Almost every judge I’ve identified as being involved in the rapid prosecution and incarceration of individuals who participated in the Southport riots has a history of letting convicted pedophiles walk free with no jail time. 🌞
A short thread on "two-tier" justice:
JUDGE ANDREW MENARY
Sentenced William Nelson Morgan, 69, to 32 months in prison for refusing to move out of the way of police officers.
Menary previously let a pedophile who collected baby rape videos walk with no jail time because his lawyer said he had "good character."
JUDGE JOHN TEMPERLEY
Sentenced Billy Thompson, 31, to 12 weeks in prison for emojis which incited racial violence.
Temperley previously let a pedophile who had been stashing child abuse images walk free because he had "displayed remorse."
JUDGE FRANCIS LAIRD
Sentenced Charlie Bullock, 21, to 18 months in prison for throwing rocks at a line of police.
Last week, Laird let a pervert who had a collection of over 700 toddler and animal rape videos walk with no jail time because he "showed remorse."
JUDGE PAUL SLOAN
Sentenced Leanne Hodgson, 43, to 2.5 years for “shouting racist abuse” at a police officer.
Sloan had previously let a pedophile caught with 10,000 images of schoolgirls walk free because he hadn’t looked at the images frequently enough.
JUDGE NEIL RAFFERTY
Has denied bail to even those arrested with viewing the riots remotely.
Rafferty previously let a man convicted of raping his “vulnerable” niece walk free because he was “remorseful.” (Keep hearing that word)
JUDGE MARK BURY
Sentenced Brandon Kirkwood, 20, to 2.5 years in prison for pushing a “large wheel bin” at police.
Bury recently let a pedophile walk free with a recommendation to “go get some fresh air” instead of collecting child abuse images.
JUDGE JEREMY RICHARDSON
Sentenced Kenzie Roughley, 18, to 2 years in jail for kicking a CCTV van and goading police.
Richardson previously let a pedophile go after he targeted a vulnerable 13 year old girl for sexual abuse because he would “suffer comprehensibly in prison.”
JUDGE ROBERT LINFORD
Sentenced David McGuire, 45, to 2.5 years in jail for spitting on police officers.
Linford previously let a pedophile go with a community sentence after he was caught with child sexual abuse images because he had a “constructive view of the future.”
JUDGE STEVEN EVERETT
Sentenced Julie Sweeney, 53, to 15 months in prison for a Facebook post which read “blow the [Southport] mosque up.”
Everett has let multiple pedophiles walk free. He once called it “unconscionable” to send a man caught with child rape images to jail.
JUDGE GUY KEARL
Sentenced Phillip Hoban, a renowned pedophile hunter, to 8 months in prison for shouting “who the fuck is Allah” and making racist lip gestures.
Previously allowed a man found with 2,700 photos of young girls being sexually abused to walk free.
JUDGE JOHN POTTER
Sentenced Oliver Chapman, 23, to 20 months in prison for kicking a window during the riots that followed the murder of three children.
Potter previously let a pedophile who had collected images of toddlers being raped walk free because he had a job.
JUDGE CATARINA SJOLIN KNIGHT
Sentenced Wayne O’Rourke to 3 years in prison for posting “misinformation” about the murder of the three girls in Southport.
Knight previously let a man found with 1300 videos of children being sexually abused walk free.
JUDGE JULIAN LAMBERT
Sentenced Bradley McCarthy, 34, to 20 months in prison for shouting at a police dog and being “racist.”
Lambert previously allowed a man who downloaded over 7000 child rape images of girls as young as 10 to walk free with a warning not to do it again.
JUDGE RHYS ROWLANDS
Sentenced Daniel Kingsley, 33, to 21 months in prison for being racist on Facebook following the murder of three little girls in Southport.
Rowlands previously allowed a pedophile who hoarded child rape images to walk free because he was “still young.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I absolutely despise essay-posting but as the co-owner of the outlet (@ReduxxMag) that broke the news about Khelif and Lin and started this wildfire, I feel compelled to put to bed some of the bullshit surrounding this story.
A rapid-fire FAQ:
1. "L & K are just women with high testosterone!"
Khelif and Lin were never tested for their testosterone levels.
