Post

More from @SenseReceptor

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Nov 28

This is the real reason America is headed toward civil war, and almost nobody understands what's happening (1/3):

"We're headed toward civil war, and this is what caused it: We can't get resolution in the courts. There's nowhere else to go. The courts refuse to do their jobs."

Electrical engineer and independent investigator John Beaudoin, Sr. (@JohnBeaudoinSr) describes for Cornelia Rose (@FlashlightsPod) how two rulings from 2007 and 2009—Bell Atlantic Corp. v Twombly and Ashcroft v Iqbal—have severely hamstrung plaintiffs' ability to argue their cases in U.S. courts—particularly in regard to civil rights and discrimination lawsuits.

Now, because people with legitimate grievances can't get their proverbial day in court, justice is seeping out onto the streets. Ultimately, Beaudoin says, this will lead to civil war for America.

For reference, per Grok (asked to provide an overview of Ashcroft v Iqbal in simple language aimed at a lay population):

"In 2009, the Supreme Court decided a big case called Ashcroft v. Iqbal. A man named Javaid Iqbal sued top government officials, saying they put him in harsh detention after 9/11 because of his religion and race. The Court (in a close 5–4 vote) said that to keep a lawsuit alive, you can’t just make vague accusations or repeat legal buzzwords. You need clear, specific facts that make the claim seem realistic—not just possible, but plausible. If the complaint looks mostly like conclusions without solid facts to back them up, the judge can throw the case out early, before any evidence is gathered."

"This ruling (together with a similar 2007 case called Twombly) gave judges much more power to dismiss cases right at the start. Before, many lawsuits could move forward to the evidence stage; after Iqbal, dismissal rates jumped from around half to two-thirds or more, especially in civil-rights and discrimination cases. Courts also started using the same tough 'plausibility' test when checking if a plaintiff was actually harmed and can trace that harm to the defendant (this is called 'standing'). As a result, thousands of cases now get thrown out early for sounding too weak or speculative, making it much harder for regular people to sue the government or big companies."

---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------

"You've got a lot of things happening in the United States and around the world. One is climate change. You bring a case. Climate change dismissed. Elections in 2020. Sixty cases were brought on behalf of the Trump campaign. Sixty. All 60 were dismissed without a substantive hearing. They didn't get to discovery. They were dismissed on the procedural stage."

"And for an example, not only my three cases, they used Ashcroft versus Iqbal, right? They used these cases against me, in all three of the cases I brought. But also from me, little old me, pro se litigant, not a lawyer, representing myself, all the way up to the— the, the states, Texas and Missouri, brought a case against Pennsylvania for the elections, saying that Pennsylvania broke its own laws. It automatically goes to the Supreme Court because it's two states against another state.

"They call it original jurisdiction. So it goes to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court said, dismissed, you don't have standing. And they cited Ashcroft versus Iqbal. So not only was it my cases, but all the way up to The President, and 60 cases, all dismissed. They all say you don't have standing.

"So it's elections, it's climate, it's trans in kids, it's Covid. Covid vaccines. Whatever social issue it is, you don't get any resolution in the courts. The courts are not doing their job of dispute resolution.

"So what happens, Cornelia, is civil society breaks down. You have people dividing into camps because the issues are not being settled or adjudicated. And so you leave it to society to fight amongst each other, fight on social media, fight in the streets. So we're devolving as a civil society based on what's happened with, with these two cases and the way the courts are operating extremely inefficiently, dismissing righteous cases that should be heard.

"So, anyway, the summation is— This graph is the problem with the United States. And everybody's looking at the executive and legislative branches trying to solve it. That's not where the problem is. You can fix those two branches if the courts will actually hear the cases. They're not hearing them."

(2/3) "We're headed toward civil war, and this is what caused it. We can't get resolution in the courts. There's nowhere else to go. The courts refuse to do their jobs... The most foundational right you have is being abridged by this idea of standing doctrine...."

----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------

We're headed towards civil war, and this is what caused it. We can't get resolution in the courts. There's nowhere else to go. The courts refuse to do their jobs. And what I didn't mention here, I could go through the whole history of it back to the Magna Carta, but the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, the last line is you have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. That is the most foundational right.

If you want to uphold your right to freedom to exercise your religion, if you want to uphold your right of freedom of speech, what are you going to do about it? You're going to go to court and sue somebody, and then the court says, nope, you don't have standing. So your foundational right, that upholds all others other than the Second Amendment that we don't want to get to. Right? We don't want to talk about violent, you know, using guns to support your right to freedom.

