In the past few days, #Ukraine and its offensive into #Kursk has demonstrated again how surprise plays a major role in human conflict. What role has surprise played in this war, and how did Ukraine surprise Russia...again? 1/22 🧵 🇺🇦
2/ Surprising the opponent is an important method of seizing the initiative on the battlefield or at the strategic level. But the impacts of surprise are transient. As such, exploitation must be executed quickly against surprised – and shocked – enemy forces before they can regain coherency in their command and control and respond effectively.
3/ The past 30 months of war since the Russian large-scale invasion of Ukraine offers multiple examples where advanced technology has not prevented humans from innovating, deceiving and surprising their enemies.
4/ Key examples include: the previous Belgorod incursions, the defeat of Russia north of Kyiv, the Kerch bridge attack, the drone attacks on Moscow, the Kharkiv offensive in 2022, the failure of the Ukraine counteroffensive in 2023, the Progozhin mutiny, and the reinvigoration of NATO (big surprise for Putin).
5/ The events of the past 72 hours have demonstrated this again. Ukraine, in a rapidly developing offensive, crossed its frontier with Russia and has been advancing on two axes of advance into the Kursk region of Russia.
6/ The question needs to be asked: how did Ukraine achieve such a stunning surprise against the Russians at this point of the war?
7/ Surprise has many contributing factors, as Schelling wrote: "Surprise, when it happens to a government, is likely to be a complicated, diffuse, bureaucratic thing. It includes neglect of responsibility, but also responsibility so poorly defined that actions get lost. It includes gaps in intelligence, but also intelligence that like a string of pearls too precious to wear, is too sensitive to give to those who need it."
8/ A full accounting of Russian performance in the lead up to, and during, this August 2024 Ukrainian cross-border offensive is some way off. Likewise, we probably won’t be exposed to the Ukrainian intelligence and planning for this offensive for some time into the future.
9/ However, it is likely that the Ukrainian surprise against the Russians was the result of five key factors: good intelligence; Ukrainian deception measures; Ukrainian operational security; timing; and Russian self-deception / failure of humility.
10/ Contributing Factor 1: Good Intelligence. Intelligence is a foundational element of military operations. Combining collection ops with their in-depth knowledge about Russian culture & doctrine will have provided the foundations for the planning for this operation into Kursk.
11/ Contributing Factor 2: Deception. NATO doctrine on deception describes it as “deliberate measures to mislead targeted decision-makers into behaving in a manner advantageous to the commander’s objectives.” pravda.com.ua/eng/articles/2…
12/ Ukraine probably developed a comprehensive deception plan that was designed to decieve Russia (and other observers) about the following: 1. Its intention to conduct a major offensive in 2024; 2. Movement of forces for the offensive; 3. Location & timing of where the Ukrainian offensive would be conducted; 4. Stockpiling of logistics to support the operation; 5. Deployment of key supporting elements including air defence and EW.
13/ Contributing Factor 3: Operational Security. Achieving surprise also demands strict operational security that commences long before the execution of an operation. This operational security will have been designed by the Ukrainians to deny the Russians knowledge of Ukraine’s intention to deceive them about planned operations.
14/ Contributing Factor 4: Timing. In war, the ability to exploit time is one of the most important considerations in the planning and execution of military activities. Timing for this Ukrainian offensive will have been driven by its capacity to concentrate the forces required for close combat, engineer support, artillery, air defence, communications, logistics, and electronic warfare.
15/ Ukraine shaped expectations among its supporters – and therefore in the Russian military leadership – that any kind of major offensive from the Ukrainian armed forces is probably not likely in 2024. Therefore, they have got inside the temporal decision cycle of the Russians as well as those observing the war. This week, #Ukraine did something much earlier than expected.
16/ Contributing Factor 5: Russian Self-Deception and Failure of Humility. Self-deception involves denying or rationalizing away the significance, relevance, or importance of opposing evidence and / or logical argument. This is not uncommon in military affairs.
17/ An element of self-deception in Russian military leadership in the lead up to the offensive might also be a failure of humility. A failure of humility occurs when a military force fails to undertake the intellectual efforts to understand their adversary.
18/ The Russians, believing that they had the strategic momentum in this war, and making good progress on the eastern front in Ukraine, failed to give the Ukrainians adequate credit for being a thinking, complex and adaptive entity that was studying them and planning accordingly.
19/ Surprise remains one of the enduring features of war. As Clausewitz wrote, “surprise of the enemy…lies more or less at the foundation of all undertakings, for without it the preponderance at the decisive point is not properly conceivable.” And as we have seen in the past 72 hours it will continue to be a feature of the war in Ukraine.
