Minna Ålander 🌻 Profile picture
Aug 14 11 tweets 2 min read Read on X
With the Kursk operation proceeding beyond all expectations, Ukraine has reminded both Russia and the West that the war is far from settled.

I wonder whether many decision-makers and analysts in the west fully appreciate what’s at stake in this war. Some thoughts:
First: there’s no “deal solution” available. Not even Trump can “deal his way out” because there’s no status quo to return to.

At this point the war has unfolded a global effect that is the question whether the western-dominated rules-based world order will prevail.
It’s very much a win or lose situation. Russia has gathered around itself a group of states (Iran, North Korea, China) that are eager to challenge the West’s dominant position and all profit from the continuation of the war.
It’s a wild illusion that China would have any interest to pressure Russia to stop this war. On the contrary, it’s keeping Russia going because it’s very convenient for China that the US is putting both attention and resources into this - as well as the Gaza war.
At some point, also the countries in the so-called “global south” that are currently still hedging, might have to choose what kind of an international system suits them best - one dominated by China, with the support of Russia and Iran, or what the West has to offer.
In Europe, there’s a perfect chance to send both the Kremlin and Russians a message that they need to stop choosing violence because that’s not a way to live in the 21st century.

At the same time, we can help Ukraine become a prosperous and strong member of the European family.
Helping Ukraine end this war on favourable terms and integrating it into NATO and EU will give it an optimal framework to combat corruption, fortify democracy, support its already strong civil society and make it an overall productive member of a future European security order
Giving up on Ukraine and selling out its territory in a misguided deal (which isn’t inevitable, as Ukraine is just showing in Kursk) would create conditions similar to Finland after the Winter War:

Bitterly disappointed population, likely political turmoil, & possibly revanchism
European leaders should ask themselves: do we want to risk failing Ukraine, which could lead to an attempt to take back what they feel they lost unfairly, due to lack of support and even obstruction by partners ? A renewed, likely much less controllable war would probably result
European countries have an urgent self-interest in having Ukraine in NATO. We definitely want Ukraine on our side. It’s Europe’s most combat-experienced military and likely also the most innovative one. We want that know how on our side, not for it to go rogue
A long thread short:

It’s by far not inevitable that this war will have to end in a compromise unfavourable to Ukraine. The doomerism that has dominated the analytical and news landscape is simply not warranted. Nothing is decided yet and the West can still do the right thing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Minna Ålander 🌻

Minna Ålander 🌻 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @minna_alander

Aug 9
People have been puzzling over Ukraine’s objectives in the Kursk operation. Politically, I can think of at least 7:

- catch Russia off guard and bring the war to Russians in a way they haven’t experienced before
- make Putin look stupid and hopefully generate discontent
- boost morale in Ukraine
- kill morale in Russia
- seize control of the information sphere
- show the west that Russia can be attacked without it resulting in WW3 (🤞)
- reassure western supporters that Ukraine can win this war
- put an end to the recently increased talk about when would be a good time to start negotiating by mixing up the front line
- tactically, to force Russia to move troops in a way that opens possibilities for Ukraine elsewhere

(Ok that was already 9 but one more:)
Read 5 tweets
Aug 3
This reminds me of a conversation I had in November 2022 with a Russian opposition-supporter who had fled Russia. They said that Finland’s visa restrictions on Russians are undermining our own value system.

A thread:
I explained that the extensive access Russians enjoyed to Europe was a privilege, not a right. Therefore, it can be revoked if the trust that’s the basis of granting such a privilege is broken.

No other third country nationals from the EU’s eastern neighbourhood had such access
Apart from the necessity to make Russian citizens feel the consequences of the war, which includes taking away that access to Europe, it’s also a security question. Due to Russia’s extremely cynical methods, it’s hard to know who might turn out to be a “little green man”.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 17
In the past 2 years, most Finns also seriously asked themselves the question: would I be ready to die defending my country ? And for most of them, the answer was yes. Finns know that a war would mean many of us dying. That’s why we want to prevent one (hence NATO membership)
In spring 2022, I had this conversation with literally all my friends: Finns living abroad wondering whether they should go back to Finland just in case, and even most left wing artist friends inquiring whether they could also contribute in some way to the war effort if need be
Now, the mood is different. Russia has emptied the border of troops and equipment (they’re all in Ukraine…) and it looks like it’ll take them a while to reconstitute in a way that would pose a serious military threat to Finland. The new military districts only exist in excel
Read 5 tweets
Jul 3
European NATO countries’ security isn’t separate from that of Ukraine.

The better the war goes for Russia, the more capacity it has free to stir up incidents in other countries - likely below the threshold of armed conflict but it’s a quite direct threat nevertheless.
Example from Finland: we had a peaceful year after submitting the NATO application as Russia was bogged down in Ukraine. Since fall 2023, after the failed Ukrainian counteroffensive, we’ve seen:
- instrumentalized migration
- several attempts at sabotage at water supply
- attempted break-ins (at least one successful) at other critical infrastructure, such as electricity supply.

These are almost daily in the news at the moment.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 2
Call me a hopeless idealist but I’d like to think that 80 years of western European integration and 30 years of integration with what was separated by the iron curtain means something.

It’ll be hard to re-learn how to be serious about defence again but unity might prevail
European integration was facilitated by the American security guarantees but it’s nevertheless a unique political process in the world. We Europeans managed to do this one thing right after having messed up pretty much everything imaginable, on a global scale, in the past.
Europeans got very comfortable under the US security blanket and it’ll be brutal to get out into the real world. But I’m not sure that we’re completely doomed.

Just look at defence cooperation in many parts of Europe: the Dutch have integrated their land force with Germany
Read 6 tweets
Jun 30
Suomessa on täysi konsensus siitä, että itäraja pitää turvata kaikkia mahdollisia hyökkäyksiä vastaan.

Edellinen keskusta-vasemmistohallitus aloitti aidan rakentamisen, sääti lain rajan väliaikaisesta sulkemisesta ja aloitti rajamenettelyn valmistelun.
Mikä nyt harmittaa monia tämän hallituksen käännytyslaissa on sen huono valmistelu. Huutia on tullut jo heti alkuvaiheessa ja on alusta asti ollut selvää, että tämä laki on ristiriidassa Suomen muun oikeuskäytännön kanssa. Lopulta se ei ehkä edes mene läpi juuri siitä syystä.
Moni olisi toivonut, että hallitus olisi osannut etsiä keinoja vastata rajan haasteisiin tavalla, joka ei vesitä sääntöperäisen järjestyksen periaatteita - jonka ylläpitäminen on siis Suomen kaltaiselle pienelle valtiolle ehdoton turvallisuusintressi.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(