But if we set that aside, then the most foundational right before that is the right to petition for redress of grievances and your right to due process of law in the 14th Amendment, equal protections under the 14th Amendment, and your right to dispute resolution in the courts in Article 3, Section 2. The most foundational right you have is being abridged by this idea of standing doctrine that derives authority from this very attenuated path of authority that says Article 3, Section 2 says you have a right to go to court if you have a valid complaint against somebody in another state or if it has to do with a federal law.

(3/3) "Covid comes in in 2020, [and there are] 180,000 more cases than normal—180,000. How does the court system handle that? ... There's only one way to do this: You have to start dismissing cases and not hearing them. It's the only way to manage this."

In this last clip, Beaudoin describes how courts used Ashcroft v Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v Twombly to dismiss legitimate cases concerning U.S. citizens who were having their constitutional rights trampled thanks to the (so-called) Covid public health policy measures.

----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------

"This is the— This is the US District courts. And so you have the graph going from 1995 to 2024. It's every other year. So the blank on the far right side is 2024. So that's 30 years. You have 30 years, and you're going along 1995, '6, '7. You see, these are all the differences each year. This is difference from, say, average. It's really linear least squares approximation trend line. I don't want to explain that. Let's just say this is the excess cases.

"In 1995, you know, it's like minus 6,000. Actually easier for me to read mine. And then 1996 was 13,000. 14. Minus 2,000. Near zero at 16 cases. It goes along. So you've got a range from 14,000 at the highest to minus 18,000 at the lowest. And then even in 20— What was that? 2019, 10,000.

"But then in 2020, so Covid hits, right? Covid comes in in 2020, 180,000 more cases than normal. 180,000. How does the court system handle that? If you look at the graph in the below, I just used a percentage. Okay? Percentage more than expected. And, you know, you've got the. The most is 5.7%, and the least is minus 6.3%. So your range for 25 years, your range is 5.7% max and minus 6.3% deficit. And then all of a sudden, you have a 62% increase. That's that, 180,000 extra cases.

"Did you hire 62% more people to handle those cases? No. Did everybody in the court system, all the judges and all the clerks, did they work 62% more hours? Like 14 hours a day, every day for a year? No. There's only one way to do this. You have to start dismissing cases and not hearing them. It's the only way to manage this."

Read 4 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Nov 12

The most important point re: Covid and the real reason MAHA is just a psyop–failure:

"Over 90% of [the health freedom movement] is...talk about the safety and efficacy of these vaccines...[but that's] a dead end...[because the Covid jabs] are weapons."

See 🧵 for evidence

This clip is of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) taken from a conversation with Debbie Lerman and Children's Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) CEO Mary Holland (@maryhollandnyc) posted to Rumble on November 11, 2025.

----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------

"One of my large points of frustration is the whole health freedom movement. 90% of it, over 90% of it, is people just talk about safety and efficacy of these vaccines. In my opinion, it's a dead end. And it was set up as a dead end for everyone to walk in and march in place. Until they continued the constructed digital cage and everything else that Debbie was talking about.

"The safety and efficacy discussion, as I said, is inapplicable to EUA countermeasures. It is not possible to even conduct clinical trials for EUA countermeasures because according to the law, these products are non-investigational. This is a very, very important categorization of substance of these products. If it's non-investigational, it's not possible to clinical trial it. Because clinical trial in humans is an investigation. That's how the law treats it.

"Since it's non-investigational. And in addition to being non- investigational chemical substance, the chemical substance can be freely adulterated with any poison. It is also okay to lie about it. If you are covered person using it as a covered countermeasure, meaning you following HHS and DOD orders when using it, then, as Debbie said, it's a license to kill. You can kill as many people as you want or don't want, as many as they tell you, and be fully absolved from liability. And the whole sovereign immunity of the state will be applied to absolve you from liability.

"So I just explained to you that these products are weapons. There is only one conclusion that arise from it. If it's a non-investigational can be adulterated as poison. Anybody who is injuring or killing people with them absolved from liability, they are weapons. There's no other space into which all of this falls other than it's a weapon and it's used as a weapon and the people who are using it as a weapon, are absolved from liability. Just like the soldiers in the combat field. If they kill or injure anyone."

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1819437546197180900?s=20

(2/8) This video essay outlines the overwhelming evidence that shows the Covid jabs are bioweapons.

