32-1/ COVID update for epidemiological weeks 31-32 of 2024.
Both Biobot and CDC wastewater numbers indicate the current wave is still on the rise, but looking at some cities it seems to have passed its peak (next slide)...
32-2/ For instance, NYC's (Manhattan's) wave started late, showed a sharp upward trend, and now it's dropping off quickly. Boston's wave started earlier, and was less pronounced, but it's dropping off...
32-3/ LA's wastewater numbers seem to be rising still, but SF and San Jose (Santa Clara Co) seem to be on the downhill side of this wave. And the current wave seems to have mostly bypassed Oakland and Berkeley. Go figure. Or maybe it hasn't hit them yet?
33-4/ Of course, the overall US infection rate is still high, but what's interesting to me about the current KP.x wave is that localities are out of step with each other. I miss the CDC's county hospitalization rate map which helped us visualize where the hotspots were.
33-5/ Hospitalization rates are at 3.3 per 100,000. This is the lowest for any wave so far. They may rise a bit, but they'd have to more than double to reach the previous high water mark. I doubt that's going to happen.
33-6/ And notice that the CDC still tracks COVID by respiratory season, even though the CDC has admitted (without fanfare) that COVID doesn't follow a seasonal cycle.
33-7/ There were predictions that COVID would become a seasonal virus. So far it hasn't, and I doubt that it will. Notice that experts quoted in this CNN story from 2021 only looked at North America—and they overlooked the same waves hit the S. Hemisphere… tinyurl.com/4tzahw2p
32-8/ Explanations for why it hasn't become seasonal seem to boil down to two arguments: (1) it has a high mutation rate, and (2) it's highly transmissible. I'm not convinced the first explains its aseasonal behavior, though—because...
32-9/ ...human influenza viruses have higher mutation rates than SARS2. But SARS2 has a much higher reproduction number (R0) than seasonal influenzas. Seasonal flu R0s range from 1.2-1.8. SARS2 Omicron had an est R0 of 8-10. This is second only to measles (R0: 12-18).
32-10/ I could see how the high R0 value of SARS2 could override a seasonal rhythm. But before I dismiss the first explanation completely, I'd be curious what the mutation rates are for other hCoVs (OC43, HKU1, 229E, NL63).
32-11/ Speaking of transmissibility, did the Olympics turn into a superspreader event as some predicted? For attendees, it's hard to say. The French don't seem to have kept up their COVID reporting (if so, I can't find their stats). And for the athletes, it's also hard to say...
32-12/ The Olympics didn't implement universal COVID testing and reporting protocols. So athletes and countries did their own thing. So it's impossible get a clear picture of the infection rate among athletes...
32-12/ What surprised me is that at least 3 athletes who tested positive (and were symptomatic) won medals. COVID wasn't able to stop them from winning medals (amazing!). Of course, Noah Lyles had to be carried off the field after he won his bronze... tinyurl.com/mwdyhwrf
32-13/ And it's likely that >80% of the athletes have had COVID at some point (based on N-gene seroprevalence estimates I've seen for US and some Euro countries). So there's no indication that Long COVID is preventing athletes from competing and breaking records.
32-14/ That's it for this update. I'll see you in two weeks. I've got a backlog of links to studies that I want to post. I might do a separate update for those (if I can organize them all). Also, apologies for the numbering error that crept into this thread. /end
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
30-1/ COVID update for epidemiological weeks 29-30 of 2024.
COVID wastewater numbers are still rising at a steady rate. CDC's wastewater chart shows more significant rise than Biobot, but (as I said before) I don't really trust the CDC's methodology and lack of transparency.
30-2/ The current wave is manifesting itself unevenly across different sewersheds. For instance, San Jose shows the current wave as big as the last one, but 40 miles up the road, Oakland doesn't show much of wave at all...
30-3/ NYC (Manhattan) has seen a strong surge in the past 4 weeks. While up in Boston, things may have peaked.
51-1/ Summary of COVID trends as of epidemiological weeks 50 & 51.
Wastewater numbers continue to rise. Biobot and CDC agree (but I suspect they're using the same sewersheds for their data). OTOH, before we freak out, we should zoom out...
51-2/ This wave is shaping up to surpass, the BQ.1 wave at the end of last year. But despite JN.1's immune evasiveness (at least in vitro) and ACE2 binding scores (at least in vitro) which are lightyears beyond Omicron, it's not another Omicron. Zooming out...
52-3/ But the wastewater levels are higher than the ww levels during the Delta wave of 2021! However, if we take the CDC hospitalization rates divided by CpmL concentrations for each peak, we see that the current wave (as of 2 wks ago) is ~1/4 as virulent as Delta. Go T cells!
49-1/ Summary of COVID trends as of epidemiological weeks 48 & 49.
Biobot shows our wastewater numbers are climbing quickly, indicating a rapid spread of the virus (probably all due to JN.1). NE and Midwest showing the largest increases.
49-2/ CDC's NWSS says the same w/ Midwest having highest ww activity. Biobot and NWSS numbers are 10-14 days old. We probably haven't reached BQ.1 territory, yet, but soon will.
49-3/ I'll remind folks that BQ.1's climb was snuffed out by XBB.1.5, which outcompeted BQ.1, but didn't create new cases—the theory being that XBB.1.5's ⬆️ ACE binding values outcompeted BQ.1, but similar immune evasion values didn't open up new infection opportunities. Maybe.
39-1/ Summary of COVID trends as of Epidemiological Weeks 38-39. Good news—the current wave in the US has definitely peaked and is starting to drop off. Biobot wastewater shows a sharp drop-off in 3 out of 4 regions—and 4th, the NE US, is starting to drop, too...
39-2/ Emergency Department visits are falling. Hospitalizations may trail the ED curve by a week or two, but they seem to have peaked as well...
39-3/ It's worth noting that the southern states got hit the worst in this wave—at least as a percentage ED visits due to COVID. Compare Alabama to New York—5% vs 2%...
37-1/ Summary of COVID trends as of Epidemiological Weeks 36-37. This week's update will be brief because I'm traveling. The main question on my mind is has the current wave peaked, yet? Nat'l wastewater avgs have dropped off 12% in last 2 weeks.
37-2/ Midwest still climbing, but the South—where case rates were 2x higher than the rest of the US 3-4 weeks ago—has the sharpest drop in wastewater numbers. The CDC's ww percent change category chart shows things leveling off, too. I never found that metric useful because…
37-3/ …because it's not tied to any baseline number and it hides the peaks and troughs—but it is what it what it is. But if we zoom out on the Biobot data, we can see where we stand now vs previous waves. I got pushback that this wave is almost as high as the Delta wave. True...
35-1/ Summary of COVID trends as of Epidemiological Weeks 34-35. EG.1.5's impact on US & world case numbers is starting to become clear. Also more info BA.2.86, and I'll dig into the lit on asymptomatic COVID (spoiler: lots of poor studies).
But first the wastewater numbers...
35-2/ If you had asked me two days ago, I would have told you that wastewater indicators seemed to indicate the latest COVID wave had reached its peak. But then data from some more sewersheds came in, and ww may still be trending upward...
35-3/ The Biobot tool ——displays the overall variant proportions, but that data is two weeks behind wastewater RNA concentration data. It shows EG.5 growing at 14% as of 16 Aug. Could EG.5 be responsible for this latest upturn in ww numbers? Maybe. biobot.io/data/