đź§µAustralian military expert affirmed tragic death of 7 WCK aid workers was not deliberate, vindicating Israel. He assessed that unexpected gunmen were with convoy and looked like Hamas; but failures still led to mistaken attack. An important independent report, some detail: 1/
The primary reason for the IDF misidentification error was the unexpected presence of armed persons, one of whom fired his weapon into the air on the trailer of the WCK truck, which was deemed “consistent with Hamas hijacking the aid convoy.” 2/
The official Australian report by Air Chief Marshal Mark Binskin noted that later on several additional gunmen moved around the WCK escort vehicles. According to the Australian assessment, IDF brigade officials “classified” the gunmen “as Hamas.” 3/
A key reason for the identification of gunmen as Hamas is that the guards were not coordinated with IDF, and furthermore, the IDF would not have allowed armed guards anyhow. Report admits WCK could have inadvertently hired armed guards with links to Hamas. 4/
However there was a situational awareness breakdown and IDF controls failed, which IDF fully admits, which led to errors in decision making and misidentification of convoy as hostile. 5/
An interesting revelation: The Australian report noted that the IDF post-incident investigation system is similar to the Australian system. Fake NGOs @hrw @amnesty @btselem and others (falsely) claim that Israel’s post-incident investigations are a sham, do not really happen. 6/
The Australian report concluded that Israel’s acceptance of accountability, reporting and response has been “appropriate” and “sufficient” – again, contradicting fake NGO and some media claims that Israel never does these things properly. 7/
Report is important as it may be the first time an independent foreign military expert published a public report assessing IDF action. It's also perhaps the only time in history an army has allowed a foreign investigation like this. But Israel is always treated differently. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵INTENTIONAL STARVATION by Israel is among Gaza’s core blood libels. UN's own data proves food entering during war matched pre-war levels; Israeli data shows far more especially during ceasefire. But no matter the evidence, the lie persists. Here are the facts. Sources⬇️1/
UN OCHA itself—not Israel nor “hasbaraists”—affirmed that 40,655 trucks of aid entered Gaza 10/2023-12/2024, about 80% food. That’s ~75 trucks/day of only food, matching pre-war levels. See source & UN chart for truck data: 2/ ochaopt.org/content/report…
But UN admits, in same source, that it did not count private sector trucks. COGAT records 63,700 total trucks with 49,600 of food from 10/2023-12/2024. That's ~110 trucks/day or 50% ABOVE pre-war levels. Simply impossible to claim starvation strategy. 3/ gaza-aid-data.gov.il/main/
đź§µEconomist released article claiming perhaps 109,000 Gaza deaths based on Jan 2025 "study" in Lancet. The study's "capture-recapture" analysis has proven flawed. Also, 900 deaths relied upon by the Lancet study were removed by Hamas in March 2025, invalidating the results. 1/
Lancet study used Hamas' June 2024 fatality list to match up deaths with 2 other lists, a sensitive analysis that matches deaths. But in March 2025 Hamas removed ~900 deaths from the June list which the study relied upon. The study is no longer valid. 2/
This thread highlights another set of major flaws in the "capture-recapture" analysis and the inside information that the study's authors received directly from Hamas' Ministry of Health. 3/
🧵Hamas→ Al Jazeera→ Int'l media reported that an IDF airstrike hit the Thai restaurant in Gaza yesterday killing many. But entire incident is FAKE, easily proven, as the restaurant, under a white tent, is fully intact. Videos show "fatalities" moving. Evidence & sources: 1/
Middle East Eye issued a video of strike's aftermath, killing “women & infants” inside the place according to “witnesses.” Somehow tent roofing isn't even torn, mounted TVs & lighting are intact after an airstrike hit this exact location. Here are some still shots from video. 2/
Other videos (sources at end of thread) show lots of “dead” men inside, none with any visible injuries, not even torn clothes—yet mortally wounded after an airstrike. Worker recounts how he could not tell how many bodies were pulled out of restaurant. But the curtains are OK. 3/
🧵Hamas' human shield strategy is exposed in a groundbreaking new report by @HJS_Org. All NGO & UN reports omits this "missing chapter" because it proves Hamas is to blame for civilian harm in Gaza. @Mr_Andrew_Fox and I co-authored. Some key details: 1/ henryjacksonsociety.org/publications/h…
Hamas’ human shield strategy encompasses 10 distinct strategies, overlapping, that by design blur the line between combatant & civilian, so that the presence of civilians impede IDF attacks. It is intended to result in civilian casualties when Israel strikes Hamas targets. 2/
Most importantly in the report, massive & detailed evidence has been provided for each element of the strategy which is why it runs to 87 pages. The evidence is indisputable—very often from Hamas’ own videos. Only Hamas supporters & apologists will continue to deny it. 3/
Right now we're supposed to believe that breastfed infants are literally dying of starvation because Israel did not allow food into Gaza, while nearby gourmet cake shops & restaurants are actively serving Gazans. There are dozens of these videos daily, it's not an anomaly.
Here is an example of a fake claim of infant death by supposedly literal starvation, I won't show photo. Whatever happened is likely from pre-existing condition unrelated to literal lack of food. ~50 of these out of 60,000 births in Gaza in last 12 months have been recorded.
Several UN and NGO sources confirm about 60,000 births in Gaza in last 12 months, equal to or above pre-war pace.
đź§µNew report by @HJS_Org further evidences Hamas faked Gaza fatality numbers and hid combatants killed (specific evidence shown). Even so, Hamas data shows IDF targeted combatants. Also: foreign doctors working in Gaza lied to media about what they saw. Some key revelations: 1/
It’s already been shown that 72% of combat aged fatalities were men. New report offers more data, such as for Khan Younes deaths only. Adult men were killed at a 5x rate versus adult women – again proving no indiscriminate attacks by Israel (if so, it would be close to 1:1). 2/
As the war went on, the IDF "hit rate" on combatants went up significantly. From Oct 24 to Mar 25, 76% of new fatalities reported were male, with a large majority combat age, as chart below shows. 3/