They make you more likely to get Covid and can otherwise only maim, injure, or kill.

This isn't subtle.

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1819437546197180900?s=20

(3/8) Army General Gus Perna was the Chief Operation Officer of Operation Warp Speed.

DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, developed the tech for the COVID injections starting more than a decade prior to 2020.

Source: washingtonpost.com/national-secur…

Read 9 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Nov 6

"Nazi Germany... hid their bioweapons under cancer research and so have we... [and] a guy won the Nobel Prize... [for producing] stomach cancer in rats by giving them a certain type of parasite... But it only worked if...[the] animals... ate a high-sugar diet or were vaccinated...I think [parasites have] been weaponized."

This clip of Dr. Lee Merritt, an orthopedic surgeon who did her residency in the United States Navy and served for over 10 years as a Navy physician and surgeon, is taken from an interview posted to the His Glory TV (@HISGLORYME) Rumble channel on November 4, 2025.

----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------

"Why weren't these parasites a problem back then? And I will tell you, there's multiple factors to look at, but I think this has been weaponized. And it turns out that you, that in fact a guy won the Nobel Prize for this that you, to get— They showed that they could produce stomach cancer in rats by giving them a certain type of parasite. And this was also done in Japan with a different parasite. So two different groups of researchers, they showed you could do this. But it only worked if it didn't work in healthy, normal animals. It only worked in animals that either ate a high-sugar diet or were vaccinated.

"So let's just think about this. What is the 20th century done in America? We started vaccinating. We started vaccinating the guys going down to World War I. That was when we first vaccinated our troops. And we've been doing it to the military ever since then, at about after World War II, then we took on vaccinating our school children. And then, as I predicted years ago, I said that you people think that these vaccines and school children, you're not standing up against them because you don't think it's gonna bother you. But they're coming after everybody. And that's what they are now, right?

"They got the flu shot, the shingle shot. So vaccination does something to make you susceptible to these parasites. Not just this toxoplasmosis one, but the ones that cause cancer and all sorts of things. And what have they done about the food pyramid in the 20th century? We had the food pyramid and the bottom was all carbohydrates. So that's where we [are].

"And one last thing... I'll just say that in 1971, Nixon declared that we were going to stop the bioweapons offensive program in America. And we signed the treaty with I think 178 nations or something like that. We figured, we thought the Soviets turned around and violated it. And all sorts of people violated it. Well, probably everybody violated it, including us. But in any case, t the same time that we signed that treaty, he converted Fort Detrick, the bioweapons lab. He took it to HNHS to be part of the National Cancer Institute. And that happened in Nazi Germany. They hid their bioweapons under cancer research, and so have we."

Reference for the claim that a guy (Johannes Fibiger) won the Nobel Prize for discovering that a nematode can cause stomach cancer:

Full source video: rumble.com/v716l7m-cat-pa…

Read 5 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Oct 17

Oncologist Dr. William Makis:

"Every component of the COVID vaccine can contribute to cancer...[the] spike protein [is] integrating into...tumor cells...& Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is...excited about this...he's...stated that one-third of all people will get cancer, guaranteed"

This clip of Dr. Makis (@MakisMedicine), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Shannon Joy (@ShannonJoyRadio) posted to The Shannon Joy Show Rumble channel on October 16, 2025.

----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------

"I think every component of the COVID vaccine can contribute to cancer. And we don't know right now which are the main drivers of cancer. My personal, hypothesis is that it's the damage to the immune system that is driving the cancer. I think we're seeing extensive immune system damage across the board in the vaccinated population, because they get infected more often. So they keep getting Covid and they'll say, well, I got my sixth or seventh shot, Covid shot, and I've gotten Covid five times, six times now.

"They keep getting sick. They keep getting sick with other infections like influenza. They keep getting viral, reinfections, you, know, with Epstein Barr virus and HSV, herpes simplex and so on. They get shingles, so their immune systems are damaged and destroyed. And this is happening to kids as well. The kids are also getting damaged immune systems. I think that's going to be one of the big drivers of cancer.

"But the work that Kevin McKernan is doing is in terms of the DNA contamination of the vaccines, the SV40 promoter, and the plasmids that have contaminated the vaccines because of the mass manufacturing process that Pfizer and Moderna are using, and they are still using. He's actually now discovering, the vaccine component, so the DNA contamination, which has a spike protein integrating into cells. And he's finding it in cancers, in tumor cells. This is actually where the research is right now is there's already several papers coming, tested the tumor. They did genetic testing on the tumor and they found the vaccine component integrated into the tumor cell and it's in all the tumor cells.

