đź§µAustralian military expert affirmed tragic death of 7 WCK aid workers was not deliberate, vindicating Israel. He assessed that unexpected gunmen were with convoy and looked like Hamas; but failures still led to mistaken attack. An important independent report, some detail: 1/
The primary reason for the IDF misidentification error was the unexpected presence of armed persons, one of whom fired his weapon into the air on the trailer of the WCK truck, which was deemed “consistent with Hamas hijacking the aid convoy.” 2/
The official Australian report by Air Chief Marshal Mark Binskin noted that later on several additional gunmen moved around the WCK escort vehicles. According to the Australian assessment, IDF brigade officials “classified” the gunmen “as Hamas.” 3/
A key reason for the identification of gunmen as Hamas is that the guards were not coordinated with IDF, and furthermore, the IDF would not have allowed armed guards anyhow. Report admits WCK could have inadvertently hired armed guards with links to Hamas. 4/
However there was a situational awareness breakdown and IDF controls failed, which IDF fully admits, which led to errors in decision making and misidentification of convoy as hostile. 5/
An interesting revelation: The Australian report noted that the IDF post-incident investigation system is similar to the Australian system. Fake NGOs @hrw @amnesty @btselem and others (falsely) claim that Israel’s post-incident investigations are a sham, do not really happen. 6/
The Australian report concluded that Israel’s acceptance of accountability, reporting and response has been “appropriate” and “sufficient” – again, contradicting fake NGO and some media claims that Israel never does these things properly. 7/
Report is important as it may be the first time an independent foreign military expert published a public report assessing IDF action. It's also perhaps the only time in history an army has allowed a foreign investigation like this. But Israel is always treated differently. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
đź§µAnother @airwars "airstrike analysis" that concluded the IDF killed ONLY civilians in an Oct 10, 2023 attack has now been proven to have killed senior PIJ commander Ashraf al-Qara (ID 413317470, Age 53). This is the 3rd case found recently. Airwars will you update the data? 1/
Airwars' assessment for the strike assumed civilian status for everyone, although in this case they had clues 53 year old Al-Qara was a commander. But they still counted him as a civilian. Now you know @Airwars @Emily_4319 @Anna_Zahn1 @desilva_rowena 2/ airwars.org/civilian-casua…
Here is the second case of an Airwars analysis that assumed only civilians were killed: in fact it also killed confirmed PIJ commander Ayman Hassan Yassin (ID: 901319533). 3/
đź§µAnother @airwars "airstrike analysis" that concluded IDF killed ONLY civilians based on "local sources" has now been proven to have killed PIJ commander Ayman Hassan Yassin (ID: 901319533). This is the 2nd case found recently. The Yassin family head was a terrorist leader. 1/
As a review: Airwars’ preposterous “analysis” issued in 2024 evaluated IDF airstrikes from October 2023. They concluded that out of 606 IDF airstrikes, only 26 — or 4% — killed a combatant. The other 580 killed ONLY civilians! Seriously. 2/
But with just a handful of recent Hamas & PIJ martyr notices showing Oct 2023 deaths, the narrative is badly cracking. Mo’men Amin Jabara al-Agha, age 27—listed by Airwars as a civilian—was honored by Hamas as member of al-Qassam Brigades. Yassin is the second case found. 3/
đź§µToday we learn based on Hamas & PIJ admissions that a so-called journalist, Doctors without Borders worker & nursing supervisor at Kamal Adwan Hospital were combatants killed in action. IDF did not target civilians but terrorists posing as them. The truth will be revealed. 1/
This thread identifies these persons from PIJ martyr notices. Hamas and PIJ are revealing more and more of their losses. @GabrielEpsteinX continues to expose the truth. 2/
🧵Airwars is often cited as “proving” excessive civilian harm in IDF airstrikes. But within only a handful of recent Hamas martyr notices, a strike they labeled “civilian-only” included a confirmed combatant. As more notices emerge, the @airwars "evidence" will collapse. 1/
As a review: Airwars’ preposterous “analysis” issued in 2024 evaluated IDF airstrikes from October 2023. They concluded that out of 606 IDF airstrikes, only 26 — or 4% — killed a combatant. The other 580 killed ONLY civilians! 2/
This outcome isn’t a surprise. Airwars has no reliable way to identify combatants in Gaza. Hamas & PIJ don’t publish combatant or casualty lists, fighters wear civilian clothes, live in family homes, and Gazans are instructed to conceal combatant deaths. 3/
🧵The Gaza WWI cemetery story should focus on Hamas militarizing it with tunnels & rockets. That’s the war crime. That’s the depravity. The destroyed corner is where the tunnel detonation occurred. As usual, only Israel’s response is condemned. Sources & details: 1/
In August 2025 the IDF destroyed a km long tunnel adjacent to the cemetery. This has been geolocated in detail, confirming the demolition occurred where the current damage is found. 2/
đź§µAccording to many military experts like @EvansRyan202 @Mpolymer apocalyptic images of Gaza, like below are prima facie evidence of disproportionate attacks. Eyesight is all you need to know. The US would not do this. Is that true? Scroll down for more photos and the answer. 1/
Large areas were totally destroyed or damaged. It's true, like here: