New interdisciplinary review was published on current Long COVID science, with a roadmap for science and policy!
It is written in plain language, so it's worth a read on its own, but I just want to pull out some highlights about what WE DO KNOW into a single thread...
1/many
This is definitely the definition for Long COVID I'll be explicitly using from now on: Long COVID is "the constellation of post-acute and long-term health effects caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection."
2/
Long COVID "affects nearly every organ system, including the cardiovascular system, the nervous system, the endocrine system, the immune system, the reproductive system, and the gastrointestinal system."
It affects people regardless of age or pre-existing health status.
3/
The specifics of the risk have varied over time (as the virus and medicine both evolve), but one thing is clear: The risk of Long COVID accumulates with each infection.
People with three infections are more at risk than people with two infection, for example.
4/
The *risk* of LC is correlated with the severity of acute COVID, but because most of the people around the world have had mild COVID, these "mild" cases "constitute more than 90% of people with long COVID, despite their lower relative risk..."
5/
The specifics of Long COVID are unclear, simply because studies have not been consistent enough to be comparable.
One of the biggest problems is labeling "remission" as "recovery," especially when many manifestations "are chronic conditions that last a lifetime."
6/
Simply put, we're facing a MASSIVE threat to global public health. This review looked at what is known—and what issues will have to be addressed going forward!
7/
Fundamentally, one of the biggest problems with grasping the nature of Long COVID is the "dynamic nature of the pandemic itself, which gave rise to many variants and subvariants, each yielding potentially different rates of long COVID"
8/
But you know what is really interesting? If we stick to the absolute bare-minimum definition (having one of three clusters of symptoms three months after infection), we consistently see that AT LEAST *7% of the population* is impacted.
9/
The global count of people affected by Long COVID is jarring: even only accounting for symptomatic cases and the most-likely outcomes, they "estimated a cumulative global incidence of long COVID by the end of 2023 of approximately 400 million."
400 MILLION.
10/
And you know what else makes it challenging to estimate the global incidence of Long COVID? We don't yet know what risks "are not yet manifest and may emerge years or decades after infection."
This is a pressing global health issue.
11/
What causes Long COVID? Why does it occur?
Well, the specifics are still being figured out. There's not yet a clean answer to that question. All we do know is that it can involve many different systems, and many different variables affect outcomes.
12/
There are, however, some more-salient pathways that have been proposed, "including viral persistence, immune dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, complement dysregulation, prothrombotic inflammation and microbiome dysbiosis"
13/
Viral persistence is of particular concern, because persistence of "either replicating virus or viral RNA or protein fragments" in certain tissues "may be common" and "may trigger chronic low-grade inflammation and tissue injury."
14/
Viral persistence is of particular note for further investigation, because studies "have demonstrated persistence of the virus in extrapulmonary sites, including the brain and coronary arteries, of individuals with severe COVID-19."
15/
But here's the thing: Even if SARS-CoV-2 *isn't* directly infecting the brain, we DO know that "a transient respiratory infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces prolonged neuroinflammatory responses" and *brain fog* is associated with "disrupted blood-brain barriers."
NOT GOOD.
16/
When it comes to the immune system "abnormalities in the immune system have been documented in" pwLC, including a heightened antibody response to various herpesviruses, "exhausted T cell responses," uncoordinated adaptive immunity, and autoimmune responses.
17/
Note that some of the vascular, endocrine, and GI impacts of LC can also have a DIRECT impact on nervous system and brain function.
(IMO, LC is primarily neurological, with the overarching condition being triggered by dysregulation in these other areas.)
18/
How can LC be prevented? The best way to avoid Long COVID is to avoid SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Masking and ventilation "can reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and... the risk of long COVID."
Vaccines ALSO reduce the risk of (but don't entirely *prevent*) LC.
19/
There are some drugs in the works that have been shown to be useful in acute COVID, but it's still not entirely clear if they have a significant impact on the risk of Long COVID.
The best thing you can do for yourself is to not have anymore SARS-CoV-2 infections.
20/
What about treatments? There is nothing yet, other than a few promising leads.
Current treatment for Long COVID is based on evidence for "treating similar symptomatology from other conditions," including ME/CFS and Gulf War illness.
So, nothing specific yet.
21/
All of these issues are compounded by "lack of widespread recognition and understanding of long COVID among medical professionals" and a "general pervasive pandemic fatigue with an urge to 'move on'."
Unfortunately, the virus is unaware the pandemic was DECLARED "over".
22/
The impacts have been SIGNIFICANT.
- 1 in 4 pwLC have to "limit activities outside work in order to continue working."
- The increased demand created by LC "exacerbates existing pressures on health systems."
- There are "wide and deep ramifications on national economies."
23/
The economic losses in the United States alone are "on par with the global 2008 Great Recession," incurring financial losses of around $11,000 per capita.
And this is with the assumption that, for those who develop Long COVID, it will only last five years.
24/
So... what do we do?
The rest of the paper lays out detailed research and policy roadmaps we can follow to navigate this crisis, and it's worth a read:
The path forward isn't easy, but this is not a problem that CANNOT be ignored.
One of my absolute worst habits is rephrasing a sentence without making sure I removed all the redundant words. 🤦♂️
26/25
Agreed! It seems likely to be an underestimate.
I think they were aiming to define the bare minimum scope of what is actually known fairly definitively, and based on that the floor of the estimate is 400 million. It’s a good strategy from a policy advocacy perspective!
That's not to say that it's impossible to use solid-state media for long-term storage. It's just that anything with durability guarantees gets prohibitively expensive quickly. Spinning hard drives—as well as DVDs and Blu-ray discs!—are your friend.
2/
- The way data is stored in solid-state media makes it much more susceptible to bit rot than other media.
- In a spinning hard drive, the moving parts are the most common point of failure.
- When you burn a DVD, that shit is fairly permanent.
3/
I wish people would understand that insurance underwriters have armies of actuaries calculating risks, and if an insurance company drops you, it's because things have changed in such a way that insuring you will take more out of the financial pool than you're putting in
1/
It sucks, but it's a direct result of the fact that humans are widely inhabiting locations that are rapidly becoming impossible to inhabit safely. If you can't find insurance for your home, it means there's a high likelihood you'll need to move soon anyway.
2/
You get insurance so that you can replace all of your stuff in the event of a disaster. When the insurance company effectively says "the risk of disaster is so high that insuring you would almost certainly cause us to lose a lot of money," it ALSO means your life is in danger
3/
So here’s the thing about some of the subtle neuro damage related to SARS-CoV-2 infection that I think a lot of people miss: some of the known deficits are correlated with things like impulsiveness and poor emotional control, so we might expect to see deficits there are well
1/
Consider how impatient people seem to be on the road in the last couple years relative to the 2010s, and I think we have a perfect example of where this is LIKELY already manifesting.
2/
This impact is particularly insidious for the person experiencing it, because poor impulse control, by definition, doesn’t really come on gradually. My biggest concern is how interactions under these circumstances will play out if this impact continues to become more common
3/
Let's review some major points in the Nukit controversy, since some people are unclear:
- Someone criticized someone's use of Nukit lanterns.
- Nukit attacked the critic because, as noted, this is how they market
- Nukit now demands "mediation" with the community (how??)
1/
So let's look at this a bit more critically. Here is the "evidence" Nukit provided that the didn't say anything racist. First of all, these aren't the comments in question, but it's worth a look anyway.
2/
Let's be clear about what happened here: Someone lamented the unequal access to protective measures and criticized someone who seems to be using a certain device to *maintain the status quo*, and the manufacturer of the device found it unacceptable.
3/
NEW STUDY! This exploratory study identifies a SPECIFIC PHENOTYPE OF LONG COVID that appears related to NEUROMUSCULAR DISTURBANCE rather than lung damage—and they've termed it Complex Ventilatory Dysfunction!
Breakdown of the paper (thread written for a general audience!)...
1/
Broadly speaking, there are two groups of acute covid outcomes involving dyspnea (shortness of breath) as a long-term symptom:
- Severe cases that may have physical lung damage
- "Mild" cases that now have ME/CFS-like features, but who have no evidence of lung damage!
2/
In this study, they explored this distinction further and identified a distinct subset of patients with a pattern of breathing abnormality that they have termed complex ventilatory dysfunction (CVD).
So how did they arrive at this conclusion? Let's dig in!
NEW STUDY! It VERY thoroughly supports the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 emerged as a zoonotic spillover event in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market—using multiple methods!
Breakdown of the paper (written for a general audience!)...
1/many (but it's worth it, I promise!)
This paper reanalyzes the same data from the April 2023 paper in Nature that cast doubt on the Huanan Market hypothesis (pictured).
In the new paper published in Cell this week, another group conducted far more detailed (and statistically sound) analyses!
2/
This new paper starts by reviewing the evidence supporting the Huanan Market hypothesis, and some of the details are FASCINATING!
To begin with, of the 174 COVID cases identified with an onset of December 2019, 32% had a link to the Huanan Market.