The claims that they were disqualified from the 2023 Women's World Boxing Championship due to simple testosterone abnormalities were made by their respective national sporting bodies, who, obviously, have some motivation to lie here.
2. "L & K have female ID!"
Khelif and Lin are not believed to be transgender, and @ReduxxMag made that VERY clear in our July 28 article.
They are believed to be impacted by a Difference of Sexual Development, in which there is a developmental abnormality in secondary sex characteristics. This is a medical condition which can manifest with children being born with ambiguous or disfigured genitalia. Male children impacted by DSDs are often "assigned female at birth" due to these genital defects, as there is a genuine assumption they are girls.
Thus, their identification documents would be completely irrelevant in this case. As is the fact they were "raised as girls." That's entirely expected for male children with DSDs.
Even more so for male children with DSDs in socially conservative countries.
Is a boy without a penis more likely to be raised as a boy or a girl? Exactly.
3. "The IBA never said they had XY chromosomes!"
On March 25, 2023, IBA President Umar Kremlev said that the boxers disqualified at the championships had XY chromosomes. He said this in a statement to TASS News.
There were only two boxers disqualified at the championships: Lin and Khelif.
4. "But Kremlev could be lying!"
Over the last 72 hours, the IBA has released two separate statements confirming that Khelif and Lin were not subject to testosterone testing, but had instead been subjected to a separate test validated by two independent laboratories.
That test confirmed they were not eligible to compete in women's boxing as per the IBA guidelines.
Crucially, the IBA defines "woman" as "an individual with XX chromosomes." In their guidelines, they also indicate that the gender tests they use to determine if a person is eligible to compete with women is a chromosomal test, not a hormone test.
In their second statement, the IBA condemned the IOC for allowing Khelif and Lin to proceed as they believed it was putting female boxers at risk and that they did not support "boxing between the genders."
5. "Why doesn't the IBA release the test!"
They cannot. It is protected medical information. They would be sued.
Khelif and Lin, however, can agree to have the laboratories release those tests themselves... Why haven't they?
6. "The IBA didn't let L & K appeal their disqualification!"
Yes they did. They have no choice in the matter. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is a fully independent tribunal which oversees all disputes in elite athletics. Every athlete has a right to bring a case to the CAS.
Lin did not challenge the disqualification.
Khelif challenged the disqualification but withdrew the appeal before it could proceed through the court.
Please ask yourself why. If they were genuinely female, why would they have chosen to refuse their opportunity to establish that in an irrefutable and legally binding way at a fully independent venue? Literally none of this would have happened had they simply submitted their tests to the CAS.
Buuuut... Consider that all decisions at the CAS are public information. It was through a CAS challenge that the world became aware that Caster Semenya had XY chromosomes, for example.
If Khelif and Lin had proceeded through the CAS, there would have been irrefutable evidence, documented by an independent body, that they were either male or female.
So why? Why did they not want the CAS to examine their tests? Why did they not want this information to be public? I think the reason is obvious.
7. "But the IOC approved their eligibility for 2024!"
The IOC stopped sex testing athletes in 1999. Since then, they have deferred to individual sporting bodies to ensure athletes were eligible.
HOWEVER, for the purposes of the 2024 Paris Olympics, there is no formal oversight body for boxing. This is the first time this ever happened.
As a result, the IOC created an ad-hoc boxing unit to temporarily oversee the boxing competitions in Paris. This unit has no guidelines for gender eligibility, and has apparently just been allowing boxers to compete "as females" if they have female gender markers on their passports/legal documents.
8. "The IBA is corrupt and cannot be trusted!"
The IOC has long had an issue with the IBA because the IBA has refused to disqualify Russian athletes on the basis of their national identity.
Claims of the IBA's "corruption" can basically be summarized to "Russia bad, Russians evil." The IBA has literally no history of bullshitting about the sex of boxers involved and it doesn't benefit them in any kind of way to do so.
9. "The IBA only disqualified L & K because they beat Russian boxers at the 2023 championships!"
No they did not. I started seeing this weird, completely false claim circulating over the last 24 hours.
Khelif beat Thailand's Janjaem Suwannapheng and was set to compete against China's Yang Liu for gold in the Welterweight category.