"But they're going to say, well, you know, it's just one case and it's anecdotal and all this, or it's a couple of cases and it's anecdotal. But this is where I think the the research is being focused to prove that, yes, this genetic therapy, because it's not a vaccine. And I posted about this recently. This was from the SEC filings of Moderna. They stated this is a gene therapy, it's not a vaccine.

"[And] it's contaminated. So it's got all kinds of genetic junk in there. It's not just the modified mRNA, it's got the DNA contaminations. It's got DNA mRNA Hybrids, it's got double-stranded RNA hybrids. It is literally a cocktail of genetic junk encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle, which itself is quite toxic, that is delivering this genetic junk all over our body. It's dumping it into the bone marrow. So we're seeing leukemias and blood cancers like multiple myeloma. It's dumping it into the brain, crossing the blood–brain barrier, because it's a lipid particle, crosses very easily.

"And I'm seeing brain cancers, the most aggressive brain cancers you can imagine, the glioblastomas. It's dumping it into the ovaries and testicles. We're seeing ovarian and testicular cancers. It's dumping it into the kidneys. I'm seeing kidney cancers. And so wherever this genetic material goes and it doesn't stay in the arm, that was the big lie. I think that was one of the biggest lies that people should go to jail for, for the rest of their lives. Who created this, this monstrosity.

"And it doesn't stay in the arm. About 75% of it is in the bloodstream within a couple of hours. And it's delivering this genetic junk with the lipid nanoparticles all over the body. And the most shocking situation that no one's talking about, and I've talked about this, put out a few articles on this, is it crosses the placenta and it's dumping the genetic material into the fetus and the fetus takes it up, and now I'm seeing cancers in fetuses, in utero. These babies are deliver, are, are developing tumors in the womb. And so there was a case not that long ago of, of triplets being born. I think the first one had a tumor that, that grew in utero and then through the placenta, transferred it to the second one. So the second one developed cancer a few months after being born. I mean, these are horror stories, Shannon. These are absolute horror stories.

"This MRNA technology needs to be halted and banned. It needs to be banned. I don't care if they're going to try to investigate it for the next 20 years and try to figure out what went wrong. This is extremely dangerous. It's got to be banned because we're going to be overtaken completely with cancer.

"And you know, Pfizer and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is actually super excited about this and he's publicly stated that one third of all people will get cancer guaranteed. And that he's going to scale up production of cancer drugs and mRNA cancer vaccines the way he scaled up production for Covid vaccines."

Full source video: rumble.com/v70dqla-cancer…

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1873792420820713647

Adding on to Dr. Makis' remarks, I'd like to say that most people have no idea what kind of future we're headed for. So much of humanity is going to be plagued with cancer, we'll be facing a genuine existential threat to our existence....

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1873792420820713647

Read 4 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Oct 12

THE GAZA METHOD: What Has Come for Palestinians Will Soon Come for Us All

A 🧵 describing how the violence, AI-targeting systems, drone warfare, biometric refugee camps, land grabs, and digital IDs being deployed in Gaza will imminently enslave the Western World. (1/22)

This thread is inspired by a Substack article authored by Tarik Cyril Amar titled “The Gaza Method” and published on February 2, 2024 (see thread’s second-to-last tweet). I first heard about this idea (that, as Amar says, “The mass murder in Gaza outlines a pattern, a set of tools and measures of extermination, subjugation, and expulsion that are ready for export and will be in high demand...like so much else of Israel’s spying, policing…and murder skills and tech [are]....”) via former Assistant Secretary of HUD and founder of the Solari Report Catherine Austin Fitts, who has noted that “Gaza is a method” in numerous interviews since the publication of Amar’s Substack article.

In this clip from an interview with Jorn Luka posted to Luka’s eponymous YouTube channel in July 2025, Fitts notes that “Palestinians [have been used] to prototype the 15-minute cities and now [they’re being used] to prototype [a] land grab. And if we let this happen…this is not going to stop [there].”

Fitts adds, “If we let this go down… it's going to keep happening around the world because this is not a one-off situation; this is a prototype, and that's why the Palantir technology [being used] is relevant. So I think the most important thing [to consider] is will the world let this happen? … Because the message is going to be, ‘Okay, if you look at how we're controlling [Palestine] and you look at how we're propagandizing or we're mind controlling [everyone], we can now get away with this. And if we can now get away with this, then we can roll this out worldwide.”