20/ Ukraine has achieved a major surprise against Russia in its #Kursk offensive. This tactical, operational and strategic surprise shows that modern military operations are far less transparent than some would have us believe. Humans, not technology, still determine the trajectory of war. End
21/ You can read my full, detailed examination of how #Ukraine surprised Russia - again - in my latest piece at Futura Doctrina ($). mickryan.substack.com/p/surprise-att…
22/ Thank you to the following for images used in this thread: @War_Mapper @NOELreports @DefenceU @defencehq @IAPonomarenko and #BattleofKursk2024pravda.com.ua/eng/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Maybe we can finally dispense with the ‘transparent battlefield’ fallacy. War’s enduring feature, as Clausewitz described, is that it is a human endeavour and that it is full of uncertainty, friction, emotion and surprise. 1/5 🧵
2/ The level of strategic, operational and tactical deception shown by the Ukrainians during the planning, assembling forces and ongoing execution of the #Kursk operation has been superb.
3/ This is not a technical achievement - it is a human one. People who have learned from their successes and failures since February 2022 have crafted an operational design that is being competently executed by motivated soldiers.
Now that we have had a couple of days to observe the new Ukrainian cross-border attack into Kursk, I wanted to offer a quick assessment of what we know, as well as Ukraine's potential objectives and the challenges it faces. 1/23 🧵( (Image: @DefenceU)
2/ Surprise is an important continuity in human competition and warfare. The aim is to shock an adversary and overwhelm them when they are their weakest or when they least expect it. That shock, and the accompanying break down in enemy cohesion & ability to effectively respond, can then be used to seize ground and destroy enemy formations.
3/ It appears that yet again, the Ukrainians have surprised Russia, and observers in the west, with their latest operation. Over the past 72 hours, we have watched as Ukraine has launched a significant cross-border assault into Russia’s Kursk region.
A good thread from @RALee85 on the new Ukrainian operation on the Kursk axis. Given defensive pressures elsewhere, particularly with Russia's advances towards Pokrovsk and Toretsk, the strategic rationale for this operation at this time is difficult to fathom. 1/5 🧵
2/ One potential driver is political. The government of #Ukraine want to shift momentum and the strategic narrative, and have directed such an operation.
3/ Another potential driver is operational. That is, to draw away Russian forces from the Donbas to defend on the Kursk axis. However, given Russian advantages in manpower, Russia can probably cover both with limited impact on its operations in eastern #Ukraine.
“The threats the United States faces are the most serious and most challenging the nation has encountered since 1945 and include the potential for near-term major war.” The report from U.S. National Defense Strategy Commission has been released. Some highlights. 1/11 🧵
2/ On China - “The Commission finds that, in many ways, China is outpacing the United States and has largely negated the U.S. military advantage in the Western Pacific through two decades of focused military investment. Without significant change by the United States, the balance of power will continue to shift in China’s favor. “
3/ Russia - “Russia will devote 29 percent of its federal budget this year on national defense as it continues to reconstitute its military and economy after its failed initial invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Russia possesses considerable strategic, space, and cyber capabilities and under Vladimir Putin seeks a return to its global leadership role of the Cold War.”
In the last 48 hours, #Ukraine conducted one of its longest-range strategic strikes yet. Today, an update on what is occurring with Ukraine’s multiple strike campaigns, their key functions and the challenges that Ukraine will face in strike operations against Russia for the remainder of 2024 and into 2025. 1/18 🧵🇺🇦
2/ The weekend strikes are claimed to have damaged a Russian Tu-22M3 long-range supersonic bomber at the Olenya airfield, south of Murmansk. This particular airfield lies about 1800 kilometres from Ukraine and is close to Russia’s border with northern Finland.
3/ The Ukrainians have also recently struck key targets in Crimea. This included the significant damage to Russia’s last railway ferry in Crimea. This vessel has been used to transport military equipment to Russian forces in the occupied peninsula and thence to forces in southern Ukraine.
In the past 24 hours we have seen again the brutality of the Putin regime, and the murderous band of barbarians called the Russian military. The deliberate attack by a Russian precision missile on the Okhmatdyt hospital, despite its horror, is part of a wider Russian campaign to terrorise the people of #Ukraine. 1/10 🧵🇺🇦
2/ This was not the action of a few bad apples. It is the outcome of a systemic, command-led campaign to terrorise and brutalise Ukrainians, just as the Russians did with Syrians and Chechens.
3/ Russian political and military leaders have nurtured a culture of indiscriminate killing in Ukraine and set the conditions for it to flourish. They bear full responsibility for the killings at Okhmatdyt hospital, Bucha and other atrocities across Ukraine in the past two and half years.