Lin beat Bulgaria's Svetlana Kamenova Staneva for bronze in the Featherweight category.
They were scheduled to fight no Russian boxers in either one of their categories, and only one Russian boxer won a gold medal in the entire championship (Anastasiia Demurchian, Light Middleweight).
India won the most gold medals (4) at the 2023 Women's Championship. China won the most medals overall (7). Kazakhstan won the second most medals overall (6). Russia only won 3 medals at the championship.
Also worth noting that another Taiwanese boxer, Huang Hsiao-wen, won gold in the Bantamweight category. So for all the Taiwanese mouthpieces claiming Lin's disqualification was just "discrimination against Taiwan"... lol no.
10. "L & K were only singled out because they don't look feminine!"
This idea that Lin and Khelif were singled out for not meeting some "western feminine beauty standard" is atrocious and quite easily refutable when you look at literally any of their competitors, most of whom do not meet that arbitrary standard themselves because boxing is a physically demanding sport for robust people, male or female.
Below is Khadija El-Mardi of Morocco, for example, who likely would be accused of failing to meet this supposed "western feminine beauty standard." El-Mardi won gold in the Heavyweight category at the 2023 World Championships. She is advancing to the quarter-finals in Paris as we speak. She's one of the best female boxers out there.
She is a woman. Her features and tall stature literally do not matter. She is biologically female. Sex testing would return an XX.
Women are adult human females. This is true regardless of their external appearance.
Likewise, men are adult human males. This is true regardless of abnormalities or defects in their secondary sex characteristics.
To return to point #10 in this post, this appears to now be the narrative that is being manufactured in real time - that Khelif was somehow simply being “punished” for beating a Russian boxer in the 2023 championships.
Note how the AP frames this. They make it seem as though Khelif was disqualified after beating Amineva.
In reality, the AP had to go back TWO MATCHES to find where Khelif had fought a Russian. After besting Amineva, Khelif went on to beat Uzbekistan’s Navbakhor Khamidova, and then Thailand’s Janjaem Suwannapheng. Khelif was disqualified just before facing off against China’s Yang Liu.
No Russian advanced to the finals of this match. The Russian boxer didn’t even came close to it. Disqualifying Khelif wouldn’t have advanced the Russian boxer to a favourable position.
Further, multiple other boxers very easily beat Russian opponents and advanced to win gold without any such problems. Such as Morocco’s Khadija El-Mardi in the heavyweight, who directly beat Russia’s Diana Pyatak for a spot in the gold match that she would ultimately win.
Other Russian boxers were left in the dust in other categories where they didn’t even end up placing at all. Yet no other boxers were “punished” for directly beating these Russian competitors.
It also doesn’t mesh for Lin Yu-Ting, who never matched against a single Russian boxer.
This new narrative they’re inventing is borderline schizophrenic.
On a profound level, men are deeply ashamed of their own sexuality. Why? Because they feel like they are slaves to it in a way women are not.
This is why men have constructed grand theories, philosophies, and even religions dedicated to blaming women for their boners.
Men projected whorishness onto women out of shame. Men are whores by their very biological construction.
A woman can only get pregnant by one man at a time. She only ovulates and is fertile during a small window during a monthly cycle. Women’s arousal is FAR harder to prompt than men’s, who can literally get aroused by looking at this light fixture:
uh oh stinky I’m detecting some obvious and brutally unchangeable anatomical dimorphism
and there’s a reason she wanted to gloss right over this, the most important skeletal difference between men and women… Not because it’s so obvious so would quickly render her thread useless, but because of what it represents.
Two years ago I provided Twitter comms with a hashtag that was being used to trade child porn on this app.
Despite all the Elon fanfare… it’s as active as ever.
There’s even a photo of a little girl promoting the abuse material she’s “starring” in. It’s been up for 8 days.
As of *13 minutes ago* there is someone offering pics/vids of babies up to 5 years old, as well as material of mentally handicapped children.
Twitter has had what they needed for years to solve this problem. It wasn’t solved then. It hasn’t yet been solved now.
Proofs.
All Twitter was focused on at the time was trying to get me to amend an article I’d written on it to include comment on their STRONG commitment to blah blah blah blah 🤪