Source video for clip: youtube.com/watch?v=FoAX4F…

(2/22) “My plan calls for the creation of a new international oversight body—The Board of Peace…and one of the people that wants to be on the board is the U.K. former Prime Minister Tony Blair.” — Donald Trump, September 29, 2025

Roughly a year-and-half after Amar’s “The Gaza Method” post and three months after Fitts’ interview with Luka, U.S. President Donald Trump announced at a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair would be appointed to the newly minted “Board of Peace,” billed as a “new international oversight body” tasked with governing Gaza’s transitional government as Israel withdraws from the Palestinian territory (1).

1. Source: the-independent.com/news/world/mid…

(3/22) “Under the proposal, Blair would lead a body called the Gaza International Transitional Authority (Gita) that would have a mandate to be Gaza’s ‘supreme political and legal authority’ for as long as five years.” — The Guardian, September 25, 2025

In an article posted by The Guardian four days prior to Trump’s announcement, the media outlet described how Blair would oversee the Gaza International Transitional Authority (Gita) and would be “a compromise between Donald Trump’s own initial proposal for the US and Israel to ‘take over’ Gaza and the New York [‘technocratic’] declaration endorsed by more than 140 states.”

The article also noted that “a separate Palestinian Executive Authority” would be “headed by a CEO formally appointed by the Gita board” and would “be responsible for overseeing a series of technocratic ministries, including health, education, finance, infrastructure, judicial affairs, and welfare.”

Source: theguardian.com/world/2025/sep…

Read 22 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Oct 10

"[Covid] was a taking... Every 80 to 120 years... the central banking–warfare model... resets...[and] the currency changes... [and] plagues and resets go together because plague laws allow you to do a lot of the things you need to do during a reset."

This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from an interview with Brannon Howse (@HowseLive) posted to the WorldviewTube (@WorldviewTube) Rumble channel on October 9, 2025.

---------------Partial transcription of clip----------------

"[Covid-19] was a taking... Our economic model, which is about to be revised dramatically, is called the central banking warfare model. Central banks print money and, and the military and intelligence make sure that everybody takes it and they police the system. Every 80 to 120 years since the central banking warfare model has been operating, we go through resets. So it's like flushing the system and each time it gets flushed, the currency changes.

"So the last big reset, we had a reset during the Spanish flu. So plagues and resets go together because plague laws allow you to do a lot of the things you need to do during a reset. You know, it gives you emergency power.

"In 2018, the central bankers met in Jackson Hole, where the G7 central bankers meet every. And they reviewed a plan from the BlackRock Investment Institute prepared by a group of retired central bankers, and it's called the Going Direct Reset. And literally they, I'm sorry, that was in 2019. August 2019. In 2018, they had just agreed to a policy called FASAB 56, which we need to discuss to understand the federal budget and credit, what's really happening there. But then they proceeded back into, their desks in September and the Going Direct Reset began.

"Of course, the big part of that reset came with the powers, that the pandemic provided, which is you inject $5 trillion, and I'm going to grossly oversimplify just to make it clear. You inject $5 trillion of money supply directly. Instead of going to the reserve track, you go directly into the financial institutions in the market. At the same time, you shut down Main Street.

"So think of the economy as publicly traded companies, big corporations, and then small businesses and farms. Okay, so we inject 5 trillion, most of it going here, and then we shut down Main street, which means now the big guys can not only pick up huge market share, but they can go shopping and pick up a lot of real estate and assets. And because you're shut down and you have no income, right?

"This is a squeeze play. Right? So it's the big guys versus the small guy. There was one estimate at the end. We created 500 new billionaires and we shut down basically 35% of the small businesses in the country. And San Francisco it was 49%. So if you look at consolidating the economic and political control, it was fantastically successful."

Here's the Going Direct Reset plan as outlined by BlackRock in Aug. 2019:

It notes that "Going direct means the central bank finding ways to get central bank money directly in the hands of public and private sector spenders." blackrock.com/corporate/lite…

Here is Bank of International Settlements head Agustin Carstens noting CBDCs—central bank digital currencies—can be used to monitor how people spend their money.

This is key to the Going Direct Reset: central bankers supply the digital money, and they control how it's spent.