1/ One reason Gender Ideologues hijacked our institutions is that woke activists don't understand how *LEGITIMACY* works
I'll explain:
The woke think legitimacy is a matter of power and authority: A thing is legitimate when people with power and authority say it's legitimate...
2/ As such, they think that the legitimacy of various types of medical interventions (IE: puberty blockers, mastectomies, and cross sex hormones for 15 year olds) depends entirely on whether or not the people with the power and authority in the medical system say it is.
Now...
3/ Most of us believe that the legitimacy of medical treatments rest on a foundation of objective truth, objective standards of quality, rigorous criteria for safety, attention to detail, and careful application of sturdy medical ethics.
The woke reject all of that. Here's why:
4/ The woke think all the standards and criteria for Truth, safety, health, morality, and so fourth are "socially constructed," and therefore they are merely the expressions of the values and interests of a particular group of people in a particular culture.
Read that again.
5/ For this reason the woke deny that the standards of western medicine are objective. They think the standards of care, rigor, safety, and truth used in western medicine are merely a mask for the values and interests of a white, racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, culture.
6/ On this view the medical institutions which oversee standards of care are not actually trying to do what is best for everyone, they use their medical power and authority to further their own interests at the expense of trans people, gay people, black people, etc.
So...
7/ This means Gender Activists don't think the western medical standards for health, appropriateness, rigor, care, and safety, are built on a foundation of objective truth.
Gender activists deny that western medicine is tied to an objective understanding of how the world works.
8/ They think western medical standards, and in fact ALL standards ( including standards of truth, justice, morality,safety, democracy, rationality, and any other standard you can think of) are really just expressions of the values and interests of the people who invented them.
9/ Because woke activists think whoever has the power gets to decide what is legitimate, they took over our institutions in order to re-write the standards
Then they changed the rules to say that it is totally legitimate to give mastectomies to 15 year olds confused about gender
10/ The woke think all legitimacy about social power and authority. They also think the only proper use of power is in the service of advancing wokeness. So they think the only way a standard is "legitimate" is if implementing it advances woke ideas (like gender ideology).
11/ This means the gender activists think the only way a standard is legitimate is if it advances Gender ideology.
They cannot comprehend the idea that legitimacy is matter of objective truth and rigorous standards and people ideologies, interests, and agenda's don't matter.
12/ The standards of western medicine are supposed to be grounded in objective truth, rigorous scientific standards, attention to detail, and sturdy medical ethics.
It is not grounded in whose self-interests are served, whose ideology is advanced, or who selfishly benefits.
13/ The thing that make the standards of care of western medicine legitimate is their well grounded connection to objective truth, objective facts, rigorous methods, and sturdy medical ethics.
Everyone benefits (unselfishly) when we ground legitimacy in objective standards....
14/ We must reject the absurd and nihilistic standard of legitimacy that was cooked up by Gender activists who claim that masectomies, puberty blockers, and cross sex hormones for 15 year olds are "legitimate."
If you immerse yourself the various political tribes on twitter (IE: feminist, MAGA, centrist, Woke, ETC). you realize they inhabit entirely different worlds of meaning.
They don't just disagree on facts, they disagree about the MEANING of the facts, and to interpret them...
It's not merely that they disagree about what the facts are, it's that even when they agree about the facts they don't agree about how to understand and interpret the facts.
They disagree about what those facts tell us, what we learn from those facts, and what those facts MEAN
We have a disagreement about MEANING
Our culture now believes that truth is a matter of interpretation, with the implication being that you don't have direct access to truth, all you have is your own interpretation of your own perspective on the world and your experiences
1/ This maoist "re-education programming," and I'll show you how it works🧵
The goal of this is to say "I own you, I own your social media, I own your voice, you life will be nothing but a vessel for leftist ideology. If you refuse I will take away your ability to earn a living"
2/ Maoist "re-education" is a type of brainwashing which seeks to implant, instill and indoctrinate maoist/communist/leftist beliefs into the mind of the person being "re-educated"
Look at this text: the mayor refuses to tell the employee what to say. Now, let me tell you why...
3/ It's because the mayor does not want the employee to merely **express** the Mayor's values. The Mayor wants to employee to show that the employee has fully and completely **INTERNALIZED** the Mayor's values and beliefs.
The employee has to prove he isn't merely obeying...
1/ After reading @ConceptualJames here, I deleted these tweets.
The "weird" insult is a dialectical trap. The goal of Queer Theory is to attack and subvert the very idea of *normalcy,* and bolish all social norms, expectations and standards.
2/ As @VinesMatthew explains, queer theory opposes the very idea of normalcy and the imposition of ANY social norms
The reason they call the right weird is because if the right is "weird," and the left is "queer" that means neither side is NORMAL, and thus NORMALCY is abolished
@VinesMatthew 3/
queer theory want to abolish normalcy, and that means abolishing ALL norms:
-moral norms
-social norms
-norms of rationality and reason
-scientific norms
-Political norms
If they can make the right "weird" and the left "queer" that neither side can stand for **NORMALCY**
They talk like this so they can implicitly accuse their opponents of being childish and beneath them.
Making accusations via tone, attitude, and innuendo lets them launch implicit accusations that they cannot explicitly defend.
Using sarcasm, snark, innuendo suggestion, and tone make their pointlets them launch accusations and engage in status lowering insults without having to actually state what the accusations and insults are.
This lets them make accusations without taking responsibility.
The whole point is to treat you like you are a child who is benesth them as a way to suggest you *are* a child who is beneath them and *they* (the leftist) is the adult in the room.
It is a way to place themselves in a position of higher status and authority in the conversation.
The U.S. Agency for Global Media, to agency responsible for government media has adopted DEI.
Let's take a look
A thread🧵
2/ To begin with, The U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAMG) Believes that diversity and Inclusion are not just idealistic goals. They want to make it a part of the fabric of the organization.
3/ As noted in the USAGM's Diversity and Inclusion policy, it is the Federal Government rules and regulation, as found in an executive order, which makes all of the D&I required