assets frozen amounted to 7.24 billion francs.

👉 27 July 2024: the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (Seco) confirmed that Switzerland would not follow the EU’s approach. In line with Swiss law and international obligations, Switzerland stated it could not generate “any extraordinary income in connection with the funds of the Russian central bank.”

Seco clarified that this position pertains specifically to Switzerland. As of April 2024, the total value of assets from the Central Bank of the Russian Federation frozen in Switzerland was just over CHF7 billion. These funds are separate from those frozen assets owned by individuals or companies linked to Russia.

This is a chronology of the Swiss governments capitulation to pro-russian interests and politicians, culminating in a flat out refusal to follwo the EU in disbursing profits from frozen assets to Ukraine.

Something else is clear - they have reduced the amount frozen from 19.6 billion held by ONE BANK in February to just 7 billion Swiss Francs frozen by the whole country. Switzerland failed to properly disclose the TOTAL amount of russian assets in 2022, and again in 2023 - with limited data being offered by UBS and its newly acquired business Credit Suisse.

Nothing has been reported but the thousands of other businesses and banks running shady and secretive portfolios on behalf of russians who have washed their stolen proceeds into the west via Switzerland since the Second World War.

The Swiss put out a clear statement in February 2023 saying “Local banks are required to report deposits of non-sanctioned Russians of 100,000 francs or more to the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (Seco) and have pledged not to accept any more client funds above that amount.”

No reporting of any disclosures has been reported, while one bank alone has “downsized” the value of seized assets by over 12 billion Swiss francs.

Quacks like a crooked duck, flies like a crooked duck, looks like a Vatnik duck.

In conclusion:

Swiss neutrality is an oxymoron.

Did you know that the Swiss have ongoing links and facilitation with stolen Ukrainian grain, ongoing trading and profiting in russian oil, as well as irrefutable evidence they have provided direct assistance to the Russian military over the past decade, since the illegal occupation of Crimea? Read my threads on these claims in the tweets below👇

_____________________________________________

Folks, I self-fund my equipment, research and subscription costs. I would appreciate your coffee support ! If you enjoy my threads, please help me keep the threads free, it takes just a few minutes to support my work on Patreon or BuymeACoffee - in any currency. 👇 Informative, evidence lead research for the price of a few coffees!Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(